Meta:Requests for help from a sysop or bureaucrat

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
(Redirected from WM:RFH)
Jump to: navigation, search
Requests and proposals Requests for help from a sysop or bureaucrat Archives (current)→
Meta-Wiki has a small active community. When a normal user requires the assistance of an administrator or bureaucrat for some particular task, it is not always easy to find one. This page helps users find one when they need one; asking specific admins directly via their talk pages is one way to elicit a fast response. See also: Stewards' noticeboard, Access to nonpublic information policy noticeboard, Category:Meta-Wiki policies, Category:Global policies
Wikimedia Meta-Wiki


This box: view · talk · edit

Please find answered requests in the archives (this month).

Filing cabinet icon.svg
SpBot archives all sections tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} and sections whose oldest comment is older than 10 days.

Translation of Basque Wikimedians User Group[edit]


Could a translation sysop mark the last edits on Basque Wikimedians User Group for translate please ?

Thank you very much. Kvardek du (talk) 09:11, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi Kvardek du. The problem I see is that they changed the translation units, so marking the page for translation might fail as far as I know. Since I can be wrong, maybe Kaganer or Base could correct me here. Thanks. —MarcoAurelio 14:29, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done - markup was fixed, page was marked for translation. --Kaganer (talk) 15:21, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Request for move[edit]

Category:Public Outreach -> Category:Public outreach

per titling conventions. This is translate protected. Blue Rasberry (talk) 14:35, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done with the translate-protected category. Next step is to move the articles, which I can do as well with my slave MABot. Will update. —MarcoAurelio 14:59, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Request to mark for translation[edit]

Hi. Could someone please mark Connected Open Heritage/Information for Data Partners and Connected Open Heritage/Information for GLAM Partners as ready for translation (possibly also take a peak at how rtl support for the tables was handled). These are the two main documents we will be using when first getting in contact with new partners, hence the need for them to be translatable. Cheers /André Costa (WMSE) (talk) 10:03, 19 July 2016 (UTC)