Meta:Requests for help from a sysop or bureaucrat
- Before posting to this page, make sure your comment doesn't belong at one of these specific request pages:
- Requests for (translation/central notice/interface) adminship on this Meta-Wiki
- Requests for CheckUser information on this Meta-Wiki
- Requests for oversight of edits on this Meta-Wiki
- General requests for permissions on other wikis
- Requests for CentralNotice banners and campaigns
- Import is currently enabled in this wiki from some projects. From other wikis, you will need to copy and paste your materials by hand but please remember to add a link, as a permanent link, and the history of the page being imported in the edit summary to avoid copyright violations.
- To report vandalism on Meta: please click here. For immediate assistance, join #wikimedia-metaconnect and use !admin@meta to notify administrators.
- To report cross-wiki vandalism see Steward requests/Miscellaneous.
See also: Stewards' noticeboard, Access to nonpublic personal data policy noticeboard, Category:Meta-Wiki policies, Category:Global policies
General requests for: help from a Meta sysop or bureaucrat · deletion (speedy deletions: local · multilingual) · URL blacklisting · new languages · interwiki map
Personal requests for: username changes · permissions (global) · bot status · adminship on Meta · CheckUser information (local) · local administrator help
Cooperation requests for: comments (local) (global) · translation
- Assistance with Meta-Wiki maintenance is always welcome.
- Many files awaiting review for basic
{{information}}, source and license.
None currently.
Please find answered requests in the archives (this month).
 |
SpBot archives all sections tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} after 1 day and sections whose most recent comment is older than 10 days.
|
Filter proposal: Disallow temporary accounts from editing IP user and user talk pages
[edit]Since temporary accounts have been rolled out since September, I believe IP user and user talk pages will no longer be very meaningful to use in the future (except for historical archival purposes).
I queried and found following 5 edits. All of them got reverted.
- 29556503 made by ~2025-30888-19 to User talk:47.155.194.159
- 29556498 made by ~2025-30888-19 to User talk:47.155.194.159
- 29556495 made by ~2025-30888-19 to User talk:47.155.194.159
- 29493750 made by ~2025-29781-87 to User talk:68.3.67.81
- 29295259 made by ~2025-65262-5 to User talk:112.157.104.102
I'm proposing a filter to prevent temporary accounts from editing IP user and user talk pages.
// Based on [[:w:vi:Special:AbuseFilter/126]]
user_type == "temp"
& (page_namespace == 2 | page_namespace == 3)
&
(
page_title rlike '^(?:\d{1,3}\.){3}\d{1,3}$' /* IPv4 */
| page_title rlike '^([0-9a-fA-F]{1,4}:){1,7}[0-9a-fA-F]{1,4}$' /* IPv6 */
)
We can also limit it to autoconfirmed only if needed. – Phương Linh (T · C · CA · L · B) 11:26, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
- User talk:IPADDRESS pages may still be used for things like discussing IP blocks, so I'm not sure about this one. — xaosflux Talk 11:43, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
- I would at least support temporary accounts not being allowed to edit IP userpages at the very least. //shb (t • c) 12:52, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
- There's no need for them to edit user pages as IPs shouldn't even have userpages so that part of it is definitely fine. With these IP user talk pages, considering how quickly the vandalism was spotted, I'd rather these IP talk pages that no-one looks at be vandalism than say, RfH. I take quite a conservative approach to page protection based on my homewiki though, so that is just my take. --Ferien (talk) 13:20, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
- A tangential problem: Should temporary accounts have user (sub)pages? There are currently 8 such pages. NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 13:49, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
- I mean, I guess - they can draft things in user space just like anyone else. But nonsense can be deleted just like always. — xaosflux Talk 14:13, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
- I am noting here that English Wiktionary has a similar filter, Special:AbuseFilter/192. Codename Noreste (discuss • contribs) 17:01, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
MediaWiki:Gadget-markAdmins-data.json
[edit]Good day all. With the amount of local userright changes (LA, WMF-related, Omb, U4C). I'd like to seek the community's opinion on whether we should automate this process. DreamRimmer is willing to take up the task but the obstacle is that DreamRimmer bot does not have sysop rights and can't edit the page, and giving the bot sysop rights to edit a single page seems to be an overstretch. As suggested by DreamRimmer, I propose that we move the file to the bot's userspace and let it handle the updates automatically. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 11:01, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
- Sounds good to me. The page is in JSON, so there's no security risk (not to mention the bot owner is already a sysop). @DreamRimmer: How will the bot differentiate limited and regular sysops? NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 11:47, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
- I have not thought about the functionality yet, but I will probably spend some time on it tomorrow. I am sure there are reliable ways to detect the differences, such as checking whether an RfA or RfLA page was created recently whenever there is a change in admin rights. – DreamRimmer ■ 12:01, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
- As per our current config, we don't differentiate between limited and regular sysops, both are listed as (A). So both regular and limited admins can be categorized together under the same group in future. As for user rights with an expiry, the bot shall add in a note of the expiry and remove the username when the rights have expired. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 12:49, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
Support See no problem here. – Phương Linh (T · C · CA · L · B) 10:54, 7 November 2025 (UTC)- This seems reasonable here. JSON pages are automatically fully protected so it shouldn't require additional protection, nor would it cause problems. Codename Noreste (discuss • contribs) 17:03, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
- See this en.wikibooks discussion for precedent. JJPMaster (she/they) 17:24, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
- Does this mean we'll modify the core module so it fetches the JSON via an HTTP request rather than importing it with
require? From a technical standpoint, that sounds like a significant regression in server-side efficiency. Dragoniez (talk) 17:41, 7 November 2025 (UTC)- I've filed phab:T409617 as a possible workaround. Dragoniez (talk) 04:34, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
- A page that is implicitly used by the community should not be placed in userspace if possible. DreamRimmer is trusted, so I'm fine with adding +sysop to the bot. Leaderboard (talk) 11:21, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
- Perhaps instead the bot can update a JSON list in their userspace, and the gadget in MediaWiki namespace can just source the names from the JSON page? This prevents even needing the +sysop or the move. EggRoll97 (talk) 02:09, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Report concerning User:Fay to day i jarls
[edit]Fay to day i jarls (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • GUC • CA) — Reasons: Vandalism XReport --NDG (talk) 12:29, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Count Count (talk) 12:54, 11 November 2025 (UTC) Report concerning User:栗山良太を守る会
[edit]栗山良太を守る会 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • GUC • CA) — Reasons: Vandalism XReport --MathXplore (talk) 12:31, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Count Count (talk) 12:53, 11 November 2025 (UTC) Report concerning User:Bonbobonbo
[edit]Bonbobonbo (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • GUC • CA) — Reasons: Long-term abuse. Wikinger XReport --NDG (talk) 13:33, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. TenWhile6 13:42, 11 November 2025 (UTC) Report concerning User:~2025-32832-08
[edit]~2025-32832-08 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • GUC • CA) — Reasons: Please nuke everything as non-translations. XReport --NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 16:43, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Ternera (talk) 16:59, 11 November 2025 (UTC) Report concerning User:Nyimbo Nyimbo
[edit]Nyimbo Nyimbo (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • GUC • CA) — Reasons: Please nuke and revdel everything. XReport --NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 16:46, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. EggRoll97 (talk) 19:02, 11 November 2025 (UTC) Report concerning User:~2025-32872-13
[edit]~2025-32872-13 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • GUC • CA) — Reasons: Long-term abuse XReport --NDG (talk) 17:09, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
- Locked. Ternera (talk) 18:07, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Ternera (talk) 18:07, 11 November 2025 (UTC) Report concerning User:Johames89
[edit]Johames89 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • GUC • CA) — Reasons: Long-term abuse XReport --NDG (talk) 17:40, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
- Locked. Ternera (talk) 18:07, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Ternera (talk) 18:07, 11 November 2025 (UTC) Report concerning User:(alatbantudengar)
[edit](alatbantudengar) (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • GUC • CA) — Reasons: Vandalism XReport --NDG (talk) 19:13, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Ternera (talk) 21:13, 11 November 2025 (UTC) Report concerning User:Krellran
[edit]Krellran (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • GUC • CA) — Reasons: Vandalism XReport --NDG (talk) 19:21, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
- Locked. Ternera (talk) 21:12, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Ternera (talk) 21:13, 11 November 2025 (UTC) Report concerning User:Skibidi Paralastor
[edit]Skibidi Paralastor (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • GUC • CA) — Reasons: Vandalism XReport --NDG (talk) 19:29, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
- Locked. Ternera (talk) 21:12, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Ternera (talk) 21:13, 11 November 2025 (UTC) Report concerning User:~2025-32921-96
[edit]~2025-32921-96 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • GUC • CA) — Reasons: Vandalism XReport --
Done by mtarch11. //shb (t • c) 05:34, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. shb (t • c) 05:34, 12 November 2025 (UTC) Global user: SCP-2000 (talk • contribs • User rights • global contributions • CentralAuth • block log)
Reason for request: I am the Director of the Wikimedia Community User Group Hong Kong (WMHKG), as well as the coordinator of the upcoming bi-annual edit-a-thon. We may use the event registration feature for the edit-a-thon / workshops in near future. Thanks.
Criteria met:
- No active blocks.
- Global edits: 46,679
- Additional Criteria: Director of WMHKG
SCP-2000 05:37, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
- Done --SHB2000 (talk) 05:39, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. shb (t • c) 05:39, 12 November 2025 (UTC) Report concerning User:SweepyMaids
[edit]SweepyMaids (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • GUC • CA) — Reasons: Spammer, see SUL XReport --NDG (talk) 11:59, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
- Done --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 13:19, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 13:19, 12 November 2025 (UTC) Request deletion for Meta:Requests for limited adminship/Peterxy12
[edit]I created the page carelessly, so can you help me delete the page? Peterxy（talk） 13:16, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
- Done --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 13:19, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 13:19, 12 November 2025 (UTC) Policy violations and canvassing from SophiaJustice59
[edit]Hi admins, sorry to bother you with a messy RfC. Requests for comment/The state of Simple English Wikipedia was recently started by SophiaJustice59. As you might know, I am an active editor on Simple English Wikipedia so am heavily against this and involved in this "proposal" of sorts, so I am not going to take any admin action on my own. However, I see many issues with this discussion from a procedural point of view which I feel are now needing admin action:
- Sophia has been as vague as she possibly could be with the proposal. You will notice that the opening statement of the RfC actually proposes no action. I was under the impression this was required for an RfC - however, even if it is not, the closing projects policy requires the local community to be informed and while I can't find it in policy, it is a well-accepted procedure that all closure requests are to go on Proposals for closing projects instead of Requests for comment. She has failed to do either, but she is setting a tone for closing the wiki while not actually stating it in words.
- At the same time, especially when considered with the above fact, she has canvassed to attempt to tilt the outcome of her RfC. She purposely pinged Piotrus, who started the third closure request for simplewiki, and notified the enwiki community at w:en:Wikipedia:Village pump (WMF)#Community input warranted, while failing to notify simplewiki. Closure requests that fail to notify the local wiki are typically ignored per the closing projects policy, and she has gone well beyond this in notifying the people who are mostly likely to support the proposal.
- As a general note (while not necessarily needing admin action on its own), Sophia has repeatedly accused others of incivility and assuming bad faith, when I do not believe this to be the case, while at one point arguing that I treat simplewiki as my hermit kingdom(!). If anything, I have perhaps engaged in the proposal more than is necessary, but I don't believe any of my comments are problematic.
Overall, I believe the RfC should be closed as invalid and a means of evading the Proposals for closing projects mechanism - as if the proposal were to be made at the correct venue, it would likely be rejected given the reasoning is almost identical to what it has been in the past. Sophia's behaviour has not been in line with expectations for closing projects or really in speaking with other editors. I don't think it is yet worthy of a block but certainly of a warning. However, I'll leave this for you to decide. Thank you, --Ferien (talk) 16:10, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
- Ferien has not declared that he is a bureaucrat of SWP. Instead of acknowledging legitimate concerns from Meta community members and discussing with them, you appear to have resorted to casting aspersions and using the process to try closing a legitimate RfC by fixating on minute procedural details of which most users would not be aware unless they have been around for years to be sufficiently familiar with the rules. Even if your claim that I must have notified of your community was true, it would not impact on the validity of our concerns. I find it difficult agreeing that "criticism of SWP is welcome" when this is how disinterested critics are treated. My RfC statement was phrased in a civil manner, backed by data, examples, and points from supporters of previous closure proposals. Just because you feel unsettled by someone doubting SWP in which you serve as a bureaucrat, it does not make them bad-faith actors. I would like to say that I expected a constructive dialogue out of my RfC, but we appear to have a huge disconnect, which makes our dialogue unlikely to proceed. I mean no offense to your community, but I am simply voicing legitimate concerns as a Meta community member. SophiaJustice59 (talk) 16:55, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
- I don't intend to respond to this any more now as it'll make it harder for the admin to review the situation themselves, but I've declared I'm an active member on simplewiki, user rights just aren't relevant here. For the rest of this, assume good faith isn't a get out of jail free card, and I don't think I've not assumed good faith up until the point of reporting. I've given you opportunity to elaborate and I appreciated your justification even if I didn't think it was right. So that's just not why I'm reporting as otherwise I would have been reporting a few other users here. That being said, we don't randomly go discussing the bad bits about random projects on meta unless we want to close them, because we'd be here for a good long while if we did that. We had a discussion about simplewiki last year. And I don't think I've fixated on the issue of not letting the community know, I mentioned it twice initially and then went onto other things, before reporting here where it was relevant. A final word, if you want to argue you're new and that you don't know much about general procedures, starting an RfC is probably the last thing you'd want to do. --Ferien (talk) 20:47, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
- In addition, I do not accept that pinging one of the previous closure proposers is a form of "blatant canvassing" as alleged by Ferien. The wording and the underlying assumption is not policy-compliant. I do not see that it is inherently wrong to ask for input from a previous closure proposer when he was deeply involved in the process. If SWP had no problems that warranted Meta community discussions, Ferien as a bureaucrat of SWP should not take issue with it. The allegation of "blatant canvassing" is unfair, sounding more like an arbitrary use of rules to try ending legitimate discussions. I hope that patrolling sysops can consider this, preferably reminding Ferien to assume good faith when interacting with relatively new users. If I did not fully follow the process as alleged by Ferien, I would welcome a reminder from sysops, while more ideally, Ferien's report should be closed as a content dispute. SophiaJustice59 (talk) 17:20, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
- I'm not going to close the RFC because I have a conflict of interest as a simplewiki admin. However, I agree with Ferien that it's not right for you to alert the English Wikipedia about the RFC while failing to notify us at the Simple English Wikipedia as required by Requests for comment/Policy. Ternera (talk) 17:32, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for pointing it out. I am not familiar with the rules as I am relatively new. I apologize for failing to inform the SWP community. However, I believe that my RfC points are worthy of discussion as I am not the only user noticing that SWP is beset with long-term problems: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7...the RfC should be allowed to continue. SophiaJustice59 (talk) 17:42, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
- In response to Ferien's claim that I have not made clear the intention of my RfC, I have actually done it in this comment:
... Furthermore, I am not saying that the project should be closed, but a serious review should be conducted to facilitate major improvements, if the project really has thousands of active contributors, given that the project has been around for pretty much as long as English Wikipedia.
- I'm not going to close the RFC because I have a conflict of interest as a simplewiki admin. However, I agree with Ferien that it's not right for you to alert the English Wikipedia about the RFC while failing to notify us at the Simple English Wikipedia as required by Requests for comment/Policy. Ternera (talk) 17:32, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
In addition, the allegation At the same time, especially when considered with the above fact, she has canvassed to attempt to tilt the outcome of her RfC. is an example of assumption of bad faith. At no time did I act with such an intent. SophiaJustice59 (talk) 19:12, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
Request to open RfC for undeletion of G. R. Meneghetti items
[edit]Hello, I would like to request administrator assistance to open a Request for Comment regarding the undeletion of items related to the Argentine author **G. R. Meneghetti** and his published trilogy **“El Último Redentor.”**
My account does not yet meet the technical requirements to create an RfC directly. Below is the complete context and supporting evidence demonstrating that the deleted items represent verifiable and culturally recognized literary works and related entities.
- Items to be restored:**
- [G. R. Meneghetti](https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q136716661) - [El Último Redentor: El camino del cazador](https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q136719588) - [El Último Redentor (trilogy)](https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q136715942) - [Tinta Libre Ediciones](https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q136718492)
Book information • Title: El Último Redentor: El camino del cazador (Book 1 of the trilogy) • Author: Gerardo Ricardo Meneghetti (pen name G. R. Meneghetti) • Publisher: Tinta Libre Ediciones (Argentina) • ISBN: 978-631-306-946-0 • Publication date: August 2025 • Format: A5 (21 × 15 cm), 386 pages ________________________________________ Official registration • Official ISBN registry – Agencia Argentina de ISBN (screenshot evidence): https://drive.google.com/file/d/1qLJqEMeEU_f_sv1kjvKOBkB6S-jB48Kj/view?usp=drivesdk • ISBN 978-631-306-946-0 – Registered under “Meneghetti, Gerardo Ricardo”; published by Tinta Libre Ediciones (2025). ________________________________________ Independent press coverage and publication data • Paralelas – “Novelista de nuestra ciudad presentará El Último Redentor” (30 Sep 2025) https://paralelas.com.ar/Noticias/Novelista-de-nuestra-ciudad-presentar%C3%A1-El-%C3%BAltimo-Redentor-El-camino-del-cazador-el-primero-de-una-trilog%C3%ADa/#wbb1 • Paralelas – “Presentación oficial de la primera novela de El Último Redentor” (12 Oct 2025) https://paralelas.com.ar/Noticias/Presentaci%C3%B3n-oficial-de-la-primera-novela-de-la-trilog%C3%ADa-El-%C3%BAltimo-redentor/#wbb1 • Paralelas – “Gerardo Meneghetti: del sueño a la realidad en la Feria del Libro de Córdoba” (15 Oct 2025) https://paralelas.com.ar/Noticias/Gerardo-Meneghetti-del-sue%C3%B1o-a-la-realidad-en-la-Feria-del-Libro-de-C%C3%B3rdoba/#wbb1 • Todos Para Uno Diario – “Gerardo Meneghetti, escritor de Laguna Paiva, presentó su primer libro en la Feria Internacional en Córdoba” (15 Oct 2025) https://todosparaunodiario.com.ar/gerardo-meneghetti-escritor-de-laguna-paiva-presento-su-primer-libro-en-una-feria-internacional-en-cordoba/ • Portal Oficial AMSAFE Capital – “En Laguna Paiva: acompañamos a Gerardo Meneghetti en la presentación de su libro” (18 Oct 2025) https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1CvSVyr11n/ • Paralelas – “El Último Redentor, de Gerardo Meneghetti, será motivo de un taller de lectura en Biblioteca Villa Talleres” (22 Oct 2025) https://paralelas.com.ar/Noticias/EL-%C3%9ALTIMO-REDENTOR-DE-GERARDO-MENEGHETTI-SER%C3%81-MOTIVO-DE-UN-TALLER-DE-LECTURA-EN-BIBLIOTECA-V-TALLERES/#wbb1 • Paralelas – “Se realizó el lanzamiento oficial de El Último Redentor: El camino del cazador, en Llambí Campbell” (7 Nov 2025) https://paralelas.com.ar/Noticias/Se-realiz%C3%B3-el-lanzamiento-oficial-de-El-%C3%BAltimo-redentor-El-camino-del-cazador-en-Llambi-Campbell/#wbb1 • Publisher – Tinta Libre Ediciones official site: https://www.tintalibre.com.ar/ • Goodreads – author page: https://www.goodreads.com/author/show/60918635.G_R_Meneghetti • Goodreads – book page: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/243013163-el-ltimo-redentor • Amazon – product page: https://www.amazon.es/El-%C3%BAltimo-redentor-camino-cazador-ebook/dp/B0FX3FNZBB/ • Google Play Books – publisher listing: https://play.google.com/store/books/details/G_R_Meneghetti_El_%C3%BAltimo_redentor?id=IxqREQAAQBAJ
Media interviews and public broadcasting (Recordings archived by the author; confirm multiple independent broadcasts across Santa Fe Province.) • FM Powermax – “El Diario de Analía”, Oct 4 2025: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nwink1O8Wvo • FM Powermax – “Todos para uno Radio”, Oct 13 2025: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i2fOzF6uFtk • FM Cóndor – “Nuestras raíces”, Oct 14 2025: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HKpZh0YDzkQ • FM Aarón Castellanos – “El Cepillo”, Oct 15 2025: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UXfPlmcZb9c • FM Comunal Nelson – “A mi manera”, Oct 23 2025: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2KlYhyArOO8 • FM Comunal Llambí Campbell – “Entre nosotros”, Oct 29 2025: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S_SoulqEqjY • FM La Cumbre – Juanjo Cazón, Nov 1 2025: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cQYCuy-cEsA ________________________________________ Institutional recognition • Declaration of Cultural Interest – Honorable Chamber of Deputies of Santa Fe Province (official document): https://drive.google.com/file/d/1jYmFyNFxmtHK39x9aqKyOJ24-ul8OIkZ/view • Honorary Mention – AMSAFE La Capital (official document): https://drive.google.com/file/d/1sOXtTlbkgTrqfUEB_NsrC4ERb8GGp9JX/view ________________________________________ Online discoverability • Google search index for “Gerardo Meneghetti”: https://www.google.com/search?q=Gerardo+Meneghetti ________________________________________ Series context – El Último Redentor (Trilogy / Literary Series Q136715942) El Último Redentor is a planned dark-fantasy trilogy: • Book 1: El camino del cazador (published, ISBN 978-631-306-946-0) • Book 2: El clamor de sangre (in advanced editing) • Book 3: El ocaso de la luz (completed draft) The trilogy functions as a unified literary and transmedia project with consistent mythological and cultural themes and has been presented publicly in Santa Fe Province. ________________________________________ Cultural impact and educational value The trilogy has been integrated into educational and cultural programs, including public library presentations and community reading projects, demonstrating sustained cultural activity beyond individual promotion. ________________________________________
I respectfully ask that the undeletion request be reopened or that administrators consider restoring these items based on the clear verifiability and public coverage of the subject.
Thank you very much for your time and for your work maintaining Wikimedia projects.
G. R. Meneghetti — Author (Argentina) Goodreads Author Page: https://www.goodreads.com/author/show/60918635.G_R_Meneghetti G.R.Meneghetti (talk) 17:18, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
- @G.R.Meneghetti, you were already told here that this was a clear case of self promotion and that the items would not be undeleted. This is not the place to appeal the decision. Please keep the undeletion discussion on Wikidata and continue the discussion there. Ternera (talk) 17:24, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Ternera (talk) 17:25, 12 November 2025 (UTC) Event organizer for Ryok_Kundyi2912
[edit]Global user: Ryok_Kundyi2912 (talk • contribs • User rights • global contributions • CentralAuth • block log)
Reason for request: I am preparing for an event soon to be hosted within the month for the Jju Wikipedia currently in the Incubator.
Criteria met:
- No active blocks: None
- Global edits: 2,928
- Additional Criteria: Grant recipient
Additional information: None. Thank you.
--~2025-33135-79 (talk) 19:54, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
- Can you sign in and sign this request yourself? — xaosflux Talk 20:24, 12 November 2025 (UTC)