Meta:Requests for help from a sysop or bureaucrat

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
(Redirected from WM:RFH)
Jump to: navigation, search
Requests and proposals Requests for help from a sysop or bureaucrat Archives (current)→
Meta-Wiki has a small active community. When a normal user requires the assistance of an administrator or bureaucrat for some particular task, it is not always easy to find one. This page helps users find one when they need one; asking specific admins directly via their talk pages is one way to elicit a fast response. See also: Stewards' noticeboard, Access to nonpublic information policy noticeboard, Category:Meta-Wiki policies, Category:Global policies
Meta-Wiki maintenance announcements [edit]
General maintenance announcements:
(as of 30 July 2016)

Discussions:
(as of 30 July 2016)
  • RFC on giving stewards local checkuser access at Meta-Wiki (2016-04-08).
  • RFC on the update of Meta:Deletion policy (2016-07-27).
(Last updated: 2016-07-27)
Wikimedia Meta-Wiki

Participate:

This box: view · talk · edit

Please find answered requests in the archives (this month).

Filing cabinet icon.svg
SpBot archives all sections tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} and sections whose oldest comment is older than 10 days.

Request for move[edit]

Category:Public Outreach -> Category:Public outreach

per titling conventions. This is translate protected. Blue Rasberry (talk) 14:35, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done with the translate-protected category. Next step is to move the articles, which I can do as well with my slave MABot. Will update. —MarcoAurelio 14:59, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done with the articles as well; forgot to mention it. Left C:Public Outreach as a category redirect. Best regards, —MarcoAurelio 10:53, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Request to mark for translation[edit]

Hi. Could someone please mark Connected Open Heritage/Information for Data Partners and Connected Open Heritage/Information for GLAM Partners as ready for translation (possibly also take a peak at how rtl support for the tables was handled). These are the two main documents we will be using when first getting in contact with new partners, hence the need for them to be translatable. Cheers /André Costa (WMSE) (talk) 10:03, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

@Kaganer, Base: for syntax checking and marking for translation. —MarcoAurelio 10:52, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Was marked by Pamputt, 2016-07-20. --Kaganer (talk) 14:38, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Request for closure[edit]

Hello. Would you please close Meta:Requests for comment/Meta checkusers and stewards. Opened three months ago, I think it is safe to close after that period of consideration. Best regards, —MarcoAurelio 10:51, 27 July 2016 (UTC)