Meta:Requests for help from a sysop or bureaucrat: Difference between revisions
→Removal of +Autopatrol from User:MCC214: new section |
|||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
They had been warned not to tag LTA pages [https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MCC214&oldid=19536798 here] and they simply blanked those remarks, seemingly they had read the warning. They did it again [https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Peoplelike2222&diff=prev&oldid=19704384 here] which is not needed at all. Just a simple author blanked deletion request is needed at all. Given the history of their talkpage which quite a fair bit of editing issues are shown and most recently [https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MCC214&diff=19697658&oldid=19545126 riley] did point out more concerns and they continued editing without addressing, I am in the point that they should not have autopatrol flag (which they are able to tag other user userpages over the AF).--[[User:Camouflaged Mirage|Camouflaged Mirage]] ([[User talk:Camouflaged Mirage|talk]]) 10:21, 14 January 2020 (UTC) |
They had been warned not to tag LTA pages [https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MCC214&oldid=19536798 here] and they simply blanked those remarks, seemingly they had read the warning. They did it again [https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Peoplelike2222&diff=prev&oldid=19704384 here] which is not needed at all. Just a simple author blanked deletion request is needed at all. Given the history of their talkpage which quite a fair bit of editing issues are shown and most recently [https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MCC214&diff=19697658&oldid=19545126 riley] did point out more concerns and they continued editing without addressing, I am in the point that they should not have autopatrol flag (which they are able to tag other user userpages over the AF).--[[User:Camouflaged Mirage|Camouflaged Mirage]] ([[User talk:Camouflaged Mirage|talk]]) 10:21, 14 January 2020 (UTC) |
||
:Multiple attempts have been made by multiple users to dialogue with [[User:MCC214]] about their editing behavior; none have been dignified with a response. This includes when MCC was issued a 3 day block; the user returned to editing after archiving the block rationale without responding. As attempts to discuss this behavior have gone unanswered, I am going remove autopatrol without further discussion while issuing a warning as continuing this behavior may lead to another block or other restrictions. '''~[[User:~riley|<span style="color:#232323;">''riley''</span>]]''' ''(<span style="color:#4F4F4F;">[[User talk:~riley|<span style="color:#4F4F4F;">talk</span>]]</span>)'' 20:07, 14 January 2020 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:07, 14 January 2020
- Before posting to this page, make sure your comment doesn't belong at one of these specific request pages:
- Requests for (translation/central notice/interface) adminship on this Meta-Wiki
- Requests for CheckUser information on this Meta-Wiki
- Requests for oversight of edits on this Meta-Wiki
- General requests for permissions on other wikis
- Requests for CentralNotice banners and campaigns
- Import is currently enabled in this wiki from some projects. From other wikis, you will need to copy and paste your materials by hand but please remember to add a link, as a permanent link, and the history of the page being imported in the edit summary to avoid copyright violations.
- To report vandalism on Meta: please click here. For immediate assistance, join #wikimedia-metaconnect and use !admin@meta to notify administrators.
- To report cross-wiki vandalism see Steward requests/Miscellaneous.
See also: Stewards' noticeboard, Access to nonpublic personal data policy noticeboard, Category:Meta-Wiki policies, Category:Global policies
General requests for: help from a Meta sysop or bureaucrat · deletion (speedy deletions: local · multilingual) · URL blacklisting · new languages · interwiki map
Personal requests for: username changes · permissions (global) · bot status · adminship on Meta · CheckUser information (local) · local administrator help
Cooperation requests for: comments (local) (global) · translation
- Assistance with Meta-Wiki maintenance is always welcome.
- Many files awaiting review for basic
{{information}}
, source and license.
- Proposal to amend Meta-Wiki's inactivity policy (April 11, 2023).
Please find answered requests in the archives (this month).
![]() |
SpBot archives all sections tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} and sections whose most recent comment is older than 10 days.
|
Abuse filter for IP edits on broadcasts
Would you add an abuse filter to prevent ips from editing subpages of special:prefixindex/Global message delivery/Targets/ ? I don't think IPs can do anything productive there. I'm not sure if broadcasts could even be sent to IP talk pages.
If you want to go a step further: semi-protection of the pages is probably not a good idea as users might not be confirmed before wanting to edit this. However, maybe not-confirmed editors should shouldn't be editing other users entries. Jura1 (talk) 11:19, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
Comment presumably only in the main namespace, rather than to impact the translations that are attached to some of the pages, and would fall under the PAGENAME paths. @Jura1: Do you have some examples of what IP addresses have been doing, as it may be worthwhile customising a disallow notice to better guide them, maybe even look at something translated, or to a landing page. — billinghurst sDrewth 23:18, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
- Is this only an issues on meta-wiki? The local titleblacklist may be better to deal with this. — xaosflux Talk 00:32, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
Is it still a reason that this page to be fully protected? (There's no indication that this page itself is a policy.)--GZWDer (talk) 11:46, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
- The comment on the protection says "official policy amended by OC's member" and I have no reason to argue that. Plus it is an OC and staff managed page, I suggest that you ask them directly. They have rights and can address any concerns that you have. — billinghurst sDrewth 23:05, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
Removal of +Autopatrol from User:MCC214
They had been warned not to tag LTA pages here and they simply blanked those remarks, seemingly they had read the warning. They did it again here which is not needed at all. Just a simple author blanked deletion request is needed at all. Given the history of their talkpage which quite a fair bit of editing issues are shown and most recently riley did point out more concerns and they continued editing without addressing, I am in the point that they should not have autopatrol flag (which they are able to tag other user userpages over the AF).--Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 10:21, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
- Multiple attempts have been made by multiple users to dialogue with User:MCC214 about their editing behavior; none have been dignified with a response. This includes when MCC was issued a 3 day block; the user returned to editing after archiving the block rationale without responding. As attempts to discuss this behavior have gone unanswered, I am going remove autopatrol without further discussion while issuing a warning as continuing this behavior may lead to another block or other restrictions. ~riley (talk) 20:07, 14 January 2020 (UTC)