Steward requests/Checkuser: Difference between revisions

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Content deleted Content added
Line 105: Line 105:
:'''New''': For Alpha71 is open a [[w:it:Wikipedia:Utenti problematici/Votazioni sulla messa al bando/Alpha71|banning votation]]. --[[User:Leoman3000|Leoman3000]] 13:22, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
:'''New''': For Alpha71 is open a [[w:it:Wikipedia:Utenti problematici/Votazioni sulla messa al bando/Alpha71|banning votation]]. --[[User:Leoman3000|Leoman3000]] 13:22, 31 December 2008 (UTC)


::Funnily enough, Leoman3000, that is talking above, is the same person who blocked sistematically me, S.M. in both wikis. Now he is here to defamate me almost i am a criminal? A very impartial guy, really.
::Funnily enough, Leoman3000, that is talking above, is the same person who blocked sistematically me, S.M. in both wikis. Now he is here to defamate me almost i am a criminal? I am supposed to be a 'treath' to wiki? Last time i have a block, it was because i asked more work by admins in wikinews.it and what's the supposed 'journalist style' that i missed. This lead to my indefinite block. A very impartial guy, really. Now he has deleted my wikinews personal pages. So what? What's the point to do it? Delete an userpage, because i have used a SP? Where is written this?


;results:
;results:

Revision as of 20:22, 3 January 2009

To request checkuser access, see Steward requests/Permissions.
Shortcut:
SRCU
This page allows you to request checkuser information on a wiki with no local checkusers. Make sure to specify the wiki on which you want the check to be performed. Note that many projects have local checkuser procedures, and checkuser information on these wikis should be requested locally; see also the Steward handbook.

Please use headers in the format "username@wiki", such as "billy@enwikisource".

Local checkuser request pages:

Cross-wiki requests
Meta-Wiki requests

Requests

some unacceptable usernames @ zhwp.

Recently, @ zhwp. ,many unacceptable usernames appeared, like w:zh:User:白毛一用是書身, w:zh:User:蒋家军大屠撒, w:zh:User:十字军大屠剎, w:zh:User:百無一用是舒身, w:zh:User:台灣雜重共非, w:zh:User:壞破我是不, w:zh:User:偉大的維權神父, w:zh:User:Alert("Kegns");, w:zh:User:百無一用是書身. They appeared during very short time, and the usernames cursed some of the zhwp sysop. Apparently the usernames were created deliberately. Could you please find out is there any user controlling these a/c?--1j1z2 17:08, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Here are the results:
  • 白毛一用是書身 = 百無一用是舒身 = 蒋家军大屠撒 = 十字军大屠剎 = Clpro2 = Luihopan = 西崎 = JackyCheung = NobisenACE = Alisonees528 = Reila527 and likely Hkgalbert and Pilotsk
  • 台灣雜重共非 = 壞破我是不 = 偉大的維權神父 = Alert("Kegns"); = 百無一用是書身 but I didn't find anyone else within that group.
--FiliP × 22:48, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
???why my username "JackyCheung" is showed???--JackyCheung 07:55, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Because maybe they are your sockpuppets and you've already been blocked? --FiliP × 08:05, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I think the credibility of this result is very low.Skjackey tse 10:10, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe they are not the same persons, but technical evidence suggests otherwise. Behavioral evidence is something I don't have, since I don't understand Chinese. Because of the complex situation regarding open proxies that is going on on zhwiki, maybe another steward would like to take a look and try to get results on their own. --FiliP × 13:31, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If You wish I can have a look at this too, but not before the new year, on 1st or 2nd, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 08:59, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'm the admin of zh-wiki. Artually, for some users listed above, I think the behavioral evidence doesn't support these results. If birdy would check that again, I think the credibility and the accuracy of the result would be higher.--J.Wong 01:50, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Clpro2 said he is Canadian--203.223.231.158 12:13, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
my results
  • Likely Likely the same user:
Group1
Group2
Group3


  • Unlikely Unlikely to be involved at all: JackyCheung, Reila527, Luihopan, Reila527, Hkgalbert, I can't confirm the result of Dungodung that JackyCheung is involved in this.

Best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 15:18, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Upon further inspection and consulting with Spacebirdy, I'd like to apologize and correct myself. In some way, it might be possible that all or some of those named users are connected (except Hkgalbert and NobisenACE, who are most definitely not connected), but given the circumstances (zhwiki target audience forced to use open proxies etc.), it is unlikely, up to some degree, that they are connected. Technical evidence can be tricky sometimes and in a clearer situation (e.g. ukwiki) it wouldn't be so ambiguous. All I can say at this point is that in the future I'll be more careful and appreciative of the technical situation in countries such as China and that I am sorry it has come to this, because I've done the check in good faith. --FiliP × 17:27, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:A04167 @ zhwp

Suspected that this user is a sockpuppet of a indefinitely blocked user User:Msnhinet8jps @ zhwp. Both users shared the same editing habit, which is creating stubs (short articles) of hurricanes in Pacific Ocean by copying paragraphs from main article 2008 Pacific Typhoon Season (as those hurricanes are defined insignificant in creating an individual article) and combining with incorrect information to make the article looks correct. Please check if these two user accounts are related, thank you. --Altt311 04:53, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

results

Unrelated Unrelated

  • A04167
  • Msnhinet8jps

but Msnhinet8jps seems to have some socks, Likely Likely to be the same user:

*) currently blocked accounts (did not check if indefinit)

Best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 15:44, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Stefanomencarelli @ it.wikinews

Stefanomencarelli is a problematic user that was blocked indefinitely on it.wiki after seven segnalations for recidive personal attacks about users and community. Same manners on Italian Wikinews: also there he was blocked for same time. Next, he used IPs 80.104.204.90 and 80.104.203.52 to make insults again. The day after, user Sting makes some polemic and vandalic edits, like Stefanomencarelli's style.

Next time Alpha71, on it.Wiki, came back to attack a new candidate admin (link). On it.wiki he didn't make edits since March 2008. Some doubts for his style; this is similar Mencarelli's, too (I've forget: Alpha71 talks about Stefanomencarelli in that page, too).

Can you check these users? Excuse for my English and thank you. --Leoman3000 01:08, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New: For Alpha71 is open a banning votation. --Leoman3000 13:22, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Funnily enough, Leoman3000, that is talking above, is the same person who blocked sistematically me, S.M. in both wikis. Now he is here to defamate me almost i am a criminal? I am supposed to be a 'treath' to wiki? Last time i have a block, it was because i asked more work by admins in wikinews.it and what's the supposed 'journalist style' that i missed. This lead to my indefinite block. A very impartial guy, really. Now he has deleted my wikinews personal pages. So what? What's the point to do it? Delete an userpage, because i have used a SP? Where is written this?
results

 Confirmed socks:

Best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 16:08, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Several usernames @ mswp

w:ms:User:Farhanshafik, w:ms:User:Farhanrobaie 95, w:ms:User:Farhanshafikdurai, w:ms:User:Suneo, suspected as sockpuppets of w:ms:User:Rashdan who is currently in the voting procedure of an adminship request.refer here All the suspected users voted "support" with quite same reasons. Please check if all those really are sockpuppets. Niduzzi 04:39, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

He admitted.(here) Case is clear. Niduzzi 06:39, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please check if w:ms:User:Rashdan edits using other accounts other than the primary one. We suspect the user above is using more than one account. Diagramma Della Verita 13:51, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
results

 Confirmed socks of


(most seemed to have had interest in voting here)

Best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 16:35, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Independent confirmation needed

The following discussion is closed.

Please check my account in Russian Wikipedia ru:User:Smartass2009 for intersections with ru:User:+Shipilov. Unfortunately this cannot be done through Russian checkusers who keep hinting that ru:User:+Shipilov is my account. None of them is trustworthy; independent confirmation is absolutely needed. SA ru 15:15, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not done as that's a job for the Ombudsman committee to investigate. This doesn't concern stewars. Thanks --FiliP × 15:19, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See also