Steward requests/Global permissions
Any active Wikimedia editor may participate in the discussion, though only stewards may use {{yes}} or {{no}} templates.
Cross-wiki requests |
---|
Meta-Wiki requests |
Requests for global rollback permissions
| Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Global rollback for Gaeser
- Global user: Gaeser (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
Hello, I would like to get global rollback. Since last time I am active at SWMT, have rollback and editor rights, and I was the sysop of Georgian wikipedia. Regards, --Gaeser 17:20, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
Global rollback for Babylonian Armor
- Global user: Babylonian Armor (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
I have an extensive history of reverting vandalism on English Wikipedia, and I wish to use Global Rollbacker rights on other projects to complete the mission of delivering knowledge (whether it be on french wikipedia, or hungarian wikiquote). I am trying to build my cross-project portfolio right now, and as I said, Global Rollbacker would be awesome for what I am trying to accomplish!
- Sorry, but you don't have enough edits or experience. While your offer to help is much appreciated, we really look for people with months of reverting vandalism at multiple small wikis. Additionally, you should build up tenure before requesting global rollback. Please reapply in some months when you have more experience. Regards, –Juliancolton | Talk 03:52, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry but global rollback is for those active in countering vandalism/spam across many projects through some time (see global rollback). Looking at you edits I do not see a need for the tool right now. — Dferg (talk) 19:39, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
Global rollback for Bsadowski1
- Global user: Bsadowski1 (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
I have remained active crosswiki since my last request, doing many reverts and taggings, and I think that rollback globally would help me do the job faster. I also have been doing XWiki spam reports as well. --Bsadowski1 07:11, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
- Support please --.snoopy. ✉ 07:27, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
- bored Support —DerHexer (Talk) 14:45, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
- Support --WizardOfOz talk 16:02, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
- Support - Sure. Known and trusted at simplewiki, sure to use the tools responsibly. –Juliancolton | Talk 16:28, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
- Support; active enough. -- Mentifisto 16:52, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Jyothis 15:07, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
- Support - He does a good xwiki work and is also trusted. He'll do fine with the extra bit. Barras talk 20:21, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
- Support--- @lestaty discuţie 20:33, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
- Support At least he did run after a lot of persuasion. Good XWiki work. Pmlineditor ∞ 17:06, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
Global rollback for Church of emacs
- Global user: Church of emacs (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
I'd like to apply for rollback. I've been an active member of the SWMT for some months; beside that I'm a sysop/oversight on dewiki as well as a sysop on meta and mediawikiwiki. Regards, --Church of emacs talk · contrib 14:44, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
- bored Support —DerHexer (Talk) 14:45, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
- Support --.snoopy. ✉ 15:00, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
- sure --Mardetanha talk 15:50, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Jan eissfeldt 16:02, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
- Support --WizardOfOz talk 16:03, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
- Support; active enough. -- Mentifisto 16:52, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Jyothis 15:07, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
- Support Always nice and helps with the xwiki work. I trust coe. No worries here. Barras talk 20:21, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
- Support--- @lestaty discuţie 20:33, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
- Support Hell yes. Good choice. Pmlineditor ∞ 17:07, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
Requests for global sysop permissions
Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
| <translate>
Requests for global editinterface permissions
Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
|
Requests for global IP block exemption
Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
|
Global IP block exempt for Fire in the Hole
- Global user: Fire in the Hole (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
I'm gonna use this account when on school or public places, I know my school is blocked at some wikis, and this could be useful when editing here, thanks in advance, --MisterWiki 22:56, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
Done --Jyothis 04:14, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
- I'm a bit confused: Aren't school IPs usually blocked with the option "Block anonymous users only"? I thought that IP block exempt was mainly for users who have to use open proxys. --Church of emacs talk · contrib 11:36, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
- Mhh, the global flag just bypasses global blocks. The flag doesn't help with local blocks if I remember correctly. I'm not sure if the flag's needed here. Barras talk 20:24, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
- Exactly. I think it should be removed. Pmlineditor ∞ 17:05, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
- Mhh, the global flag just bypasses global blocks. The flag doesn't help with local blocks if I remember correctly. I'm not sure if the flag's needed here. Barras talk 20:24, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
- I'm a bit confused: Aren't school IPs usually blocked with the option "Block anonymous users only"? I thought that IP block exempt was mainly for users who have to use open proxys. --Church of emacs talk · contrib 11:36, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
What wiki has blocked your school? For instance, enwiki blocking your school is no reason since you're blocked on enwiki. es:Drini 17:10, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
See also
- User groups — Information on user groups
General requests for: help from a Meta sysop or bureaucrat · deletion (speedy deletions: local · multilingual) · URL blacklisting · new languages · interwiki map
Personal requests for: username changes · permissions (global) · bot status · adminship on Meta · CheckUser information (local) · local administrator help
Cooperation requests for: comments (local) (global) · translation