Meta:Requests for bureaucratship/Thehelpfulone
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.
- Successful, no objections and more than enough crat endorsements, mine notwithstanding. Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 15:51, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thehelpfulone[edit]
- Thehelpfulone (talk • contribs • count • logs • page moves • block log • CA • email)
Hi all! I've been a Meta-Wiki admin for just under a year now (granted I had a few months in-between where I was inactive altogether). I'm one of the most active admins, with ~5500 edits and over 500 log actions, and run User:Thehelpfulbot across a few wikis, for double redirect fixing and interwiki links. I'm also a translation administrator, one of the reasons why I'd like to request the extra mop as there have been requests for translation adminship recently that can be processed fairly uncontroversially (and as this is an area I'm active in, I know who would be suitable). Meta:Changing username can always do with an extra pair of hands, especially as a large proportion of our active crats are stewards so are busy with other tasks. Finally, I'm a bureaucrat on test.wikipedia and Outreach so I know how to use the tools. Thanks for your consideration. The Helpful One 15:54, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- crat endorsement - No problem for me. -Barras talk 15:56, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Endorse - Of course. :) Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 16:10, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes - This message is approved by the Addihockey10 cabal. Addihockey10 (talk) 16:14, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Support, trustworthy and active user. Snowolf How can I help? 16:18, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Support: No problems. ~ ⇒TomTomN00 @ 16:33, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- More bureaucrats! :) Ajraddatz (Talk) 17:01, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Support one of the most active admins here. πr2 (t • c) 17:40, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Because he is Thehelpfulone. :D --WizardOfOz talk 18:08, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Support I was expecting this. :) Good luck in advance! Trijnsteltalk 18:23, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Why not? -FASTILY (TALK) 21:06, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Endorse Good role for a good admin. fr33kman 22:38, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. Ruy Pugliesi◥ 01:39, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Support, no problems here. Jafeluv (talk) 10:54, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Useless 'crat endorse. — [ Tanvir | Talk ] 11:01, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --Luckas msg 12:22, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Support, sure!--Frigotoni ...i'm here; 14:42, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]