User talk:Tegel/Archive/2015

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki

Archive for 2015


Wikimedia Forum

Why undo i question re meta not using global blocks, no comment given on undo

I have replied on Wikimedia Forum. Keep the question in one place only. -- Tegel (Talk) 18:02, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Did update re blocking, how can you request unblock from global for enwiki if enwiki is blocked. arbcom cant even be accessed either.

Proxy on brwiki

Hi,

Until now, nobody used proxies for vandalism on the breton Wikipedia (brwiki) so no one cares about them. But as you have seen, right now, someone is actually using proxies to change other people’ messages. Is there something to do to block all proxies IP on brwiki ?

Cdlt, VIGNERON * discut. 21:34, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Open proxys has different IP-addresses so there is no function to block them all. They have to be blocked one by one. Often when we find Open Proxys we block the globally, so then they are blocked on brwiki as well. If you find Open Proxys you can report them on Steward requests/Global so we can plate a global block on them. -- Tegel (Talk) 21:41, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, thank you for your answer. Cdlt, VIGNERON * discut. 21:57, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please

This page User:Russavia@global is used here. Please, could you let the link for future reference?. Thanks --The Photographer (talk) 17:21, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There shouldn't be a user page for a non-existing account. I put a note on this on your talk page. -- Tegel (Talk) 17:24, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I understand, however, this page is mentioned in a log blocking a user, it is important to make the link for future reference. --The Photographer (talk) 17:26, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The link works from RC and other places, not just from CentralAuth. We can't create user pages for all non-existing accounts. I suggest that you create a case in Phabricator so the link from CentralAuth go to some suitable place. -- Tegel (Talk) 17:31, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, thanks --The Photographer (talk) 18:12, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

the pressure cooker

Att vara under en tryckkokare under snart ett år, är lång tid för att vara "i affekt"! Känn dig fri att permabanna alla mina konton. Det är nog bäst för alla att dörrarna är väl stängda! -- Innocent bystander (talk) 12:44, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi wi

The person associated with this account is doing so illegally he is using my phone his name is Robert and he has been hacking in my sites hiding behind my emails chemini505@gmail.com. I will be going to fbi reporting him he is sex disgusting he goes by kocfo96 and horny41 he is sick dude he hacked in my stuff cause I found out what he was doing he is a cyber stalker

Who are you referring to? And why are you letting this Robert use your phone? -- Tegel (Talk) 18:01, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Block

Hello Tegel. Thank you for this.--Calak (talk) 13:22, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request

Hello, time has ended [1]--6AND5 (talk) 15:29, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Not to be picky, but there is a couple of hours left. -- Tegel (Talk) 17:21, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


IP 146.0.32.85

Hallo Tegel,

Sorry, ich kann kein Schwedisch, aber Du hast folgendes veranlasst, was auch auf die deutesche Wiki wirkt, also hoffe ich, dass Du auch Deutsch verstehst:

Du bist aus dem folgenden Grund nicht berechtigt, die Seite zu bearbeiten:

Deine IP-Adresse wurde auf allen Wikis gesperrt.

Die Sperre wurde durchgeführt von Tegel (meta.wikimedia.org). Die angegebene Begründung ist Open proxy.

   Beginn der Sperre: 15:44, 25. Mai 2014
   Ablauf der Sperre: 15:44, 25. Mai 2015

Deine aktuelle IP-Adresse ist 146.0.32.85. Bitte gib alle obigen Details in allen gemachten Anfragen an.

Ich halte das für den völlig falschen Weg. Vandalismus ist ein eigenständiges Problem und macht sich nicht an IP-Adressen fest. Ich weiss nicht, wie es bei Dir in Schweden ist, aber viele in Deutschland möchten einfach nicht, dass Persönlichkeitsprofile über sie erstellt werden (können), und haben trotzdem wertvolle Beiträge zur Wiki zu leisten.

Bei uns gibt es ein schönes Sprichwort: "Wie es in den Wald hineinschallt, so schallt es heraus" Meine Lebenserfahrung bestätigt dies. Wenn Du offen und ehrlich handelst, begegnen Dir die anderen ebenso.

Somit die Anregung: Denk einmal unbefangen darüber nach, was Dir im Leben wichtig ist, wie Du am liebsten von anderen angenommen werden möchtest.

Es würde mich freuen, Dir damit einen kleinen Anstoß zu weniger Datenkontrolle und mehr Vertrauen in das Gute und Wertvolle der Menschen geben zu können.

Lieben Gruß sendent Falk von Falkenstein

Hi. No open proxies is a policy and an IP-address can be blocked just by being an open proxy, but in this case the proxy has been used for vandalism as well. So for that reason it's been blocked. Based on the vandalism that has come from this open proxy I have no intention to remove the block. -- Tegel (Talk) 14:51, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Global block of 46.119.77.79

Hi, you globally blocked 46.119.77.79 - I suspect that 176.8.179.37 (contributions on en.wp) and 134.249.208.6 (contributions on en.wp) are the same person. --Redrose64 (talk; at English Wikipedia) 17:17, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Yes, probably the same user, so I gave the other IP-addresses the same treatment. Thanks for reporting it. -- Tegel (Talk) 17:35, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

The Strategy Barnstar
For your contributions to the 2015 Strategy Consultation. Philippe Beaudette, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 06:25, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User talk protection

Hi, could you be so kind and semiprotect my user talk again, for a longish period? The only thing that ever happens on it is Wikinger vandalism. Thanks, – Fut.Perf. 14:36, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

requesting for bot approval

can you approve some of bot request? I requested with others but none of them are active.-Mr wikilover (talk) 10:54, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

192.36.199.133

I saw you globally locked 192.36.199.133, but the user also uses the IP 192.36.199.130, can you block that one too? --AmaryllisGardener talk 23:27, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thanks for letting me know. -- Tegel (Talk) 06:05, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

deletion

Hey why did you deleted my article?????— The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mehdihasan1125 (talk)

Hi. Because it is off-topic material for this wiki, Meta. This is not a wiki for articles. Check out Wikipedia instead. -- Tegel (Talk) 18:21, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Tegel, especially if a user is new and poorly informed, as appears in this case, en.Wikiversity is a better place to suggest, it is far more inclusive and will support a user learning how to create articles. (We have even supported children, one user was 7 and what he was writing looked like nonsense or vandalism. He is now a WMF sysop, so it works.) The user will often be guided to do the work in their own user space, with move to mainspace later if the page becomes usable as an educational resource. Creating articles on Wikipedia without knowing the myriads of rules to be followed can be highly frustrating. Thanks. --Abd (talk) 15:51, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. You are free to recommend the user another alternative. Since the user account was created on en.wiki, and that it's the biggest and most well known wiki, it's easy to assume that it was there the user wanted to contribute. -- Tegel (Talk) 12:21, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your opinion

please view this. --Դեմ խմբակային իշխանությանը (talk) 15:29, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have review and I come to the same conclusion as Avi. -- Tegel (Talk) 16:43, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Hi, have the technical ability to block a global account at the request of the participant?--6AND5 (talk) 21:14, 13 May 2015 (UTC) Hi,[reply]

No. This is not what the block tool is used for. If you don't want to participate any more, just log out and don't login. Why not just take a windbreak and return later? -- Tegel (Talk) 19:26, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This is a big problem for you?--6AND5 (talk) 19:46, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Or I have to do every day vandalism?--6AND5 (talk) 19:54, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Photo-vandalism

Hi Tegel! Could you, please, help here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Domace_govedo.jpg This is an obvious vandalism, because the title of the photo means "domestic cattle" (!?) Thanks, Maestro Ivanković (talk) 15:01, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I'm not an admin on Commons, so I can't delete the image. I have marked the image for a speedy deletion, so a local admin will take care of it shortly. I have locked the account that uploaded the images as a vandalism-only account. -- Tegel (Talk) 15:07, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please unblock me

please unblock me I was doing a school project and if I can`t use Wikipedia I can`t finish it from the site I were on

The block has expired, so there is nothing for me to do. -- Tegel (Talk) 13:05, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Privacy policy/az

Can you get back in the mine. Edits Templates fled the translation. :) --Uğurkenttalk 10:50, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think I got it right. Translation pages can be difficult to fix sometimes. -- Tegel (Talk) 11:36, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked from id.wikipedia without reason

Hello, I am SuperWindows, an Italian Wikipedia user. Yesterday, I went on the id.wikipedia to make a correction, and I was blocked with this reason: "Inappropriate username". I would like to know how to appeal my block. Best regards. --SuperWindows (talk) 09:04, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The best way is if you appeal your block on your talk page on id.wikipedia. -- Tegel (Talk) 10:13, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, I am following your advice. --SuperWindows (talk) 11:37, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Global.css

Hi, Tegel. Can you fix it? I do not hardly guess that would work. :) --Uğurkenttalk 14:28, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No, I would consider it to be a spam-link, so it's now deleted. -- Tegel (Talk) 16:56, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Block

Hi, i've Got a problem. Im texting form a Phone because on pc five minuts ago i found my IP blocked. I have dynamic ip and probably it has been used by someone elementy on the afternoon. Could you fix this? Mix321 (talk) 20:57, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DanielTom19 and more

Hi Tegel, tonight I must have block usernames such as DanielTom11, DanielTom17, DanielTom18, DanielTom19 on Wikiquote, yet they keep coming. Now I wonder if there is something more we can do, such as block a range of IP addresses? -- Mdd (talk) 00:02, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I'll see if I can find anything suitable. -- Tegel (Talk) 00:11, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Global CSS/JS migration

Hello Tegel. You have global scripts in User:Tegel/global.js, which you import using your local JS pages. Since August 2014, your global.js and global.css pages are loaded automatically on all wikis. Although you requested cleanup via GlobalCssJs, there are still several pages left like da:User:Tegel/common.js. Do you want me to fix this by removing the imports from your local pages using Synchbot (without changing any other content)? —Pathoschild 02:18, 07 July 2015 (UTC)

vandalism in classical Chinese wp

the article zh-classical:二〇一五年 was replace text with japanese character by IP user again and again. please block him, and set the page semi-protected.thank you.--122.90.98.35 12:36, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:68.106.15.33

Hi, I just wanted to point 68.106.15.33 out to you - it appears to be the same person as 70.162.224.240 (currently blocked), 68.106.15.33, etc, who you've been repeatedly blocking for a while now. They have the same ISP, same location and same style of editing.

I hope this is an acceptable place to bring this up. Let me know if somewhere else would be better. :) - Nikki (talk) 05:14, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On a related note, 101.176.133.6's block expired and they're doing exactly the same thing as they were before. - Nikki (talk) 07:33, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It looks like 68.106.15.33 is now 24.251.27.201. - Nikki (talk) 13:58, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. I'm on vacation at the moment with limited internet access. If you think that there is enough for a global block you can place a request at Steward requests/Global and someone will take care of it. -- Tegel (Talk) 14:03, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Erasing File:LRC Logo gold.jpg

Hi Tegel, yesterday I uploaded this file to use it in wikipedia. It's a development of another but now old logo which is uploaded on mediawiki too (File:Worldsymbol.gif) Please explain the deletion while worldsymbol.gif is in use. An information before erasing files would be a friendly way. Thank you Andro x

The file was uploaded to www.mediawiki.org, the wiki used to document the Mediawiki software. Images uploaded there can only be used on that wiki. If you are using Commonist to upload images, check the settings so it upload images to Wikimedia Commons. It has happen in the past that when users upgrade the software it changes the settings to upload images on www.mediawiki.org. -- Tegel (Talk) 12:18, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thank you - the dividing line between the projects is not so easy to recognize. Andro x (talk) 21:33, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:bogic

Hi, what do I do to unlock my account. My IP 178.162.216.36. Bogic (talk) 17:49, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have changed the global block so you can login with your account. -- Tegel (Talk) 17:56, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

IP 31.61.141.45

Hello, you explain to me why you blocked me the opportunity to edit the Wikipedia namely plwiki ??? Or I do not know if it was you because once I edit and later , I received information about the blockade. TharonXX (talk) 14:42, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The block has nothing to do with you. The reason for the block is to stop a long time vandal from vandalising. It's related to this: Global block of Orange ranges (2015)/pl/Global block of Orange ranges (2015)/en. The user switched to your ISP so we had to place a short block for that ISP as well. I have modified the block so you can login with your account. -- Tegel (Talk) 14:48, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

How can we improve Wikimedia grants to support you better?

Hi! The Wikimedia Foundation would like your input on how we can reimagine Wikimedia Foundation grants to better support people and ideas in your Wikimedia project.

After reading the Reimagining WMF grants idea, we ask you to complete this survey to help us improve the idea and learn more about your experience. When you complete the survey, you can enter to win one of five Wikimedia globe sweatshirts!

In addition to taking the the survey, you are welcome to participate in these ways:

This survey is in English, but feedback on the discussion page is welcome in any language.

With thanks,

I JethroBT (WMF), Community Resources, Wikimedia Foundation.

(Opt-out Instructions) This message was sent by I JethroBT (WMF) (talk · contribs) through MediaWiki message delivery. 01:24, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Last call for WMF grants feedback!

Hi, this is a reminder that the consultation about Reimagining WMF grants is closing on 8 September (0:00 UTC). We encourage you to complete the survey now, if you haven't yet done so, so that we can include your ideas.

With thanks,

I JethroBT (WMF), Community Resources, Wikimedia Foundation.

(Opt-out Instructions) This message was sent by I JethroBT (WMF) (talk · contribs) through MediaWiki message delivery. 19:09, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is a message from the Wikimedia Foundation. Translations are available.

As you may know, the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees approved a new "Access to nonpublic information policy" on 25 April 2014 after a community consultation. The former policy has remained in place until the new policy could be implemented. That implementation work is now being done, and we are beginning the transition to the new policy.

An important part of that transition is helping volunteers like you sign the required confidentiality agreement. All Wikimedia volunteers with access to nonpublic information are required to sign this new agreement, and we have prepared some documentation to help you do so.

The Wikimedia Foundation is requiring that anyone with access to nonpublic information sign the new confidentiality agreement by 15 December 2015 (OTRS users have until 22 December 2015) to retain their access. You are receiving this email because you have access to nonpublic information and are required to sign the confidentiality agreement under the new policy.

Signing the confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information is conducted and tracked using Legalpad on Phabricator. The general confidentiality agreement is now ready, and the OTRS agreement will be ready after 22 September 2015. We have prepared a guide on Meta-Wiki to help you create your Phabricator account and sign the new agreement: Confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information/How to sign

If you have any questions or experience any problems while signing the new agreement, please visit this talk page or email me (gvarnum(_AT_)wikimedia.org). Again, please sign this confidentiality agreement by 15 December 2015 (OTRS users have until 22 December 2015) to retain your access to nonpublic information. If you do not wish to retain this access, please let me know and we will forward your request to the appropriate individuals.

Thank you,
Gregory Varnum (User:GVarnum-WMF), Wikimedia Foundation

Posted by the MediaWiki message delivery 23:33, 15 September 2015 (UTC) • TranslateGet help

Please block 113.80.38.145 in classical Chinese wp

Vandalism only IP, he empties articles [4], or create no meanful contexts [5]. Maybe he is the cross wiki abuse user User:Xiechaoqin.--122.90.85.101 10:15, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

the IP user [119.230.252.246] vadal classical Chinese wp again

He has been block by you, and now he come to vadal the article 二〇一六年 again [6] (continuous addition of text in Japanese). In addition, it's better to set the article semi-protected.--122.90.101.143 09:56, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I have semi-protected the page. The drawback is that you can't edit the page, but if you create an account you can edit the page after 4 days. -- Tegel (Talk) 12:10, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of my talk page

In regards to your reason for doing this, I understand. You banned the editor who edited on my talk page. I just want you to know that I received an email notification about this with the exact wording of the post. And if it is pertinent to anything, that post was in response to a CFD I submitted at the English Wikipedia article Philip Anthony Roberts. So, that editor is still active on English Wikipedia, at least. Maile66 (talk) 15:37, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is a message from the Wikimedia Foundation. Translations are available.

I wanted to follow-up on an message I sent you in September regarding the need for you to sign a confidentiality agreement by 15 December 2015 (OTRS users have until 31 December 2015) in order to maintain your access from Wikimedia to nonpublic information.

As you may know, the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees approved a new "Access to nonpublic information policy" on 25 April 2014 after a community consultation. The former policy has remained in place until the new policy could be implemented. That implementation work is now being done, and we are transitioning to the new policy.

An important part of that transition is helping volunteers like you sign the required confidentiality agreement. All Wikimedia volunteers with access to nonpublic information are required to sign this new agreement, and we have prepared some documentation to help you do so.

The Wikimedia Foundation is requiring that anyone with access to nonpublic information sign the new confidentiality agreement by 15 December 2015 (OTRS users have until 31 December 2015) to retain their access. You are receiving this message because you have access to nonpublic information and are required to sign the confidentiality agreement under the new policy. If you do not sign the new confidentiality agreement by 15 December 2015, you will lose your access to nonpublic information.

Signing the confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information is conducted and tracked using Legalpad on Phabricator. We have prepared a guide on Meta-Wiki to help you create your Phabricator account and sign the new agreement: Confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information/How to sign

If you have any questions or experience any problems while signing the new agreement, please visit this talk page or email me (gvarnum(_AT_)wikimedia.org). Again, please sign this confidentiality agreement by 15 December 2015 (OTRS users have until 31 December 2015) to retain your access to nonpublic information. If you do not wish to retain this access, please let me know and we will forward your request to the appropriate individuals.

Thank you,
Gregory Varnum (User:GVarnum-WMF), Wikimedia Foundation

Posted by the MediaWiki message delivery 08:11, 16 October 2015 (UTC)TranslateGet help[reply]

template import request

{{helpme}}

Hi,

At this rfc discussion at wikimedia forum during my discussion to seek proper clarifications, I had to use en:w:Template:specify and en:w:Template:which.

Undersigned kindly requests your help in importing en:w:Template:specify and en:w:Template:which templates from en wikipedia to meta.

thanks and regards.

Mahitgar (He who knows ,wants to know and and loves to keep others informed) (talk) 05:32, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ip unblock'

Please REPLY to my unblock request of a range M7 blocked. Please do it and I will stop NOW. --166.172.57.132 19:51, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What are you saying? What will you do if I don't reply on the request? -- Tegel (Talk) 19:52, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
just freaking review it. I ain't doin nothin till u review the request. U can block me all u want anonymously. --166.172.57.132 23:55, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
A review is done, but I don't think that you like the result. -- Tegel (Talk) 00:38, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I don't and thanks for being a nitwit to my friend ip who is in da range. --170.185.83.19 15:33, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I reviewed the contributions from that range and come to the conclusion the block is the correct way to protect Wikipedia and the other projects from vandalism. Your friend is welcome back with good contributions when the block has expired. -- Tegel (Talk) 17:31, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Tegel just PLEASE fucking unblock him. He promised he will edit constructively. He is a fan of the New York Islanders and Oakland Raiders. For fucksake please unblock him. --166.137.98.160 11:51, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

my request

Please reply there and please unblock them instead of being a dumb twat. --170.185.83.19 17:12, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't help users that calls me names so I will not do anything regarding that block. I leave that up to other users to decide on. If you continue to be rude you will be blocked from Meta as well. -- Tegel (Talk) 17:17, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Please review it --170.185.83.19 17:29, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I have reviewed it before and you didn't like the answer then. Do you really want me to look at it again? I don't think so. -- Tegel (Talk) 17:31, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes but dot make me mad and want to rant. Just unblock them for fuck sake. --170.185.83.19 20:00, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

England, England, England

Du kan väl hålla ögonen på sv:Special:Bidrag/Swave_2 som ännu bara håller till hos oss på svwp. En användare med ganska samma intresse blev globalt blockerad för ett tag sedan. Någon åtgärd på svwp var dock aldrig aktuell. -- Innocent bystander (talk) 14:24, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Användaren i fråga verkar återkomma oregelbundet med sina bidrag, men någonting att hålla koll på. Det tidigare kontot är inget som jag just nu kommer ihåg. Det kanske var när jag var borta en vecka. -- Tegel (Talk) 18:15, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet?

Hi Please what you think about thoses users Michael.Klemp and Ahim1947? --Grind24 (talk) 20:40, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I would guess that it's one person that has two accounts. Ahim1947 was created first and then the user wanted a better name so instead of renaming the account he created a new. -- Tegel (Talk) 11:11, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May I?

I saw you're a steward and you can be found Recent changes in zh-classical wikipedia, so can you delete this page that just a copy of its English page. --Suchichi02 (talk) 10:01, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done. -- Tegel (Talk) 10:38, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Help to delete the pages in Hakka Wikipedia, please.

Help to delete the pages which are listed below in Hakka Wikipedia, please. Reason: not necessary pages.

Thanks.--Eager Lin (Message) 06:02, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There are issues (talk). Nemo 12:16, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest to match against added_lines instead of new_wikitext and to make it log-only (or tag and/or throttle) for now. Nemo 12:18, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I have removed the disallow flag for now. -- Tegel (Talk) 12:30, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Still better to match added_lines, the only new match is a false positive. Nemo 13:27, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I will look into this later. -- Tegel (Talk) 13:33, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Email

I emailed you yesterday so please reply to it on my talk page. --London Thortvedt on tires (talk) 12:41, 1 December 2015 (UTC) London Thortvedt on tires (talk) 12:41, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I have not received any e-mail from you. Do you want me to take action based on your global contributions? -- Tegel (Talk) 13:25, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I would like o edit this wiki so please change te block for 74.131.36.145 to anonymous users only, account creation disabled, cannot edit own talk page to the same day it is supposed to actually expire. I wan to edit this wiki. --Tekkenismyworld Lets go Jaguars! 20:38, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You edit this page, so there is no need to change any block settings. -- Tegel (Talk) 20:41, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

why block me

please give me suggestions how i get unblock ? — The preceding unsigned comment was added by Chaitifashion (talk)

I guess that you refer to the block on the Mediawiki wiki. I blocked you because you continued to upload off-topic images to the wiki after two messages on your talk page. You need to inform yourself where you should upload the images. The Mediawiki wiki is only for documenting the Mediawiki software, and everything is off-topic. I noticed that the images that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons where deleted as copyright violations. Before you upload any new images you need to inform yourself what type of images is OK to upload. If you promise not to upload any images on the Mediawiki wiki then I can remove the block. -- Tegel (Talk) 12:42, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What future IdeaLab campaigns would you like to see?

Hi there,

I’m Jethro, and I’m seeking your help in deciding topics for new IdeaLab campaigns that could be run starting next year. These campaigns aim to bring in proposals and solutions from communities that address a need or problem in Wikimedia projects. I'm interested in hearing your preferences and ideas for campaign topics!

Here’s how to participate:

Take care,

I JethroBT (WMF), Community Resources, Wikimedia Foundation. 03:34, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please block my test account I made

I was testing the title blacklist, and accidentally created an account. The account is My ip is 123.123.123.123 (talk · contribs). Can you indefinitely block it as it was created accidentally Username Violation 23:20, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Username Violation: Oh boy... I blocked this at one of the other projects. Tropicalkitty (talk) 23:37, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you for your help in the Mongolian Wikipedia! In our section we have surprisingly fewer admins and surprisingly local sleepy ones operate there but you and numerous other foreign admins help us a lot! Cheers! Orgio89 (talk) 03:48, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Spam in Interlingue-Wikipedia

Hello! Can you please remove this page from the Interlingue-Wikipedia: https://ie.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emilija89mor Its obviously spam. If possible please block the IP-address, too. Thank you very much! Valodnieks (talk) 11:44, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lombard wiki redirect

Hi! The website of the City oh Portobuffolè, not Portobuffolé. So, if You see other modifications, don't have problem to rollback. --Sciking (talk) 17:07, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Using copy and paste to move an article to a new name is against Wikipedias license. The reason is that the history of the page is not moved. You need to use the special move-tool. -- Tegel (Talk) 17:08, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I know (in fact, I have rollbacked the edit of the IP), but i wanted to clarify the situation. For the Italian istitution, the IP use a uncorrect name. Hi --Sciking (talk) 17:14, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I have no objection to the correct name, only that the move is done correct. -- Tegel (Talk) 17:15, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Loredana Bertè

Hello, I've seen that you were editing on Ukrainian WP for the correction of Bertè's name. Thank you for that, I have serious problems with Cyrillic letters. But do you know how/when the corrections are gonna be reviewed? The same problem shows at Russian WP. Regards, XanonymusX (talk) 20:55, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]