Steward requests/Global permissions

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
< Steward requests(Redirected from SRGP)
Jump to: navigation, search
Requests and proposals Steward requests (Global permissions) latest archive
This page hosts requests for global permissions. To make a request, read the relevant policy (global rollback, global sysop, global rename, …) and make a request below. Explain why membership is needed for that group, and detail prior experience or qualifications.

This is not a vote and any active Wikimedia editor may participate in the discussion.

Successful global rollback requests require no fewer than 5 days of discussion, while successful global renamer and global sysop discussions require no fewer than 2 weeks.

Cross-wiki requests
Meta-Wiki requests


Requests for global rollback permissions[edit]

Symbol comment vote.svg Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Your request might be rejected if you don't follow the instructions, and not doing so would reflect poorly on your suitability.
Please also review the Global rollback policy.
Instructions for making a request

Before requesting, make sure that:

  1. You have sufficient activity to meet the requirements to be allocated the global rollback flag
  2. You have a global account;
  3. You are logged in on this wiki, and the account is part of your global account;
To make a request
Copy the template below to the bottom of this section and explain of why you need the access and why you're suitable.
=== Global rollback for [[User:Foo|Foo]] ===
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!-- don't change this line -->
 |domain    = global <!-- don't change this line -->
 |user name = Username
}}
::''Not ending before {{subst:#time:j F Y H:i|+5 days}} UTC''

The request will be approved if consensus to do so exists after a period of consideration of no less than 5 days (no exceptions are allowed no matter how obvious the result may seem). This is not a vote, and all input is welcome. Stewards will determine whether consensus exists; when doing so it is likely that the weight given to the input of those involved in cross-wiki work will be most influential.

Global rollback for Leitoxx[edit]

Hi.I have been an active member of SWMT, constantly monitoring # cvn-sw, and have access to revert tools in few wikis, so when I do it manually reverse. I think global rollback rights would be very useful for me and would make my work a lot easier.Thanks in advanced Leitoxx Work • Talk • Mail 00:59, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Not ending before 23 July 2016 00:59 UTC
  • Support Support: Seems to have enough cross-wikiness.Deleted for the reason of other users mentioned below.- Earth Saver (talk) at 02:46, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Oppose Oppose You had your adminship removed on es.wikiversity for abusing multiple accounts [1] and for using the admin tools to hide the creation of the new account. --Rschen7754 04:31, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Oppose Oppose Enough cross-wiki countervandalism, my oppose is mostly per Rschen7754. Use of admin tools to cover up sockpuppetry and supporting your own RFA on the Spanish Wikiversity is incredibly worrying, even if it was over two years ago. If you're able to explain a little more about the circumstances surrounding that, I might consider striking my oppose, but for now, I can't support this request. Omni Flames (talk) 10:11, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Oppose Oppose hat collecting. Natuur12 (talk) 10:20, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Oppose Oppose per above.--Grind24 (talk) 17:09, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral What Rschen7754 mentioned above is enough for a community ban. Such deceitful and uncollegial behavior is unacceptable for a community built on trust. I believe several editors will surely oppose this request on the basis of that deceptive act. I understand that it happened a long time ago and that's why I am reluctant to oppose this request at the moment. However, can you comment on this allegation and the motive behind your behavior then? We do understand that the global rollback rights would be very useful for you and would make your work a lot easier but can you tell us why we should trust you with this tool, considering your antecedent on es.wikiversity ? Wikicology (talk) 20:29, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Oppose Oppose Given the 20 or so additional user rights you have (most of them being autopromoted rights), you do in fact appear to be hat collecting. I don't think global rollback is a good idea for a user who has had their sysop rights revoked for abusing multiple accounts. Music1201 talk 21:00, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral, per Wikicology's comment. --Ks-M9 Talk (es-wiki) 23:25, 21 July 2016 (UTC).
X mark.svg Not done. RadiX 03:59, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Requests for global sysop permissions[edit]

Symbol comment vote.svg Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Your request might be rejected if you don't follow the instructions, and not doing so would reflect poorly on your suitability.
Please also review the Global sysops policy.
Stewards
When you give someone global sysop rights, please list them on Users with global sysop access and ask them to subscribe to the global sysops mailing list.
Instructions for making a request

Before requesting, make sure that:

  1. You have a global account;
  2. You are logged in on this wiki, and the account is part of your global account;
To make a request
Copy the template below to the bottom of this section and explain of why you need the access and why you're suitable. If you previously requested that right, please add a link to the previous discussion(s).
=== Global sysop for [[User:Foo|Foo]] ===
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!-- don't change this line -->
 |domain    = global <!-- don't change this line -->
 |user name = Username
}}
:''Not ending before {{subst:#time:j F Y H:i|+2 week}} UTC''

The request will be approved if consensus to do so exists after a period of consideration of no less than two weeks (no exceptions are allowed no matter how obvious the result may seem). This is not a vote, and all input is welcome. Stewards will determine whether consensus exists; when doing so it is likely that the weight given to the input of those involved in cross-wiki work will be most influential.

Global sysop for DAR7[edit]

Not ending before 21 July 2016 15:42 UTC

I would like to be the global administrator Meta Wikimedia because I think I'm familiar with all the policies and recommendations of all the Wikipedias of all languages spoken in the world, so that my articles on history and geography of Brazil and my state of Paraná be improved, for example, in the Wikipedias of English, Spanish, French, Italian, German and Dutch languages, because there one of them have very few contributions and also why the administrator tool allows autorreview. Moreover, with this status I can: reverse vandalism, copyright violations, block and unblock users in all Wikipedias of all languages spokens around the world, among other tasks. DAR7 (talk) 15:42, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

  • Oppose Oppose The wikipedia language projects listed above are not applicable to global sysops; additionally global contributions do not show a high level of cross-wiki work on projects that would benefit from a global sysop. — xaosflux Talk 17:25, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Oppose Oppose This user isn't a sysop anywhere on Wikimedia, in fact, they don't have any additional user rights on any WMF project. The user also has edits only on nine different projects, and only on two of them do they have over 50 edits. Additionally, they don't really seem to understand what permissions this right actually grants. Omni Flames (talk) 05:59, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Oppose Oppose You don't need the mop to be a valuable editor. Wikicology (talk) 19:40, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Oppose Oppose misunderstanding of the role, lack of experience, no need for the global sysop bit. Please take a good look through SWMT and GS for more information on this role and its scope. Ajraddatz (talk) 19:56, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Oppose Oppose This person wants power only. MechQuester (talk) 22:49, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Oppose Oppose No particular need for the bit, instead of hat collecting, gain more experience by reverting vandalism massively at about 40 small wikis. --Pokéfan95 (talk) 03:55, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Oppose Oppose English, Spanish, French, Italian, German and Dutch Wikipedias have opted out of global sysop, and even if they weren't, using global sysop would be against the global sysop policy because they all have well over 10 administrators. Also, you don't appear to have a need for these tools. Music1201 talk 07:25, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Oppose Oppose No. Never. User has no idea about the GS Bit, only wants to have the glory to say I'm a GS. --Pratyya (Hello!) 13:15, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Oppose Oppose well intentioned editor in Wikipedia (pt). He didn't understand what it takes to be a GS, only that. DARIO SEVERI (talk) 20:33, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Oppose Oppose You can revert bad changes without GS; the blocking other users part I have a concern, and since you are saying "I think I am familiar with the policies", I don't have confidence in supporting this because it's not 100% certain. Tropicalkitty (talk) 22:42, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Oppose Oppose You're not sysop in any project so you lack experience account for the use of sysop tools. And again, I've never seen you in small Wikipedia that have less than 500 000, 250 000 and 100 000 items. You are present in 9 projects, little for a global sysop. Good luck Apipo1907 (talk) 11:31, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
X mark.svg Not done It makes no sense to continue this discussion. Ruslik (talk) 17:48, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Global sysop for Apipo1907[edit]

Hello community. Now I introduce myself to the status of global syso after a few weeks of thinking even if I am a relatively new contributor.

Presentation.

I am Congolese by birth, living Brazzaville. I have a global account but my main account on the francophone Wikipedia where I autopatrol. I also made some changes on the Italian and English Wikipedia and Commons. I am sysop on Wikipedia Lingala which has a small community.

For tools?

After reading all the recommendations I had a need tools to fight against vandalism in Wikipedia small that I travel frequently. This will allow me to invest myself more in the projects of the WMF. I will then use them to remove unnecessary pages that I can find on my visit, revoke, remove copyright, old block vandals. From this, I promise to take care especially very small Wikipedia. In case I am elected, nothing would prevent me from taking care of small projects. Apipo1907 (talk) 18:08, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

  • Oppose Oppose user has little cross-wiki experience and activity. Not now, but in the meantime take a look at SWMT. eurodyne (talk) 18:20, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Oppose Oppose, per Eurodyne, not now. --Stang 02:33, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Oppose Oppose per Eurodyne. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 02:55, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Oppose Oppose Not now, sorry. ~riley (talk) 08:06, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Not yet, but I will consider supporting after some months of activity in the SWMT. Thanks for applying. Defender (talk) 14:33, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Oppose Oppose Come back after more experience in cross-wiki countervandalism and other maintenance work and I'll be happy to support you, but not yet. Omni Flames (talk) 02:28, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Oppose Oppose With only 9 months tenure and less than 5000 global edits, I cannot support giving global sysop to you. Music1201 talk 19:55, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Oppose Oppose, per Eurodyne and Defender.--Syum90 (talk) 11:04, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Neutral Moral neutral because I don't want to stack opposes. Thank you for applying for GS, but you need to get some more experience by reverting cross-wiki vandalism. I recommend you to join SWMT. After you get enough cross-wiki experience, feel free to apply again. Thank you! --Pokéfan95 (talk) 11:20, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Neutral Moral neutral since I don't want to stack opposes too .Per Eurodyne, not now, thanks for volunteering.- Earth Saver (talk) at 11:02, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral I hate to pile on. Please come back when you have enough cross-wiki experience. Wikicology (talk) 05:14, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Oppose Oppose, per Eurodyne. --Kayser Ahmad (talk) 14:18, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Oppose Oppose ~riley (talk) 00:26, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Oppose Oppose Grind24 (talk) 17:12, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
X mark.svg Not done no point in continuing this thread. Matanya (talk) 17:17, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Requests for global IP block exemption[edit]

Symbol comment vote.svg Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Your request might be rejected if you don't follow the instructions, and not doing so would reflect poorly on your suitability.
Please also review Global IP block exemption. Not all rights changes are notified here; please watch Special:Log/gblrights to see them all.
Please note: Global IP block exemption does NOT make one immune to locally-created blocks of any sort, only global blocks created via Special:GlobalBlock.
Instructions for making a request

Before requesting global IP block exemption, make sure that:

  1. You have a global account;
  2. You are logged in on this wiki, and the account is part of your global account;
To request global IP block exemption
Copy the template below to the bottom of this section and explain why you need the access and why you're suitable. If needed, link to relevant discussions.
=== Global IP block exempt for [[User:Foo|Foo]] ===
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!--don't change this line-->
 |domain    = global<!--don't change this line-->
 |user name =  Username
 |discussion=
}}
<Add an explanation here>, thanks, --~~~~

The request will be approved if consensus to do so exists after a short period of consideration (typically 5 days). This is not a vote, and all input is welcome. Stewards will determine whether consensus exists; when doing so it is likely that the weight given to the input of those involved in cross-wiki work will be most influential.

Requests for global rename permissions[edit]

Symbol comment vote.svg Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Your request might be rejected if you don't follow the instructions, and not doing so would reflect poorly on your suitability.
Please also review the Global rename policy.
Stewards
When you give someone global rename rights, please add them to the list of global renamers and ask them to subscribe to the global renamers' mailing list.
Instructions for making a request

Before requesting, make sure that:

  1. You have a global account;
  2. You are logged in on this wiki, and the account is part of your global account;
  3. You have considered the addition of a user language box to your user page
To make a request
Copy the template below to the bottom of this section and explain of why you need the access and why you're suitable. If you previously requested that right, please add a link to the previous discussion(s).
=== Global rename for [[User:Foo|Foo]] ===
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!-- don't change this line -->
 |domain    = meta.wikimedia <!-- don't change this line -->
 |user name = Username
}}
:''Not ending before {{subst:#time:j F Y H:i|+2 week}} UTC''

The request will be approved if consensus to do so exists after a period of consideration of no less than two weeks (no exceptions are allowed no matter how obvious the result may seem). This is not a vote, and all input is welcome. Stewards will determine whether consensus exists; when doing so it is likely that the weight given to the input of those involved in cross-wiki work will be most influential.

Requests for other global permissions[edit]

Symbol comment vote.svg Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Your request might be rejected if you don't follow the instructions.
Instructions for making a request

Before requesting additional global permissions, make sure that:

  1. You are logged in on this wiki;
  2. No specific section on this page exists for the permission you want to request;
To request additional global permissions
Copy the template below to the bottom of this section and explain what kind of access you need and why. If needed, link to relevant discussions. If you hold, or have previously held, the right and are asking for either a renewal or revival of that right, please add a link to the previous discussion.
=== <Add requested permission here> for [[User:Foo|Foo]] ===
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!--don't change this line-->
 |domain    = global<!--don't change this line-->
 |user name = Username
 |discussion=
}}
<Add an explanation here>, thanks, --~~~~

The request will be approved if consensus to do so exists after a short period of consideration. A steward will review the request.

remove global OTRS member for MGA73[edit]

Thanks, --Krd 07:15, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done, Linedwell (talk) 07:50, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

See also[edit]