Jump to content

Steward requests/Global: Difference between revisions

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Latest comment: 2 days ago by Serial Number 54129 in topic Requests for global (un)lock and (un)hiding
Content deleted Content added
MajavahBot (talk | contribs)
m Bot clerking
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
Line 48: Line 48:
::{{on hold}} for internal discussion. <b>[[User:EPIC|<span style="color:blue">EPIC</span>]] ([[User talk:EPIC|<span style="color:green">talk</span>]])</b> 20:59, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
::{{on hold}} for internal discussion. <b>[[User:EPIC|<span style="color:blue">EPIC</span>]] ([[User talk:EPIC|<span style="color:green">talk</span>]])</b> 20:59, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
:::Declining report for now, there are two local blocks and are under discussion on Commons, yes, but they are still editing some wikis without local blocks, and as it was mentioned in the stewards' IRC channel, this is mostly a local issue at the moment that local communities are able to handle. I do understand the reasoning for locking and I think we can potentially consider a lock (or, better, a global block) here if, for example, they were blocked on another wiki or if there is any evidence of sockpuppetry, but since this is not the case at the moment I am declining. <b>[[User:EPIC|<span style="color:blue">EPIC</span>]] ([[User talk:EPIC|<span style="color:green">talk</span>]])</b> 18:12, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
:::Declining report for now, there are two local blocks and are under discussion on Commons, yes, but they are still editing some wikis without local blocks, and as it was mentioned in the stewards' IRC channel, this is mostly a local issue at the moment that local communities are able to handle. I do understand the reasoning for locking and I think we can potentially consider a lock (or, better, a global block) here if, for example, they were blocked on another wiki or if there is any evidence of sockpuppetry, but since this is not the case at the moment I am declining. <b>[[User:EPIC|<span style="color:blue">EPIC</span>]] ([[User talk:EPIC|<span style="color:green">talk</span>]])</b> 18:12, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
::::[[User:Just Step Sideways]] jumped his own claim. He should know you not gonna glock on a two-can case, but, boy, ain't it jus' purdy that [https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Lighthumormonger&diff=prev&oldid=900463017 Commons just indeffed this guy]. That's the three lock, go GLock. [[User:Serial Number 54129|<span style="color:black">'''——'''</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Serial Number 54129|<span style="color:black">''SerialNumber''</span>]][[User talk:Serial Number 54129|<span style="color:#8B0000">54129</span>]] [[User:Serial Number 54129|<span style="color:black">'''——'''</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Serial Number 54129|<span style="color:black">''SerialNumber''</span>]][[User talk:Serial Number 54129|<span style="color:#8B0000">54129</span>]] 22:28, 18 July 2024 (UTC)


=== Global lock for RSR2003 ===
=== Global lock for RSR2003 ===

Revision as of 22:28, 18 July 2024

Skip to top
Skip to bottom
Shortcut:
SRG
This page hosts requests for global (un)blocks, (un)locks and hidings.

If you are here because you have been affected by a global block, please see Global blocks/FAQ for more information about global block and routes to appeal.

Note: (un)blocks apply to IP addresses or accounts; and (un)locks apply to global accounts.

Cross-wiki requests
Meta-Wiki requests

Requests for global (un)block

Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Your request might be rejected if you don't follow the instructions.
Please also review Global blocking .
Global blocks don't affect Meta-Wiki, so if your IP address or account is blocked, you can still appeal here. IP addresses or accounts that cause disruption on Meta should be reported at Meta:Requests for help from a sysop or bureaucrat instead of here so that they can be blocked locally.
Please describe the kind of cross wiki abusive activity you see from the IP or account. Saying an IP or account is a long term abuser is not helpful, but saying "IP vandalizes at ban.wikipedia, no.wikipedia and vi.wikipedia" is. This is especially important for range blocks. If you do not provide enough details, your request might be declined.
Instructions for making a request

Before requesting, make sure that:

  1. You know the IP address(es) or accounts you wish to have globally blocked or unblocked.
  2. For blocks, the global blocking criteria are met.
  3. For unblocks, your request addresses the original reason for blocking the IP or account, if any.

To make a request for the address(es) or account(s) to be blocked or unblocked

Copy the template below to the bottom of this section and explain why the address(es) or account(s) should be blocked/unblocked.
=== Global block/unblock for [[Special:Contributions/Some IP address or account|Some IP address or account]] ===
{{Status}} <!-- Do not remove this template -->
* {{Luxotool|IP address}}
Description, evidence, diffs, etc. --~~~~
When requesting that your IP be unblocked, note that stewards need to know your IP address to even consider a request.
To find your IP, please visit https://www.whatismyip.com/
You are not required to disclose your IP in public - you may make requests privately to any steward on IRC or by email at: stewards@wikimedia.org

Global block for 212.179.0.0/16

Status:    Done

Cross-wiki abuse. Open proxy. · מקף Hyphen · 09:47, 18 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Done ----Alaa :)..! 09:51, 18 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Is the exemption for anonymous only intentional? I'm not sure if it's correct. Thank you! · מקף Hyphen · 10:07, 18 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Fixed --Alaa :)..! 16:29, 18 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Global block for 27.147.139.142

Status:    Done

Long-term abuse. LTA behavior. Ternera (talk) 14:40, 18 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Robot clerk note: Done by AmandaNP. MajavahBot (talk) 15:05, 18 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Global block for 103.144.18.37

Status:    Done

Long-term abuse. Ternera (talk) 14:50, 18 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Robot clerk note: Done by AmandaNP. MajavahBot (talk) 15:25, 18 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Global block for 83.26.199.43

Status:    Done

Long-term abuse. Ternera (talk) 15:21, 18 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Done EPIC (talk) 15:25, 18 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Global block/unblock for 2806:103E:2:0:0:0:0:0/48

Status:    Done

Refer to en:Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Mexican media image vandal for a general overview. Due to the Olympics, this range is once again active and editing articles related to Mexico at the Olympics, Paralympics (as well as some other sports comitees) and adding the irrelevant 2010 Winter Olympics entry picture to the en:Mexico at the 2024 Summer Olympics; the 2012 Summer Paralympics entry picture to en:Mexico at the 2024 Summer Paralympics, as well as the picture of a parathlete that won't even participate in the games) in all Wikis (example, example, example). --Tbhotch (talk) 19:03, 18 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Done EPIC (talk) 19:11, 18 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Requests for global (un)lock and (un)hiding

Be sure to follow the instructions below:
  • Your request might be rejected if it doesn't include the necessary information.
  • Warning! This page is publicly viewable. If the account name is grossly insulting or contains personal information please contact a steward privately in #wikimedia-stewardsconnect or email your request to the stewards VRT queue at stewards-oversight@wikimedia.org (direct wiki interface) but do not post it here. Thanks.
  • Warning! This is not the place to ask for locks based on your opinion that someone is disruptive. Global locks are used exclusively against vandalism and spam, not because of content disputes, not because you think that someone deserves to be globally blocked. In such cases, you should ask for local blocks at appropriate places.
  • If you are globally locked, you should appeal your lock to stewards-appeals@wikimedia.org.

Please describe abusive activity of an account before reporting them here. Since stewards are often not active at projects the reported accounts are, things that seem obvious to you may not be equally obvious to the reviewing steward.

Instructions for making a request

Before requesting that a global account be (un)locked, please be sure that:

  1. You have evidence of cross-wiki disruption from the account(s).
  2. You can show that it is not feasible to use local-only blocks or other measures like page protection to combat the disruption.
  3. You have considered making the request in #wikimedia-stewardsconnect, especially for account names which will be hidden, or for urgent requests.
To make a request for an account to be locked or unlocked
Copy one of the codes below to the bottom of this section and explain why the account(s) should be locked/unlocked.
=== Global lock/unlock for Foo ===
{{status}} <!-- do not remove this template -->
* {{LockHide|username}}
* {{LockHide|username|hidename=1}} <!-- if you do not want the name to be visible on this page -->
*...
Reasons, etc. --~~~~

For many accounts:

=== Global lock for spambots/vandals ===
{{status}} <!-- do not remove this template -->
{{MultiLock|username|username2|username3}}
{{MultiLock|username|username2|username3|hidename=1}} <!-- if you do not want the names to be visible on this page -->
*...
Reasons, etc, --~~~~

Global lock for Lighthumormonger

Status:    Not done

Disrupting multiple projects with absurd claims of being an admin and head of the "Wikipedia Editors Guild." en.wp Commons meta Just Step Sideways (talk) 20:26, 17 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

 On hold for internal discussion. EPIC (talk) 20:59, 17 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Declining report for now, there are two local blocks and are under discussion on Commons, yes, but they are still editing some wikis without local blocks, and as it was mentioned in the stewards' IRC channel, this is mostly a local issue at the moment that local communities are able to handle. I do understand the reasoning for locking and I think we can potentially consider a lock (or, better, a global block) here if, for example, they were blocked on another wiki or if there is any evidence of sockpuppetry, but since this is not the case at the moment I am declining. EPIC (talk) 18:12, 18 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
User:Just Step Sideways jumped his own claim. He should know you not gonna glock on a two-can case, but, boy, ain't it jus' purdy that Commons just indeffed this guy. That's the three lock, go GLock. ——SerialNumber54129 ——SerialNumber54129 22:28, 18 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Global lock for RSR2003

Status:    On hold

Lock all:

Long-term abuse. Cross-wiki socking, see also en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/RSR2003/Archive. Lymantria (talk) 07:15, 18 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

 On hold for internal discussion. EPIC (talk) 07:37, 18 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
I would strongly support a lock for the reasons given above, see also my last request. Regards Wüstenspringmaus talk 12:28, 18 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Global lock for スロープラウンジ

Status:    Done

Long-term abuse. Wüstenspringmaus talk 17:11, 18 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Done EPIC (talk) 17:15, 18 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Global lock for Eli Darwin

Status:    Done

Sock of Risto hot sir (talk · contribs). --Huñvreüs (talk) 17:31, 18 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Done EPIC (talk) 17:41, 18 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Global lock for Rou Nouz

Status:    Not done

Cross-wiki abuse. Promotion-only account. Wüstenspringmaus talk 17:45, 18 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Decline for now. Yes, there is what looks like self-promotion, but promotion is not the same as spam, and as long as svwiki admins are fine with them working on their draft (which I, as an svwiki admin, am, it is not overly promotional or so), I don't think there is a need for a global lock at the moment. EPIC (talk) 17:53, 18 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Global lock for Marilyn Natalia

Status:    Done

Long-term abuse. Cross-wiki abuse. Wüstenspringmaus talk 18:08, 18 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Done EPIC (talk) 18:13, 18 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Global lock for 태훈아 바지에 덩싸지마

Status:    Done

Lock all:

Long-term abuse. Cross-wiki abuse. LTA 보민개. LR0725 ( Talk / Contribs ) 18:47, 18 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Done EPIC (talk) 18:49, 18 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Global lock for I am in the Sic Building

Status:    Done

Long-term abuse. ClumsyOwlet (talk) 19:23, 18 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Done EPIC (talk) 19:33, 18 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Global lock for Awake 7698

Status:    Done

Long-term abuse. ☠︎Quinlan83☠︎(𝖄𝖔𝖚 𝖙𝖆𝖑𝖐𝖎𝖓' 𝖙𝖔 𝖒𝖊?) 19:28, 18 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Done EPIC (talk) 19:32, 18 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

See also