Community Wishlist Survey 2023/Miscellaneous/Possibility of thanking for more subsequent edits

Random proposal ►◄ Miscellaneous The survey has concluded. Here are the results!

Possibility of thanking for more subsequent edits

Problem: Somebody made subsequent edits in a single article in a short period of time. I see them in my watchlist and I can add "thanks" for a single edit. But when I open the diff (example), I must first go to history, select one of edits and thank for single edit only.
Proposed solution: For subsequent edits of one user, provide the [thank] link in the diff view.
Who would benefit: Editors and watchlist users
More comments: The notification could read "You received thanks for your edits in <compare link>".
Phabricator tickets:
Proposer: JAn Dudík (talk) 08:20, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

I would very much appreciate this. It's sort of stupid to thank someone for the last edit in a link, one that was probably a minor fix to spelling, when you really appreciated the series of edits. Daniel Case (talk) 00:00, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You could just thank the largest edit. I don't think thanking a range would be hard technically, but for a less experienced user the link to a combined diff might be less understandable than the diff to a single edit. They will still see the specifics of their last edit (timestamp, edit summary etc) as that's how range diffs are displayed. (The task for improving that is T14191.) --Tgr (talk) 03:55, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is that I usually see only the last in a series of edits. Or no one edit is the one I found most helpful. Daniel Case (talk) 06:21, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Voting

Support SeGiba (talk) 21:04, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Rtfroot (talk) 21:34, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Much better than receiving 50 different thanks for copyediting one article. SHB2000 (talk | contribs) 22:58, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Stöter ibland på detta själv Sabelöga (talk) 23:32, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Magnoliasouth (talk) 23:36, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support ·addshore· ^{talk to me!} 00:06, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support DemonDays64 (talk) 00:24, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Klein Muçi (talk) 00:49, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Hyruspex (talk) 01:08, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --NGC 54 (talk｜contribs) 01:10, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yeeno (talk) 02:06, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support St. Andrews Drive (talk) 07:22, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Doktor Züm (talk) 07:46, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jurbop (talk) 07:48, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kekavigi (talk) 08:36, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Arado Ar 196 (talk) 08:41, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Oltrepier (talk) 09:47, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support CaféBuzz (talk) 10:29, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wiki editors are volunteers who give labor for thanks. This infrastructure is fundamental to respect to volunteers. Bluerasberry (talk) 14:49, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nehaoua (talk) 16:00, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Radio-Somewhere (talk) 16:50, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Mbkv717 (talk) 17:14, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support LauraFarina (talk) 18:28, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support VastV0idInSpace0 (talk) 20:08, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support NillaGoon (talk) 22:18, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Toadspike (talk) 22:21, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support De nue pw (talk) 22:25, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Goliv04053 (talk) 00:11, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is better than receiving 50 different thanks -- may disrupt users. Thingofme (talk) 02:59, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Marine 69-71 (talk) 03:58, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support HLFan (talk) 07:33, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wedderkop (talk) 12:16, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yep. My personal experience exactly (of giving them). And on the risk of adding idea on top of another idea, Why can't we add our custom thank you message? We can avoid the technical limitation (or difficulty) in granting this wish, if we could just say when we thank someone, "Thank you for <insert your personal thank you notes here>" instead. ✒ Bennylin 10:04, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tacsipacsi (talk) 19:47, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support //Lollipoplollipoplollipop::talk 13:42, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Barkeep49 (talk) 21:38, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thooompson (talk) 14:21, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Laurent Meesseman (talk) 14:49, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No more thanking notifications please. Ruthven (msg) 15:41, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Aishik Rehman (talk) 07:37, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support cyrfaw (talk) 11:20, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Hey man im josh (talk) 17:03, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Geraki ^T_L 11:29, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 06:22, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support · · · Peter (Southwood) ^(talk): 11:18, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cryorett (talk) 13:17, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Unexpectedlydian (talk) 15:58, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Hans5958 (talk) 05:21, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmarsch (talk) 06:24, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 11:18, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support —מקף⁻ණ (Hyphen) 23:58, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support yes please DrowssapSMM (talk) 16:54, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Serieminou (talk) 22:53, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Althair (talk) 04:36, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tchoř (talk) 10:21, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. —— Eric Liu_（Talk） 03:14, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]