Meta:Requests for help from a sysop or bureaucrat

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
(Redirected from WM:RFH)
Jump to: navigation, search
Requests and proposals Requests for help from a sysop or bureaucrat Archives (current)→
Meta-Wiki has a small active community. When a normal user requires the assistance of an administrator or bureaucrat for some particular task, it is not always easy to find one. This page helps users find one when they need one; asking specific admins directly via their talk pages is one way to elicit a fast response. See also: Stewards' noticeboard, Access to nonpublic information policy noticeboard, Category:Meta-Wiki policies, Category:Global policies
Meta-Wiki maintenance announcements [edit]
General maintenance announcements:
(as of 25 May 2017)

Discussions:
(as of 25 May 2017)
(Last updated: 2017-05-03)
Wikimedia Meta-Wiki
This box: view · talk · edit

Please find answered requests in the archives (this month).

Filing cabinet icon.svg
SpBot archives all sections tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} and sections whose oldest comment is older than 10 days.

Response to 2017 ban in Turkey/Sig[edit]

I've semi-protected Response to 2017 ban in Turkey/Sig. Current situation of thousands of italian signatures, and many per second, from unregistered contributors, makes me think some kind of bot or zombie network is operating on the page. If this is because the campaign is being advertised in Italy currently and that behaviour can be justified then feel free to lift the protection. CC. @Jalexander:. —MarcoAurelio 11:03, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Apparently a sitenotice on itwiki + other places is the responsible of this. Lifted the edit protection but left the move protection just in case. —MarcoAurelio 11:15, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Just wanted to bring some more attention to this because I don't think it's correct for this user to be doing this. On the signature page, Miloo.amila (talk · contribs) has been progressively removing signatures, sometimes in large chunks. The user did not explain any of the removals with an edit summary and in a couple of instances it looks like they just have not been handling edit conflicts properly and have saved over others. I am concerned it would be tricky to re-add the signatures, because the removals are spread out over about 40 separate edits. But if they had no right to be removed, they should be re-added. Seb26 (talk) 17:26, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Admins can assist with the improper behaviour. With regard to the removals, then someone with interest should probably fix it. It shouldn't be considered a task for administrators.  — billinghurst sDrewth 03:17, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

billinghurst I'm very sorry. I was trying to create a link with my name and copying and pasting I dubbed some names and so after I noticed I deleted them,I thought I had canceled duplicates. I'm very sorry for the fact. Seb26 explained that I can use preview.

Duplicate signatures did you put them in?

---Miloo.amila

Edit being flagged as Spam[edit]

Hi. I am trying to edit this page https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:New_Readers/Offline and it says "Warning! — Your edit has been automatically identified as being spam or advertising. Please note that such edits are not allowed on any Wikimedia project. Users that engage in such behaviour will have their editing privileges removed. If you believe that the edit you wanted to make was constructive, we sincerely apologize. You may click the Submit button again to confirm it. A brief description of the rule which your action matched is: «Antispam». Feel free to report false positives to our administrators' noticeboard."

This is the additional I am trying to add:

Feedback 4[edit]

  • It's good how offline articles appear in exactly the same format and presentation as when they were online
  • I like the simplicity of saving a single page at a time and I think that would be the most common use-case. The idea in Feedback 3 of saving a whole set of pages / targets on the current page, seems more like a power user feature. It could add clutter to the UI and if it was automatic, it could use a lot of data.
  • Using iconography can be difficult - it's not clear whether the bookmark or the star icon is the one to save an article for reading offline
  • An "Update all" feature could be useful, to re-sync all the pages you have saved offline

--Djcunning (talk) 16:40, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

@Djcunning: Thanks. You should be able to add your text. I have updated the filter. Yes check.svg Done  — billinghurst sDrewth 08:31, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment.  — billinghurst sDrewth

Massmessage sender right[edit]

I need that right to send some messages (like ITM being approved User group) to some affected persons or may be severely affected (in Italian, rarely in other languages, when I need). ITM is not the only field of application, there may be others but will restrict to a minimum the lists the number of people who do not have expressly made known to me the consensus and these can always remove yourself. It would simplify a lot of work and would allow more people to stay up to date on what interests them directly on their Wiki of origin. An example: update on the status of a grant they were interested in, on the development of a tool, and so on urgent alerts. etc.--Ferdi2005 (Posta) 18:24, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

@Ferdi2005: I would prefer to see a specified list of groups where you are preparing to utilise massmessage, rather than a general listing of what you might do. Will your sending be to lists that are opt-in only, or would you be looking to create your own send lists? Would you also please identify any advanced rights that you have and where. Thanks. 01:18, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
@Billinghurst: Hi, I want to send only opt-in list, but in some cases I could insert some member putting the key opt-out. I can not provide a precise list because I might change as needed. I'm a sysop on It.wikinews.--Ferdi2005 (Posta) 13:28, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Done Granted for 1 year to expire on 2018-05-18. for opt-in distribution lists I am reasonably comfortable, though would like to see this restricted to opt-in mailing lists, noting that opt-in can be where people ask to be added. If you wish to change the provision of the right granting, please look to leave another note here, with a link to this discussion (either archives or permalink). Granting right for a year, which should be able to be continued with a simple note here requesting right.  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:35, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
Thanks! See you in 2018--Ferdi2005 (Posta) 12:28, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
Can I also mean for opt-in an input board made MANUALLY (and I repeat, manually) to a user or to an entire village pump then agree to sign up?--Ferdi2005 (Posta) 13:28, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
If someone indicates that they wish to be on the list, and you add them, I would consider that opt-in.  — billinghurst sDrewth 13:41, 18 May 2017 (UTC)