Jump to content


From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
This page is a translated version of the page Wikidentify and the translation is 100% complete.
이것은 신규 WMF 자매 프로젝트 제안입니다.
제안 상태
상태승인 거부됨
이유This can be done by Wikidata, once phab:T154426 is resolved.--GZWDer (talk) 06:16, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
상세 제안 내용
프로젝트 설명identify objects on earth
다국어 위키인가요?one mulitilingual wiki
잠재적인 언어 수many
관심 참여자
See below.

위키감정(Wikidentify, Reverse Wikipedia라고도 함)는 식물의 검색표에서 알고있는 것처럼 지구상의 물체를 식별하는 프로젝트가 될 수 있습니다. 사물을 병렬로 식별하는 방법에는 여러 가지가있을 수 있습니다. 기초는 위키데이터가 될 수 있으며 마침내 위키백과 문서를 얻습니다. 이러한 키 포함, 제외 및 동화 속성을 결합 할 수 있습니다.

사용 예

  • 노란색과 디젤 연료 및 제외 픽업 트럭을 선택하면 이 옵션으로 해당 색상으로만 생산된 자동차를 얻게됩니다.
  • 그림자에서 자주 자라는 높이와 위치 및 옵션 트리를 선택하면 f.e. 선택할 수있는 세 가지 종.
  • 무게, 색상 및 주변 세부 사항을 선택하면 사과 나무의 열매 일 수 있습니다.
  • 라벨이 표시된 국가와 음향 크기를 선택하고 프로펠러 수를 선택하면 비행기 유형이 표시됩니다.
  • ...


대체 이름

  • Wikidentification – All other WMF projects are nouns.

관련 프로젝트/제안

도메인 이름

메일링 리스트 링크

  • not yet


관심있는 사람들

반대한 사람들

  1. This sounds like something to be implemented in WikiData; we don't need another sister project. Chris Troutman (talk) 01:33, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    Maybe sounds, but is more complex (just take the GUI). There are thinkings from experts necessary I think. Conny (talk) 13:40, 1 August 2013 (UTC).[reply]
  2. I agree with Chris that this should be seen as a WikiData tool. I support its creation, but I don't see the need for a separate wiki for that. --Piotrus (talk) 03:57, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    Hm ok, maybe a seperate skin for Wikidentify is enough, if there is a way to integrate special needs like Klaas mentioned. Hope you opposers read discussion from specialists f. e. in german wikipedia (linked) and support overload of data for items to identify then. Maybe not everyone is interested in Wikidentify, but so this people maybe become the information overload in Wikidata... Thanks, Conny (talk) 09:43, 20 August 2013 (UTC).[reply]
  3.  Klaas|Z4␟V09:13, 18 August 2013 (UTC) Agree with Chris. Great task for an advanced tool in WikiData perhaps even a special namespace there, I suggest to move this proposal to a suitable team of developers there.[reply]
  4. Wikidata will be doing this. comment on why this project would be needed in addition to the current plans for Wikidata because I fail to see the need for this in addition to the current plans. Blue Rasberry (talk) 15:06, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Weak oppose based on current scope. It makes sense to create dichotomous key to identify biological species but adding others into the scope makes it a bit too broad. (Ok, I can see that niche audiences like aviation fans would potentially treat this site as the go-to source to identify aircraft types but I want to see more listed in the proposal on how to carry out its goal.) OhanaUnitedTalk page 19:18, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  6. This would be a great add-on to Wikidata, but it's hard to see how a separate project is needed. -- Ypnypn (talk) 18:04, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  7. I hope that Wikidata will offer such a tool, eventually. — Ivan Shmakov (dc) 09:05, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  8. As proposed, I don't see a use for this. Sven Manguard (talk) 22:50, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Completely duplicate with query feature of Wikidata.--GZWDer (talk) 14:04, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]