Steward requests/Global permissions

Shortcut:
SRGP

This page hosts requests for global permissions. To make a request, read the relevant policy (global rollback, global sysop, global rename, …) and make a request below. Explain why membership is needed for that group, and detail prior experience or qualifications.

This is not a vote and any active Wikimedia editor may participate in the discussion.

Global rollback and global interface editor requests require no fewer than 5 days of discussion while abuse filter helper and maintainer requests require no fewer than 7 days. Global renamer and global sysop requests require no fewer than 2 weeks of discussion. For requests that are unlikely to pass under any circumstances, they may be closed by a steward without further discussion (after a reasonable amount of input).

Quick navigation:

Global rollback
Global sysop
Global rename
Global IP block exemption
Other global rights
Removal of access
Local permissions

Dynamic pages:

Cross-wiki requests
CheckUser information Global blocks/locks Permissions (global) Permissions (bot) Permissions (other) Username changes/ usurpation requests Miscellaneous requests URL blacklisting Title/username blacklisting Email blacklisting
Meta-Wiki requests
CheckUser information Deletion Permissions Requests for help

Requests for global rollback permissions

Shortcut:
SRGR

Please be sure to follow the instructions below:

Your request might be rejected if you don't follow the instructions, and not doing so would reflect poorly on your suitability.

Please also review the Global rollback policy.

Please note that Global rollbackers discussions are not votes. Comments must present specific points in favor of or against a user's approval.

Instructions for making a request

Before requesting, make sure that:

You have sufficient activity to meet the requirements to be allocated the global rollback flag

To make a request: Copy the template below to the bottom of this section and explain of why you need the access and why you're suitable.

=== Global rollback for {{subst:u|{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}}} ===
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!-- don't change this line -->
 |domain    = global <!-- don't change this line -->
 |user name = {{subst:REVISIONUSER}} <!-- don't change this line unless you're nominating another user -->
}}
::''Not ending before {{subst:#time:H:i, j F Y (T)|+5 days}}''

The request will be approved if consensus to do so exists after a period of consideration of no less than 5 days (with rare exceptions, no matter how obvious the result may seem). This is not a vote, and all input is welcome. Stewards will determine whether consensus exists; when doing so it is likely that the weight given to the input of those involved in cross-wiki work will be most influential.

Global rollback for Icodense

Status: In progress

Global user: Icodense (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)

Not ending before 22:28, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello! I would like to request global rollback rights in order to assist more effectively with combating cross-wiki vandalism and spam.

I have been an active contributor on Wikipedia since 2015 and have long-standing experience in anti-vandalism work. I regularly use SWViewer for cross-wiki monitoring (some of my actions there only appear under my former username Icodense99). While my main activity is on the German Wikipedia, I have also been active globally for a longer time and would like to contribute more efficiently in this area. In particular, being able to view temporary account IPs would often be very helpful in my work.

I am a current member of the German ArbCom and take policy compliance and responsible tool usage very seriously. I have read and understood the global rollback policy and the local policies regarding global rollback rights, and I also have WP:2FA enabled.

Thank you for your consideration. --Icodense (talk) 22:28, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Support LGTM. Experienced and active, don't see a reason not to.--A09|(pogovor) 22:40, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support No-brainer. NDG (talk) 22:47, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support per A09 and NDG. //shb (t • c) 22:55, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Excellent anti-vandalism work. --Der-Wir-Ing ("DWI") talk 00:42, 13 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Codename Noreste (talk • contribs) 00:50, 13 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support I don't put a terribly high bar up here for GR, but they've surpassed it considerably. EggRoll97 (talk) 02:06, 13 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thanks for volunteering! 🪶-TΛNBIRUZZΛMΛN (💬) 02:24, 13 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ameisenigel (talk) 08:06, 13 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support I have seen this user quite active on swviewer PieWriter (talk) 08:48, 13 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support 𝓰𝓲𝓷𝓪𝓪𝓷기나ㅏㄴ(T/C) 09:00, 13 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support sufficient xwiki activitt and experience.-FusionSub (talk) 12:33, 13 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Saroj (talk) 12:34, 13 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Most of your cross-wiki activity has been limited to two periods, March 2024 and January 2026, while your anti vandalism work over the years has been mostly focused on your home wiki dewiki. I do not see this as an issue and trust that you will make good use of the tool, though I would encourage caution when working on projects whose language you do not understand. – DreamRimmer ■ 12:48, 13 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Edit matrix is not low, but also not high. I checked about 50 wikis and found:
- Most living edits are typo fixes rather than spam removals or reverts.
- The most noticeable anti-spam edit surge is related to the Henryk Jan Dominiak case.
- Occasional vandalism reverts are good.
- One revert on hrwiki that is not to an obvious vandalism edit. The reverted user went on to make the same edit several times, all reverted by multiple sockpuppets. Eventually, an admin edited the article to a state that appears in agreement with that user.
These are in agreement with the statistics above (courtesy of DreamRimmer). NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 14:16, 13 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the feedback on the revert on hrwiki. Wrongly seemed to me like an obvious vandalism ethno-POV edit about Yugoslavia (removal of the name of Croatia), because at the time the page was also under the title Hrvatska Boka (it was moved to the current name later). Should have looked closer there. --Icodense (talk) 14:39, 13 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
For stewards: The hrwiki revert has no bearing on my !vote. It was simply a mistake I found (in fact, the only one). NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 00:10, 15 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ternera (talk) 14:51, 13 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 03:32, 14 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --V0lkanic (talk) 14:31, 14 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Some concerns with the limited bursts of activity, but reverts look good overall and candidate has a good breadth of experience. Support. – Ajraddatz (talk) 20:04, 14 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tenshi! (Talk page) 20:13, 14 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sincerely, Qədir (talk) 20:27, 14 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Infinite0694 (Talk) 21:09, 14 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Requests for global sysop permissions

Shortcut:
SRGS

Please be sure to follow the instructions below:

Your request might be rejected if you don't follow the instructions, and not doing so would reflect poorly on your suitability.

Please also review the Global sysops policy.

Stewards: When you give someone global sysop rights, please list them on Users with global sysop access and ask them to subscribe to the global sysops mailing list.

Please note that Global sysops discussions are not votes. Comments must present specific points in favor of or against a user's approval.

Instructions for making a request

Before requesting, make sure that:

You have a global account ;
You are logged in on this wiki, and the account is part of your global account;

To make a request: Copy the template below to the bottom of this section and explain of why you need the access and why you're suitable. If you previously requested that right, please add a link to the previous discussion(s).

=== Global sysop for {{subst:u|{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}}} ===
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!-- don't change this line -->
 |domain    = global <!-- don't change this line -->
 |user name = {{subst:REVISIONUSER}} <!-- don't change this line unless you're nominating another user -->
}}
::''Not ending before {{subst:#time:H:i, j F Y (T)|+2 week}}''

The request will be approved if consensus to do so exists after a period of consideration of no less than two weeks (no exceptions are allowed no matter how obvious the result may seem). This is not a vote, and all input is welcome. Stewards will determine whether consensus exists; when doing so it is likely that the weight given to the input of those involved in cross-wiki work will be most influential. Please note: Since 2019 all global sysops are required to have two-factor authentication (2FA) enabled.

Requests for global rename permissions

Shortcut:
SRGREN

Please be sure to follow the instructions below:

Your request might be rejected if you don't follow the instructions, and not doing so would reflect poorly on your suitability.

Please also review the global rename policy and the global renamers policy page.

Stewards: When you give someone global rename rights, please add them to the list of global renamers and ask them to subscribe to the global renamers' mailing list.

Instructions for making a request

Before requesting, make sure that:

You have a global account;
You are logged in on this wiki, and the account is part of your global account;
You have considered the addition of a user language box to your user page

To make a request: Copy the template below to the bottom of this section and explain of why you need the access and why you're suitable. If you previously requested that right, please add a link to the previous discussion(s).

=== Global rename for {{subst:u|{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}}} ===
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!-- don't change this line -->
 |domain    = meta.wikimedia <!-- don't change this line -->
 |user name = {{subst:REVISIONUSER}} <!-- don't change this line unless you're nominating another user -->
}}
::''Not ending before {{subst:#time:H:i, j F Y (T)|+2 week}}''

The request will be approved if consensus to do so exists after a period of consideration of no less than two weeks (no exceptions are allowed no matter how obvious the result may seem). While all input is welcome, there is a hard 80% support requirement for this role as per the global renamer policy.

Global rename for ATannedBurger

Status: In progress

Wiki: meta.wikimedia.org (list 'crats • bot policy • summary • 'crats rights)
User: ATannedBurger (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)

Not ending before 22:52, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello. I would like to request global rename permissions. I'm a current admin on zhwiki and would like to request rename permissions to process unblock requests involving usernames that violated local policies and a new suitable username has been selected by the unblock requester. Thanks. --

\int

（☎）dt 22:52, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Support sysop on zhwiki with valid rationale and use case. //shb (t • c) 01:28, 6 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support 𝓰𝓲𝓷𝓪𝓪𝓷기나ㅏㄴ(T/C) 01:46, 6 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Seems fine, fair enough. EggRoll97 (talk) 06:15, 6 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Saroj (talk) 06:37, 6 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support LGTM, glad to have one more colleagues helping. aqurs 🍧 07:32, 6 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ren Jian (Talk) 07:33, 6 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 08:25, 6 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yours sincerely, Exusiai 彼女の愛は、甘くて痛い。 13:24, 6 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Nishino⭐Asuka 14:17, 6 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support I hope I can vote? PieWriter (talk) 10:30, 7 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Anyone can use one account to express an opinion on a request at SRGP. Note that, like with most wiki "votes", it isn't strictly a vote but rather a consensus-seeking exercise that does give more weight to arguments than pure numbers. So you can both express a +/- vote but you are also welcome to give a rationale why (or why not). – Ajraddatz (talk) 20:06, 14 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I see thank you for the elaboration. PieWriter (talk) 08:06, 15 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --V0lkanic (talk) 10:36, 7 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sincerely, Qədir (talk) 11:34, 7 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support – DreamRimmer ■ 11:51, 7 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Jackyming 14:59, 7 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ameisenigel (talk) 15:12, 9 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support --Peterxy（talk） 00:52, 10 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ternera (talk) 14:22, 10 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Codename Noreste (talk • contribs) 20:19, 10 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -J. Ansari Talk 10:33, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Borhan (talk) 13:13, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support HurricaneZeta (talk) 21:36, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--DARIO SEVERI (talk) 05:00, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Taiwanese Elephant🐘(talk|contribs) 17:21, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Polar Be ar 03:43, 13 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support, best wishes. 浅村しき (talk) 08:20, 14 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Requests for global IP block exemption

Shortcut:
SRIPBE

Please be sure to follow the instructions below:

Your request might be rejected if you don't follow the instructions. Please review Global IP block exemption. You may request Global IP block exemption via stewards

wikimedia.org if you can not edit this page.

Please note: Global IP block exemption does NOT make one immune to locally-created blocks of any sort, only global blocks.

If you want to edit the Chinese Wikipedia, usually global IP block exemptions will not help you. Please see this instruction to request a local IP block exemption.

Instructions for making a request

Before requesting global IP block exemption, make sure that:

You have a global account ;
You are logged in on this wiki, and the account is part of your global account;

To request global IP block exemption: Copy the template below to the bottom of this section and explain why you need the access and why you're suitable. If needed, link to relevant discussions.

=== Global IP block exempt for {{subst:u|{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}}} ===
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!--don't change this line-->
 |domain    = global<!--don't change this line-->
 |user name = {{subst:REVISIONUSER}}
}}
<Add an explanation here>, thanks, --~~~~

The request will be approved if there is demonstrated need for the permission, such as bypassing a global block from someone who is not the intended target.

Global IP block exempt for Peterxy12

Status: On hold

Global user: Peterxy12 (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)

My country blocked Wikipedia, VPN required, I have ipblock-except in zhwiki, enwiki, frwiki, commonswiki and wikidata, and I have over 300 edits on SRG, I want to edit other projects, requires global IPBE, thanks.Peterxy（talk） 07:16, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

After your last request here when you were declined for being blocked on your homewiki, you picked up yet another block on your homewiki. What is going on that keeps getting you blocked? — xaosflux ^Talk 02:39, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Xaosflux:I was subset blocked for 6 months on my homewiki because I harassed other users. Later, I was blocked for 3 months because I used machine translations. Now, I have no active blocks, so can you graduate my GIPBE right? Thank you. Peterxy（talk） 06:19, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the note, I'm leaving this for another steward to handle. — xaosflux ^Talk 12:41, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Xaosfluxǃ Chinese is my native language. If you need any assistance about the request, I can help. Polar Be ar 12:46, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Johannnes89:What should I do? Peterxy（talk） 03:18, 10 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You can see my global contribtions. Peterxy（talk） 09:37, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Peterxy12 If you need me to explain anything, I can be your bridge to Stewards. Polar Be ar 12:46, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Xaosflux:Sorry, my local IPBE will be expired. Can you renew my local IPBE right? Thank you. Peterxy（talk） 13:36, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

See RFH — xaosflux ^Talk 15:43, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I need others to check.

On hold Peterxy（talk） 21:37, 13 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Global IP block exempt for Borhan

Status: In progress

Global user: Borhan (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)

I often using VPN during my travels and while using a public internet hotspots. I have been affected by global IP bans in the past when trying to edit projects on bn.wiki, wikidata, commons, or using swviewer to work against vandalism. So to work properly, i need the permission. thanks, --Borhan (talk) 18:04, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Global IP block exempt for DerFuchs

Status: In progress

Global user: DerFuchs (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)

Security concerns and need to use VPN/proxy due to deteriorating democratic situation and authoritarian consolidation, thanks, --DerFuchs (talk) 19:37, 10 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Global IP block exempt for Drunk Experiter

Status: In progress

Global user: Drunk Experiter (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)

(Steward clerk) ticket:2026011210007321, user with somewhat sufficient editing history and valid reason for using proxy. --Luciferian Thomas 09:48, 13 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Global IP block exempt for Saisønisse

Status: Not done

Global user: Saisønisse (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)

Pinging @Xaosflux — As per UTRS #85915 (also, the same "mistakenly surprised" global IP block that later rescinded on March 7, 2024). As an act of gesture, I want to renew this global IP block exemption for a second time due to having good record of contributing articles. So, please take this notice seriously. Saisønisse (talk) 14:21, 15 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Not done this account is already GIPBE until 2026-03-06; if there is still a need start a renewal a week or so before it expires. Note, the IP range you had an issue with in 2024 via UTRS is no longer blocked. — xaosflux ^Talk 14:26, 15 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Requests for other global permissions

Please be sure to follow the instructions below:

Your request might be rejected if you don't follow the instructions.

Instructions for making a request

Before requesting additional global permissions, make sure that:

You are logged in on this wiki;
No specific section on this page exists for the permission you want to request;

To request additional global permissions: Copy the template below to the bottom of this section and explain what kind of access you need and why. If needed, link to relevant discussions. If you hold, or have previously held, the right and are asking for either a renewal or revival of that right, please add a link to the previous discussion.

=== <Add requested permission here> for {{subst:u|{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}}} ===
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!-- don't change this line -->
 |domain    = global <!-- don't change this line -->
 |user name = {{subst:REVISIONUSER}} <!-- don't change this line unless you're nominating another user -->
}}
<Add an explanation here>, thanks, --~~~~

The request will be approved if consensus to do so exists after a short period of consideration. A steward will review the request.

Global CAPTCHA exemption for LightandDark2000

Status: In progress

Global user: LightandDark2000 (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)

I would like to request Global CAPTCHA exemption, given the number of times I've run into issues with CAPTCHA filters and edit filters slowing or even entirely blocking my attempts to reverse vandalism on multiple Wikimedia projects. The edit filter blocks are worse in that regard, but I'm not sure what can be done about that. I think that Global CAPTCHA exemption would make my antivandalism work significantly easier (at least, without the use of Global Rollback), as I currently run into this issue rather often when reverting vandalism on sites like the Italian, French, and Chinese Wikipedias, which prevents Twinkle from working when this happens and forces me to spend significantly more time doing a manual revert. These issues currently make cross-wiki antivandalism work a lot more of a pain than I think it should be on projects where I currently don't have Rollback, especially on foreign language wikis. Obviously, I'm not a spammer, and I'm experienced with writing content and dealing with vandalism, so this shouldn't be an issue. I would appreciate being granted this permission. Thanks. LightandDark2000 🌀 (talk) 16:45, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I'm aware this isn't a vote, but

Support. This global group is intentionally light-weight, and I fail to see the harm that some say giving this out widely would bring. CAPTCHA exemptions even says an acceptable rationale for granting is that it is clear someone isn't a spambot. I think LightandDark2000 meets that. EggRoll97 (talk) 18:58, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Seems that you are mostly having non-CAPTCHA problems? Are you hitting edit filters where their only action is to present a captcha? Can you point to an example? — xaosflux ^Talk 18:59, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I'm having non-CAPTCHA problems (edit filter disallowing), but those don't present a CAPTCHA - they block the edit entirely. As for the CAPTCHAs, I have to clear those manually on multiple Wikimedia project right now if I want to do anything involving the adding (or re-adding) of links that were deleted by vandals, which is extremely aggravating. I don't have a specific example, but let's say that a vandal deletes a paragraph of information from the article of Luis Arce or the Louvre Museum on French Wikipedia; in order just to reverse the vandalism, I would have to do a manual revert and fill out a CAPTCHA. LightandDark2000 🌀 (talk) 02:45, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

That doesn't make sense, as you already have skipcaptcha permissions on frwiki. Is that a situation you are actually seeing, or something you are proposing could happen? — xaosflux ^Talk 13:08, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't aware that was a thing. I've run into the CAPTCHA issue on multiple wikis, including fr.wiki, it.wiki, zh.wiki, and a number of different Wikiquote/Wikiversity sites, so getting a local perm won't be enough to bypass this. LightandDark2000 🌀 (talk) 15:33, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Support I've also run into this issue multiple times. Their failed global rollbacker application was mainly due to lack of recent experience; their competence was not questioned at any point. Leaderboard (talk) 12:54, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Leaderboard: In my oppose !vote, I did question a few reverts. That being said, the same argument does not apply to this permission request. NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 13:01, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support, Users who globally support Wikimedia, such as Rollbacker, Filemover, etc., should be given a permanent exception.
זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 23:40, 9 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Abuse filter helper for Dragoniez

Status: In progress

Global user: Dragoniez (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)

Not ending before 09:42, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

I would like to request abuse filter helper rights. I have several reasons for this request:

I have been involved in developing the AbuseFilter extension on Phabricator and Gerrit to improve user experience (e.g. 1, 2, 3, 4). Many tasks on Phabricator contain links to local private filters, and there have been cases where I had the time to submit a patch but refrained because I couldn't see those filters to pinpoint the reported issue. With these rights, I would be able to address more tasks and continue improving AbuseFilter functionality.
As a jawiki sysop/CU (and also as one of the few active filter maintainers on the project), I often track vandals across projects when they move between wikis, both when they come to jawiki and when jawiki LTAs go to other projects. Abuse filter helper rights would facilitate this work and also allow me to improve local filters to prevent further abuse.
Jawiki has currently opted out of global filters (Special:Diff/24974777). This has never been reconsidered since the initial opt-out, largely because no active jawiki filter maintainers have (full) access to global filters. I would like to work on this and am happy to discuss it with the local community as needed.

Thank you for your consideration! --Dragoniez (talk) 09:42, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Dragoniez Are you hoping to have the community rescind the opt-out? Leaderboard (talk) 10:17, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Leaderboard No, I'm not aiming to have the community rescind the opt-out, and I'm completely neutral on whether jawiki should opt in or remain outed out. What I meant is that right now only a very small number of people from jawiki can actually see how global filters work in detail. I would be happy to be one of them and to help start a new discussion if global filters might actually benefit the local community. Dragoniez (talk) 10:41, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Looking at the discussion that resulted in the opt-out, it happened because there was one opposer (Loasa) who argued that for global filters, for a project that would not receive much false positives (if at all), it would likely be the opposite effect at Japanese Wikipedia (some if not many), and that asking a Meta administrator to exclude jawiki from a global filter wasn't feasible. Codename Noreste (talk • contribs) 19:09, 13 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support, the request seems reasonable to me. Codename Noreste (talk • contribs) 16:20, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support User has a clear need and can be trusted --Ameisenigel (talk) 22:09, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support LGTM 𝓰𝓲𝓷𝓪𝓪𝓷기나ㅏㄴ(T/C) 09:01, 13 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support – DreamRimmer ■ 13:04, 13 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support shb (t • c) 13:05, 13 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support valid reason. Borhan (talk) 14:27, 14 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Trusted + valid use case. --V0lkanic (talk) 14:31, 14 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support I support regardless of whether jawiki as a community opts into global filters. We should frankly evaluate the candidate here, rather than their community. And on that front, the candidate is trustworthy and has a valid use-case. I see plenty of reasons they should be granted this group, and no reasons that they would cause harm with it. EggRoll97 (talk) 04:33, 15 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support They already have the abuse filter maintainer (sysop) right on jawiki, which leads me to believe that they will make good use of this permission PieWriter (talk) 08:07, 15 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sincerely, Qədir (talk) 09:24, 15 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Requests for global rollback permissions

Global rollback for Icodense

Requests for global sysop permissions

Requests for global rename permissions

Global rename for ATannedBurger

Requests for global IP block exemption

Global IP block exempt for Peterxy12

Global IP block exempt for Borhan

Global IP block exempt for DerFuchs

Global IP block exempt for Drunk Experiter

Global IP block exempt for Saisønisse

Requests for other global permissions

Global CAPTCHA exemption for LightandDark2000

Abuse filter helper for Dragoniez

See also