User talk:SHB2000/Archives/2024

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki

RFCs

Please do not wikikawyer, or think that you have the position of lead prosecutor or rebutter of commentary. You put forward your proposal, and you need to leave it there and allow people to have their points of view. It is not yours to curate, and you end up feeding the trolls. IMO don't over invest, it doesn't help.  — billinghurst sDrewth 00:19, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Are you talking about Special:Diff/26142880? That was removed by Steinbach, not me (an action which I do support but wouldn't do myself). It's a bit of a reach to call something wikilawyering for something I did not do. SHB2000 (talk | contribs) 00:51, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
But if you're considering my reply to other oppose voters, I think it's more than reasonable to rebut something. It is an RfC, which is for discussing things. It isn't a discussion if the proposer can't rebut, especially if it's directed at them. --SHB2000 (talk | contribs) 00:55, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
In saying that, I will step back from the RfC for my own wellbeing. --SHB2000 (talk | contribs) 00:58, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
I am talking about your commentary on everyone's opinion (and just from looking at the history of the page, without burying myself within it). IMO it is a really poor practice and very combative. You are entitled to raise the RFC, and to have your opinion. What gives you the right to think that you can comment or challenge other's opinions? How would you feel if the roles were reversed? Others don't have independent minds and points of views?  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:17, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
I never claimed I had the right to "challenge" other's opinions. --SHB2000 (talk | contribs) 21:25, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: SHB2000 (talk | contribs) 01:20, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

Just a quick thank you

I don't normally respond to opposes, but I just wanted to thank you for your candid comment — I really appreciate honest feedback, and I entirely understand and respect your position. I hope in time I am able to rebuild the trust. Kind regards — TheresNoTime (talk • they/them) 11:15, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

Hi, TheresNoTime, thank you for the message! I believe this nomination will pass, but if it didn't I'd definitely support you if there are no issues by around June (which is long enough) were there no additional issues. All the best, --SHB2000 (talk | contribs) 11:17, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: SHB2000 (talk | contribs) 04:03, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

Civility warnings

Hi! When leaving messages like this, it's best to provide a link to the diff you're referencing. Not doing so makes it harder for others to verify it, and weakens your message. Regards, Vermont (🐿️🏳️‍🌈) 15:05, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

@Vermont: Sure thing and thanks for the reminder. --SHB2000 (talk | contribs) 21:48, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: SHB2000 (talk | contribs) 01:05, 2 May 2024 (UTC)