Steward requests/Permissions: Difference between revisions

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Browse history interactively
← Older editNewer edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
move request to the correct section
Line 153: Line 153:
}}
}}
Previously I had applied for edit interface right at sa.wikipedia to enable transliteration tool there ([[Steward_requests/Permissions#Junaidpv_.40_sa.wikipedia.org]]). As there is no right like 'edit interface' at sa.wikipedia, I change my request and now apply for temporary admin right. I will help the wiki to integrate the transliteration tool there. Thank you [[User:Junaidpv|Junaidpv]] 06:25, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
Previously I had applied for edit interface right at sa.wikipedia to enable transliteration tool there ([[Steward_requests/Permissions#Junaidpv_.40_sa.wikipedia.org]]). As there is no right like 'edit interface' at sa.wikipedia, I change my request and now apply for temporary admin right. I will help the wiki to integrate the transliteration tool there. Thank you [[User:Junaidpv|Junaidpv]] 06:25, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

====Adeliine@et.wikimedia====
{{sr-request
|status = <!--don't change this line-->
|domain = et.wikimedia
|user name = Adeliine
|discussion= [http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_chapters#Wikimedia_Eesti Meta-page showing Wikimedia Estonia board members]
}}
I am Teele Vaalma (global username Adeliine), a board member of Wikimedia Estonia. I am asking for sysop rights to change wiki interface (i.e. links on the sidebar should be suitable for the organization - contact, membership etc.), manage pages (delete, protect from editing), blocking vandals if necessary. [[User:Adeliine|Adeliine]] 22:48, 4 November 2010 (UTC)


=== Bureaucrat access ===
=== Bureaucrat access ===

Revision as of 22:48, 4 November 2010

Shortcut:
SRP

This page is for requests to have stewards grant or revoke administrator, bureaucrat, checkuser, and oversight rights on Wikimedia projects which do not have a local permissions procedure.

Old sections are archived. The list of archives is below.

  • Requests for bot flags are handled at SRB, and requests for global permissions are handled at SRGP.
  • If you are requesting adminship or bureaucratship, and your wiki has a local bureaucrat, submit your request to that user or to the relevant local request page (index).
  • For urgent requests, such as to combat large-scale vandalism on a small wiki, contact a steward in the #wikimedia-stewardsconnect IRC channel. In emergencies, type !steward in the channel to get the attention of stewards. Otherwise, you can type @steward for non-urgent help.

Other than requests to remove your own access or emergencies, please only make requests here after gaining the on-wiki approval of your local community.

Quick navigation: Administrator | Interface administrator | Bureaucrat | CheckUser | Oversight | Removal of access | Miscellaneous | Global permissions

(translate | edit)

Cross-wiki requests
Meta-Wiki requests

Using this page

1. Place the following code at the bottom of the appropriate section below: 

==== Username@xxproject ====
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!-- don't change this line -->
 |domain    = <!-- such as en.wikibooks -->
 |user name = 
 |discussion= 
}}
(your remarks) ~~~~

2. Fill in the values:

  • domain: the wiki's URL domain (like "ex.wikipedia" or "meta.wikimedia").
  • user name: the name of the user whose rights are to be changed (like "Exampleuser"). In case you're requesting access for multiple bots, leave this field blank and give a list of these bots in your remarks
  • discussion: a link to the local vote or discussion about the rights change (for example, "[[ex:Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship#ExampleUser]]"). This should normally be for at least one week, but no more than three weeks (if so, you'll need to restart the process).

3. If anything is missing from your request, a steward will request more information.

Confirmation of signing confidentiality agreement

Certain permissions (notably CheckUser and Oversight) additionally require users to sign a confidentiality agreement. Users requesting these permissions must make a request below, and must also sign the confidentiality agreement with the Wikimedia Foundation. The request is placed on hold temporarily, until the receipt has been formally confirmed by the Office.

Requests

COPY THE FOLLOWING CODE to the bottom of the appropriate section below: 

==== user name@xxproject ====
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!--don't change this line-->
 |domain    =
 |user name =
 |discussion= 
}}

Administrator access

See administrator for information about the position. Requests for removal of access belong in another section. Admins doing cross-wiki work may wish to see IRC/wikimedia-admin for information about joining #wikimedia-admin.

If you are requesting administrator status to translate the wiki interface, this should be done at the translatewiki.net instead (see mw:localisation). You can ask questions in the IRC channel or on the mailing list.

If you are requesting adminship to handle one-time vandalism incidents or clearing a deletion backlog, please see Vandalism reports and Steward requests/Speedy deletions.

Stewards
Currently-active temporary permissions are listed at /Approved temporary; copy granted requests to the appropriate section there, stating the date of removal in the section header and at the bottom of the request. Please invite new sysops to the admin IRC channel.
Archiving
Requests only need remain listed below for a few days, and may afterward be removed as long as they have been copied to the subpage. Users who archive requests on that page, please check if the request was correctly added to the temporary subpage before removing it from this page.

For permanent sysopship please provide a link to the local community approval. For temporary sysopship please state for how long and for which tasks you need it, and link to a local announcement.

Mayur @ sa.wikipedia.org

Status:    In progress

Hi i am a bureacrat on hindi wikipedia and also working with sanskrit wikipedia.But it is very difiicult to contribute there without transliteration tool and some other gadgets.I have already done it for hi wikipedia, but donot have sysop access on sa wikipedia.I requested there about one month ago but here are no active users, admins(not active for last 135 days) and bureaucrat(not active for last 70 days).So i am requesting here.Thank you--Mayur(Talk•Email)  04:29, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Comment Mayur, as I heard, Shiju and Junaid are working on the translit tools for sa wiki. I would rather wait for that than duplicating the work. --Jyothis 21:24, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Comment Ok, i am taking back my proposal, i was appllied for it one month back when this wiki got vector format. and how do you think i will make duplicate work, i have made transliteration tool for sanskrit seperately one month ago.there is very less difference between hindi devnagri and sanskrit devnagri script. But i also think that junaid work will be up to the mark so i have no interest left for adminship of sa wiki.However i didnot applied for installation of tool only, i wanted to work with that wiki and improve it quality but as far as i observe now its malyalam wikipedian who have taken the whole responsibility for indian languagges growth, So it will be better for me to work with my home project or if they want to reinstall transliteration tool in hi wiki i can left my crat and admin flag there.Thank you very much for your humble response--Mayur(Talk•Email) 

If I can be a pest, Mayur, I'd like to note that Jyothis has started an RFC at Requests for comment/Indic Sysop which may be of interest to you. Kylu 01:10, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Artem Korzhimanov@ru.wikinews

Status:    In progress

I have more than 400 edits in this domain and I am an administrator and arbitrator in ru.wp. I would like to help with importing some useful features for which I need access to MediaWiki. Our community is quite small (about 6-7 active users) so I hope 2 3 votes "pro" is enough for making decision. Artem Korzhimanov 14:13, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Are there any active users with edit histories more than a couple months old? I see that everybody who voted for you are rather new to ru.wikinews; I would like to see what more experienced users have to say. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 21:37, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hm... Probably, I am misunderstanding your question, but two "pro" votes were given by Akishin D. and Ssr. Both have quite long edit histories: Akishin — since March, 2010 and Ssr —since May, 2010. Both are administrators and the most active editors now. Artem Korzhimanov 08:44, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Without many active users, I prefer granting temporary flag while your wiki already has a few other administrators.Jusjih 03:25, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Temporary flag, say, for a half a year would be ok. Artem Korzhimanov 08:44, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bhawani Gautam Rhk@ne.wikibooks

Status:    Not done

presently there are no active comunity and no admin in ne.wikibooks. As I am already admin in Nepali wikipedia.

I want to contribute and make ne.wikibooks active as a sysop pl.-- Bhawani Gautam Rhk14:12, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

Hum, please wait (7 days) a "decision" here, and continue your contribution to the this wiki... but I think that a temp adminship is a good idea. - @lestaty discuţie 23:48, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Not done No response from the community and no contribution on the wiki by the requester. -- @lestaty discuţie 02:51, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gapo@kowikinews

Status:    Done

Thank you. – Kwj2772 (msg) 15:12, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done --dferg ☎ talk 18:19, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ezagren@bjn.wikipedia

Status:    Done

Thank's. --Ezagren 16:02, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like a clear-cut case, but with the vote started on October 26, I would like to wait for a few more days.Jusjih 02:56, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Done I gave to you a temporary permission for six months, just to the community see your work as sysop. Expires 28 April 2011. Enjoy. -- @lestaty discuţie 03:06, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Les Meloures@lbwiktionary

Status:    Done

Les Meloures got a temporary adminship of three months (see here) and was one of the two only active sysops on this project (with Ooswesthoesbes@lbwiktionary) since his temporary sysopship expired. I think that, regarding to his contributions and sysop operations, permanent adminship could be fine. Thanks. Quentinv57 12:01, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The community needs to be informed before no matter if it is for permanent or temporary adminship. As far as I can see there's no current local announcement regarding this request. Please tell him to open a RfA & leave it open for a week. We will see after that time. Thanks, --dferg ☎ talk 13:50, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Please see this discussion. Therefore, this community sums up itself as this user [3]. -- Quentinv57 17:57, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Despite that, I think that we will need a more fresh community announcement. I humbly think that a announcement from July is not valid. Regards, --dferg ☎ talk 23:12, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, sure. He started a new discussion this morning here. I'll PM you next week-end. Thanks. -- Quentinv57 10:43, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The following message has been moved from Steward requests/Permissions/2010-10 :

Hello,
Please can my sysop status be reactivated. Actually I am the only luxemburgish speaking member on this project, who can do this task as a native speaker. I can't do all corrections without sysop status. I'm sysop on lb:Wiki since four years.
Best regards Les Meloures 08:21, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Done, expires: 04/05/2011 please remember to translate the interface at betawiki: only and to upload images preferably to commons:, please come back a few days before the status expires to prolong it or hold a local voting if the community grows, thanks --dferg ☎ talk 16:41, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Albert galiza@glwiktionary

Status:    In progress

On wikt:gl:, Albert galiza was elected as a new administrator. Grant him the status, please. Thanks. [ Furagaitas * ] 18:49, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Per longstanding practice and subsequent RfC, 2 votes are not considered enough for promoting somebody to permanent administrator status. Notwithstanding 3 months of temporary and renewable adminship can be granted if the user agrees with that. Regards, --dferg ☎ talk 23:07, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
He's been a bureaucrat at gl.wiki since 2008, and both gl.wikt and gl.wiki have been very connected. [ Furagaitas * ] 18:21, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Please don't refer to the RFC as if it was policy. thanks. Seb az86556 18:56, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WizardOfOz @ bs.wikinews.org

Status:    Done

Hello. I´m requesting a temporary adminship for updating of the main page and some deletions for a month or shorter. Please see also Proposals for closing projects/Closure of Bosnian Wikinews. We want to restart the project and there are no active admins around. I´m sysop here on meta, bs.wikipedia, bs.wikiquote and GR. THX --WizardOfOz talk 09:58, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done as this is a trusted community member. Until December 1 2010. --FiliP ██ 11:11, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

JenVan@ruwikibooks

Status:    In progress

See also User talk:Kylu#JenVan@ruwikibooks. Thanks! JenVan (talk) 11:46, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Junaidpv@sawikipedia

Status:    In progress

Previously I had applied for edit interface right at sa.wikipedia to enable transliteration tool there (Steward_requests/Permissions#Junaidpv_.40_sa.wikipedia.org). As there is no right like 'edit interface' at sa.wikipedia, I change my request and now apply for temporary admin right. I will help the wiki to integrate the transliteration tool there. Thank you Junaidpv 06:25, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Adeliine@et.wikimedia

Status:    In progress

I am Teele Vaalma (global username Adeliine), a board member of Wikimedia Estonia. I am asking for sysop rights to change wiki interface (i.e. links on the sidebar should be suitable for the organization - contact, membership etc.), manage pages (delete, protect from editing), blocking vandals if necessary. Adeliine 22:48, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bureaucrat access

Steward requests/Permissions/Crat-header


Akishin D.@ruwikinews

Status:    In progress

Sorry, I don't understand how many votes I should have. Thank you.Дмитрий talk+ 13:30, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I imagine it's safe to state that one isn't enough. Usually we want to see a minimum of 15, but that number is rather variable and nobody's much been involved in the discussion about it lately. Want to keep your vote open longer? Kylu 03:07, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
In our project we can not have so much votes. I get only 9 votes. Do Meta have some time limit for voting?Дмитрий talk+ 14:37, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
To avoid violating "meatpuppetry" guidelines, it'd be preferable that the teenage voters don't have enough time to meet eachother, get married, have children, and those children have grandchildren, all of which are voting on the same issue. Other than that, there's not really any huge guideline, so let's say a maximum of ten years, to be on the safe side? Kylu 13:12, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'm noting that the diffs for the first six votes are on n:ru:Викиновости:Заявки на статус бюрократа by the way, as Akishin D. copied them over to the new page without linking to the source in the edit summaries. Kylu 16:55, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I am copied them from n:ru:Викиновости:Заявки на статус бюрократа. Look at the history. Дмитрий talk+ 13:46, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Zawthet@Myanmar Wikipedia

Status:    Not done

I would like to request for Bureaucrat access in Myanmar Wikipedia as there is no active local Bureaucrat. Zawthet 09:36, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Um, while it's awfully nice of you to pre-decline the request diff, you should probably wait at least a couple weeks first and see if you get some votes. Kylu 02:14, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Steward consensus was that there were too few votes. This would indicate your community is still too small to need a bureaucrat. Please comment on Talk:Bureaucrat#Minimum_number_of_votes if you feel strongly that we are wrong. Shanel 23:05, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RajeshPandey@ne.wikipedia

Status:    Not done

There are no bureaucrats in Nepali wikipedia. I am a wikimania scholar, had been to Wikimania Gdansk 2010, and I have been an administrator in Nepali wiki before 2007. We need a bureaucrat. I hope this will be helpful. Thanks. --RajeshPandey 20:24, 2 October 2010 (UTC) from ne:user:RajeshPandey[reply]

Unless I am hallucinating, discussion you linked to doesn't seem to exist. Shanel 08:58, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The link was broken; now fixed, but just 1 day old. –SJ · talk | translate 23:48, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Please leave your discussion open for two weeks. Kylu 23:45, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Steward consensus was that there were too few votes. This would indicate your community is still too small to need a bureaucrat. Please comment on Talk:Bureaucrat#Minimum_number_of_votes if you feel strongly that we are wrong. Shanel 23:05, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Murma174 @ frrwiki

Status:    In progress

There were only 7 pro's received, but considering, frr is a minority language, this is an acceptable quote IMO. --Murma174 09:57, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Comment There's an ongoing (if slow) discussion at Requests_for_comment/Minimum_voting_requirements#Minimum_requirements_to_elect_Bureaucrats which you may want to join regarding the subject of how many votes are required to prove that a local community is active enough to qualify for local bureaucrats. To protect your project, you may want to consider implementing an inactivity policy of some sort, along the lines of "If I'm inactive for X months, people with access may perform bureaucrat related tasks in my stead". Just a thought. Kylu 16:21, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Meanwhile it are 9 pro's(10 including me;-)). And I implemeted an inactivity-policy. Thank you for this hint! --Murma174 11:24, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Now there are 10 votes (excluding Murma174). Holder 03:48, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
So by your preference on the discussion page, you want to wait for another five, yes? Kylu 03:50, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know, perhaps also 10 votes could be enough for a small wiki ;-) Holder 16:16, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
full support - in the first weeks and months I was editig and helping on frr, -jkb- 18:33, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Albert galiza@glwiktionary

Status:    Not done

On wikt:gl:, Albert galiza was elected as a new bureaucrat. Grant him the status, please. Thanks. [ Furagaitas * ] 18:50, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm tending to decline this request. The RfC is setting that we need 10/15 votes to promote somebody to bureaucrat status. Two votes is not even enough for promoting somebody to permanent sysop status. Comments welcome. --dferg ☎ talk 23:02, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Kylu 16:59, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
so this RFC is policy now? Seb az86556 15:22, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The RFC is not policy, but I doubt that you will find a steward who will promote someone to bureaucrat where there are a total of two votes and the existing bureaucrat was not, as far as I can tell, contacted at all. This is, of course, exactly the reason I started that RfC to begin with: So we'd have a firm policy and when "obvious" declines like this come up, they can be handled with a minimum of fuss. Kylu 15:33, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I was just making sure; I don't oppose this request's being declined, I was just stunned by the reason given. The RFC ain't over/done yet and I'm still not sure about a lot of the stuff that's been said there. Thanks Kyulu. Seb az86556 15:58, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CheckUser access

Steward requests/Permissions/CU-header

ماني@fawiki

Status:    In progress

per discussion above , as local crat , i closed the RFCU as successful , i also asked from the user to send identification to the foundation as soon as possible Mardetanha talk 17:51, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Progress report? --dferg ☎ talk 23:25, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Castelobranco@ptwiki

Status:    Done

On wiki.pt, Castelobranco was elected for a one-year term as surrogate (70%-80% in pro/con voting and at least 25-30 editors' approval), ready to take the place of Daimore. He is also identified since February 2010. Thanks. Ruy Pugliesi◥ 20:48, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Granted Mardetanha talk 21:06, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

MagnusA@svwiki

MagnusA has been elected as new Checkuser on sv.wikipedia. He himself will tell You when he wants to have the CU-flag set, since he wants to finish some beuraucrat-clean-up before he becomes a checkuser. (When he becomes Checkuser, he has to resign as beuraucrat because of local policy.) I give You this message now to prevent other users to ask for the CU-flag for MagnusA. -- Lavallen 09:32, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And now I am ready to make the move. MagnusA 07:18, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Status:    Done

I have been elected as CheckUser at svwiki with 42 votes support and none against. I have identified myself to WMF.

Please also remove my bureaucrat access at svwiki. As Lavallen says above I have to return these tools due to local policy at svwiki.

One side note: The account for Höstblomma (svwiki's new Oversighter) is a fully global account. May the svwiki tag that was appended to her account on the Identification board be removed? MagnusA 14:49, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done, also removed the svwiki tag for Höstblomma Shanel 00:55, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oversight access

To request to have content oversighted, ask in #wikimedia-stewards, or email oversight-l@lists.wikimedia.org for requests regarding English Wikipedia. This is the place to request Oversight access. Note that temporary Oversight access is not permitted and the temporary status is only used by Stewards.

Stewards
Do not grant Oversight access unless the user is identified to the foundation, which will be announced on the Identification noticeboard. When you give someone oversight access, list them on Oversight.

Höstblomma@svwiki

Status:    Done

Höstblomma has been elected for Oversight access with 41 votes and no against. She has been informed, that she has to send a copy of her identification document to WMF. -- Lavallen 08:36, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

She has identified. Philippe (WMF) 09:46, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It's a SUL-account, You can remove the "sv" from the identification-template. -- Lavallen 10:09, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Done. LeinaD (t) 10:51, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of access

<translate>

  • If you're requesting the removal of your own permissions, make sure you're logged in to your account. If you have multiple flags, specify which you want removed. Stewards may delay your request a short time to ensure you have time to rethink your request (see [[<tvar name="self-discussion">Talk:Steward_requests/Permissions/2011#Self_requests</tvar>|previous discussion]] on 24 hour delays); the rights will not be restored by stewards once they are removed.
  • To request the removal of another user's permissions, you must gain consensus on the local wiki first. When there is community consensus that the user's access should be removed, provide a link to the discussion, with a brief explanation of the reason for the request, and summarize the results of discussion. However, as bureaucrats of some wikis may remove users from the administrator or bureaucrat group, please see also a [[<tvar name="crat-rem">Bureaucrat#Removing_access</tvar>|separate list of these specific wikis]].
  • To request the removal of another user's permissions for inactivity, link to your local inactivity policy. If your site does not have inactivity policy, the global policy [[<tvar name="aar">Admin activity review</tvar>|Admin activity review]] applies.
  • See the [[<tvar name="usage">#Using this page</tvar>|instructions above]] for adding new requests. Please post new requests at the bottom of the section.</translate>


Nicke L@svwiki

Status:    Done

Swedish Wikipedia has a one-year-policy for sysop/crats. (local policy) Nicke chooses to not ask for a new period. Sysop access should be removed. -- Lavallen 10:32, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think this is the diff Lavallen is referring to: Nicke will not seek reelection. Diupwijk 11:34, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Utført Laaknor 12:00, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thuresson@svwiki

Status:    Done

Swedish Wikipedia has a one-year-policy for sysop/crats. (local policy) Thuresson resigns as bureaucrat as above. To be re-elected as sysop, you need 75% support (local policy), which he failed to get. Both crat and sysop access should then be removed. -- Lavallen 10:32, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Utført. Laaknor 12:00, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Svanen93@svwiki

Status:    Done

sv.wikipedia has a one-year policy. -- Lavallen 16:32, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done Shanel 00:43, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wind@ruwiki

Status:    Done

I'm an arbiter of the Russian AC, you can check my status here.

The AC gave the bureaucrat Wind one week to begin the confirmation in order to confirm this flag. After it hasn't been done, the flag should be removed. --Track13 0_o 00:29, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done crat flag removed. Regards -- @lestaty discuţie 02:48, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

B****n@svwiki

Status:    Done

Same as "Svanen93" and "Nicke L" above. -- Lavallen 18:58, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Jyothis 19:07, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actarus Prince d'Euphor@frwiktionary

Status:    In progress

First election (fr:wikt:Wiktionnaire:Administrateurs/Actarus Prince d'Euphor) : 8 Pour, 3 Contre, 1 Neutre --> Local decision (4 August 2010) : temporary permission for 3 months (End : 4 november 2010).

Second election (fr:wikt:Wiktionnaire:Administrateurs/Actarus Prince d'Euphor (2) August-September 2010) : 5 Pour, 4 Contre, 3 Neutre. Local decision : End : 4 nov 2010 not protested.

Can you please proceed the removal of Actarus Prince d'Euphor sysop flag in the french Wiktionnary ? Thanks. Stephane8888 09:40, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Miscellaneous requests

Steward requests/Permissions/Misc-header

Junaidpv @ sa.wikipedia.org

Status:    In progress

Hi, I am a sysop at ml.wikipedia and ml.wikibooks, developed and implemented a language independent transliteration tool. Integrated it to ml.wikipedia and ml.wikibooks, helped hi.wikipedia to enable it. Now I would like to help sa.wikipedia too for the same purpose. So I am requesting here for edit interface right at sa.wikipedia.org. Thank you. Junaidpv 15:27, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There is no local right by that name, though you could ask for adminship there to edit MediaWiki pages. I wonder if you may also be interested in this proposal: Requests_for_comment/Indic_Sysop. Kylu 15:36, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If there is no local right by this name and getting a sysop right is the only way to edit Mediwiki pages. Then I change my request to get Sysop right. If a new separate request have to be submitted above for this purpose, let me know or you can move this. Junaidpv 17:28, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You'll need a new vote, also. Consider that some people may be happy to give him the ability to add such tools, but hesitant to provide other abilities as well. Once you have results for admin tools, please create a new section above for that. Thanks. Kylu 18:10, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Comment :Hi , I am a sanskrit wikipedian. it is very difficult to edit sanskrit wikipedia without the help of an inbuilt typing tool. and it will be very helpful if Mr. Junaid can provide a good typing tool for us. this is very important and will help a lot in the development of sanskrit wikipedia community.so I request here to grant the edit interface right to Mr.Junaid as soon as possible.If there is no local right by that name then I request here to grant him sysop access to the sa.wikipedia for the above mentioned purpose. PS: His request is accepted by local community [ Link ] Thank you, --Hrishikesh.kb 16:29, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciated, but please have them vote explicitly for granting him adminship (temporary or otherwise) first in a new section and mark the old one as "not doable" since there's no such right. Kylu 17:16, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I have submitted a new request above for temporary admin right. Junaidpv 06:29, 3 November 2010 (UTC) Steward requests/Permissions/Footer[reply]

Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steward_requests/Permissions&oldid=2188698"