Stewards/confirm/2011/Nick1915

Nick1915[edit]

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, xWikiness, recent logs, all logs & activity | translate: translation help, statement

English:

Languages: it, vec, en-2, he-1, fr-1, es-1
Personal info: This past year, due to university tasks (reaching bachelor degree), I have been less active as the year before. I've done my best trying to help in request pages and wherever/whenever was possible, but my freetime was so short! I hope I'm still trusted and now, that I'm less busy in my real life, I think I could be helpful as a steward. Thank you.

español:

Idiomas: en
Información personal: su discurso aquí

русский:

Языки: en
Личная информация: здесь должно быть заявление

Comments about Nick1915[edit]

—DerHexer (Talk) 00:13, 7 February 2011 (UTC) Should be confirmed.[reply]
Keep - @lestaty ^discuţie 00:27, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Active, helpful and experienced. No objections. -- Dferg ^{☎ talk} 00:42, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep friendly and helpful , looking forward to work another year with you Mardetanha ^talk 01:07, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
-- Màñüé£†¹5 ^talk _es 01:28, 7 February 2011 (UTC) Keep doing a great job![reply]
behold Thank you for doing this job. Finn Rindahl 01:58, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -FASTILY ^(TALK) 02:30, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
no objections --Jan eissfeldt 08:47, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Rather a strong keep for me - good work done --Herby ^{talk thyme} 15:54, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Roberto Segnali all'Indiano 11:40, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep micki t 14:19, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sure. Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 14:34, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Miaou ? DarkoNeko 15:48, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Maximillion Pegasus 15:56, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Melos 17:56, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --WizardOfOz ^talk 19:42, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
confirm, no issues –Juliancolton | ^Talk 19:53, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -Barras 20:15, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Trijnstel 20:31, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No - rude, incivil, ignores policy, makes up claims about policy that are unfounded, and cannot be trusted with any privileges. Ottava Rima (talk) 20:40, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Tanvir • 02:57, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Bhawani 16:41, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Chaojoker 17:48, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Avi 18:02, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Vituzzu 18:51, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --valepert 18:52, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Piero Montesacro 19:06, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Ask21 19:08, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- only objection above known to be spurious. --Abd 03:03, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih 09:39, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose,Strong Oppose i think a steward decisions should be based on policies not on their own decision--Mayur ^{(talk•Email)} 12:44, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- sorry? Which decisions?--Nick1915 -^{all you want} 16:04, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - Hmm! You changed mine, rohit and bhavani gautum user group to temporary admin inspite of 5-7 votes in favour.I was agree for not granting bureaucrat access because atleast some admins should be there before we promote any body as bureaucrat on a wiki.But temporary access is granted only when we have no vote in vaour or 1 or 2 vote in vaour.We provided consensus link as required but you simply took your own decision to grant us a temporay adminship without any policy of such kind.--Mayur ^{(talk•Email)} 18:11, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    - two of those have 4 votes and just one with 5 votes, there's no policy about the number of the votes, but it's clear that when a project is too small or has too few active users it's "advisable to grant temporary rather than permanent rights" as steward handbook said.--Nick1915 -^{all you want} 19:01, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
      - Then why your steward hanbook was not followd for users who have already been granted permanent sysops and bureaucrat flag on these small projects.This permanent sysops and bureacrats are inactive since 2-3 years. Whether it is steward handbook or anything else all users should be treated under same behaviour And hi wiktionay is not a small project it has 4 admins and one bureaucrat and some active users too.Your act simply violated the fact that Stewards simply work on commnuity consensus--Mayur ^{(talk•Email)} 19:38, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
        Sorry, it's not the same thing, "historical" sysops or 'crats were flagged in a time when policies weren't so clear (or didn't exist yet); now we're obliged to follow actual policies and it's not up to us to act toward them -old sysops- without a local agreement.--Nick1915 -^{all you want} 19:59, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
        Still you are not able to justify because as per your statement "now we're obliged to follow actual policies and it's not up to us to act toward them -old sysops- without a local agreement" and You are treating hi wikitionary a small wiki project which have already a very unactive bureaucrat and 3 very inactive sysop.You were in so hurry to grant 6 month tempory access that you also mentioned wrong refernce in edit summory of my right change by you.finally it is very wrong to grant temporary acces for 3 months without any vote and temporay access for only 6 month with 5 votes in a project having bureaucrat.Really a very frustrating action taken by you on behalf of your own opinion--Mayur ^{(talk•Email)} 18:28, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
        I'm sorry, but what you say makes no sense (PS if look better, that diff contains in the same way your request' infos). My last post--Nick1915 -^{all you want} 11:49, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, Nick sorry if my any statement hurted you but i was examining your behaviour and some query of mine.You are A active and hard working steward,Good luck--Mayur ^{(talk•Email)} 14:46, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, active steward --Mercy 12:51, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep fetchcomms☛ 02:45, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, no problems here. Jafeluv 09:41, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --birdy geimfyglið _(:> )=| 16:09, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Alex Pereira ^falaê 18:03, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Romaine 20:06, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. --Erwin 12:45, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Mjbmr ^Talk 15:27, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Christian Giersing 06:58, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira 22:33, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Conditional Keep Given that you are not as busy right now.--Snaevar 21:38, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Vigorous action 10:01, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Precious antitroll weapon. - εΔ ω 19:05, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
Keep Very active. --Millosh 17:56, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Shizhao 13:09, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Béria Lima ^msg 17:35, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Zyephyrus 06:50, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Hoo man (talk) 11:31, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]