Jump to content

Steward requests/Global: Difference between revisions

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Content deleted Content added
Reporting POOP VERSUS PEE (TwinkleGlobal)
Line 121: Line 121:
See the [[en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jeremiah Caquias|Sockpuppet investigations]] casepage. [[User:ClumsyOwlet|ClumsyOwlet]] ([[User talk:ClumsyOwlet|talk]]) 02:10, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
See the [[en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jeremiah Caquias|Sockpuppet investigations]] casepage. [[User:ClumsyOwlet|ClumsyOwlet]] ([[User talk:ClumsyOwlet|talk]]) 02:10, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
::{{done}} <b>[[User:EPIC|<span style="color:blue">EPIC</span>]] ([[User talk:EPIC|<span style="color:green">talk</span>]])</b> 02:16, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
::{{done}} <b>[[User:EPIC|<span style="color:blue">EPIC</span>]] ([[User talk:EPIC|<span style="color:green">talk</span>]])</b> 02:16, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

=== Global lock for POOP VERSUS PEE ===
{{Status}}
*{{LockHide|1=POOP VERSUS PEE}}
Cross-wiki abuse. [[User:20041027 tatsu|''20041027'' 𝓽𝓪𝓽𝓼𝓾]]([[User talk:20041027 tatsu|talk]]) 02:43, 3 April 2024 (UTC)


== See also ==
== See also ==

Revision as of 02:43, 3 April 2024

Skip to top
Skip to bottom
Shortcut:
SRG
This page hosts requests for global (un)blocks, (un)locks and hidings.

If you are here because you have been affected by a global block, please see Global blocks/FAQ for more information about global block and routes to appeal.

Note: (un)blocks apply to IP addresses or accounts; and (un)locks apply to global accounts.

Cross-wiki requests
Meta-Wiki requests

Requests for global (un)block

Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Your request might be rejected if you don't follow the instructions.
Please also review Global blocking .
Global blocks don't affect Meta-Wiki, so if your IP address or account is blocked, you can still appeal here. IP addresses or accounts that cause disruption on Meta should be reported at Meta:Requests for help from a sysop or bureaucrat instead of here so that they can be blocked locally.
Please describe the kind of cross wiki abusive activity you see from the IP or account. Saying an IP or account is a long term abuser is not helpful, but saying "IP vandalizes at ban.wikipedia, no.wikipedia and vi.wikipedia" is. This is especially important for range blocks. If you do not provide enough details, your request might be declined.
Instructions for making a request

Before requesting, make sure that:

  1. You know the IP address(es) or accounts you wish to have globally blocked or unblocked.
  2. For blocks, the global blocking criteria are met.
  3. For unblocks, your request addresses the original reason for blocking the IP or account, if any.

To make a request for the address(es) or account(s) to be blocked or unblocked

Copy the template below to the bottom of this section and explain why the address(es) or account(s) should be blocked/unblocked.
=== Global block/unblock for [[Special:Contributions/Some IP address or account|Some IP address or account]] ===
{{Status}} <!-- Do not remove this template -->
* {{Luxotool|IP address}}
Description, evidence, diffs, etc. --~~~~
When requesting that your IP be unblocked, note that stewards need to know your IP address to even consider a request.
To find your IP, please visit https://www.whatismyip.com/
You are not required to disclose your IP in public - you may make requests privately to any steward on IRC or by email at: stewards@wikimedia.org

Global block for 151.34.237.171

Status:    Not done

xwiki spam. · מקף Hyphen · 16:45, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

See also all the recent IPs on spamcheck(lakecomotourism.it) · מקף Hyphen · 16:48, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
I do see some linkspam but I don't think global block is the best solution here, especially since these IPs are dynamic and haven't edited for a while now. What would be better would probably be to request this domain to be added to the spam blacklist. EPIC (talk) 16:52, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
OK, thanks👍
Talk:Spam_blacklist#lakecomotourism.it · מקף Hyphen · 16:53, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
It seems like the case wasn't too clear judging by the spam blacklist talk page, but like mentioned, since these IPs are dynamic global blocks won't do much here, so marking as not done for now. EPIC (talk) 20:51, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Global block for 109.207.77.156

Status:    In progress

Abused OP, source IPQualityScore. Estrellato (talk) 19:34, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

IPQS is sadly quite weak when it comes to proxy checking, and other proxycheckers seem to give negative here, including Spur as well. EPIC (talk) 19:37, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
This should be enough? Plus we both know its the "substubvandalen" and this editor always used OP. Estrellato (talk) 20:41, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Also marked as VPN by toolforge Proxy checker. Estrellato (talk) 20:42, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
The only proxy checker on Toolforge which marked this as a proxy was namely, well, IPQS. Anyways, you do still have a point, but I will leave this to Amanda or another steward perhaps, and see if they can find anything different from my research. EPIC (talk) 20:56, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Status:    Done

Cross-wiki abuse. Machine translated mass editing. Estrellato (talk) 19:51, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Done EPIC (talk) 19:55, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Global block for 151.82.206.174

Status:    Done

Long-term abuse. Mtarch11 (talk) 01:50, 3 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Done EPIC (talk) 01:52, 3 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Requests for global (un)lock and (un)hiding

Be sure to follow the instructions below:
  • Your request might be rejected if it doesn't include the necessary information.
  • Warning! This page is publicly viewable. If the account name is grossly insulting or contains personal information please contact a steward privately in #wikimedia-stewardsconnect or email your request to the stewards VRT queue at stewards-oversight@wikimedia.org (direct wiki interface) but do not post it here. Thanks.
  • Warning! This is not the place to ask for locks based on your opinion that someone is disruptive. Global locks are used exclusively against vandalism and spam, not because of content disputes, not because you think that someone deserves to be globally blocked. In such cases, you should ask for local blocks at appropriate places.
  • If you are globally locked, you should appeal your lock to stewards-appeals@wikimedia.org.

Please describe abusive activity of an account before reporting them here. Since stewards are often not active at projects the reported accounts are, things that seem obvious to you may not be equally obvious to the reviewing steward.

Instructions for making a request

Before requesting that a global account be (un)locked, please be sure that:

  1. You have evidence of cross-wiki disruption from the account(s).
  2. You can show that it is not feasible to use local-only blocks or other measures like page protection to combat the disruption.
  3. You have considered making the request in #wikimedia-stewardsconnect, especially for account names which will be hidden, or for urgent requests.
To make a request for an account to be locked or unlocked
Copy one of the codes below to the bottom of this section and explain why the account(s) should be locked/unlocked.
=== Global lock/unlock for Foo ===
{{status}} <!-- do not remove this template -->
* {{LockHide|username}}
* {{LockHide|username|hidename=1}} <!-- if you do not want the name to be visible on this page -->
*...
Reasons, etc. --~~~~

For many accounts:

=== Global lock for spambots/vandals ===
{{status}} <!-- do not remove this template -->
{{MultiLock|username|username2|username3}}
{{MultiLock|username|username2|username3|hidename=1}} <!-- if you do not want the names to be visible on this page -->
*...
Reasons, etc, --~~~~

Global lock for Marcijanonavijac

Status:    In progress

Long-term abuse. GRP. Leonidlednev (talk) 15:14, 1 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Since this account last edited over five years ago GRP has likely forgotten about the account at this point. EPIC (talk) 15:25, 1 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Now that it has been reported there might be a chance that they decide to revive it (I think). ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk)
15:57, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Yep, you have a point but with such an old account I think it is long forgotten and don't really think it will be used in the near future, especially since they instead have created many new accounts since then and they usually don't stay on their accounts for very long either (and I'm not sure they regularly check this page either). EPIC (talk) 16:02, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Global lock for Elshad Iman (Elşad İman)

Status:    In progress

Long-term abuse. User has been globally locked before, but unlocked with one-account restriction. But it is obvious that he did not follow it. Being indefinitely blocked on 3 wikis, undisclosed paid edits, continuing legal threats warrants a re-lock. You might want to read this discussion. --Nemoralis (talk) 18:41, 1 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

This seems like a bit more of a controversial case to me. I'll leave room for comments from other stewards here. EPIC (talk) 18:45, 1 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
I have identified his following socks and blocked them on azwiki before:
Memoli13 (globally locked), 90AA123, Correspondentman, Kontentman and Redaksiya. Nemoralis (talk) 18:50, 1 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Pinging @Vermont from previous discussion. Nemoralis (talk) 12:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
This page is mostly meant for locks in clear cut cases, and this feels like a more complicated/controversial case. So, honestly, I think a discussion about this should rather be held at SN, just like last time, which is more appropriate for this specific case. EPIC (talk) 12:30, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Was there ever a CU result confirming these accounts? If not, this is a really good SRCU candidate as there is data still existing. Please ensure to present evidence and you can ping me for review. -- Amanda (she/her) 13:06, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Global lock for Trọng Phú có mẹ cây cầu Yến Nhi, Tuyết Nhi, Kiến Tường

Status:    Done

Long-term abuse. Trieu Thuan Son socks. Ayane (meta | phab) 18:33, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Done EPIC (talk) 18:34, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Global lock for spam farms

Status:    Done

Lock all:

Spam farm accounts. Seawolf35 (talk) 18:48, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Done EPIC (talk) 18:50, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Global lock for CharmainBedford

Status:    Done

NTSAMR Spambot, see global abuse log. Seawolf35 (talk) 18:54, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Done EPIC (talk) 18:55, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Global lock for Sanatsalicerik

Status:    Done

cross-wiki spam, spam only account, already blocked in 2 projects but continues with other projects hence global lock required. --Tehonk (talk) 19:00, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Done EPIC (talk) 19:03, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Global lock for Coordinación Nacional de Conservación del Patrimonio Cultural, CNCPC-INAH

Status:    Withdrawn

Long-term abuse. HoY. Seawolf35 (talk) 18:58, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Doesn't really look like HoY - at least hard to say it is HoY when the editing patterns don't match and the username isn't something related to church or Italy. (and if it was HoY it would likely already have been locked at this point, this account has existed for quite a while, just seems like a normal spammer) EPIC (talk) 19:01, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
HOY rarely/doesn't use WP project space pages like this account did on eswiki. A09 (talk) 20:12, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Or spam only account Seawolf35 (talk) 19:02, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Looking at deleted edits on eswiki it just looked like someone using their userpage as a draft to write about their company. It was of course not a very appropriate use of the userpage, but there was no linkspam or anything and they haven't went cross-wiki either. Overall I don't think this is a pure spammer, but rather someone just being unfamiliar with policies. EPIC (talk) 19:08, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Global lock for DickDestroyer69420

Status:    In progress

Abusive username. –TANBIRUZZAMAN (💬) 19:50, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

I'm not sure about this one. The edits on skwiki don't give me the feeling that they are an unconstructive user - just that their username isn't appropriate, and the block on enwiki is a soft block. This leads me to the conclusion that it's probably better for them to get their username changed since they do not seem to be here for any negative purposes. EPIC (talk) 19:52, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Global lock for more of Bulut's sockpuppets

Status:    Done

Lock all:

Last few for today. ClumsyOwlet (talk) 21:43, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Done EPIC (talk) 21:49, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Global lock for Sockcucker156

Status:    In progress

Long-term abuse. Abusive username. LTA Kamen rider saber. TheWikiCyclone (talk) 01:52, 3 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Shouldn't this be stale at this point? Was created in November last year, only edited enwiki (where they were locally blocked) and made no further edits since then. EPIC (talk) 01:54, 3 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
@EPIC Sorry. I figured that a global lock would be good because some long-term abusers will come back on an old sock, and then they will vandalize another wiki from there. TheWikiCyclone (talk) 02:06, 3 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
No need to apologize, but is this an LTA who does such thing? I know some do (such as ACV) but it's hard to say whether this user also follows that same pattern since there's been nothing from there since six months. EPIC (talk) 02:15, 3 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
I don't really think so, but they usually engage in cross-wiki vandalism that would get them globally locked anyway. I requested this as a preemptive measure to make sure that they wouldn't do such things. TheWikiCyclone (talk) 02:31, 3 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Global lock for yet another sockpuppet of Jeremiah Caquias

Status:    Done

See the Sockpuppet investigations casepage. ClumsyOwlet (talk) 02:10, 3 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Done EPIC (talk) 02:16, 3 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Global lock for POOP VERSUS PEE

Status:    In progress

Cross-wiki abuse. 20041027 𝓽𝓪𝓽𝓼𝓾talk02:43, 3 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

See also