Grants talk:Project/Modjou/Wiki Kouman 2019 en Côte d'Ivoire (Local language in Côte d'Ivoire)
Project Grant proposal submissions due 30 November![edit]
Thanks for drafting your Project Grant proposal. As a reminder, proposals are due on November 30th by the end of the day in your local time. In order for this submission to be reviewed for eligibility, it must be formally proposed. When you have completed filling out the infobox and have fully responded to the questions on your draft, please change status=draft to status=proposed to formally submit your grant proposal. This can be found in the Probox template found on your grant proposal page. Importantly, proposals that are submitted after the deadline will not be eligible for review during this round. If you're having any difficulty or encounter any unexpected issues when changing the proposal status, please feel free to e-mail me at cschillingwikimedia.org or contact me on my talk page. Thanks, I JethroBT (WMF) (talk) 23:20, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
- Hello I JethroBT (WMF), Thank you very much.--Modjou (talk) 01:11, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
Eligibility confirmed, round 2 2018[edit]
We've confirmed your proposal is eligible for round 2 2018 review. Please feel free to ask questions and make changes to this proposal as discussions continue during the community comments period, through January 2, 2019.
The Project Grant committee's formal review for round 2 2018 will occur January 3-January 28, 2019. Grantees will be announced March 1, 2018. See the schedule for more details.
Questions? Contact us.--I JethroBT (WMF) (talk) 03:09, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
Questions de Lyokoï[edit]
Salut ! Je découvre ce projet de grant et j'ai quelques questions, étant wiktionnariste j'aimerais savoir comment tu compte procéder techniquement ? Et quel est la connaissance qu'ont les participants de leurs propres langues, ils et elles savent l'écrire (moi ça n'a pas été le cas quand j'ai fait ça pour des langues régionales en France) ? Lyokoï (talk) 18:06, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
- Salut Lyokoï!, Pendant la phase pilote j'ai confectionné un formulaire pour permettre à tous les intéressés de s'inscrire. Par la suite j'ai sélectionné les candidats en fonction des réponses qu'ils ont fourni (leur motivation, leur niveau de connaissance dans leur langue locale,etc). Cette méthode nous a évité plusieurs désagréments et a très bien fonctionné. C'est donc le même procédé que je compte suivre pour la suite. Au plaisir.--Modjou (talk) 20:34, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Aggregated feedback from the committee for Modjou/Wiki Kouman 2019 en Côte d'Ivoire (Local language in Côte d'Ivoire)[edit]
Scoring rubric | Score | |
(A) Impact potential
|
8.3 | |
(B) Community engagement
|
7.0 | |
(C) Ability to execute
|
6.5 | |
(D) Measures of success
|
5.8 | |
Additional comments from the Committee:
|
This proposal has been recommended for due diligence review.
The Project Grants Committee has conducted a preliminary assessment of your proposal and recommended it for due diligence review. This means that a majority of the committee reviewers favorably assessed this proposal and have requested further investigation by Wikimedia Foundation staff.
Next steps:
- Aggregated committee comments from the committee are posted above. Note that these comments may vary, or even contradict each other, since they reflect the conclusions of multiple individual committee members who independently reviewed this proposal. We recommend that you review all the feedback and post any responses, clarifications or questions on this talk page.
- Following due diligence review, a final funding decision will be announced on March 1st, 2019.
I JethroBT (WMF) (talk) 19:40, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Round 2 2018 decision[edit]
Congratulations! Your proposal has been selected for a Project Grant.
The committee has recommended this proposal and WMF has approved funding for the full amount of your request, 25,487.68 USD
Comments regarding this decision:
The committee supports Wiki Kouman 2019 in an effort to record and document local languages of Côte d'Ivoire on French Wiktionary and Wikimedia Commons, and to train local community members to develop this content. Given the investment required for this work related to project management, the committee requests that the applicants consider carefully how to encourage continued engagement by the event participants beyond the grant period.
Next steps:
- You will be contacted to sign a grant agreement and setup a monthly check-in schedule.
- Review the information for grantees.
- Use the new buttons on your original proposal to create your project pages.
- Start work on your project!
Upcoming changes to Wikimedia Foundation Grants
Over the last year, the Wikimedia Foundation has been undergoing a community consultation process to launch a new grants strategy. Our proposed programs are posted on Meta here: Grants Strategy Relaunch 2020-2021. If you have suggestions about how we can improve our programs in the future, you can find information about how to give feedback here: Get involved. We are also currently seeking candidates to serve on regional grants committees and we'd appreciate it if you could help us spread the word to strong candidates--you can find out more here. We will launch our new programs in July 2021. If you are interested in submitting future proposals for funding, stay tuned to learn more about our future programs.On behalf of the Project Grants Committee, KCVelaga (talk) 05:10, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
Results[edit]
Thank you for working on some very important and promising area of Wikimedia projects, namely Wiktionary and local languages, where there's a lot of low hanging fruit. If I read the report correctly, we got something like a thousand lemmas, a hundred recordings and 30 new users; if I read the statistics correctly, a single user is responsible for more than half of the output.
The numbers are a bit underwhelming when compared to the expenses involved: for instance the Serbian Wiktionary grant seems to have created about 30k lemmas with a similar amount, while the various Igo Wiktionary grants appear to have a similar participation with one tenth of the budget. Some affiliates like Serbia and Armenia seem to have been bigger outputs, while others a bit smaller (Israel), but the numbers aren't necessarily comparable.
I understand however that this project was probably in a less favourable context, so it would be interesting to learn whether you think this project has shown you a way to make the activities sustainable in the long run. Hopefully a comparison with other international experiences will also be useful. Nemo 19:59, 22 February 2020 (UTC)