Steward requests/Permissions: Difference between revisions

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Content deleted Content added
G(x) (talk | contribs)
→‎Removal of access: +3 Sysop removal request
Line 160: Line 160:


:Done. --[[User:Mercy|Mercy]] 08:21, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
:Done. --[[User:Mercy|Mercy]] 08:21, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

==== Phisite@th.wikipedia ====
{{sr-request
|status = <!--don't change this line-->
|domain = th.wikipedia
|user name = Phisite
|discussion= [[:th:WP:AC/N#ระงับสิทธิผู้ดูแลที่ไม่มีความเคลื่อนไหว|Arbitration Committee decision]]
}}
According to the local policy of Arbitration, the ArbCom have rights to revoke administrator rights due to inactivity (have less than 50 edits over 1 year period before removal, as stated [[:th:WP:SYSOP|in the policy]]) Phisite, who has been inactive since 2007, has been notified [http://th.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Phisite&action=historysubmit&diff=3724966&oldid=3688375 here] but no response has been given. I, as the ArbCom clerk, hereby request on behalf of the ArbCom to have this user's sysop rights removed. Regards, --[[User:G(x)|G(x)]] 10:43, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

==== ไร้สติ@th.wikipedia ====
{{sr-request
|status = <!--don't change this line-->
|domain = th.wikipedia
|user name = ไร้สติ
|discussion= [[:th:WP:AC/N#ระงับสิทธิผู้ดูแลที่ไม่มีความเคลื่อนไหว|Arbitration Committee decision]]
}}
According to the local policy of Arbitration, the ArbCom have rights to revoke administrator rights due to inactivity (have less than 50 edits over 1 year period before removal, as stated [[:th:WP:SYSOP|in the policy]]) Phisite, who has been inactive since 2008, has been notified [http://th.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:ไร้สติ&action=historysubmit&diff=3724968&oldid=3696650 here] but no response has been given. I, as the ArbCom clerk, hereby request on behalf of the ArbCom to have this user's sysop rights removed. Regards, --[[User:G(x)|G(x)]] 10:43, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

==== Kie@th.wikipedia ====
{{sr-request
|status = <!--don't change this line-->
|domain = th.wikipedia
|user name = Kie
|discussion= [[:th:WP:AC/N#ระงับสิทธิผู้ดูแลที่ไม่มีความเคลื่อนไหว|Arbitration Committee decision]]
}}
According to the local policy of Arbitration, the ArbCom have rights to revoke administrator rights due to inactivity (have less than 50 edits over 1 year period before removal, as stated [[:th:WP:SYSOP|in the policy]]) Phisite, who has been inactive since 2009, has been notified [http://th.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Kie&action=historysubmit&diff=3724969&oldid=3722243 here] but no response has been given. I, as the ArbCom clerk, hereby request on behalf of the ArbCom to have this user's sysop rights removed. Regards, --[[User:G(x)|G(x)]] 10:43, 1 February 2012 (UTC)


=== Miscellaneous requests ===
=== Miscellaneous requests ===

Revision as of 10:44, 1 February 2012

Shortcut:
SRP

This page is for requests to have stewards grant or revoke administrator, bureaucrat, checkuser, and oversight rights on Wikimedia projects which do not have a local permissions procedure.

Old sections are archived. The list of archives is below.

  • Requests for bot flags are handled at SRB, and requests for global permissions are handled at SRGP.
  • If you are requesting adminship or bureaucratship, and your wiki has a local bureaucrat, submit your request to that user or to the relevant local request page (index).
  • For urgent requests, such as to combat large-scale vandalism on a small wiki, contact a steward in the #wikimedia-stewardsconnect IRC channel. In emergencies, type !steward in the channel to get the attention of stewards. Otherwise, you can type @steward for non-urgent help.

Other than requests to remove your own access or emergencies, please only make requests here after gaining the on-wiki approval of your local community.

Quick navigation: Administrator | Interface administrator | Bureaucrat | CheckUser | Oversight | Removal of access | Miscellaneous | Global permissions

Cross-wiki requests
Meta-Wiki requests

Using this page

1. Place the following code at the bottom of the appropriate section below:

==== Username@xxproject ====
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!-- don't change this line -->
 |domain    = <!-- such as en.wikibooks -->
 |user name = 
 |discussion= 
}}
(your remarks) ~~~~

2. Fill in the values:

  • domain: the wiki's URL domain (like "ex.wikipedia" or "meta.wikimedia").
  • user name: the name of the user whose rights are to be changed (like "Exampleuser"). In case you're requesting access for multiple bots, leave this field blank and give a list of these bots in your remarks
  • discussion: a link to the local vote or discussion about the rights change (for example, "[[ex:Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship#ExampleUser]]"). This should normally be for at least one week, but no more than three weeks (if so, you'll need to restart the process).

3. If anything is missing from your request, a steward will request more information.

Confirmation of signing confidentiality agreement

Certain permissions (notably CheckUser and Oversight) additionally require users to sign a confidentiality agreement. Users requesting these permissions must make a request below, and must also sign the confidentiality agreement with the Wikimedia Foundation. The request is placed on hold temporarily, until the receipt has been formally confirmed by the Office.

Requests

COPY THE FOLLOWING CODE to the bottom of the appropriate section below:

==== Username@xxproject ====
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!--don't change this line-->
 |domain    =
 |user name =
 |discussion= 
}}

Administrator access

Steward requests/Permissions/Sysop-header

Odisha1@or.wiktionary

Request to grant admin rights again --Srikant Kedia 14:46, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please post another notice requesting an extension of your admin rights? Thanks, PeterSymonds (talk) 14:48, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Not done at this time. Please first notify the community. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 01:17, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I was busy in Outreach, so just now opened the request. --Srikant Kedia 08:23, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks - Request on hold until 1 February 2012 to allow community input. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 01:47, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2012-08-01. Bencmq 01:56, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User Reza1615@fa.wiktionary

I have a request to extend my access on fa.wiktionary Reza1615 10:42, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please kindly post a local notification about your extension of temp sysop. Thanks. Bencmq 04:08, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Shouldn't there be a voting? --Faofficer 10:28, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
On minor wikis is the process often less formal. You can still support, oppose or comment if you like. -- Lavallen 13:13, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
if you see the last changes I was the only active user at that wiki! please reactive my access also in minor wikis temporary adimn doesn't neeed voting also itis the last 3 moth voting!Reza1615 12:47, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Please post a local notification ( = announcement) about your extension. I'm not asking you to open a vote. Bencmq 12:49, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
‌I made an announcement hereReza1615 14:41, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
On hold until 2 February. Ruslik 11:10, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Reza1615 wrote that he was the only active user at that wiki. Ok! If there is no community why there is an admin needed? The local RfA announcement shows votes in favor of Reza1615; but these users aren't a member of the wiktionary community, if there is any. As far as I can see, Reza1615 is kind of a global admin in all persian projects. Is this ok? Please pay attention to rules and regulations! --Faofficer 18:33, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Zylbath@nds.wiktionary

I ask you to extend my adminship on nds.wiktionary. Even though there hasn't been much traffic lately, this is going to change soon, when I have more time. Thank you. Zylbath 19:41, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide a link in a prominent place on nds.wiki asking for an extention. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 18:30, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I'm sorry. Trijnstel just said on my user side, I just need to post a request for extension here. How does that side have to look like? Must there be an electation again? Zylbath 18:49, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
On the village pump, please post a note saying that you are requesting access extension and link it to us. We will wait a couple of days to see if there's any objection and if not, we will prolong your status. Best regards. —Marco Aurelio (Nihil Prius Fide) 21:57, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

خَرگوش@ks.wikipedia

Request for extension of admin rights. Unfortunately there is still no community at ks.wikipedia other than myself. I will be happy to face an election as soon as community exists. Until then I would be prefer to maintain admin privilege for basic site maintenance purpose. Thank you Sirs. --خَرگوش 22:12, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide a link in a prominent place (like Village Pump) on kswiki asking for an extension. --FiliP ██ 08:43, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bureaucrat access

Steward requests/Permissions/Crat-header

CheckUser access

Steward requests/Permissions/CU-header

Oversight access

To request to have content oversighted, ask in #wikimedia-stewards, or email oversight-l@lists.wikimedia.org for requests regarding English Wikipedia. This is the place to request Oversight access. Note that temporary Oversight access is not permitted and the temporary status is only used by Stewards.

Stewards
Do not grant Oversight access unless the user is identified to the foundation, which will be announced on the Identification noticeboard. When you give someone oversight access, list them on Oversight.

Arkanosis@fr.wikipedia.org

The Arbitration Comitee of Wikipedia in French, on behalf of which I'm writting, has decided to grant oversight access to Arkanosis. He's not yet identified by the Foundation (but has been notified to do so). Thanks in advance, --Gede 01:18, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I've sent a mail to secure-info. Best regards — Arkanosis 10:30, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of access

<translate>

  • If you're requesting the removal of your own permissions, make sure you're logged in to your account. If you have multiple flags, specify which you want removed. Stewards may delay your request a short time to ensure you have time to rethink your request (see [[<tvar name="self-discussion">Talk:Steward_requests/Permissions/2011#Self_requests</tvar>|previous discussion]] on 24 hour delays); the rights will not be restored by stewards once they are removed.
  • To request the removal of another user's permissions, you must gain consensus on the local wiki first. When there is community consensus that the user's access should be removed, provide a link to the discussion, with a brief explanation of the reason for the request, and summarize the results of discussion. However, as bureaucrats of some wikis may remove users from the administrator or bureaucrat group, please see also a [[<tvar name="crat-rem">Bureaucrat#Removing_access</tvar>|separate list of these specific wikis]].
  • To request the removal of another user's permissions for inactivity, link to your local inactivity policy. If your site does not have inactivity policy, the global policy [[<tvar name="aar">Admin activity review</tvar>|Admin activity review]] applies.
  • See the [[<tvar name="usage">#Using this page</tvar>|instructions above]] for adding new requests. Please post new requests at the bottom of the section.</translate>

Sterio@is.wikipedia

The Icelandic Wikipedia has an inactivity policy for it´s admins and bureaucrats. Admins and bureaucrats who have not made any edits for one year are notified on their talk pages. If they don´t respond within one month or don´t express any interest in keeping their rights, they will lose them. The notification on Sterio´s talk page has been there since 2008, so I am requesting removal of both his admin and bureaucrat rights.--Snaevar 22:34, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done. PeterSymonds (talk) 22:36, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Capaci34@de.wikipedia.org

Please remove my admin right in the de.WP. Thank you. --Capaci34 07:08, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thank you for your help! --Mercy 08:19, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Trivelt@pl.wikipedia

Due to our rule, introduced after voting, in the name of Polish Wikipedia community, I hereby request for removing sysop access, due to their inactivity for over a year. Trivelt had been notified according to the procedure, but failed to reply. Tar Lócesilion 20:02, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done. PeterSymonds (talk) 20:04, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

AndrzejzHelu@pl.wikipedia

On behalf of the Polish Wikipedia Arbitration Committee I hereby request an immediate removal of sysop rights from the account of pl:User:AndrzejzHelu on the said project in accordance with the Committee’s decision concerning the user (9 Committee members voted in favour, 0 against, 0 abstained). The Committee’s verdict in the recently heard case against the said user includes an enforcement in the form of removing sysop rights for AndrzejzHelu due to his misuse of administrator tools and violation of project's rules. The verdict is enforceable immediately. Thank you in advance, Sebk. 22:24, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done. PeterSymonds (talk) 22:26, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Scuzzer@sv.wikipedia

Please remove the administrator rights. --MagnusA 08:09, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Mercy 08:21, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Phisite@th.wikipedia

According to the local policy of Arbitration, the ArbCom have rights to revoke administrator rights due to inactivity (have less than 50 edits over 1 year period before removal, as stated in the policy) Phisite, who has been inactive since 2007, has been notified here but no response has been given. I, as the ArbCom clerk, hereby request on behalf of the ArbCom to have this user's sysop rights removed. Regards, --G(x) 10:43, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ไร้สติ@th.wikipedia

According to the local policy of Arbitration, the ArbCom have rights to revoke administrator rights due to inactivity (have less than 50 edits over 1 year period before removal, as stated in the policy) Phisite, who has been inactive since 2008, has been notified here but no response has been given. I, as the ArbCom clerk, hereby request on behalf of the ArbCom to have this user's sysop rights removed. Regards, --G(x) 10:43, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kie@th.wikipedia

According to the local policy of Arbitration, the ArbCom have rights to revoke administrator rights due to inactivity (have less than 50 edits over 1 year period before removal, as stated in the policy) Phisite, who has been inactive since 2009, has been notified here but no response has been given. I, as the ArbCom clerk, hereby request on behalf of the ArbCom to have this user's sysop rights removed. Regards, --G(x) 10:43, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Miscellaneous requests

Steward requests/Permissions/Misc-header

See also

Steward requests/Permissions/Footer