Sustainability Initiative/fr

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Bienvenue sur la page de l’Initiative Soutenabilité !

Bienvenue sur la page de lInitiative Soutenabilité, qui a pour but de discuter et réduire l'impact environnemental du mouvement Wikimédia.

Quel est l'impact environnemental du mouvement Wikimédia et pourquoi le sujet est-il important ?[edit]

Dans la mesure où ils dépendent d'énergie produite à partir de combustibles fossiles comme cette centrale au charbon au Texas, les projets Wikimédia contribuent au réchauffement climatique.

L'impact environnement du mouvement Wikimédia est plus important que ce que vous pensez. Les serveurs de Wikipédia, le chauffage, la climatisation et l'éclairage des sites de la fondation Wikimedia et des mouvements affiliés, ainsi que les voyages des contributeurs partout sur la planète pour Wikimania et d'autres événements, pour finalement afficher n'importe quel article de Wikipédia sur un appareil de lecture — tout ceci nécessite une quantité importante d'énergie, dont la production contribue au réchauffement climatique.

Nous disposons d'une marque puissante et pouvons l'utiliser pour montrer un leadership vert. Étant donné l'influence démesurée du mouvement Wikimédia en tant que marque et que client de services de centre de données, il y a beaucoup de potentiel pour qu'il joue un rôle grandement positif sur ce terrain. C'est pourquoi l'impact environnement du mouvement Wikimédia compte énormément.

Où en sommes-nous ?[edit]

Globalement, le mouvement Wikimédia n'a pas une si grande empreinte énergétique comparé à d'autres sites très visités tels que Google ou Facebook. Cela peut s'expliquer par les efforts de Wikipédia pour être efficace, et par la nature des pages des projets Wikimédia — principalement du texte, avec peu de vidéos. Par ailleurs, le mouvement Wikimédia emploie relativement peu de personnes.

En ce qui concerne les sources d'énergie, le mouvement Wikimédia s'appuie grandement sur les sources d'énergie à base de carbone, avec quelques exceptions positives. Le point positif est que la fondation Wikimedia est ouverte sur ce sujet et a fait les premiers pas vers un engagement pour les énergies renouvelables.

Passage de justesse : score « D » pour Wikipédia dans le « Click Green Scorecard » 2015 de Greenpeace USA[1].

Consommation et sources d'énergie[edit]

Vue d'un serveur de Wikimedia.

Centres de données[edit]

Les serveurs de la fondation Wikimedia sont répartis dans quatre centres de données en colocation en Virginie, au Texas et à San Francisco aux États-Unis et à Amsterdam en Europe. En mai 2016, les serveurs utilisent 222 kW, ce qui équivaut environ à 2 GWh d'énergie électrique par an. En comparaison, un foyer aux États-Unis consomme 11 MWh/an[2], la moyenne pour l'Allemagne est de 3 MWh/an.

Seuls les quelques serveurs d'Amsterdam fonctionnent avec des énergies renouvelables, les autres utilisent un mélange énergétique classique. Globalement, seulement 9 % de l'énergie des centres de données de la fondation Wikimedia provient de sources renouvelables, le reste se partageant entre le charbon, le gaz et l'énergie nucléaire (34 %, 28 % et 28 % respectivement)[1]. La majeure partie de la demande d'électricité du mouvement Wikimédia se situe en Virginie et au Texas, qui ont malheureusement des consommations importantes de combustible fossile.

Nom du serveur Emplacement du centre de données Fournisseur Date
d'ouverture
Consommation énergétique moyenne (kW) Sources d'énergie Empreinte carbone (CO2/an) Option
renouvelable
et coût
eqiad Ashburn, Virginie
20146-20149
États-Unis
Equinix (Site web) février 2011 mai 2016 : 130

mai 2015 : 152

32 % charbon
20 % gaz naturel
25 % nucléaire
17 % renouvelable[3]

1040000 livres = 520 short tons = 470 tonnes

= 0,32 * 130 kW * 8765,76 hr/an * 2.1 lb CO2/kWh pour le charbon[4]
+ 0,20 * 130 kW * 8765,76 hr/an * 1.22lb CO2/kWh pour le gaz naturel[4]
+ 0,25 * 130 kW * 8765,76 hr/an * 0 lb CO2/kWh pour le nucléaire
+ 0,17 * 130 kW * 8765,76 hr/an * 0 lb CO2/kWh pour le renouvelable

En 2015, Equinix a réalisé « un engagement de long terme pour utiliser 100 pour cent d'énergie propre et renouvelable ». En 2017, Equinix a renouvelé sa promesse.
codfw Carrollton, Texas
75007
États-Unis
CyrusOne (Site web) mai 2014 mai 2016 : 77

mai 2015 : 70

23 % de charbon
56 % de gaz naturel
6 % de nucléaire
1 % hydro/biomasse/solaire/autre
14 % éolien (Oncor/Ercot)

790 000 livres = 400 short tons = 360 tonnes

= 0,23 * 77 kW * 8765,76 hr/an * 2.1 lb CO2/kWh pour le charbon[4]
+ 0,56 * 77 kW * 8765,76 hr/an * 1.22lb CO2/kWh pour le gaz naturel[4]
+ 0,06 * 77 kW * 8765,76 hr/an * 0 lb CO2/kWh pour le nucléaire
+ 0,15 * 77 kW * 8765,76 hr/an * 0 lb CO2/kWh pour les renouvelables

?
esams Haarlem
2031 BE
Pays-Bas
EvoSwitch (Site web) décembre 2008 mai 2016 : <10

mai 2015 : 10

"a combination of wind power, hydro and biomass"[5]

0 s/o
ulsfo San Francisco, Californie
94124
États-Unis
UnitedLayer (Site web) juin 2012 mai 2016 : < 5

mai 2015 : < 5

25 % de gaz naturel
23 % de nucléaire
30 % de renouvelable
6 % hydro
17 % non-spécifié (PG&E)[6]

13000 livres = 6,7 short tons = 6,1 tonnes (+ non-spécifié)

= 0,00 * 5 kW * 8765,76 hr/an * 2.1 lb CO2/kWh pour le charbon[4]
+ 0,25 * 5 kW * 8765,76 hr/an * 1.22lb CO2/kWh pour le gaz naturel[4]
+ 0,23 * 5 kW * 8765,76 hr/an * 0 lb CO2/kWh pour le nucléaire
+ 0,36 * 5 kW * 8765,76 hr/an * 0 lb CO2/kWh pour l'hydro/le renouvelable
+ 0,17 * 5 kW * 8765,76 hr/an * ? lb CO2/kWh pour le non-spécifié

?
eqsin Singapore Equinix (Website) ? ? ? ? ?

À faire :

  • mettre à jour l'empreinte carbone des serveurs dès que de nouvelles données sont disponibles

Voyages et événements[edit]

Des milliers de Wikimédiens utilisent l'aviation commerciale pour se rendre aux événements chaque année, ce qui représente une source significative d'émission de carbone. Les émissions de carbone dues aux voyages aériens pour la Wikimania sont estimées à environ 1 874 tonnes de CO2 [7], soit plus du double du CO2 généré pour le fonctionnement des serveurs.

'À faire :

  • estimer l'empreinte carbone des voyages pour la Wikimania et autres conférences
  • discuter des possibilités de réduction de l'empreinte carbone de ces voyages

Bureaux[edit]

Un aperçu du système de ventilation des bureaux de la fondation Wikimedia à San Francisco.

La fondation Wikimedia a un bureau à San Francisco et environ 250 employés[8], environ la moitié des employés sont des travailleurs à distance. Wikimedia Deutschland a un bureau à Berlin avec 77 personnes[9] qui est alimenté par de l'énergie renouvelable[10]. Les autres organisations du mouvement peuvent disposer de bureaux également. On ne connait pas actuellement quels sont leur usage et sources d'énergie.

Nom de l'organisation Emplacement du bureau Nombre d'employés sur place Consommation énergétique annuelle Sources d'énergie Empreinte carbone (CO2/an) Option renouvelable et coût
Fondation Wikimedia San Francisco, États-Unis 2016 : 127 (sur un total de 254) 2015 : 383 MWh (estimé) 25 % de gaz naturel

23 % de nucléaire
30 % de renouvelable
6 % d'hydro
17 % non spécifié
(PG&E)[6]

120000 livres = 58 short tons = 53 tonnes (+ non-spécifié)

= 0,25 * 383000 kWh * 1,22 livres CO2/kWh pour le gaz naturel[4]
+ 0,23 * 383000 kWh * 0 livre CO2/kWh pour le nucléaire
+ 0,36 * 383000 kWh * 0 livre CO2/kWh pour le renouvelables
+ 0,17 * 383000 kWh * ? livre CO2/kWh pour le non-spécifié

PG&E Solar Choice:

~ $ 900/mois

Wikimedia Deutschland Berlin, Allemagne 2017 : 88 2016 : 52 MWh 55 % hydro

46 % renouvelable mélangé (Naturstrom 2015)

0 s/o
Autres organisations Wikimédia (divers) ? ? ? ? ?

À faire :

  • mettre à jour les donnée sur la consommation énergétique des bureaux de la fondation Wikimedia après leur déménagement
  • partager les informations concernant l'usage énergétique des autres bureaux
  • estimer l'empreinte carbone des navetteurs
  • mettre à jour l'empreinte carbone des bureaux dès que de nouvelles données sont disponibles
  • déterminer l'empreinte carbone de la portion non spécifiée de San Francisco

Transparence[edit]

La fondation Wikimedia est relativement transparente sur son impact environnemental comme on peut le voir ci-dessus. Comme elle a rapporté les chiffres clés à Greenpeace USA pour leur rapport « Click Green Scorecard » de 2015, elle est considérée comme un « leader dans la transparence énergétique » dans le secteur d'Internet[11]. À partir de 2018, le plan annuel inclura une déclaration sur l'impact environnemental.

Engagement[edit]

Le 24 février 2017, le conseil d’administration de la fondation Wikimedia a adopté la résolution suivante à la suite de cette initiative :

La fondation Wikimedia s'engage à rechercher des moyens de réduire l'impact de nos activités sur l'environnement. Nous avons pour but de toujours agir de manière autant responsable et soutenable que possible, ce qui passe par une préférence pour les énergies renouvelables pour nos opérations. Nous croyons qu'un engagement à long terme à la soutenabilité est un élément essentiel de notre travail vis-à-vis de la mission et de la vision de Wikimedia.
À cette fin, la fondation Wikimedia prend les engagements suivants :
  • Nous chercherons à minimiser notre impact général sur l'environnement ;
  • Nous considérerons la soutenabilité comme une part importante des décisions au sujet des serveurs, des opérations, des voyages, des bureaux et d'autres approvisionnements ;
  • Nous utiliserons des énergie verte là où elles sont disponibles et raisonnables financièrement ; et
  • À partir de 2018, nous inclurons une déclaration de notre impact environnemental dans notre plan annuel.

Mais…[edit]

L'impact environnemental du mouvement Wikimédia n'est-il pas négligeable ?[edit]

Certains ont indiqué que puisque la dépense énergétique du mouvement Wikimédia était significativement plus faible que celle des autres destinations populaires d'Internet, nous ne devrions pas traiter l'impact environnemental comme un problème. Mais le réchauffement climatique étant une menace pour notre civilisation, toutes les organisations devraient trouver des solutions pour limiter leur empreinte environnementale.

Wikipédia ne remplace-t-il pas les livres imprimés ? Et Wikipédia n'aide-t-il pas assez en éduquant les lecteurs sur les sujets environnementaux ?[edit]

Certains membres de la communauté ont indiqué que Wikipédia pourrait avoir un impact global positif sur l'environnement puisqu'il remplace les encyclopédies imprimées et éduque ses utilisateurs sur les problèmes environnementaux. Cependant, de tels effets indirects sont difficiles à calculer et même s'ils existent, c'est toujours une bonne idée de réduire l'impact négatif de Wikipédia sur l'environnement.

Comment l'initiative est-elle liée à la mission de Wikimédia ?[edit]

Préserver la planète n'est évidemment pas directement lié à la promotion de l'accès à la connaissance. Cependant, en tant que Wikimédiens, nous savons que nous partageons la responsabilité commune de combattre le réchauffement climatique — apprenez-en plus sur Wikipédia.

Que pouvons-nous faire ?[edit]

Être encore plus transparent[edit]

La fondation Wikimedia pourrait publier un rapport de transparence énergétique annuel, similaire à celui qu'elle a déjà publié sur les problèmes de vie privée, qui offre une information à direction du public sur combien d'électricité elle utilise, de quelle sorte de sources l'énergie provient-elle et quelle est son empreinte carbone. La plupart des données nécessaires ont déjà été produites dans le passé. Ce serait un exemple pour l'industrie d'Internet.

  • Statut actuel : À partir de 2018, le plan annuel inclura une déclaration sur l'impact environnemental.
  • Personne clé :

Passer aux énergies vertes[edit]

Lettre à Equinix demandant des détails sur les possibilités d'hébergement verts.

La fondation Wikimedia pourrait travailler avec ses hébergeurs de serveurs pour leur faire savoir qu'elle est intéressée pour se procurer de l'énergie renouvelable lorsque c'est possible, et qu'elle explore les options pour le faire.

  • Statut actuel : en août 2017, la fondation Wikimedia a envoyé des lettres aux prestataires de service qui gèrent les serveurs, CyrusOne et Equinix, afin de leur demander des informations sur les sources d'énergie utilisées par les serveurs.
  • Personne clé : Pamela Swaby, Procurement Manager, Wikimedia Foundation.

Utiliser moins d'énergie et produire moins de déchets[edit]

Utiliser moins d'énergie signifie utiliser des équipements plus efficaces énergétiquement, comme des bâtiments à faible consommation énergétique, moins voyager, et optimiser la capacité des serveurs ainsi que la planification de leurs emplacements[12]. La réduction des déchets comprend le recyclage de plus de vieux matériels et du papier utilisé, par exemple.

  • Statut actuel : Symbol wait.svg En cours… En octobre 2017, la fondation Wikimedia déménage dans un bâtiment certifié LEED[13].
  • Personne clé :

S'engager pour une énergie verte[edit]

La fondation Wikimedia peut s’engager sur le long terme pour s’approvisionner à 100 % en énergies renouvelables. Dans la mesure où cet objectif n’est pas atteignable demain ni, selon toute apparence, dans les deux années à venir, cette ambition constitue pour les fournisseurs et le marché de l’énergie le signal qu’il existe une demande d'énergie renouvelable chez les consommateurs. Annoncer publiquement un objectif aide à montrer au monde quelles sont les intentions du Mouvement, ce qui a souvent de bonnes conséquences. Le premier jet d’un acte d’engagement a été proposé à l’équipe dirigeante en 2015.

  • Statut actuel : après l’envoi d'un premier jet d'un acte d'engagement pour une énergie renouvelable la fondation Wikimedia en août 2015 pour avis, le conseil d’administration de la fondation Wikimedia a adopté une résolution en février 2017 déclarant qu’elle s’engage à chercher des moyens de réduire l’impact de ses activités sur l’environnement.
  • Personne clé : User:Raystorm (María Sefidari), vice-présidente du conseil d’administration de la fondation Wikimedia.

Adopter une stratégie d'investissement dans l'énergie verte[edit]

Lors de la définition des dotations, la Wikimedia Foundation pourrait faire des investissements dans les énergies renouvelables une priorité et/ou éliminer les investissements dans des sources d'énergie non renouvelables.

Une revue de presse montre qu'« il existe en effet des preuves empiriques évidentes d'une corrélation positive entre les performances sociales et financières des entreprises »[14] ; d'autre part, les retours sur investissements des fonds environnementaux des États-Unis ont été aussi importants que ceux des fonds non-éthiques entre 2001 et 2009[15].

  • Statut actuel : Symbol wait.svg En cours… La politique d'investissement préliminaire concernant la dotation de Wikimédia, qui a été adoptée en janvier 2017 par le « Advisory Board » de la dotation, ne tient pas compte des problèmes de durabilité. Cependant, le financement est actuellement investi selon des standards plutôt durables par Tides[16]. En août 2017, des discussions ont débuté pour prendre des mesures en faveur d'une politique d'investissement durable d'ici juin 2018.
  • Personne clé : Lisa Seitz-Gruwell, directrice du développement, Wikimedia Foundation.

Montrez votre soutien[edit]

[$signlink Ajoutez votre signature]

En tant que membre de la communauté, vous pouvez ajouter votre signature ci-dessous pour indiquer que vous êtes en faveur d'une réduction de l'impact environnemental du mouvement Wikimédia. Vous trouverez aussi des Boîtes utilisateur sur Wikipédia en français, ainsi que sur les Wikipedia anglais et allemand.

  1. --Gnom (talk) 18:39, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
  2. --Aubrey (talk) 18:24, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
  3. --Hogü-456 (talk) 07:12, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
  4. --Jopparn (talk) 18:26, 21 February 2016 (UTC) I strongly believe that this is an area where WMF should, and could, do much more.
  5. --User:K9re11 (talk) 18:53, 21 February 2016 (UTC) I consider this to be an area which should be of big importance to Wikipedia.
  6. --Haxpett (talk) 23:15, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
  7. --Myskoxen (talk) 00:34, 23 February 2016 (UTC) Combatting climate change is everyones responsibility! That includes us.
  8. --Ternarius (talk) 22:42, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
  9. --VIGNERON * discut. 09:49, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
  10. --Velella (talk) 23:00, 11 March 2016 (UTC) It would also be good to make informed estimates of the wider additional environmental savings (costs?) that the use of services provided by the WMF deliver globally.
  11. --Salix alba (talk) 00:25, 12 March 2016 (UTC) This really needs pushing. I was disappointed that neither Jimbo, or Lila bothered to reply when i tried to raise the issue.
  12. --Thgoiter (talk) 18:30, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
  13. --Coyote III (talk) 07:48, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
  14. I feel exactly like @Jopparn; many thanks to @Gnom and @Aubrey for starting this page, and do feel free to reach out to me if you need any help. odder (talk) 13:19, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
  15. Shyamal (talk) 15:01, 29 April 2016 (UTC) long long overdue and on par if not more important than several other concerns taken up so far
  16. --Pintoch (talk) 12:26, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
  17. --Blech (talk) 13:11, 20 March 2016 (UTC) Many of the proposals could be realized cost-neutral, I think.
  18. --Danimations (talk) 01:15, 25 March 2016 (UTC) Could there be cases for Wikimedia to establish datacentres in regions where a greater proportion of energy is harnessed from renewable sources? For example, in South Australia?
  19. --TGCP (talk) 10:58, 26 March 2016 (UTC) Iceland has low price of clean electricity and cooling, good internet connection to EU and North America in the future, alhtough not yet. I think Wikimedia's information impact is much bigger than its environmental impact.
  20. --Victorgrigas (talk) 22:41, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
  21. --MichaelSchoenitzer (talk) 16:10, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
  22. --Theredmonkey (talk) 22:04, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
  23. -- FourViolas (talk) 15:02, 27 March 2016 (UTC) As a highly successful nonprofit in the Internet sector, WM has a lot of "soft power". Let's put it to use and set an example.
  24. --brion (talk) Measure twice, cut once. Let's start with the measuring. :)
  25. --Volker E. (talk) 18:58, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
  26. --Milimetric (talk) 20:05, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
  27. --Awjrichards (talk) 00:04, 6 April 2016 (UTC) Yes please, let's start understanding our current impact particularly around travel.
  28. --Ori Livneh (talk) 01:37, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
  29. —M@sssly 08:02, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
  30. Drop the "what can we do part". The very first step is to have a clear picture of emissions. Which are what ISO 14064 or GHG Protocol are for. So until it is measured, that remains unmanageable :-D Antoine "hashar" Musso (talk) 12:00, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
  31. --Mforns (talk) 14:42, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
  32. --Skra31 (talk) 16:13, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
  33. Dimi z (talk) 18:02, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
  34. --Wittylama (talk) 20:28, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
  35. --Thuvack (talk) 12:49, 29 April 2016 (UTC) -- About time we talked about this.
  36. Not so much the servers as the carbon-wasteful travel and accommodation associated with the extraordinary low-impact meetups. Tony (talk) 13:38, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
  37. Increase the impact! Just not in a negative direction. Rich Farmbrough 22:01 29 April 2016 (GMT).
  38. --Itu (talk) 16:17, 5 May 2016 (UTC) .....
  39. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:25, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
  40. --Luke081515 17:27, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
  41. --SammyMajed (talk) 08:49, 27 January 2017 (UTC) This seriously must happen. (I am not on wikimedia, but on wikipedia.)
  42. --Chiara Storti --Nonoranonqui (talk) 21:40, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
  43. --—DerHexer (Talk) 07:03, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
  44. Natuur12 (talk) 19:09, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
  45. --Vituzzu (talk) 13:49, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
  46. --Allan D. Mercant (talk) 19:31, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
  47. --Kritzolina (talk) 19:35, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
  48. --Milad A380 talk 19:38, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
  49. The first step to reducing the carbon footprint is to have public accountability of that footprint, as it is the public who pays for it. Fully support measurement of environmental impact, especially by the major offices around the world, and most importantly travel funded by donors. Then we can have a decent discussion about how to best reduce the footprint. John Vandenberg (talk) 07:14, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
  50. --CristianCantoro (talk) 09:38, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
  51. --Mélanie Huguet (talk) 21:51, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
  52. --John Cummings (talk) 20:33, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
  53. --Rogol Domedonfors (talk) 21:23, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
  54. --Kurt Jansson (talk) 07:00, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
  55. --Slashme (talk) 16:01, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  56. --Hadi (talk) 17:36, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  57. --Cameron11598 (Converse) 17:13, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
  58. --NNW (talk) 09:12, 18 November 2016 (UTC) Do we really need to talk about this? It should be self-evident.
  59. --RudolfSimon (talk) 16:36, 26 November 2016 (UTC) -- super initiative!
  60. --— KPFC💬 17:20, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
  61. -- Freddy2001 talk 22:15, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
  62. --Marcus Cyron (talk) 10:28, 8 December 2016 (UTC) - my support is gone in the moment, this initiative tries to act against Wikimanias, WikiCons etc. Marcus Cyron (talk) 01:21, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
  63. --Nicor (talk) 17:19, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
  64. --Nonformality (talk) 12:45, 9 December 2016 (UTC) If you need a hand measuring twice or slicing once: happy to help.
  65. --Simulo (talk) 20:09, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
  66. --Superbass (talk) 11:06, 12 December 2016 (UTC) Make America green again!
  67. --Mglaser (talk) 11:21, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
  68. --Lampestrasse (talk) 11:23, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
  69. --MB-one (talk) 11:34, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
  70. --WS ReNu (talk) 11:47, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
  71. --Wlanowski (talk) 11:50, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
  72. --Raymond (talk) 11:57, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
  73. --Chris Keating (The Land) (talk) 12:03, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
  74. --— TBhagat (talk) 12:24, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
  75. --Matthias Süßen (talk) 12:53, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
  76. --DCB (talk) 13:03, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
  77. --Achim Raschka (talk) 14:46, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
  78. --Wnme 17:42, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
  79. --FCT Berlin=>?! • 19:48, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
  80. --Lingveno (talk) 10:18, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
  81. --Geolina163 (talk) 23:07, 19 December 2016 (UTC) siehe Superbass ;))
  82. --Enter (talk) 19:09, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
  83. --Pauli-Pirat (talk) 19:12, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
  84. --Atomiccocktail (talk) 23:43, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
  85. --Ireas (talk) 19:54, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
  86. --Kippelboy (talk) 10:06, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
  87. --Schreibvieh (talk) 10:12, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
  88. --Code (talk) 10:33, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
  89. --Austriantraveler (talk) 10:41, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
  90. --MEW (talk) 11:18, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
  91. --Horst Gräbner (talk) 08:10, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
  92. --M.L (talk) 09:02, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
  93. --DasMonstaaa (talk) 15:21, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
  94. --Raboe001 (talk) 10:04, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
  95. --Yarl (talk) 12:18, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
  96. --Olaf Simons (talk) 21:03, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
  97. --Jojoona (talk) 20:07, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
  98. --Daniel Case (talk) 06:51, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
  99. --Jith12 (talk) 15:33, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
  100. --Jarble (talk) 20:20, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
  101. --Danielkueh (talk) 20:56, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
  102. --John Hill (talk) 21:01, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
  103. --Wolbo (talk) 22:21, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
  104. Yes, we should do more here, and this page provides a good overview. -- Daniel Mietchen (talk) 21:24, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
  105. --Johanna-Hypatia (talk) 22:15, 15 January 2017 (UTC) It would be so nice to be able to make a real difference.
  106. --SilentResident (talk) 22:20, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
  107. OhanaUnitedTalk page 22:23, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
  108. --Xzesey (talk) 22:25, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
  109. I believe this is a great thing to do. Wikipedia should set a good example here! Nightwalker-87 (talk) 22:28, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
  110. Great initiative! Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 22:30, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
  111. --Rkmlai (talk) 22:39, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
  112. --Rberchie (talk)Rberchie (talk) 08:41, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
  113. --Plantsurfer (talk) 00:27, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
  114. Please show your commitment to clean, renewable energy and go Solar or Wind to reduce the impact on our environment! Dainomite (talk) 06:24, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
  115. Shocked to see existing situation. Such a progressive movement should be leading in zero-carbon energy consumption, and ditching fossil-fuels by the end of 2017. Fully support this initiative. Simonjon (talk) 07:58, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
  116. --Weneedwikipedia (talk) 10:38, 16 January 2017
  117. Come on, WMF! Do the right thing! :) Eman235/talk 10:58, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
  118. To advance the reduction of evironmental impact from the major websites. Tk420 (talk) 11:31, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
  119. --Johnson487682 17:12, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
  120. - Willybeez (talk) 23:04, 16 January 2017 (WAT)
  121. Fully support! It's a great idea that I'm surprised hasn't already been implemented! Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:08, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
  122. Definitely; I wonder why this has not already been done. --Zenith4237 (talk) 21:18, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
  123. --Hickorypine (talk) 11:56, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
  124. --Mazuritz --Mazuritz (talk) 10:10, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
  125. --Berdea (talk) 10:28, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
    I inform that I have created for the french Wikipedia a user box to promote this project. You can see it here. --Berdea (talk) 13:53, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
  126. --Tyseria (talk) 13:26, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
  127. -- Buaidh  18:29, 18 January 2017 (UTC) professional energy engineer
  128. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 10:30, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
  129. --Jn045 (talk) 08:42, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
  130. --The RedBurn (talk) 21:40, 24 January 2017 (UTC) It can't hurt and it would be good for Wikimedia's image.
  131. --Lämpel (talk) 22:46, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
  132. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 00:16, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
  133. --GerardM (talk) 17:48, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
  134. --Prcc27 (talk) 18:35, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
  135. --Wuselig (talk) 19:42, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
  136. --Cirdan (talk) 22:54, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
  137. --Bestoernesto (talk) 04:51, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
  138. --Blippy1998 (talk) 09:38, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
  139. --Mampato (talk) 18:39, 01 February 2017(UTC)
  140. The Wikimedia Foundation should definitely switch away from fossil-fuel-generated electricity and towards wind, nuclear, solar, hydro, geothermal, etc., and preferably sooner rather than later. Checking in from the English Wikipedia, Whoop whoop pull up (talk) 17:09, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
  141. --w:User:JeffMik1 I show here my commitment to renewable energies.
  142. -AlbBurguete (talk) 00:44, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
  143. --Antón Francho (talk) 01:26, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
  144. --EdgarCabreraFariña (talk) 10:39, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
  145. -- Rexmania (talk) 13:29, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
  146. ----Juandedeboca (talk) 15:40, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
  147. --Geom Habla conmigo 16:04, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
  148. -- JaviDex (talk) 16:54, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
  149. --Super Dromaeosaurus (talk) 17:01, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
  150. --Correogsk or Gustavo (Editrocito or ¡Heme aquí!) 18:59, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
  151. --Pablohn6 (talk) 20:38, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
  152. --RobFK (talk) 16:39, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
  153. --MARC912374 (talk) 18:00, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
  154. --Jerusha Abbott (talk) 19:00, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
  155. --Humberto del Torrejón (talk) 23:56, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
  156. --Yohannvt (talk) 10:33, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
  157. --Matiras (talk) 20:16, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
  158. --Piotrus (talk) 23:36, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
  159. --Ojota (talk) 05:53, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
  160. --Samiclaus (talk) 13:27, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
  161. Jules78120 (talk) 15:05, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
  162. -- GrandCelinien (talk) 16:48, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
  163. --3Jo7 (talk) 16:56, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
  164. 0x010C ~talk~ 09:20, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
  165. --Totodu74 (talk) 09:59, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
  166. --Carlitoscarlos (talk) 14:28, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
  167. -- Archibald Tuttle (talk) 19:24, 5 February 2017 (UTC) Since this canot make things much worse ....
  168. Pamputt (talk) 20:43, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
  169. -- XDamx (talk) 08:13, 6 February 2017 (UTC) Wikipedia/Wikimedia has been changing the world for years, environmental impact is part of it!
  170. X-Javier [m'écrire] 09:22, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
  171. —— DePlusJean (from FR) 23:48, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
  172. --Radwaydenard (talk) 18:55, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
  173. -- Smallbones (talk) 19:21, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
  174. -- Гармонический Мир (talk) 07:50, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
  175. -- Vanamonde93 (talk) 15:50, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
  176. -- DimiTalen (talk) 11:42, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
  177. -- Magere Hein (talk) 11:53, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
  178. -- Ikkenickdanniet (talk) 17:12, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
  179. Grueslayer (talk) 07:40, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
  180. --Wosch21149 (talk) 10:43, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
  181. Épico (talk)/(contribs) 13:13, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
  182. --Hume42 (talk) 13:29, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
  183. Alessandro SILmanda 10:54, 11 Febuary 2017 (UTC-3).
  184. Athena in Wonderland (talk) 15:50, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
  185. Corleoneμη τα μασάς!@ 16:23, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
  186. -- LIVE NIEUWS (talk) 17:19, 11 February 2017 (UTC) 100% SUPPORT!
  187. --Phi (talk) 21:06, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
  188. --Wormke-Grutman (talk) 09:42, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
  189. --UncleMartin (talk) 06:21, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
  190. --ArgonSim (talk) 12:44, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
  191. -- R-5 (talk) 08:31, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  192. --Trebol6 (talk) 23:28, 21 February 2017 (UTC) Freedom is a duty.
  193. Morcius (talk) 10:58, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
  194. --Trident90 (talk) 11:57, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
  195. --V.C. (talk) 12:50, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
  196. Carabus (talk) 13:36, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
  197. --Bahnmoeller (talk) 14:02, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
  198. --Harald Krichel (talk) 14:15, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
  199. --Shumkichi (talk) 17:06, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
  200. --Valerio Bozzolan (talk) 17:37, 22 February 2017 (UTC) Obvious to ask, not so to apply.
  201. --Sng (talk) 19:01, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
  202. Czytelnik Janek (talk) 18:51, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
  203. --Dawidst (talk) 20:11, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
  204. --LukaszM600 (talk) 21:22, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
  205. --Ghilt (talk) 09:36, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
  206. --Andrea014 (talk) 15:02, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
  207. --Jmarchn --Jmarchn (talk) 15:47, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
  208. --Kuba Walczak (talk) 20:09, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
  209. --Neonek12 (talk) 19:41, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
  210. --Denis Apel (talk) 14:32, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
  211. --Interros (talk) 19:09, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
  212. --Galazan (talk) 08:16, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
  213. Leyo (talk) 22:32, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
  214. --Marlus Gancher (talk) 20:01, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
  215. --GroßerHund (talk) 07:41, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
  216. Batorry (talk) 15:47, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
  217. Szoltys (talk) 18:57, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
  218. Tkarcher (talk) 21:54, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
  219. --Ot (talk) 05:39, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
  220. --.js[democracy needed] 00:10, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
  221. Why not Support support this? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 05:33, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
  222. --Codc (talk) 21:15, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
  223. --Annika Möller (talk) 09:30, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
  224. --Leanex77 (talk) 23:53, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
  225. Tesser4D (talk) 11:13, 27 March 2017 (UTC) sounds good to me
  226. --山田晴通 (talk) 01:02, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
  227. Mardetanha talk 15:43, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
  228. Lotje (talk) 16:00, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
  229. Edward M. Nyameri 30 March 2017
  230. --Taweethaも (talk) 10:48, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
  231. Samwalton9 (talk) 16:21, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
  232. Spinster (talk) 16:24, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
  233. --ARipstra (WMF) (talk) 16:27, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
  234. - Sakhalinio (talk) 10:19, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
  235. --FriedhelmW (talk) 18:35, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
  236. --Pimpinellus (talk) – WikiMUC – 18:38, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
  237. --Aquilinae (talk) 18:51, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
  238. -- Catrin (talk) 18:57, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
  239. --Andropov (talk) 19:32, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
  240. --Karl Gruber (talk) 19:52, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
  241. --Albinfo (talk) 20:02, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
  242. SDKmac (talk) 20:20, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
  243. - Sargoth (talk) 20:43, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
  244. --MGChecker (talk) 21:43, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
  245. --I. Berger (talk) 21:54, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
  246. -- User: Perhelion 23:57, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
  247. --LPfi (talk) 08:16, 3 April 2017 (UTC) It is definitely good to get a clear picture, but many measures are well-known and can be taken (and some are already) without more information.
  248. --Morhelluin (talk) 10:35, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
  249. --Haltiamieli (talk) 15:22, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
  250. --ColAflash (talk) 19:09, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
  251. ----Pitxiquin (talk) 02:33, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
  252. --Ptolusque (talk) 16:36, 4 April 2017 (UTC) Free knowledge should be achieved trough sustainable means.
  253. // Martin Kraft (talk) 07:45, 5 April 2017 (UTC) for a project like Wikipedia enviromental sustainability should be a top priority
  254. I love free knowledge, but I also love a cleaner and greener environment. --Pokéfan95 (talk) 10:27, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  255. --George Ho (talk) 16:25, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  256. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:07, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
  257. --Athikhun.suw (talk) 06:47, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
  258. Rollingcontributor (talk) 10:13, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
  259. --h-stt !? 14:09, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
  260. --Eclipsis Proteo (talk) 15:32, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
  261. --Sol de Mayo de la Libertad.gif AnselmiJuan (discusión) 18:55, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
  262. --Arandu Y.M. (talk) 20:24, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
  263. --LiterallySimon (talk) 22:57, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
  264. --30greenmcrfan (talk) 04:07, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
  265. --Ce Ele 415 (talk) 14:22, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
  266. -- ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 16:27, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
  267. --Raimundo Pastor (talk) 17:05, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
  268. Rübenkopf (talk) 07:35, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
  269. --Framawiki (talk) 18:41, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
  270. --FocalPoint (talk) 18:46, 13 April 2017 (UTC) I fully support minimizing the environmental impact of Wikimedia
  271. Windino (talk) 19:20, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
  272. I am surprised this was organized only in 2016.--Alexmar983 (talk) 04:58, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
  273. Taketa (talk) 06:50, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
  274. HenriDuvent (talk) 09:11, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
  275. --Luisalvaz (talk) 14:59, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
  276. --Lichinga (talk) 15:18, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
  277. --Flixtey (talk) 16:25, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
  278. --Margott (talk) 17:16, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
  279. FeuVertClignotant.gif --Acer11 (talk) 17:17, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
  280. --Rosiestep (talk) 19:56, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
  281. --Liridon (talk) 20:25, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
  282. --Tanweer (talk) 20:42, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
  283. --Superjuju10 [Aubline available to you], 21:18, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
  284. NickK (talk) 22:19, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
  285. petrohs (gracias) 05:51, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
  286. Alvaro Molina ( - ) 06:20, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
  287. --Geugeor (talk) 10:31, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
  288. Fhala.K (talk) 17:46, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
  289. --Netha Hussain (talk) 10:42, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
  290. Bishdatta (talk) 15:42, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
  291. --EEIM (talk) 01:37, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
  292. - Stephane (talk) 16:56, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
  293. -- Anthere (talk) 08:13, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
  294. -- Michaelphoya (talk) 19:22, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
  295. --TimeWaitsForNobody (talk) 07:09, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
  296. --Julian Fischer (WMDE) (talk) 08:01, 20 April 2017 (UTC) Great initiative!
  297. --[[kgh]] (talk) 19:41, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
  298. YourEyesOnly (talk) 07:19, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
  299. TheDJ (talkcontribs) 16:13, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
  300. ---Zaddica (talk) 22:04, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
  301. --Thepwnco (talk) 15:28, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
  302. Stepro (talk) 02:03, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
  303. Bastenbas (talk) 23:13, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
  304. --Арсений1 (talk) 08:37, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
  305. --JonskiC (talk) 17:39, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
  306. --Braaark (talk) 20:45, 6 May 2017 (UTC) This is absolutely crucial.
  307. --Mosellaender (talk) 10:03, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
  308. --Kolossos (talk) 16:11, 5 June 2017 (UTC) Strong support. A world with free knowledge, but destroyed climate makes no sense.
  309. --Mag678 (talk) 19:31, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
  310. --Pols12 (talk) 14:20, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
  311. -- Symbol strong support vote.svg Strong support, Emha (talk) 19:35, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
  312. --Suzelfe (talk) 08:54, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
  313. --Nightflyer (talk) 18:12, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
  314. --AxelHH (talk) 21:59, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
  315. --A ri gi bod (talk)____Wikimedia Foundation should vote to support local publicly-owned, non-profit electric power agencies, municipalities and cities world-wide.
  316. --Daylen (talk) 22:59, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
  317. --Abhinav619 (talk) 16:49, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
  318. Rozmador [Talk] 00:02, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
  319. ~Cybularny Speak? 10:57, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
  320. Romaine (talk) 13:33, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
  321. ~ Moheen (keep talking) 18:12, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
  322. --Jetam2 (talk) 15:06, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
  323. --Rlbberlin (talk) 15:11, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
  324. MusikAnimal talk 15:17, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
  325. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 15:18, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
  326. --FULBERT (talk) 15:20, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
  327. --Incabell (talk) 15:46, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
  328. --Tdslk (talk) 17:41, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
  329. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 23:48, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
  330. -- Toblu (talk) 07:04, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
  331. --Xlynx (talk) 09:28, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
  332. Anasuyas (talk) 17:02, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
  333. Ivana Guslarevic (talk) 09:23, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
  334. --Frhdkazan (talk) 14:29, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
  335. --Sarcelles (talk) 17:31, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
  336. Skull33 (talk) 10:36, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
  337. --Helmoony (talk) 20:54, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
  338. Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:39, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
  339. --Kogge (talk) 10:40, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
  340. --Don-kun (talk) 10:27, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
  341. MisterSynergy (talk) 14:58, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
  342. I strongly support this initiative, and feel we should seek to dramatically reduce long-distance travel, as well as greening server power — OwenBlacker (Talk) 08:21, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
  343. Barnos (talk) 15:45, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
  344. 22mikpau (talk) 00:32, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
  345. Libcub (talk) 03:37, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
  346. Boundarylayer (talk)
  347. Fredlyfish4 (talk) 23:22, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
  348. Ammarpad (talk) 08:09, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
  349. Symbol strong support vote.svg Strong support Zazpot (talk) 16:32, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
  350. XanonymusX (talk) 10:27, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
  351. MeegsC (talk) MeegsC (talk) 08:14, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
  352. Trizek from FR 15:28, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
  353. --Theo Oppewal (talk) 13:14, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
  354. alkab Talk 21:57, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
  355. --Didi43 (talk) 13:33, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
  356. --Andol (talk) 20:22, 22 October 2017 (UTC) I strongly support this initiative. We all share the same responsibility for our planet and our shared future on it.
  357. -- Discostu (talk) 10:34, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
  358. --Stefanos Stefanos (talk) 23:21, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
  359. == Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:26, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
  360. --Schniggendiller (talk) 09:19, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
  361. Umweltheizung
  362. Support Support Dexxor (talk) 14:56, 05 December 2017
  363. Support Support Join Sustainable Web Design Community (W3C) Jonathan.renoult (talk) 14:40, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
  364. --Chinmayisk (talk) 13:50, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
  365. --Jamez42 (talk) 15:06, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
  366. --M kutera (talk) 00:52, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
  367. --Ute Erb (talk) 21:43, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
  368. Symbol strong support vote.svg Strong support --Ejowan (talk) 15:31, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
  369. Support Support --1971markus (talk) 12:52, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
  370. --Varina (talk) 22:01, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
  371. Support Support --Djiboun (talk) 17:40, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
  372. (talk) 00:15, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
  373. Support Support --Niridya (talk) 22:03, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
  374. Jonaes02 (talk) 11:30, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
  375. Rosarinagazo (talk) 17:09, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
  376. --Bubo 20:28, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
  377. Antimuonium U wanna talk? 16:58, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  378. --Ballerdix (talk) 5:13, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  379. -- Gustavf (talk) 16:48, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
  380. --EBjune (WMF) (talk) 22:35, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
  381. --Oceanpark123456 (talk) 08:56, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
  382. --Paolo Nota (talk) 10:43, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
  383. --Eecem1 (talk) 10:53, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
  384. --Nikolas129 (talk) 10:54, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
  385. --Eefz90 (talk) 10:57, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
  386. --Ilka5 (talk) 21:55, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
  387. --Zaramisch85 (talk) 22:04, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
  388. --Khagan1993 (talk) 22:06, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
  389. --Bobhavoc (talk) 10:38, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
  390. --Jurii (talk) 18:58, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
  391. SPQRobin (talk) 15:54, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
  392. Blervis (talk) 12:09, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
  393. Tiputini (talk) 09:34, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
  394. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 12:07, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
  395. --Skvjold (talk) would be excited to partner with you in this effort - I am part of the Bay Area Chapter of the Climate Reality Project lead by Al Gore. 06:42, 23 April 2018 (PST)
  396. Zeetendra ») 15:50, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
  397. Symbol strong support vote.svg Strong support GregRundlett (talk) 17:45, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
  398. --Daniele Pugliesi (talk) 02:55, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
  399. --Epìdosis 19:58, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
  400. Sboccia (talk) 21:25, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
  401. --Ombra 09:37, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
  402. --g (talk) 22:09, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
  403. --Nicolabel (talk) 00:37, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
  404. --Djhé (talk) 05:40, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
  405. --Bingobingolotto (talk) 06:50, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
  406. --#Reaper (talk) 17:35, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
  407. --Abbad (talk) 08:56, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
  408. BCampbell (WMF) (talk) 18:01, 16 July 2018 (UTC)


Historique et prolongements[edit]

Précédentes discussions et initiatives[edit]

Gnom présenta cette initiative à la Wikimedia Conference 2016...
... ainsi qu'à la Wikimedia Conference 2017.

À propos de cette initiative[edit]

  • Greenpeace USA a publié son rapport « Click Clean Scorecard » en juin 2015. Sur une demande de Greenpeace, l'équipe de communication de la fondation Wikimédia a fournit de manière confidentielle les données sur la consommation énergétique des serveurs de Wikimédia.
  • L'initiative actuelle a été démarré par Aubrey en juillet 2015 dans un sujet de wikimedia-l qui s'intitule « Environmental impact of Wikipedia ». Cette page a été créée par Gnom en juillet 2015.
  • Les discussions initiales avec l'équipe de la fondation Wikimédia (incluant l'équipe C-level et les membres du bureau) ont pris place à la Wikimania en juillet 2015.
  • Une discussion sur la consommation énergétique des serveurs de Wikimédia intitulée « Reducing the environmental impact of the Wikimedia movement » a eu lieu sur la liste de discussion wikitech-l en mars 2016. Une discussion sur cette initiative a eu lieu sur le groupe Facebook « Wikimedia Weekly » en avril 2016. Par ailleurs, l'initiative a été présentée à la conférence Wikimédia en avril 2016 et à la Wikimania 2017.
  • Les informations à propos de la consommation d'énergie des serveurs de Wikimédia ont été d'abord publiées en avril 2016 avec l'aide de l'équipe de communication de la fondation Wikimédia.

Prochaines étapes[edit]

  • Actuellement, nous examinons la faisabilité et le coût de l'approvisionnement en énergies renouvelables des sites des serveurs Wikimedia aux États-Unis. Toute aide concernant cette estimation sera très appréciée !

Références[edit]

  1. a b (English) Greenpeace USA: Click Clean Scorecard: Key Findings & Scores Explained, 2015, page 43.
  2. (English) Inside Energy: How Much Electricity Do You Use Each Month?
  3. "Green Data Centers". www.equinix.com. Retrieved 2016-04-07. 
  4. a b c d e f g "How much carbon dioxide is produced per kilowatthour when generating electricity with fossil fuels? - FAQ - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)". Retrieved 2017-01-16. 
  5. "Environment". www.evoswitch.com. Retrieved 2016-04-06. 
  6. a b "Clean Energy Solutions". www.pge.com. Retrieved 2016-04-07. 
  7. Voir la page de discussion.
  8. (English) https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Template:STAFF-COUNT
  9. Équipe de Wikimedia Deutschland web de l'équipe, consulté le 10 juillet 2015.
  10. (Deutsch) "Wikimedia oder: Bildung für jedermann", energiezukunft no. 15, p. n5.
  11. (English) Greenpeace USA: Click Clean Scorecard: Key Findings & Scores Explained, 2015, page 11.
  12. https://ganglia.wikimedia.org/latest/ montre que les CPUs du cluster sont utilisés à 9 % en moyenne, mais c'est seulement une partie de l'histoire.
  13. Jaime Villagomez: "Wikimedia Foundation Office Move". Wikimedia-l, 21 September 2017.
  14. doi:10.1007/s10551-008-9894-x
  15. doi:10.1007/s10551-011-0865-2
  16. Wikimedia Endowment#Sustainability ratings of Endowment investments.