Meta:Requests for adminship

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
(Redirected from WM:RFP)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Requests and proposals Requests for adminship on Meta Archives
This page hosts requests for administrator access on the Meta-Wiki; for requesting administrator access on any other wiki, please see the index of request and proposal pages, where a Steward can do the job if required. Bureaucrat, checkuser and bot requests are also made here. Before making a request here, please see the administrator policy.

Requests should be listed here for at least seven days; bureaucrats should only close after this minimum time. Discussions are not closed early. Adminship will be granted by a support ratio of at least 75%. If a request hasn't been addressed by a bureaucrat after a lengthy period of time, please leave a note at Requests for help from a sysop or bureaucrat. Requests may be extended, or put on hold by bureaucrats, pending decision or finding of consensus.

Requests for temporary adminship and bot requests may be less formal and often go for a shorter duration if consensus becomes clear after only a few days of discussion.

All editors with an account on Meta, at least one active account on any Wikimedia project, and a link between the two, may participate in any request and give their opinion of the candidate. However, more active Meta editors' opinions may be given additional weight in controversial cases.

See below for information on prerequisites on submitting a request, and how to add a nomination.
Wikimedia Meta-Wiki
This box: view · talk · edit

Information

Note that this page is for access on Meta only. See the Steward requests/Permissions page for adminship/deadminship requests on other projects.

Regular adminship

  1. Before requesting admin access, please ensure you meet all of the minimum criteria:
    • Have a user page on Meta, with links to the user pages on other participated projects. This can state that SUL is activated or be provided via a Wiki matrix if that is not possible.
    • Have a valid contact address (either a confirmed email address in preferences, or a valid email address on the user page).
    • Be a currently active contributor on Meta. This is a subjective, not an objective, measure and there is no official post count.
  2. As Meta has a cross-wiki role, admins here are expected to have cross wiki experience. SUL confirmation or a matrix will ensure that editing on other wikis can be easily seen. It would be expected that those seeking adminship here would have both reasonable experience here and on other wikis.
  3. Given the multi-lingual nature of Meta, {{#babel:}} information will be of use to others.
  4. Place a request on this page, by transcluding a subpage, for example {{Meta:Requests for adminship/Example}}. Please put the newest request on the top. Bear in mind that even if you do meet the criteria above this does not mean that the community will automatically approve a request. Please add a minimum ending date to the election, allowing a full 7 day period from the first timestamp:
    ''Ending {{subst:#time:j F Y H:i|+1 week}} (UTC)''
  5. Please note, past administrators who have given up their rights must meet all criteria at the time of the new request. There is no separate process for reinstating past administrators.

Please note: Ill-considered nominations for adminship can be draining and deflating to both the community and the candidate. Any successful candidate will need to be able to demonstrate sufficient experience within the Wikimedia community, in addition to a familiarity with Meta-Wiki. If a candidate is not already a local administrator or holder of advanced permissions on a Wikimedia content project, he or she is less likely to pass a request for adminship here at Meta-Wiki.

Interface adminship

Add your request below under the interface adminship section. Please note:

Bureaucratship

Add your request below under the bureaucratship section. Please note:

  • Only active administrators can become bureaucrats, and only after at least 6 months of regular adminship.
  • User is endorsed by two current bureaucrats after he/she nominates themselves here.

If you fail any of these requirements, you will not be assigned the bureaucrat flag. For more information see Meta:Bureaucrats.

Other access

For these types of access, create a subpage just as you would for regular adminship and add it to the appropriate section of this page.
  • Limited adminship: If you need sysop access for a particular reason (such as ability to edit protected pages), you may request limited adminship on Meta. If granted, the user understands that they will only be allowed to use the tools for the tasks they were approved, and not doing so will be grounds for immediate removal. Temporary sysop access will normally be valid for one month unless requested and granted otherwise.
  • Bot: Please read the bot policy. This wiki allows global bots and automatic approval of certain types of bots; for other bots, add your request below under the bot section, in the same way as an admin request.
  • CheckUser: please read the CheckUser policy and add your request below under the checkuser section, in the same way as an admin request.
  • Oversight: please read the Oversight policy and add your request below under the oversight section, in the same way as an admin request.
  • Translation administrator: please read Meta:Translation administrator and Meta:Translate extension. No fixed time limit for these requests is defined, and there are no particular requirements; if you provide a valid reason your request will be granted.
  • Centralnotice administrator: was added as a way to avoid granting the full administrator rights package to those who primarily only need to edit banner campaigns. Because of the potentially huge impact of banners on the wikis, this should be granted carefully and sparingly.
For these types of access, just ask on Meta:Requests for help from a sysop or bureaucrat.
  • MassMessage sender: please read about MassMessage, and provide a clear reason for requesting access. Specify a duration, or specifically request ongoing if needed.
  • Uploaders
  • Patrollers
Global renamer permissions are handled at Steward requests/Global permissions.

WMF Office Staff and Contractors

  • If you are an WMF Official or Contractor and need rights on Meta-Wiki to perform your duties the process is different. Please have a look at the WMF Staff userrights policy on Office Wiki[restricted access] and follow the procedure described there. If in doubt, please contact Trust and Safety; or send an email to trustandsafety(at)wikimedia.org.(source)

Requests for regular adminship


None currently

Requests for limited adminship

Rehman

Ending 30 may 2019 12:24 (UTC)

Hello. I would like to request for temporary adminship to cleanup Wikimedia Community User Group Sri Lanka and its number of subpages. The pages were intentionally duplicated in a previous translation attempt, but its quite confusing to most/new editors. Hence I am looking to use LangSwitch and simplify the pages. This request is a bit urgent as we are launching Wiki Loves Earth end of next week, and are hoping to get the pages neatened out by then. For transparency, I have been around since 2008, and I am an admin on enwiki and commons. Thank you, Rehman 12:24, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Moved for transclusion from Special:diff/19113882.--AldnonymousBicara? 12:31, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
Transcluded in Special:diff/19113884.--AldnonymousBicara? 12:33, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
  • Support Support trusted and experienced administrator, no issues from me. Happy for this to be escalated due to limited scope and priority of work  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:46, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
  • Support Support I prefer if Rehman run for permanent adminship instead, those srilankan language skill is needed.--AldnonymousBicara? 12:52, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
Thank you, Aldnonymous. I didn't consider permanent adminship due to the time sensitive nature of the task. If the community feels I could be of use here as a permanent admin, I would be happy to join as such. Rehman 14:39, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
  • Support Support +sysop in enwp, commonswiki, I don't think they will abuse their tools. They seems to have an urgent need as well. Trusted user with demonstrated need, I don't see any reason to oppose. For Limited sysopship, typical duration is 1 month, is it okay Rehman or do you need longer? Thanks for helping.--Cohaf (talk) 13:03, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
Thank you, Cohaf. One month is more than sufficient to get the required tasks done. Rehman 14:39, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
  • Support Support for this purpose, broadly construed to maintain the related pages (including setting protection levels/deletes/merges/etc; not including user blocking even if related to those pages). Support for 1 month duration, as it was confirmed to be sufficient. — xaosflux Talk 05:08, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
  • Support Support per Aldnonymous (but maybe we'll see gs in a short time too ;) The most appropriate would be to count until the end of June for the right (end of the WLE 2019) Regards. --Eihel (talk) 08:26, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
  • Support Support --Novak Watchmen (talk) 11:46, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
  • Support Support -FASTILY 23:57, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
  • Support Support per my position that anyone who is a sysop on a major wiki who is active enough on meta should be trusted with the sysop tools here. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:56, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

Requests for interface adminship


None currently

Requests for bureaucratship


None currently

Requests for CheckUser access

"Meta:Requests for checkuser" redirects here. To request checkuser information, see Meta:Requests for CheckUser information.

None currently

Requests for Oversight access


None currently

Requests for translation adminship


None currently

Requests for CentralNotice adminship


None currently

Requests for bot flags


None currently

See also