Stewards/confirm/2010/Andre Engels

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
< Stewards‎ | confirm‎ | 2010
Jump to navigation Jump to search
English: The 2010 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.
Suomi: Vuoden 2010 ylivalvojien vaalit on loppu. Uusia ääniä ei hyväksytä enää.
العربية: انتخابات المضيفين لعام 2010 انتهت. لا أصوات أخرى سيتم قبولها.
Deutsch: Die Stewardwahlen 2010 sind beendet. Weitere Stimmen können nicht mehr berücksichtigt werden.
Español : Las elecciones a Steward del año 2010 han concluído. No se aceptan más votos.
فارسی: .رای‌گیری در مورد انتخابات ویکیبدهای جدید پایان یافته است.رای‌های جدید مورد قبول واقع نخواهد شد.
Français : Les élections de 2010 pour Steward se sont conclues. Aucun vote au-delà de cette date ne sera compté.
Gaeilge: Tá na toghcháin Maoir 2010 dúnta anois. Ní féidir aon vótaí eile a glacadh as an am seo amach.
Galego: Xa remataron as eleccións a steward do ano 2010. Non se aceptarán máis votos.
Alemannisch : D Stewardwahle 2010 sin umme. Du chasch nimmi abstimme.
עברית: בחירות הדיילים לשנת 2010 הסתיימו. הצבעות נוספות לא תתקבלנה.
Magyar: A választás lezárult, további szavazatokat nem fogadunk el.
Italiano: Le elezioni del 2010 a Steward sono terminate. Nessun voto ricevuto dopo questa data sarà preso in considerazione.
日本語: 2010年のスチュワード選挙は終わりました。今後の投票は受け付けられません。
Nederlands: De stewardsverkiezingen van 2010 zijn gesloten. U kunt niet meer stemmen.
Polski: Wybory stewardów w 2010 roku zakończyły się. Nowe głosy nie będą akceptowane.
Português : As eleições para Steward de 2010 estão encerradas. Nenhum voto lançado a partir desta data será computado.
Русский: Выборы стюардов — 2010 завершены. Дальнейшие голоса не будут приняты.
Svenska: 2010 års val av stewarder är avslutat. Ingen ytterligare röstning kommer att accepteras.
中文: 2010年监管员选举已经结束。逾期投票将会作废。
中文(简体)‎: 2010年监管員选举已经结束。逾期投票将会作废。
中文(繁體)‎: 2010年監管員選舉已經結束。逾期投票將會作廢。
Ελληνικά: Οι εκλογές επιτρόπων για το 2010 έχουν τελειώσει. Δεν γίνονται δεκτές άλλες ψήφοι.
Türkçe: 2010 kâhya seçimleri tamamlanmıştır. Daha fazla oy kabul edilmeyecektir.
Azərbaycanca: 2010 eşikağası seçkiləri tamamlanmışdır. Daha çox səs qəbul olunmaz.

Andre Engels[edit]

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, crosswiki logs & activity | translate: translation help, statement

  • Sprachen: nl, en, de...
  • Informationen zur Person: Ich war in letzter Zeit nicht sehr aktiv, und um ehrlich zu sein, ist es nicht sehr wahrscheinlich, dass sich das bald ändern wird, aber es wäre möglich. Wenn Leute das zu wenig finden, kann ich das akzeptieren. Auf der anderen Seite denke ich, dass mir weiterhin vertraut wird und dass eine kleinere Hilfe auch eine Hilfe ist. Und ich verspreche, dass das, was ich tue, das Beste ist, was ich tun kann, auch wenn es wenig ist.
  • Languages: nl, en, de...
  • Personal info: I have not been doing much lately, and to be honest that isn't very likely to change soon; still, it might. If people find that too little, I can accept it. On the other hand, I think I'm still trusted, and every little bit of help is help. And I do promise to do what I do the best I can, even if it is little.
  • 言語: nl, en, de...
  • 候補者の情報: 最近はあまり活動できませんでした。正直申し上げて、状況は当分変わりそうにありません。少なすぎるとのご批判は甘受します。まだ信頼は頂いていると思いますし、ほんの少しの活動でも、ほんの少しはお役に立てているかと思います。量は僅かかもしれませんが、その中で最善を尽くすことをお誓いします。
  • Языки: en
  • Личная информация: здесь должно быть заявление

Comments about Andre Engels[edit]

  • basically inactive, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 01:17, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
  • If indeed inactive, don't confirm Seb az86556 01:54, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
  • trusted user, helpful and worth keeping MoiraMoira 07:27, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Can be trusted, even with less activity. Davin 08:37, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Inactive. --WizardOfOz talk 10:30, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Inactive. Doesn't need the tools -> remove. -Barras talk 11:52, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
    Doesn't demonstrate any need for the tools. Pmlineditor  12:06, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Confirm, some recent activity. Pmlineditor  14:32, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Confirm, though I would like to see more activity. --Erwin 14:08, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Confirm. Active enough per policy. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 14:50, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
  • nearly inactive - so adios! Sorry Andre - but you are one of the guys here who think this is a Order. No, it's a job with hard work. Marcus Cyron 17:31, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
  • confirm but what please care to Erwins point --Mardetanha talk 17:42, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
  • If you want to work again, I say Confirm. JAn Dudík 19:56, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Keep per Erwin. Not so inactive.--Jusjih 03:55, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Basically inactive. Rights are granted for the benefit of the community, when they ceased to be used to any degree they can be removed --Herby talk thyme 09:41, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
  • not very much activity, but a good steward nonetheless. neutral so far, inclined towards keeping --FiliP ██ 11:34, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Keep. Obelix 11:43, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Sorry, I'd rather see you move to another role which you can fulfill on a more constant basis.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 14:18, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Sorry, basically inactive and has stated he does not think he will become active anytime soon. I'll fully admit the inactivity policy currently in place is far to weak for my own likes. James (T C) 23:32, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
  • No, no confirm. Razorflame 07:14, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Confirm, per Erwin Freaky Fries 12:36, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep - Waerth 16:38, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep - USAAC Roundel 1919-1941.svg DustSpinner 22:18, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
  • keep - my view in general is that keeping onboard trustworthy people who have for some time been less active but are willing to continue using steward tools even when used very sparingly, will eventually lead to a greater evolutionary diversity in the stewards group. such diversity is essential, not only of talents or knowledge, but also variety of experience and number of years of service. with all respect, we don't want a uniform group of hyperactives solely, nor is there need of an overthrow of some sort of government, there is none here, since stewards do not rule. so let's keep such experience onboard where we can. in my philosophy, extended-rights communities should always be kept growing on a healthy wiki. please stay onboard by being/becoming sufficiently active (see current policy which sets the limits, but can use some updating as well imo). oscar 00:41, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep - Taketa 13:15, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep what a dichotomy we set ourselves, active inactivity / inactive activity; yet we are supposedly desperate for the mop and bucket extraordinaires, so we don't dare release. I feel that there needs to be a commitment to a certain level of activity. Or a commitment to work in an area of specialty. billinghurst sDrewth 13:00, 11 February 2010 (UTC) [late edit to keep, though a tenuous vote, and more that we need stewards and has flicker of activity] billinghurst sDrewth 11:40, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Lymantria 12:47, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
  • confirm. Xqt 21:06, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep -FASTILY (TALK) 22:02, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Keep. Andre is regularly doing a lot for Wikimedian community and he needs steward rights to keep doing that. --Millosh 13:21, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Keep. No worries, Cirt (talk) 02:36, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Confirm. Andre is a wise and quiet person. It is a pleasure to work together with him. Annabel 07:43, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Keep. Current activity, in my opinion, is OK. I hope it will not drop after elections... — NickK 23:08, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Remove because of inactivity. --FollowTheMedia 23:56, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Remove per the inactivity.--Caspian blue 16:13, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Sorry, but remove per inactivity --Church of emacs talk · contrib 12:25, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
  • isn't inactive, please Keep Keep. --Geitost diskusjon 00:59, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep not completely inactive, and I'm not convinced that inactivity is a very good reason for removal. JoshuaZ 03:35, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Keep. Jayjg 22:03, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Remove, inactive. Thank you for your help. NonvocalScream 00:59, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Keep. Andre is someone I've always trusted. I would say keep him in the hope he can continue to help out. SlimVirgin (talk) 13:14, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Confirm, but please be more active. LeinaD (t) 16:36, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Keep, active enough in my opinion. Lolsimon 00:17, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Has recent steward activity (log info) → keep for next time. —Innv {ru-ws} 09:56, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
  • I felt comfortable this year with every single member of the team. This is true, regardless of the mere count of actions and the amount of interactions on wiki, mailing list, IRC, social networks or real life. Therefore I'd feel much more comfy if all current stewards are confirmed. --M/ 23:05, 28 February 2010 (UTC)