Meta:Requests for help from a sysop or bureaucrat
(Redirected from Requests for help from a sysop or bureaucrat)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| ←Requests and proposals | Requests for help from a sysop or bureaucrat (at Meta-wiki only) | Archives (current)→ |
Meta-Wiki has a small active community. When a normal user requires the assistance of an administrator or bureaucrat for some particular task, it is not always easy to find one. This page helps users find one when they need one; asking specific admins directly via their talk pages is one way to elicit a fast response. It is only for assistance required at Meta-wiki, help for other wikis needs to be requested at those wikis.
|
General requests for: help from a Meta sysop or bureaucrat · deletion (speedy deletions: local · multilingual) · URL blacklisting · new languages · interwiki map
Personal requests for: username changes · permissions (global) · bot status · adminship on Meta · CheckUser information (local) · local administrator help
Cooperation requests for: comments (local) (global) · translation
(as of 04 April 2020)
- Cooperation on Meta-Wiki maintenance is always welcome.
- Many files awaiting review for basic {{information}}, source and license.
(as of 04 April 2020)
- None currently.
(Last updated: 2020-02-04)
Wikimedia Meta-Wiki
- About Meta
- Discussion pages
- Request pages
- Policies and guidelines
- Information and statistics
- Categories
- Help pages
Participate:
Please find answered requests in the archives (this month).
 |
SpBot archives all sections tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} and sections whose most recent comment is older than 10 days. |
Gadget: MarkAdmins[edit]
Hi all, for those who didn't know, -revi has had a replicate of the Commons' MarkAdmins script setup for Meta. It has since been moved out of userspace to become a gadget. It is available to be enabled in Gadgets under "Browsing gadgets". The script marks admins, stewards, GS and WMF staff (IT & SuSa). ~riley (talk) 09:27, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks. Much appreciated work :) Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 09:36, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. CptViraj (📧) 08:21, 3 April 2020 (UTC) Prohibit some long usernames?[edit]
I proposed to:
- Prohibit creation of username which is longer than 40 characters and contain some keywords on Meta
- Prevent new accounts (<4 days) with such usernames to edit Meta (targeting autocreated accounts)
This may not completely stop the abuse, but may reduce the negative impact by vandals.--GZWDer (talk) 18:41, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
- Hey GZWDer, this is the request for help page. Proposals of this type would be most appropriate in the form of a request for comment because community consensus would be needed. ~riley (talk) 18:48, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
- So per ~riley, and also if we can avoid it I would rather not have a new local username policy. We are in a big need of a global one, but local policies do not really make sense since SUL finalisation was completed. --Base (talk) 01:44, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
- I think I know what OP is driving at, to reduce usernames like XXX have XXX19 and must go to h*** something like that, I had been blocking so many of them recently. However, per ~riley, this needs RFC and I rather not as this seems to mandate a global username policy which by itself isn't feasible (due to SUL) and even if feasible, unlikely to pass. I will rather we manage by blocking, RD/OSing, locking/supressing the accounts and we might alter the filters that we have if needed as well as changing the blacklists. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 13:19, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
- Vandals would simply shorten their usernames to 39 characters. The only result of this would be to bother some volunteers on other projects (since this proposal would effect Meta only) who wouldn't be able to take part in discussions here. Also, as ~riley said, this is not the proper place to make such proposals. It would require a RfC. Vermont (talk) 18:22, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. ~riley (talk) 21:07, 3 April 2020 (UTC) Talk:Steward requests/Global[edit]
I propose to indefinitely semiprotect this page. Most recent edits are vandalism and a legitmate global block or lock requests (include e.g. requests by public figures who do not edit Wikimedia project to lock impersonation accounts) may be handled by Email or IRC.--GZWDer (talk) 05:29, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
- It's really not the place of Meta admins to be doing long-term protection of steward pages, imoh. The protection log only shows precedence for short term protection and because the page acts as a honeypot, I think leaving it as is, is most appropriate. If you think it should be, I recommend posting on the Stewards' noticeboard. ~riley (talk) 07:54, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
- Seconded ~riley. I am inclined to leave it open per honeypot and there are many valid requests from well known, established users who just cannot edit SRG which I transferred. I am also not inclined to touch meta pages regarding to stewards. I think since the last steward who protected Tegel used 1 day protection, I think the stewards had decided against long term protection. I don't see what else we can do here but to watch, which I will. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 08:53, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
Comment LTAs are going to LTA, and I would much prefer that they did it there on an intensely watched page where they can do little damage, and can be quickly managed. Anyway, as said stewards can manage their pages. — billinghurst sDrewth 21:48, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
Comment LTAs are going to LTA, and I would much prefer that they did it there on an intensely watched page where they can do little damage, and can be quickly managed. Anyway, as said stewards can manage their pages. — This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. --AldnonymousBicara? 01:05, 4 April 2020 (UTC) 
