Meta:Requests for adminship/Trijnstel

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.

No opposes, clear consensus to promote. Successful RfA. Alex Pereira ^falaê 14:09, 31 March 2011 (UTC) ·[reply]

Trijnstel[edit]

Trijnstel (talk • contribs • count • logs • page moves • block log • CA • email)
End date: 14:04, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

Hello all! I'm here today to nominate Trijnstel for adminship here on meta. She's tagged many pages for deletion here and also reverted lots of vandalism. As a sysop on nlwiki, she also fulfils the requirements. Trijnstel furthermore is already a global rollbacker. I think she has shown some need for the mop here and is also trusted enough to be an admin. I hope you agree with me. Good luck! -Barras 14:04, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for nominating me and of course I accept it. With love, Trijnstel 14:07, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support - as nom... -Barras 14:04, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Active cross-wiki user, sysop on nlwiki and judging by the deleted contributions could make use of the tools here as well. Jafeluv 14:11, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sure micki t 14:28, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --WizardOfOz ^talk 14:57, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sure. Theo10011 15:18, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support. PeterSymonds (talk) 16:15, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support, of course - Hoo man (talk) 16:26, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Seen her around quite a bit doing small wiki work, no reason why not. Ajraddatz (Talk) 20:08, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Natuurlijk, trustful and active. Sa vh ^ñ 21:02, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sure. --Erwin 21:31, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Grunny (talk) 00:00, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Don't see a reason to oppose. –BruTe ^talk 05:09, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Why not? -FASTILY ^(TALK) 07:24, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Obviously yes. :) Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 08:05, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --თოგო ^(D) 12:33, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Alex Pereira ^falaê 17:16, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Juliancolton | ^Talk 19:39, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Além do que foi dito, ela é bastante cuidadosa e respeitosa.” T_ele^s (T_alk @ C G) 05:52, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Anton 008 08:07, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support fr33kman 06:26, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support -Theo10011 10:48, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, Theo seems a great fan of Trijnstel, therefore voted twice (see the fifth support). :P — [ Tanvir | Talk ] 17:29, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support — [ Tanvir | Talk ] 02:45, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support I was planning to nom you too , welcome to admin gang band Mardetanha ^talk 17:19, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support. -- Dferg ^{☎ talk} 17:49, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support - porque non? muy Kissankellon! MoiraMoira 20:27, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Maximillion Pegasus 20:30, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Sure - Jarii94 20:47, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support; quite active. -- Menti fisto 20:48, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support yes ⇒SWATJester ^{Son of the Defender} 03:38, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Hydriz 14:15, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Sokac121 18:45, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Good use of the mop on nlwiki, no problems with the mop on meta - TBloemink 19:10, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Aude 23:58, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]