Abstract Wikipedia/Wikifunctions logo concept/Proposal 17

The zig zag shape references three different manifestations of functions:
- electronic circuits (as the symbol for a resistor); mathematical functions (as a line graph); Wikifunctions itself (as a W).
Like Wikidata's logo, the shape is composed of red, green and blue parallel lines. But instead of being straight, the lines are interwoven like threads in a loom (maybe a Jacquard loom 😊), just as Wikifunctions will interweave raw data from Wikidata to create a rich tapestry of output.
As a small bonus, this interweaving gives the W a crossed center, like in Wikipedia's wordmark.
Resembles the Whataburger logo.

Voting[edit]

Voting has closed.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Support Mahir256 (talk) 00:11, 2 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support XanonymusX (talk) 02:19, 2 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Callback to Wikidata, looks good, ++knots Arlo Barnes (talk) 03:21, 2 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Enaldodiscussão 04:25, 2 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Chaduvari (talk) 04:54, 2 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support David1010 (talk) 06:38, 2 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Diyot (talk) 07:08, 2 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Bocardodarapti (talk) 08:55, 2 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Jon Harald Søby (talk) 10:16, 2 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support BSRF (talk) 10:44, 2 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support GPSLeo (talk) 11:32, 2 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Wikipedia W, colours and threads that look dynamic. Kpjas (talk) 11:48, 2 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support I really enjoy the general idea and design though think that for smaller sizes a more simplified design would be needed. Nw520 (talk) 12:08, 2 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Tgr (talk) 13:17, 2 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Grtek (talk) 15:27, 2 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support However, needs thinner lines for smaller sized, IMHO. Ain92 (talk) 18:28, 2 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support I like it! Gopico (talk) 18:42, 2 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Pennenetui3000 (talk) 20:02, 2 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Koreanovsky (Ča–Kaj–Što?!) 23:35, 2 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Renders decently at small scales. Interweaving languages symbolism. Anon423 (talk) 02:47, 3 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Qwertic (talk) 10:30, 3 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support · · · Peter (Southwood) ^(talk): 14:46, 3 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support the best. Themanwithnowifi (talk) 14:32, 4 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Greatder (talk) 06:40, 5 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Cemal (talk) 07:16, 5 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support as proposer 😊—Neil Shah-Quinn (talk) 08:25, 5 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support nice looking Hoseina051311 (talk) 12:46, 5 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Asartea ^Talk ^{(Enwiki Talk (preferred))} 16:16, 5 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support nicely representing WorldWideWiki interaction --YaganZ (talk) 00:55, 6 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support {{u|Sdkb}} ^talk 01:37, 6 March 2021 (UTC)+Reply[reply]
Support Tiputini
Support KaMan (talk) 11:31, 7 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Qh13 (talk) 17:29, 7 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Nicolabel (talk) 22:35, 7 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support This looks so nice and is very clever! Bearloga (talk) 22:14, 8 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Daniel Mietchen (talk) 03:19, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Ebe123 (Communication | Activity report) 06:55, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Vincent Simar (talk) 21:14, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Also close to the Wonder Woman logo (which even has a tiny lambda peeking out). But no surprise that Diana Prince is a secret fan. –SJ talk 00:42, 10 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support This looks very much like "Wikifunctions" to me, it's an appealing mix of Wikidata, functions and Wikipedia. It does look different enough from other outside logos in my opnion.--Pharos (talk) 01:19, 10 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Palnatoke (talk) 06:03, 10 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Ash Crow (talk) 09:39, 10 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support abi án 12:38, 10 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Amir (talk) 13:34, 10 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support WhatamIdoing (talk) 19:19, 12 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Csisc (talk) 17:04, 13 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support the wub "?!" 18:25, 13 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Kvardek du (talk) 12:27, 14 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Skimel (talk) 19:37, 14 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Ата ^(talk) 06:00, 15 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Itamar Bet (talk) 07:50, 15 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support SCardenas (WMF) (talk) 17:36, 15 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Quiddity (talk) 17:44, 15 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Matma Rex (talk) 18:01, 15 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Incorporating the W (Wiki) into the graph signals in different Wikimedia colours is an excellent fusion. UOzurumba (WMF) (talk) 20:20, 15 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.