Planet Wikimedia/Archive: Difference between revisions

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Content deleted Content added
m some fixes to not break numbering
m archived
Line 154: Line 154:
#: What's the URL? :-) '''[[User:Cbrown1023|<span style="color:green">Cbrown1023</span>]]''' '''<small>[[User talk:Cbrown1023|<span style="color:#002bb8">talk</span>]]</small>''' 21:58, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
#: What's the URL? :-) '''[[User:Cbrown1023|<span style="color:green">Cbrown1023</span>]]''' '''<small>[[User talk:Cbrown1023|<span style="color:#002bb8">talk</span>]]</small>''' 21:58, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
#::http://wikivoices.blogspot.com .. sorry .. rather relevant isn't it ? [[User:GerardM|GerardM]] 08:47, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
#::http://wikivoices.blogspot.com .. sorry .. rather relevant isn't it ? [[User:GerardM|GerardM]] 08:47, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
# Please add ( http://mrsnina.wordpress.com/) http://mrsnina.wordpress.com/feed/ --[[User:Nina-no|Nina-no]] 20:13, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
# Oops. On 09/04, I asked for the inclusion of http://litlok.over-blog.com/, but I did not mention the ''feed'' itself. Here it is, so that the blog will appear on the french planet (under the name Litlok). Thank you: http://litlok.over-blog.com/rss-articles.xml [[User:Litlok|Litlok]] 12:03, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
#: {{Done}} in [[rev:61461|r61461]]. [[User:IAlex|<b><font color="#66A7CC">i</font><font color="#9966CC">Alex</font></b>]] 14:11, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
# Please add [[Wikimedia Sverige]]s blog on http://wikimediasverige.wordpress.com/feed/ to the [http://gmq.planet.wikimedia.org/ scandinavian list] (the blog is in Swedish). --[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] 17:51, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
#: {{Done}} in [[rev:61462|r61462]]. [[User:IAlex|<b><font color="#66A7CC">i</font><font color="#9966CC">Alex</font></b>]] 14:21, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
# Please add the wikipedia tag feed from the french free culture's blog Framablog http://www.framablog.org/index.php/feed/tag/Wikipedia/atom, under the name "Framablog" on the french planet. --[[User:FramaKa|FramaKa]] 08:38, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
#: {{Done}} in [[rev:61475|r61475]]. [[User:IAlex|<b><font color="#66A7CC">i</font><font color="#9966CC">Alex</font></b>]] 21:14, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
# The [[:wmuk:|Wikimedia UK]] feed does not appear to be getting through, and the URL on the left hand bar appears to be broken. Please could it be checked? [http://blog.wikimedia.org.uk blog], [http://blog.wikimedia.org.uk/feed/ feed]. Thanks. [[User:Mike Peel|Mike Peel]] 23:19, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
#: Fixed in [[rev:61498|r61498]]. [[User:IAlex|<b><font color="#66A7CC">i</font><font color="#9966CC">Alex</font></b>]] 19:58, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
# Please add my blog under the name "Thomas Dalton (Tango)". The filtered posts are [http://thomas-dalton.com/blog/tag/wikimedia/ here], but I'm not sure where the RSS version of that page is, hopefully someone else does! Thanks! --[[User:Tango|Tango]] 21:48, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
#: {{Done}} in [[rev:61498|r61498]]. [[User:IAlex|<b><font color="#66A7CC">i</font><font color="#9966CC">Alex</font></b>]] 19:58, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
#Hi. I'd be grateful if you'll add the newly created [http://rowiki.wordpress.org/ rowiki blog] to the [http://ro.planet.wikimedia.org/ Romanian planet] under the name "Jurnalul Wikipediei româneşti". Thank you. --[[User:Gikü|Gikü]] 15:02, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
#: {{Done}} in [[rev:61533|r61533]]. [[User:IAlex|<b><font color="#66A7CC">i</font><font color="#9966CC">Alex</font></b>]] 20:06, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
# Please add http://www.generalist.org.uk/blog/tags/wikipedia/feed/ - this is filtered to only Wikipedia-tagged posts - to en.planet under the name "Andrew Gray". Thanks! [[User:Shimgray|Shimgray]] 17:56, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
#: {{Done}} in [[rev:61716|r61716]]. [[User:IAlex|<b><font color="#66A7CC">i</font><font color="#9966CC">Alex</font></b>]] 14:49, 30 January 2010 (UTC)


=== Not added ===
=== Not added ===
Line 219: Line 234:
#:: Not added due to the consideration listed above. --[[User:RobH|RobH]] 18:40, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
#:: Not added due to the consideration listed above. --[[User:RobH|RobH]] 18:40, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
#:::Fair enough. What if it's [http://blogs.appropedia.org/tag/wikipedia,wikibooks,wikiversity,wikicommons,wikimedia/ filtered to only Wikimedia topics]? ([http://blogs.appropedia.org/tag/wikipedia,wikibooks,wikiversity,wikicommons,wikimedia/feed/ feed].) At the moment there's just a few that reference Wikipedia, but there are posts planned related to Wikiversity, for example. --[[User:Chriswaterguy|Chriswaterguy]] 07:02, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
#:::Fair enough. What if it's [http://blogs.appropedia.org/tag/wikipedia,wikibooks,wikiversity,wikicommons,wikimedia/ filtered to only Wikimedia topics]? ([http://blogs.appropedia.org/tag/wikipedia,wikibooks,wikiversity,wikicommons,wikimedia/feed/ feed].) At the moment there's just a few that reference Wikipedia, but there are posts planned related to Wikiversity, for example. --[[User:Chriswaterguy|Chriswaterguy]] 07:02, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
# Please add http://lagazettedeschampslyses.blogspot.com/, under the name "Rhadamante" on the french planet [[User:Rhadamante|Rhadamante]] 12:20, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
#: ''There appear to be no posts on this blog. --[[User:Brion VIBBER|brion]] 03:15, 28 October 2009 (UTC)''
#::{{notdone}} Still no content and no reply. [[User:^demon|^demon]] 14:31, 24 January 2010 (UTC)


== Requests for removal ==
== Requests for removal ==
Line 432: Line 450:
#Not quite sure how to do this, but the [http://www.svaksha.com/tag/wiki User:Svaksha wiki feed] is entirely off-topic. Many of the posts are about Indian politics, none of them are about Wikimedia. [[User:Kenb215|Kenb215]] 22:16, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
#Not quite sure how to do this, but the [http://www.svaksha.com/tag/wiki User:Svaksha wiki feed] is entirely off-topic. Many of the posts are about Indian politics, none of them are about Wikimedia. [[User:Kenb215|Kenb215]] 22:16, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
#:{{done}} in [[rev:49785]] [[User:^demon|^demon]] 21:24, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
#:{{done}} in [[rev:49785]] [[User:^demon|^demon]] 21:24, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
#Can Dendodge be removed please. It is nearly always off-topic. And personally I find it horribly painful to read even when it is not. [[User talk:Hesperian|Hesperian]] 23:40, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
#:Another day, another off-topic post.... [[User talk:Hesperian|Hesperian]] 23:34, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
#::I do now post more off-topic posts than on-topic ones. However, all my Wikipedia-related posts are tagged with the [http://dendodge.blogspot.com/search/label/Wikipedia "Wikipedia"] label. If there's any way to aggregate only posts with that label, that is fine by me. If not, I am happy for my blog to be removed. [[User:Dendodge|Dendodge]] 17:04, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
#Hi all. Please remove the link to [http://michalscrieunblog.wordpress.org Remigiu's blog] from the [http://ro.planet.wikimedia.org Romanian planet] blog list, because the blog was deleted. Thanks in advance. --[[User:Gikü|Gikü]] 15:05, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
:{{done}} [[rev:61463]]. [[User:^demon|^demon]] 14:21, 24 January 2010 (UTC)


[[Category:Planet Wikimedia]]
[[Category:Planet Wikimedia]]

Revision as of 07:54, 28 February 2010

Most recent on top.

Requests for inclusion

Added

  1. Please add Ting's blog and filter for Wikimedia, Wikipedia in tags. Thanks.--Wing 20:12, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Done in rev. 49480 :) --Azafred 21:02, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. My blog is (and will be) interested in Arabic Wikipedia and Wikimedia stuff only. Please add its feed into the Arabic plant.--OsamaK 17:09, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Done --Meno25 22:22, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. itwadi.com is one of the best Arabic websites that talk about the Free Software, they recently created -after a request- a tag called 'Planet Wikimedia' to be added to the Arabic Planet Wikimedia. Please add the feed.--OsamaK 10:28, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Done --Meno25 21:38, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. This is a new blog i opened to blog about wikipedia and other wikimedia matters (that would be the sole subject of the blog). The blog is in arabic and is part of a collaborative effort to revive the arabic planet. please add my feed to the planet. --Histolo2 10:36, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Done --Meno25 11:19, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. this is a category on my blog dedicated to wikimedia planet, Please add it to the Arabic Planet Wikimedia. The link is my feed Thanks. Bahaa2008 16:09, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Done --Meno25 09:16, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. My feed URL has changed. Please change the Sean Whitton entry to this new feed and this new blog url. Thanks. —Sean Whitton / 12:18, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. My blog is about development and sysadmin, but I have a feed for mediawiki specific stuff
  8. Please change the Guillaume Paumier entry for en.planet to this filtered feed and this blog url. Thank you. guillom 20:55, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Done. iAlex 14:59, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Please add an entry for Guillaume Paumier on fr.planet using this filtered feed and this blog url. Thank you. guillom 20:55, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Done. iAlex 14:59, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Could you add http://pymouss.blogspot.com, a blog about Wikipedia and other miscellanies written in French ? Pymouss Tchatcher - 18:59, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Done in r50453. iAlex 10:39, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Could we please include Yaron Koren's blog? His blog is about Semantic MediaWiki and how it is developing. Thanks, GerardM 13:45, 7 May 2009 (UTC) PS [http://yaronkoren.com/blog/?feed=rss2 this is the feed.[reply]
    Done in r50547. Aude 16:16, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Could you please add http://www.wittylama.com/blog/ to the planet feed. Thanks, Witty lama 13:45, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Done in r50547. Aude 16:16, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Hello, This is my weBlog, I create a category for wikimedia articles, Please add My Feeds to the arabic planet. --Orango speak! 13:46, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Done --Meno25 09:16, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Hello, I have a Blog with wikipedia tag, Please add it to arabic planet, Thanks. --Bassem JARKAS 08:52, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Done --Meno25 09:16, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Bahaa2008 please fix my feed url, my correct url is this-- Bahaa2008 12:10, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Please could you add [1] to fr.planet. Thank you. --Coyau 10:36, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Done in r52841 (url modified per talk). iAlex 16:20, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  17. http://wikimetro.wordpress.com/ Please add my blog for Wikimetro, which discusses Wikimetro, a local wiki that is similar to wikipedia but only focuses on collecting local info. Jjb9e 02:44, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Does not seem to exist yet. Also, PWM has evolved to be more focused on the Wikimedia family of projects - so I'm not sure that we'd want to include a blog like Wikimetro at this time. (Any other opinions?) --Eloquence 00:29, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Seems that http://wikimetroblog.wordpress.com/ was intended. It does seem to be very specifically about the one project. Perhaps they could use tags and make a filtered feed for posts of relevance to wiki folk more generally? --Chriswaterguy 17:02, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  18. http://mywikibiz-com.blogspot.com/ is my blog that focuses on wiki developments in the commercial world, with a smattering of dialogue about recent events on Wikimedia project spaces. -- Thekohser 13:45, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    1. This seems to be more about promoting Kohs' business, Mywikibiz, than to be actually about Wikimedia projects. This is especially clear when one looks at the about section. JoshuaZ 19:00, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Please add this feed of Wikimedia Hong Kong Blog (http://blog.wikimediahk.org/?feed=rss2) -- ※   JéRRy   ┼   雨雨   ※  20:21, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Done Added to zh.planet by Shinjiman on July 5th, added to en.planet by me now. Jon Harald Søby 17:42, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Please change my current blog to http://vmwa.blogspot.com/ and the feed to http://feeds.feedburner.com/remotewiki . Thanks, O (висчвын) 01:22, 13 July 2008 (GMT)
    Not done, the feed at http://feeds.feedburner.com/remotewiki was empty when I checked it. --Roosa (Talk) 19:37, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Because I haven't posted anything yet. --O (висчвын) 16:00, 28 July 2008 (GMT)
    Now has content. --O (висчвын) 16:14, 28 July 2008 (GMT)
    Done in rev:38202. --Roosa (Talk) 19:54, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  21. http://datascreamer.com Wikipedia/Media related posts. Feed url <http://datascreamer.com/?feed=rss2>. I'm not sure how to filter for wordpress, but the filter category is "Wiki" Thanks, NonvocalScream 06:18, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Added in rev:38109. --Roosa (Talk) 19:37, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Please add my personal blog at http://jamesonwiki.blogspot.com/. You can call me by James R. (User:E) and add the feed http://jamesonwiki.blogspot.com/search/label/Wikimedia which is where I will put all Wikimedia-related blog posts. — E talk 09:42, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Added in rev:38109. --Roosa (Talk) 19:37, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  23. http://dendodge.blogspot.com, it's entirely on-topic, I do assure you so, (feed)Dendodge 19:15, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Added in rev:38109. --Roosa (Talk) 19:37, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Please change my current feed (http://giggyisms.blogspot.com/search/label/English%20Wikipedia) to http://giggyisms.blogspot.com/search/label/wiki. Thanks, giggy (:O) 07:31, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Done in rev:38109. --Roosa (Talk) 19:37, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Please add David Shankbone's blog, http://blog.shankbone.org. He uses the "Wikipedia" category (feed), though most of his stuff is relevant to Wikimedia projects. Your call as to whether to include the whole blog or just the filtered feed. Thanks! -Peteforsyth 16:03, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Added in rev:38109. --Roosa (Talk) 19:37, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    I'm told that Giggy requested that this be restricted to the Wikipedia tag. David asked me to sort this out, as I'm a little more familiar with feeds. I believe this is the proper feed to accomplish that: [2] -Peteforsyth 01:59, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  26. http://durova.blogspot.com/ (I hope this is adequate; please ping me if there's any problem). Durova 17:28, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Request that this blog be removed, at it contains very personal attacks on the reputation and the parenting skills of another Wikimedian. I will also request this above. - Thekohser 13:45, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  27. http://aartedepilotarumfogao.blogspot.com/ Please remove this from the Portuguese Planet and add it to the English one - I'm switching to writing in English. The whole blog is Wikimedia/Free Culture dedicated. Please list under User:PatríciaR. Thanks,Patrícia msg 21:56, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  28. http://wikiprojectoregon.wordpress.com This group blog will be the "blog home" of WikiProject Oregon, and will be used to help the wider community understand how Wikipedia works, and how to get involved. Not much content yet, but the first main post is coming shortly, and this will be an active blog! -Peteforsyth 00:54, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Our New Mind I use the tag "wiki," but most of my content is/will be relevant, so you might not want to include the specific tag. Thanks! -Pete Forsyth 22:12, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Added feed for the "wiki" tag.--Eloquence 16:40, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  30. For my blog (feed) - could you please change the displayed name from Chris Watkins to Chriswaterguy? My real name isn't secret, but I prefer to consistently use my nick. Many thanks. --Chriswaterguy 01:32, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Please change the links of User:O to blog and feed. Thanks, 哦,是吗?(О кириллицей) 20:44, 20 March 2008 (GMT)
  32. Please add this filtered feed for my blog Pablo Garuda
    Feed:
    http://max.kanat.us/tag-syndicate/?user=chriswaterguy&tag=wikis&tag=wikitech&tag=freecontent
    Thanks! --Chriswaterguy 02:14, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Please add my recently created blog. I'm not quite exactly sure how to specify a feed URL or filter, I do use labels though... probably 90% of my posts so far have carried either Wikipedia or Wikimedia labels and thus might be of interest.
    Filtered feeds believed to be: http://nonnotablenatterings.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default/-/Wikipedia and http://nonnotablenatterings.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default/-/Wikimedia%20Foundation and http://nonnotablenatterings.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default/-/Commons but I could be wrong!
    You may list this under my real name, Larry Pieniazek or under my username, Lar, or both, as you like, I have no preference. (see my WikiMatrix for real name confirmation. ++Lar: t/c 16:39, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Only one feed added - please tag all feeds you want to see in the planet with a single tag, e.g. "Wiki", "Wikimedia". Otherwise the aggregator treats them as separate blogs, which is annoying.--Eloquence 00:30, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Please add my blog. Feeds;
    http://giggyisms.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default/-/English%20Wikipedia - English Wikipedia
    http://giggyisms.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default/-/Meta-Wiki - Meta
    http://giggyisms.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default/-/Commons - Commons
    Also if you could leave me a note to confirm doing/not doing this, it'd be appreciated. You can put my name as "User:Giggy". Cheers, Giggy\Talk 01:35, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Only one feed added - please tag all feeds you want to see in the planet with a single tag, e.g. "Wiki", "Wikimedia". Otherwise the aggregator treats them as separate blogs, which is annoying.--Eloquence 00:30, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Please add the filtered feed for my new blog and remove the old one[3]
    New: http://blog.ut7.in/feeds/posts/default/-/wikipedia?alt=rss
    Old: http://utcursch.wordpress.com/category/wikipedia/feed/
    Utkarshraj Atmaram 07:02, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  36. http://anondiss.blogspot.com/ and http://anondiss.blogspot.com/search/label/Wikimedia%20Foundation --Anonymous DissidentTalk 11:26, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Alnotka has done this for me. Done --Anonymous DissidentTalk 07:29, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Moved to this section from requests section, ready to archive. giggy (:O) 07:53, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Wiki Read Me (feed) - a daily (weekdays only) podcast which provides audio versions of Wikipedia articles. --clicknathan@gmail.com 6:12, 26 October 2008 (Pacific Time)
  38. Anyone Can Edit (feed) - My recently launched blog. Main focus is free content/free software/mediawiki development. ^demon 16:53, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  39. ExtensionTesting Blogging about MediaWiki extension testing. GerardM 00:44, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Political Bias on Wikipedia (feed http://politicalbiasonwikipedia.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default ) is all about political bias on Wikipedia. Every single post will be about Wikipedia. -- Noroton 05:27, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Please add this feed of my personal blog to the German edition of Planet Wikimedia: http://flominator.ramselehof.de/rss.php?serendipity[tag]=wikipedia Thanks, --Flominator 18:37, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Started as Wikimania blog, we would like to continue with this one (no filter, only one topic ;-)). Authors are Raymond + elya. Could you please add to de.planet, thanks! --Elya 16:00, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  43. chaps.blog.lemonde.fr. It was a personal blog but I want to limit it around only wikipedia. If you put it on the french version of planet wikipedia. Thanks.--Chaps the idol 21:39, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  44. I would like my blog to be added chetblong.blogspot.com. It is solely about Wikipedia so therefore it doesn't need to have a separate feed. Thanks in advance! Chet B Long (Now Coffee on en.wiki) (talk) 06:11, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  45. My blog, solely on Wiki-related issues. Not updated regularly but that can be changed. WBOSITG 21:34, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Please add my blog feed to the planet. The wiki related posts are here. Svaksha 16 September 2008 (UTC)
  47. anonymous101-wiki.blogspot.com - basically it's a blog with my thoughts on Wikimedia related issues Anonymous101 10:30, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Kjetil kommenterer Wikimedia. Feed. Wikimedia-only blog. To be added to the Scandinavian Planet Wikimedia. --Kjetil r 01:34, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  49. I'd like mye blog Laaknor om Wiki(pm)edia added to the Scandinavian planet. feed. Laaknor 14:30, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Hello, I'd like to have the URL of my feed changed on the new Scandinavian planet from the old blogsome feed to my new feed, since I have moved my blog to my own server. Thanks, MiCkE 15:49, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Please add http://blog.wikimedia.cz - the Wikimedia Czech Republic official blog, under the name "Wikimedia Česká republika" on the Czech planet. Thanks. Okino 03:47, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Done
    Danny B. 11:56, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Please add my WMF related blog with filtered feed at http://www.nonvocalscream.com/?cat=3&feed=rss2 Thank you, NonvocalScream 01:43, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Done --brion 03:15, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Could you please add http://litlok.over-blog.com/, under the name "Litlok" on the french planet? Thank you! Litlok 10:08, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Done --RobH 15:04, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Just found out about this - great idea! Could you addmy filtered feed under "R. Stuart Geiger"? Staeiou 18:25, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Done --RobH 15:04, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Wikimedia UK now has a blog: blog.wikimedia.org.uk - please can this be added? Thanks. Mike Peel 22:50, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Done --RobH 15:01, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Please replace my old blog, ragesossscholar.blogspot.com, with http://ragesoss.com/blog/?cat=11&feed=rss2 --Ragesoss 03:56, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Done --RobH 15:01, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Please consider to add the PediaPress blog (feed) which announces news regarding the "Wiki To Print" tool. he!ko 15:37, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Done --RobH 14:59, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Please add http://bawolff.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default/-/wiki to en planet (Please list author as my username only). Thanks Bawolff 03:35, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Done --RobH 14:58, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Please add [4] on the portuguese Planet. Thank you, Nuno Tavares 19:26, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Done --RobH 14:58, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Please add http://teqnia01.blogspot.com/search/label/%D9%88%D9%8A%D9%83%D9%8A%D8%A8%D9%8A%D8%AF%D9%8A%D8%A7 in the Arabic Planet Thanks.--Mohammed Ahmed 19:29, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Done in r56169. --Meno25 23:21, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Please add my feed to the Scandinavian planet: Wikipedai-feed Jerazol 05:28, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Done --RobH 20:18, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Please add my blog to en: filtered feed (category) thx! -- phoebe 01:23, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Done --RobH 20:18, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Hello, please include my blog in the english planet. Here is the wikipedia category and its category feed. Thank you, -- sj | help translate |+ 02:12, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    DoneAdded --RobH 14:58, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Please could you add this (rss) for en.planet , this (rss) for de.planet. My blog is on fr.planet Thank you Pmartin 12:00, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    DoneAdded --RobH 14:58, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    I think there is a problem because no blog add from the last update. Pmartin 08:58, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Looks like I had the blog url, not the feed url. I have updated them and it should reflect that soon. (Blog updates itself like that every hour or so.) --RobH 20:10, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Please include blog=http://ad.huikeshoven.org/ feed=http://ad.huikeshoven.org/feeds/posts/default/-/wiki Dedalus 15:39, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    DoneAdded --RobH 14:55, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Please include this, user name "Ziko".--Ziko 12:01, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Done, but with the feed of [5] instead of just the entire blog. --RobH 18:39, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Thank you, and sorry that I did not look earlier. / It seems not to work correctly, a recent entry is not shown. Could someone have a look? Kind regards --Ziko 20:06, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Wikilog - a blog (mostly!) dedicated to Wikipedia. All content licensed under Creative Commons! Here is the RSS feed for Wikimedia-related comments. Thank you very much! --Heebiejeebieclub 20:05, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Done --RobH 18:34, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Not done Address should be http://blog.heebie.co.uk/taxonomy/term/7/0/feed. Thanks.
    Done updated --RobH 15:00, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Hi I'd like to have my feed on scandinavian planet changed from http://mickenordin.se/blog/index.php/feed/ to http://mickenordin.se/blog/index.php/category/wikimedia/feed/ as this is my wikimedia feed. MiCkE 17:02, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Done --RobH 18:32, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  69. I'd like my blog on GMQ changed from [[6]] to [[7]] as I don't want to update two diffrent blogs anymore, and move my wikirelated stuff to my main blog. Laaknor 23:02, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Done --RobH 18:32, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  70. The Wikipedia Signpost now has a feed for announcing the contents of each new issue.--Ragesoss 15:14, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Done --RobH 18:32, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  71. http://www.greenman.co.za/blog/?tag=wikimedia&feed=rss2 - I often blog about Wikimedia topics and have set up a feed for future posts just on this topic. My content is available under a Creative Commons licence. Blog can be added as "Ian Gilfillan (greenman)". Greenman 02:42, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Done --RobH 18:32, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Please add http://luke.faraone.cc/tag/wikipedia/feed/ to the planet as "Luke Faraone (firefoxman)". Firefoxman 22:28, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Please add http://www.wikisym.org/category/wikimedia/ . Thanks! Dirk Riehle 00:09, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  74. We have started a blog for everything that has to do with Wikivoices. Thanks, GerardM 20:34, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    What's the URL? :-) Cbrown1023 talk 21:58, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    http://wikivoices.blogspot.com .. sorry .. rather relevant isn't it ? GerardM 08:47, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Please add ( http://mrsnina.wordpress.com/) http://mrsnina.wordpress.com/feed/ --Nina-no 20:13, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Oops. On 09/04, I asked for the inclusion of http://litlok.over-blog.com/, but I did not mention the feed itself. Here it is, so that the blog will appear on the french planet (under the name Litlok). Thank you: http://litlok.over-blog.com/rss-articles.xml Litlok 12:03, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Done in r61461. iAlex 14:11, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Please add Wikimedia Sveriges blog on http://wikimediasverige.wordpress.com/feed/ to the scandinavian list (the blog is in Swedish). --Ainali 17:51, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Done in r61462. iAlex 14:21, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Please add the wikipedia tag feed from the french free culture's blog Framablog http://www.framablog.org/index.php/feed/tag/Wikipedia/atom, under the name "Framablog" on the french planet. --FramaKa 08:38, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Done in r61475. iAlex 21:14, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  79. The Wikimedia UK feed does not appear to be getting through, and the URL on the left hand bar appears to be broken. Please could it be checked? blog, feed. Thanks. Mike Peel 23:19, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Fixed in r61498. iAlex 19:58, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  80. Please add my blog under the name "Thomas Dalton (Tango)". The filtered posts are here, but I'm not sure where the RSS version of that page is, hopefully someone else does! Thanks! --Tango 21:48, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Done in r61498. iAlex 19:58, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Hi. I'd be grateful if you'll add the newly created rowiki blog to the Romanian planet under the name "Jurnalul Wikipediei româneşti". Thank you. --Gikü 15:02, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Done in r61533. iAlex 20:06, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Please add http://www.generalist.org.uk/blog/tags/wikipedia/feed/ - this is filtered to only Wikipedia-tagged posts - to en.planet under the name "Andrew Gray". Thanks! Shimgray 17:56, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Done in r61716. iAlex 14:49, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not added

  1. Please add my recently created notebook to the portuguese planet:
    http://www.google.com/notebook/public/05959439175835756100/BDQjbSwoQzfqqucci
    Feed:
    http://www.google.com/notebook/feeds/05959439175835756100/notebooks/BDQjbSwoQzfqqucci
    --Spoladore 14:29, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Please, add my blog, El Malak Pharmacy blog, to the Arabic language section العربية. I made a post about specifically about wikipedia titled" do you support free knowledge? هل تدعم مجانية المعرفة urging people to share it and donate to it.
    http://elmalakrx.com/blog/?p=96
    Rss feed: http://elmalakrx.com/blog/?p=96&feed=rss2
    Mamdouh Samy, El Malak Pharmacy Blog, Egypt.
  3. Interesting feeds: |NYT Wikipedia NYT Jimmy Wales Ars Technica Wikipedia]
  4. T. Mills Kelly's edwired. "Wikis" category: http://edwired.org/?cat=14 (I'm not sure how to get the filtered feed for this category; if it can't be done, then better not to add it, as most posts are not wiki-related)--Ragesoss 00:48, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. My main feed is at http://evan.prodromou.name/rss , and I've filtered it for wiki-specific tags through Yahoo Pipes, with a feed here: http://pipes.yahoo.com/pipes/pipe.run?_id=psLszYsE3BGPFsL71fC6Jw&_render=rss . Can I add myself? --Evan 16:14, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • Rather than having two different conversations about this feed (one in private email for wikiblogplanet between Evan and me, and one here for planet wikimedia), since they're very similar conversations, can we maybe have the conversation here? I very much want Evan's feed on both planets, but do I have to point out that the structure of this feed is a little different from most feeds. Let me take the feed output for "20 Floréal CCXV" as an example, which has 4 sections, that are tagged respectively as:
    • tags: wikitravel wiki montreal amitajune toc
    • tags: rocococamp barcamp barcampmontreal recentchangescamp
    • tags: kanren scheme the reasoned schemer logic prolog
    • tags: domains ib joker godaddy phonojournalist phrygian cap
    So what I would be expecting is the first and second items, but not the third and fourth (I'm here assuming the "barcamp" + "wiki" + "recentchangescamp" + "rocococamp" + "sxsw07" + "mediawiki" tags are the ones that yahoo pipes is filtering on, and those tags, or something very like them, would probably be suitable and on-topic for planet wikimedia). However, looking at the source of the feed, the 4 posts for 20 Floréal CCXV are inside one <item> tag (i.e. it's doing it by day, rather than by item or by section). Looking at the source http://evan.prodromou.name/rss feed, it's all one <item> per day too, so it's not anything that yahoo are doing. If I understand correctly, this means that the third and fourth non-wiki items / sections in the above example would not be filtered out. Maybe that's an issue, and maybe it's not. -- All the best, Nickj 00:56, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    As is I am reluctant to accept this feed, as it would lead to lots of posts that are off-topic on the main planet. Can this be fixed somehow? I'd love to have the wiki posts.--Eloquence 19:56, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    It won't lead to lots of posts that are off-topic. Just occasionally I have posts that include both wiki and non-wiki items on the same page. I'll see what I can do to filter the non-wiki sections out. --Evan 15:06, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Flosse Posse blog about Free, Libre and Open Source Software and Content in Education. Feed at: http://feeds.feedburner.com/FlossePosse --Teemul 14:44, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Would the feed from the Wikipedia Review blog be considered worthwhile, or would that just get shot down with any number of WP:ACRONYM arrows? -- Thekohser 17:37, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Of course it does not merit inclusion. I think most people are in accord with Jimmy's feelings on this:

    I feel pretty strongly that Planet Wikimedia should be a positive and uplifting outreach tool, showing in a good light the work of good people. It should be something that we can be proud to show to people who don't know much about Wikimedia, giving them a glimpse into some of the blog conversations about our good work. It should not be a place for "wikidrama".

    The WR blog doesn't fit anywhere in that description. Most of its bloggers aren't even substantive Wikimedia editors. But thanks for the chuckle. --David Shankbone 23:24, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Strange, that it would take you several days to consider Jimmy's request that you take down the hate-filled posts on your own blog, but then you'd trot out his wishes here to support your opinion. But, that's no surprise. -- Thekohser 04:47, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    I read some posts. Some of them contain personal attacks, and some of them are harmful words to the projects - that is to say, they do nothing helpful but disparage. Very little constructive criticism. I don't think the blog fits. I do not recommend its inclusion.
    As an aside; Mr Shankbone and Mr Kohs, please take whatever it is that is between you two... off the meta wiki. Regards, NonvocalScream 23:15, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    NVS, it's ironic. You describe characteristics of a blog which are virtually identical to complaints I made about another blog in the aggregator, and it was like pulling teeth to get a few people to even consider acknowledging a problem existed. I agree. If the Planet Wikimedia aggregator is mandated to include only supportive, constructive commentary, then the Wikipedia Review blog is not intended for that mandate. -- Thekohser 23:44, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Your issue was resolved, why in the name if Wikimedia must we relive it? Please take it off meta. NonvocalScream 17:54, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    So, this project's version of BADSITES is known as "Positive and Uplifting Outreach Tool"? I guess only Pravda-style propaganda pieces need apply? Dtobias 11:54, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Oh lord my, help us all. NonvocalScream 17:54, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    I don't believe in any sort of god (or goddess), sorry. Dtobias 21:57, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Please can you add my blog to the English planet: http://virginonmedia.wordpress.com/ ((User:Steve Virgin))
    This does not appear to be a dedicated Wiki blog, thus you need to resubmit the request with some kind of filtered feed with on topic posts. --RobH 20:11, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Please change:
    Not done This information is already on the planet and correct. --RobH 15:07, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Actually this was done by me in r52674. --Meno25 21:42, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Please include my blog The blog of Khalid Yousif in Arabic Planet Wikimedia, here is the RSS feed http://khalidyousif.wordpress.com/tag/wiki/feed/ thank you :) DesertPanther 13:09, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Not done This is already in the system with these details. --RobH 15:01, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    This was done by me in r53394. --Meno25 23:17, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Please include my blog, user name "svaksha".--Svaksha 04:51, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    I have not included this because it does not seem to have a wiki related feed and its off topic. Please provide a wiki related feed and resubmit. --RobH 14:53, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    FWIW, this feed was previously included and then removed for not being on-topic, even under the "wiki" tag we were supposedly filtering by. Just as a note. ^demon 19:05, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Hi, I have had a blog for about 2 years now but I never actually used it, but one of the resolutions I made this year was to restart my blog and I already have a good post. I hope it gets included :) ...--Cometstyles 03:59, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    This just does not seem wiki related. --RobH 18:33, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  13. [8].Yousaf465
    This just does not seem wiki related. --RobH 18:33, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  14. The Appropedia blog (filtered feed - mainly stuff on general wiki issues, wiki tech and free content). At the moment many of the posts are copied from my own blog, but I've finished the copying, so there won't be any duplication. Thanks! --Chriswaterguy 17:02, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • Generally PWM is Wikimedia focused. I've included your personal blog because you are a Wikimedian, but Appropedia as a whole does not, as far as I can tell, qualify under the current inclusion guidelines. I want to raise the question broadly with PWM users: Do we want blogs like the Appropedia blog to be included? My primary concern is that then every wiki related blog (e.g. AboutUs, Wikia, Wikispaces, etc.) would qualify, and that would potentially change the scope beyond recognition.--Eloquence 03:35, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Not added due to the consideration listed above. --RobH 18:40, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Fair enough. What if it's filtered to only Wikimedia topics? (feed.) At the moment there's just a few that reference Wikipedia, but there are posts planned related to Wikiversity, for example. --Chriswaterguy 07:02, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Please add http://lagazettedeschampslyses.blogspot.com/, under the name "Rhadamante" on the french planet Rhadamante 12:20, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    There appear to be no posts on this blog. --brion 03:15, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Not done Still no content and no reply. ^demon 14:31, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Requests for removal

  1. I don't think my feed link is set correctly to filter the "Wiki" category. <http://datascreamer.com/?feed=rss2> Thanks, NonvocalScream 23:13, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Removed in rev:38202. --Roosa (Talk) 19:54, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Wikinews Reports http://wikinewsreports.blogspot.com/ - please remove that blog from the planet, since it (mostly) does not contain related to Wikimedia projects but rather just content reproduced from Wikinews. -- 89.13.186.155 18:16, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Hi, could you remove my main blog feed (Wikipedia blog, http://wikip.blogspot.com ) and add these subfeeds instead: [9] [10] [11] [12] [13]. Cheers, Tlogmer 18:02, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Please remove Wise Woman; I've seen only non-WP related posts from there.--Reagle 13:01, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Please remove general posts from [14], and instead add [15]. It's currently grabbing every post, and the latest one is off-topic. Thanks, Majorly (talk) 22:15, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Please remove this blog by Durova that attacks with personal malice the reputation and the parenting skills of another Wikimedian. - Thekohser 13:47, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Not done, no personal attacks there — VasilievV 2 20:04, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Something very interesting just happened right here. Cometstyles removed an "attack", but all it was was a QUOTE of text from Durova's attack blog, merely replacing my name with Vasiliev's name. So, individuals are forging a de facto policy that Durova's attack blog shall be promoted here, while my mere comment with nearly the exact same content gets reverted? How is that logically sound, people? -- Thekohser 13:27, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You should probably read the BIG disclaimer notice on top ;) ..--Cometstyles 13:36, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, that is duly noted. I look forward to my blog being aggregated similarly to the Durova attack blog, and all will be happy. - Thekohser 13:53, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note that Durova kindly removed that particular blog post that was offensive to me, and I have likewise removed a post of mine that was offensive to her. Wow. Cooperation and consideration. Imagine that! -- Thekohser 19:08, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • I have had a chance to read the post referenced here. I do not believe this type of posting is appropriate for the readership and does not seem to have any actual bearing on our local projects. I'm not interested in seeing on the aggregation feed. I certainly don't think the we should include a blog here for syndication that includes extortion such as this quote taken from the comments by Shankbone...

"...I will wait for you to clarify your inaccurate post and charges about my writing, or I will release the whole discussion. "

I will at this time second the removal request. NonvocalScream 03:22, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shankblog removal discussion break one

Please note that the only reason the ED article in question is mentioned on the blog is because Greg, the nominator here, brought it up and falsely accused David, the blog owner, of having written it. Is David not entitled to defend himself, on his own blog, against a baseless accusation? This particular blog post represents an unseemly argument between you two; it is by no means representative of the blog's content, which is almost entirely about Wikimedia-related work. Disclosure: I've worked with David on his blog. -Peteforsyth 23:24, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
They are entitled to defend on blogspace. However, the example post I reviewed was horrible and not something I want to read on the feed. If I see Greg's blog spew the same I'll be here again, requesting removal as well. I don't like to see infighting on the WMF related blogs. NonvocalScream 00:30, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Some of the IP comments are from my stalker, who has issued death threats. Please pay attention to established editors - the Wikimedia Foundation is involved, as well as the FBI. So, take the IP unsigned posts with a grain of salt - there are mitigating circumstances, and that User is banned on Wikipedia (they will now deny it is them)
Most telling is that not one person has given an example of anything false or wrong. It all boils down to w:WP:IDONTLIKEIT. Keep in mind, Greg Kohs never once disputes anything I wrote. The entire diatribe he wrote is is sadly missing the integral component that any intelligent Wikipedia editor (most of us are) would spot: "Burn Shankbone because he wrote about what I factually did, and corrected my baseless accusation against him." Unlike Greg's post which are simply innuendo that is completely false, I actually blogged about the facts of Greg's behavior, with diffs. Steve Walling thanked me for sorting out a muddled subject. If Greg is humiliated by his behavior, the problem is certainly not examining it. Perhaps Greg should, instead of fighting with no argument, stop acting in a way that hurts his reputation and makes him newsworthy. There are man sources, and a Wikipedia article about him. Not notability is fair game for examination - afterall, he ran for the Board of Trustees. I'm open to non-Wikipedia Review editors sharing their insights. Over at Meta, he is arguing against my blog - but raises no argument that says anything I wrote is untrue. Isn't that...WP:CENSOR?
Lastly, we need content on the Planet. It is too heavy with programming and musings (both good), but my blog shows what any of us can achieve if we set our mind to it. I'm a paralegal with no journalism credentials. If you look at the totality of my blog, it inspires the rest of us to try it ourselves. Could you imagine a David Shankbone in L.A., Chicago, Paris, London and Tokyo?!?! We'll get those - my blog is a step to show what we can all achieve, to inspire replication. Why take that away just because Greg Kohs is humiliated by his own behavior, and wants nobody to report on it factually, from public record? If he is humiliated, maybe he should stop pulling the stunts I factually reported on. I was the first citizen journalist to interview a major sitting head of state. I know my ethics. David Shankbone 03:52, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. I'll withdraw my request at this time for removal. I do ask that in the future, please be more careful about the content in the way that it remains interesting to the readership. WMF - or local project related. NonvocalScream 04:11, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I will heed your advice, NonVocal, and Pete Forsyth is my level-headed webmaster, so both of us are open to criticism. It's just that here, I think some of my links were problematic (but only provided b/c Kohs lodged a baseless accusation against me), but I also think the higher road is the way - just as you advised. I will still write about anything notably that happens on Wikipedia, including Greg Kohs, but it will continue to be factual but I will avoid links that might raise the ire of some editors (i.e. Encyclopedia Dramatica, unless the post is about them specifically.

Your concerns were valid, but please assist me in addressing your concerns by at least writing to me on my talk page. Thanks - btw, I'm a fan of some of your work. --David Shankbone 04:33, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, in the future I will post to your talk or email you directly. I can do that. And thank you - I'm actually honored that you've read some of mine. I hope that in the future my writings will get to the caliber and detail of yours :). Best, NonvocalScream 04:40, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
My dear, you are already there! Your challenge is cohesive content. That was my biggest challenge. But your prose and mechanics are done. It's only deciding on focused content-what do you care about enough to write about every day--that will make your blog a success. At two months, I already have 14,000 article hits a week. You're on the cusp, my friend. Do you know what helped me to focus? Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, Wikinews reports news, and Commons has images - if you simply refract all of your observations though a Wiki-prism, you can write about anything! Anything! --David Shankbone 05:13, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Nonvocal, I couldn't agree with you more -- I'd rather not be having this discussion.
Not sure how that particular quote is so offensive. You can pick one item out of a string of accusations, threats, and other childish behavior, but I'm not sure that really proves anything. Plus, what you quote is from the comment thread...thus, not republished in the feed.
For what it's worth, the link mentioned in the nomination has been removed from the original post. -Peteforsyth 00:45, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Section removed, per Newyorkbrad. -- Thekohser 03:19, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Greg, you call David's speculation "shameful" and "wrong," but unless I missed something, you have yet to state that your own accusation -- which started this whole mess -- was "shameful" or "wrong." What gives? -Peteforsyth 16:27, 7 September 2008 (UTC) per above point 2 [reply]
Response removed, per Newyorkbrad. -- Thekohser 03:19, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No, Greg, I'm definitely not saying that you started everything between the two of you. But the present issue has to do with "who wrote" and "who is driving traffic to" the ED article about you -- correct? That issue originated with you drawing attention to the article, and falsely accusing David of writing it. That accusation was reckless and unkind, something you have yet to acknowledge.
By the way, there were over 1200 hits to the blog on August 20. Is it beyond your imagination that one of David's readers wrote the ED piece? -Peteforsyth 17:48, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Response removed, per Newyorkbrad. -- Thekohser 03:19, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
He has promised to be more careful. I'm inclined to believe him. NonvocalScream 16:25, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Response removed, per Newyorkbrad. -- Thekohser 03:19, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
For what is is worth, it is not that easy to manipulate me. I understand that a new blog may very well be created, David has assured me that the issue for which caused me to request removal from this aggregation will not recur. I find no reason to disbelieve. As for blogs outside the aggregator, I've no more control over that than I have at attempting to control Martin's blog (or any other non syndicated blog for that matter) My only concern here is WMF and its contributers. I can't affect what I can't control. I won't use this forum to exert pressure on blogs not syndicated here. NonvocalScream 00:18, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An inquiry about general principles

Without endorsing in particular any of what Thekohser wrote about (I agree with some of it, disagree with some of it, but in any event the details aren't relevant to my point), I will say that I think there is a problem here, but it should be addressed more broadly than just this one dispute.

I feel pretty strongly that Planet Wikimedia should be a positive and uplifting outreach tool, showing in a good light the work of good people. It should be something that we can be proud to show to people who don't know much about Wikimedia, giving them a glimpse into some of the blog conversations about our good work. It should not be a place for "wikidrama". And this whole thing is classic old-school top notch high quality wikidrama. As such, I think - links to ED or not - the post in question is really not appropriate for this venue. We have a strong "no personal attacks" policy on all wikis, and Planet Wikimedia should not only not be a way around that, it should also strive for a higher standard than an AN/I page where difficult things really need to be discussed.

I hope that this post will be removed completely, but even moreso, I hope that we can have a discussion about the purpose and standards of this aggregator.--Jimbo Wales 11:59, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, ain't this just wonderful! What about my name, my business name, the names of people close to me which have been splashed all over Wikipedia by this individual, not mention this attack blog which this person "just happened" to link to on his FR:WP page? He's got my real name and lots of other information on his blog and that's still there. I want it gone. Paul Wehage 19:45, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That sounds like something you may have to take up with that local project. NonvocalScream 20:24, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Paul Wehage, who spread around rumors that a top Wikimedian is linked to pedophilia, who told Daniel Brandt to reveal the true identity and employer of Newyorkbrad (Somey gave Daniel Brandt Newyorkbrad's I.P.); Paul Wehage, a person who has evaded an ArbCom ban on editing topics via a sockpuppet, w:User:Gretab, that he created right from the get-go. You also wrote a lot about w:User:JzG, and the name you chose, "User:Batshitinsanedufusfromhell" was checkusered over at ED and confirmed to be you. In the article ("the fieryangel") you wrote as "Batshitinsane" you trounced the entire ArbCom that topic-banned you. You have sent out countless e-mails and posted or written conservative blogs on a weekly base linking Jimmy Wales to Boy Scout Spanking art, simply because it was on Wikia's servers. Now you come here making demands? You live in France, and you have self-promoted all over that project (including calling you and Jean-Thierry celebrities of their local 20,000 person hamlet -- you're such an hero!) I'm sure the French Wikipedia knows nothing of your Wikipedia Review boast, "Wikipedia will never, ever get EU funding because of me!" I mean...really! All of this is true, and now here you are asking for these same people to help you. --David Shankbone 20:57, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Response removed, per Newyorkbrad. -- Thekohser 03:19, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Greg, Paul Wehage arguing for the revelation of Newyorkbrad's identity is all over Wikipedia Review from that time period. Then, before I had the honor of being banned, in the discussion that PW is the fieryangel, Jorge recapped prior posts PW made about Newyorkbrad, including 'Give Brand his name and location' and 'He made his bed, he can jolly well lie in it' Greg, you know how to use WR's search engine - if you want links, you will have to do the work yourself.
Has it ever dawned on you that the things you write here are embarrassing for the Wikipedia Review? For instance, you claiming I had "special access to ED checkuser data" - ED doesn't work like Wikipedia - there is no problem with posting the data. (www.encyclopediadramatica.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Drunkenlazybastard&diff=1997563936&oldid=1997563749). Now, you could try to argue that there are multiple Wikipedia-hating ex-pat musicologist spammers who write articles about Musik Fabrik's ArbCom, and whose IP is based in Lagny and assigned to Musik Fabrik's address, and thus say it's not Paul Wehage. But then you'd look kind of dumb, right? So, it will be interesting to watch you dispute that info.
Greg, I don't work on Wikipedia review, although I wrote a few non-Wikipedia related articles about New York, gays and the Republican right (Surprise!) I donated to ED because I think they do a good job at focusing on Absurdism in American culture and right wing politics, not because they taunt Wikipedia editors. Believe it or not, some people vote Republican even though they are for gay rights. Smart people recognize how multi-faceted is life and don't try to raise an w:Appeal to emotion fallacious argument as you consistently do. Wikipedia editors are smart - do you really think they don't see right through your hysterics and theatrics? ED documents more than Wikipedia. I will only take credit for edits made as User:Shankbone on there; however I know some editors on there who are very Wikipedia-focused, and I sometimes tell them about something factual on Wikipedia--like your ridiculous "I will return to do 100 precise edits, more if everyone here apologizes to me" line on w:User talk:Thekohser. What these acquaintances at ED do is run with the absurdism that every post you make is rife with. I'm sorry that it bothers you that your inappropriate behavior gets discussed, but have you ever considered that the root of the problem is you, and not those who factually report on your antics? NPA does not mean, "You don't get to talk about anything I do" it is geared toward unsubstantiated, baseless claims - such as the one you made that I created your ED article.
But here you are, someone who has worked diligently to harm Wikipedia over the last few years as much as you can. You hold grudges, and it hurts you. Did you know there are prominent editors who want to try a pay-for-editing trial program who know they will never get it passed simply because of what an albatross you and your shenanigans are to any attempt? You've taken a situation where you were probably right, and allowed your egotistical hysterics to diminish any valid argument you have. You always focus on the wrong target; in other words, everyone else is the problem but you. Most people see that as a hallmark of a self-indulgent promotion-oriented businessman who think his thoughts should be the standard. Do you not realize you come across that way, with every post? Really?
The best was the scurrilous Paul Wehage joining you in playing court jesters, making bufoonish requests in light of their highly unethical manners of seeking "revenge" against Wikipedia. Greg, you and Jon Awbrey disrupt the project in this misguidedly fruitless drive to make a point of how unreliable is Wikipedia. Then when you come crawling with your "100 precise edits" you act like you're doing us all a favor. You actually turn to your sworn enemies (like Jimmy Wales, who you constantly malign) to help you. When they actually do, it leaves no impression upon you that your rants might be based upon one fleeting moment and its extenuating circumstances. What you, Paul Wehage, Daniel Brandt, Somey, etc. never get is that despite your unethical acts, which there are many, that when you ask for assistance from people you revile, like Jimmy Wales, they try to help you out fairly. You will never sing the praises of Wales, but when you need him, you'll use him and give him no credit. That's Wikipedia Review. It's a site of demonstrably hypocritical haters. Yours and Paul's actions only proof that. I'm now waiting for Amorrow, Daniel Brandt and Somey to show up here to make as nutty and galling demands as you two have made. Just goes to show--you Wikipedia Review haters need us far moar than we need you. On some level, you all really hate that. --David Shankbone 05:45, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Response removed, per Newyorkbrad. -- Thekohser 03:19, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Response removed, per Newyorkbrad. -- Thekohser 03:19, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ok, I've created this and comments/discussion you suggest is welcome on the talk page. Anyone can edit the draft also. I'll be adding to the draft later. Once it is done - It can be transcluded. NonvocalScream 16:32, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • I agree with Jimbo (and Nonvocal) and I have removed the three "Kohs" posts. 95% of my blog is dedicated to Wikimedia and my work on it. Greg Kohs wants to do and say anything, without having anyone talk about it because his own behavior embarrasses him. I disagree with that silly argument, but I also agree that for posts on the Planet Wikimedia we should be showing the strides all Wikipedians make, and the interesting work they undertake. Showcasing our more embarrassing "hangers on" and their disruption and hysterics is not the right place for the Planet Wikimedia aggregator. I agree. But I plan to start a new blog where I can publish my thoughts on such matters outside the Wikimedia aggregators, and stick to my Wiki contributions on Shankblog; that is a reasonable request. Greg, I'm a writer and I don't like being told what and who I can write about; everything you "dispute" boils down to ignorance (Your credited on the photo by having text embedded in the photo - a common way to give attribution; trust me, if anyone should know, it's me); the non-policy BADSITES (he likes ED! He donated to ED! Get rid of his blog!"; untruths like "I've never asked to come back to Wikipedia (anyone who reads w:User:Thekohser can quickly see that's not true); and an absolute hysterical tone. It's funny that people you continually disparage and make fun of both on and off wiki (Jimmy Wales; Durova, et al.) and from whom you demand apologies, are the same people you crawl to for help when your ego has been bruised by your own theatrics, the same you continue with here. It's another indication of how much Wikipedia Review needs Wikipedians to have any sort of success. So why do you continually disparage these people? Perhaps it will be something to ponder on a new, non-Planet WIkimedia blog. Even Wikipedians have freedom of speech and thought, and communal decisions are only within the context of Wiki-related matters. Greg, if you think censorship is the way to win the hearts and minds of Wikipedians ("HE GAVE MONEY TO ED!") you're deluded. You never seem to go about things smart, as if you never were taught that one attracts more flies with honey than vinegar. --David Shankbone 18:09, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Response removed, per Newyorkbrad. -- Thekohser 03:19, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It would be impolite for me not to say "thank you" for removing the three blog posts. Show me some sincerity and not blog about me again, and then you'll have not only my thanks, but my admiration. It's not "censorship", David; it's just good business sense. I'm really not that interesting from a marketing angle. -- Thekohser 22:59, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • I would like to make a note that Name removed, per Newyorkbrad. -- Thekohser 03:19, 18 April 2009 (UTC) is attempting to revert my contributions here, declaring "discussion ended". I have posted factual information about his pursuits with another site where he stands behind his edits. He wants to remove these facts from the discussion. He has fewer than 15 edits to Wikimedia Meta wiki, since January 2008, almost all of them related to his interest in Planet Wikimedia. I have nearly 250 edits, since starting here in December 2006, with topical interests all across the board. I think this is important for everyone to keep in perspective. -- Thekohser 21:01, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm really not interested in his pursuit on other sites being detailed here. This forum is for Planet Wikimedia. I believe the issue on the feed is resolved. I'm likely to archive anything outside of that scope. Let us keep that in perspective. You came with a feed issue, and the issue was resolved. This forum is not for anything else but the feed. Respectfully, NonvocalScream 01:36, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]


  1. Writing Within the Rules the Wikipedia category feed is http://writingwithintherules.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default/-/wikipedia John Broughton 02:44, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  2. A new personal start, please add http://achim-raschka.net/blog/ with rss http://achim-raschka.net/blog/?feed=rss2 , categories Wikipedia and Wikimedia to the german planet. Greetings from Berlin -- Necrophorus 15:16, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • I'd prefer to add only one category because each one is treated as a separate feed - can you tag all posts as "Wikimedia" or "Wiki"? I've added the Wikipedia category for now.--Eloquence 11:27, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  3. The blog "Wikimedia Pennsylvania" has been moved to a new URL, and has had it's name changed. The blog is now called "Wiki Northeast", and the new url is http://wikinortheast.blogspot.com. The blog will still be operated by myself and other regional wikimedians, and will discuss issues about USA-based groups and wiki activities. --Whiteknight (meta) (Books) 14:30, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Please include my blog Sopoforic Agents in Childhood in the English planet. The appropriate filtered feed is here. You may credit me as Tracy Poff. --Sopoforic 14:14, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Please could you add my blog Wiki-Observations with its feed at [16]. Thanks. Scarian 16:34, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Please add my brand new blog [17]. Here's the feed: [18]. Thanks. Majorly (talk) 21:29, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • This is an unfiltered feed. I've added it, but please only post Wikimedia-relevant content, or tag posts accordingly. :-) --Eloquence
  7. In my (Jakob Voss) blog http://jakoblog.de I also write about Wikimedia/Wikipedia topics in German and English. Can you please add this Feed URL to German Planet Wikimedia?
    http://jakoblog.de/feed/atom?tag=Wikipedia,Wikimedia -- Nichtich 13:39, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  8. I blog about Wikipedia. You can find my posts about Wikipedia on this URL (http://ikhnaton2.com/whisper/technology/wikipedia). The feed URL is (http://ikhnaton2.com/whisper/technology/wikipedia/feed). Please add it to the Arabic Planet Wikimedia.--Ikhnaton2 22:43, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Added.--Alnokta 03:26, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Finally I realized that there is a problem with WordPress switch from "tag" to "category". Please, change all WordPress blogs: s#wordpress.com/tag#wordpress.com/category# --Millosh 22:16, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Update request Hello - I'm currently listed as "Urpo Lankinen". Since the Yahoo Pipes thingy is so slow to update at times and it appears this site can filter by tag anyway, please update that entry to just use the main blog page [19], main feed [20] and filter on tags "wiki" and "wikipedia" (all tags I use are lowercase). --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 20:35, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Please change User:vishwin60 to User:O and the feed to http://www.vishwinrepublic.co.nr/wikimedia/feed/ . Thank you. 哦,是吗?(O-person) 04:16, 25 December 2007 (GMT)
  12. Please add my feed as "Brianna Laugher". pfctdayelise 11:51, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Please add http://archiv.twoday.net/topics/Wikis/ with RSS http://archiv.twoday.net/topics/Wikis/index.rdf to the German planet --Histo 15:56, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  14. hi, i would like to be included on the german planet. the feed is under http://piratenblog.wordpress.com/category/wikipedia/feed/ (you can include http://piratenblog.wordpress.com/category/wiki/feed/ too, but it is more general and does not contail all articles about wikipedia) the name of the blog is "Ralphs Piratenblog" or just "Piratenblog" for short. Elvis untot 15:54, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Hello please add the blog of Wikimedia Germany to the german planet. The Feed-URL is http://blog.wikimedia.de/feed/ --Finanzer 13:28, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Could you please change my filtered blog feed to: http://www.martinp23.com/blog/category/wikimedia/feed - thanks! Martinp23 20:08, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Please add my notebook to the german planet: http://www.google.com/notebook/public/15241387604284059985/BDRkjSwoQj5rvytgh - feed: http://www.google.com/notebook/feeds/15241387604284059985/notebooks/BDRkjSwoQj5rvytgh --Thoken 00:04, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  18. please add the blog.zeno.org to the german planet. There is one section with Wikipedia/zeno-Stuff and in future I want to increase my activity in blogging about articles and stuff related to wikipedia there. -- 89.196.54.202 19:18, 16 August 2007 (UTC) (Achim Raschka)[reply]
  19. Please add this category feed to the English planet, listed under my real name, Enoch Lau. The main page is this. Thanks. enochlau (talk) 12:40, 3 August 2007 (UTC) (moved down on 04:21, 11 August 2007 (UTC))[reply]
  20. I have moved my blog. Because this please delete the address http://finanzer.spaces.live.com/ from german planet and add the new address http://www.finanzer.org/blog/. The Feed for entries about wikimedia is now http://www.finanzer.org/blog/index.php/category/wikimedia/feed. Thanks --Finanzer 11:45, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Please add my blog at http://sebmol.com/ with the filtered feed url http://sebmol.com/blog/?cat=8&feed=rss2 to the English planet. sebmol ? 13:12, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Please add my Wikimedia-Blog "Der unpartheyische Correspondent" to the german planet. The feed is http://www.schulenburg.biz/correspondent/?feed=rss2 --Frank Schulenburg 21:35, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Please, change my blog feed. Instead of Blogspot, please add a feed http://millosh.wordpress.com/tag/wikimedia/feed/ (Blogspot has some bug + I am moving my blog to Wordpress.) Thanks. --Millosh 09:38, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Hm. Blogger is weird. After more then a day, it added a the article to the feed, even I removed the article. It seems that it is better to move to Wordpress. --Millosh 18:53, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  24. My blog is about various Wikimedia projects, my life editing, and other stuff. See the sub-title on the page. feeds page normal page Swatjester 01:33, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  25. My Blog http://finanzer.spaces.live.com/ is mainly about Wikipedia and some other Wikimedia projects. Sometimes i will add some posts about other things. But i have a category called Wikipedia. The feed for this category is http://finanzer.spaces.live.com/category/Wikipedia/feed.rss. Please add it to german planet. Thanks --Finanzer 08:36, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Sure, count me in as an English blogger: Here's the blog, and http://lunasantin.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default/-/wikimedia for the specific feed. Luna Santin 00:03, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Filtered feed, listed under Nick Jenkins, please. -- All the best, Nickj 09:14, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  28. I started a new blog in German centered on Wikimedia and its projects. The blog is at http://blog.dapete.de/, the feed url for wiki-relevant posts is http://blog.dapete.de/kategorie/wiki/feed. I'd like to be listed as "Peter Schlömer (Dapete)". --Dapeteばか 09:58, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  29. I have created a new blog feed for the planned "Wikimedia Pennsylvania" chapter. The URL is: http://wmfpa.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default Could you please call it "Wikimedia Pennsylvania"? --Whiteknight 19:37, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Please change my RSS feed to this link - that's just category "wiki" - David Gerard 22:30, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  31. I would like to have my blog included in the German section. I am planning to blog from the Wikimania 2007 as well. The specific feed URL is: - Wiki Feed Mario Behling 06:31, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Please add pathos.ca/blog/?cat=3&feed=rss2. I really should have joined sooner— there is a detailed summary of the board candidates that I'd like aggregated before the board elections are over next week. —{admin} Pathoschild 07:51:26, 01 July 2007 (UTC)
  33. Please include my free layers blog in the English section. The wiki specific feed URL is: http://freelayers.org/tag/wiki/feed/atom/ Mario Behling 11:50, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  34. I would like to have my blog added in the English section. Here is the filtered feed. Please add it with the signature Guillaume Paumier. Thanks in advance. guillom 13:58, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks! guillom 19:47, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Update for sleepyhead.org, switched to tags rather than categories. New url is http://sleepyhead.org/tag/wikipedia/feed. Thanks. - Cohesion 03:35, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  36. For the DE Planet; http://feeds.feedburner.com/dewikizine It is the RSS feed of the postings of DE Wikizine to gmane.org.wikimedia.wikizine.german and it realy sucks because of the plain text. But is the best I can provide. Please include it to see what it gives. I use feedburner so the source feed can be updated without breaking the url. --Walter Do you have news? Report it to Wikizine 20:19, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  37. I just started blogging and have created a wiki-specific feed: http://feeds.feedburner.com/PostGeographic-Wiki. I plan to blog more about Wikipedia in the future so would love to be included in this. Padraic 17:14, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  38. I have created a wiki-specific blog feed: http://wikibooks.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default --Whiteknight 22:06, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  39. I have a feed at http://feeds.feedburner.com/remotewiki . This is part of a larger blog (mine), which is why this is filtered to wiki only. Please add it to the English planet. (zelzany - he's still at it) 02:17, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  40. My blog is already listed on Planet Wikimedia. However, due to a hosting change (from self-hosted Wordpress to Wordpress.com) the URL is different. Instead of ending in /category/wikimedia/feed/ , the URL now ends in /tag/wikimedia/feed/ (ie [21]. That's all that needs to be changed :) Cynical 20:57, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  41. My feed is at [22] AFAIS. Please add it to the german planet. The blog is >90% wikionly. If someone tell me how to filter out the "non-mw"-Category, it would be 100% wiki. --DaB. 15:44, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Please add [23] as "Arne Klempert (akl)" to the German planet. The blog is almost exclusively focused on Wikimedia stuff. Thanks -- Arne (akl) 15:01, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Utkarshraj Atmaram - filtered feed: http://utcursch.wordpress.com/tag/wikipedia/feed/ Utcursch 11:55, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  44. German language: Weiterführende Literatur (Mathias Schindler) - theme blog: http://isbn.mathias-schindler.de/?feed=rss2
  45. I opened a blog exclusively for WM related issues (http://millosh-wm.blogspot.com/). Feed is: http://millosh-wm.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default . (There are no posts at this moment.) --Millosh 09:59, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Johannes Moskaliuk | Medien, Psychologie, Leben - feed url: http://blog.moskaliuk.com/feed/ Moskaliuk
  47. Jakob Voß, weblog title: jakoblog.de | Wikimedia-related stuff (highly related): http://jakoblog.de/category/wikimedia/feed, Wikipedia-related stuff (broader) http://jakoblog.de/category/wikipedia/feed
  48. Blog by Said Kassem Hamideh: Dialogicality - feed url: http://dialogicality.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default/-/wiki --Saidkassem 21:51, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Mark Rauterkus & Running Mates - feed url: http://Rauterkus.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default/-/wiki Rauterkus
  50. Cormac Lawler (Cormaggio) - filtered feed: http://cormaggio.org/?cat=2&feed=rss2 Cormaggio @ 18:15, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  51. German Blog: Wikipedistik - hopefully it will be more active in the future... filtered feed: [24]. Please add with real-name and user-name. Thx. --Avatar 12:36, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  52. As per a request that advisory board members add their blogs, I've made a feed with a planetwikimedia tag for my blog, copyrighteous here: http://mako.cc/copyrighteous/tags/planetwikimedia?flav=atomBenjamin Mako Hill 17:09, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  53. My german speaking blog is mainly about Wikipedia: http://wiklin.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default. To be listed as Nando Stöcklin. Thanks! --Napa 07:06, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  54. I've moved hosts because Vox is rubbish. New feed: http://davidgerard.co.uk/notes/?feed=rss2 - David Gerard 17:04, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  55. The blog will be mainly Wikimedia stuff, but in case that changes, I've provided a filtered feed: http://martinp23.southportbeekeepers.co.uk/blog?feed=rss2&cat=3 - "Martinp23" would be fine to have the blog listed as. Thanks, Martinp23 21:42, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  56. I just started off with a MediaWiki-based pseudo-bloggish thingy; a feed for all Wikimedia/MediaWiki related stuff is here, and there's also a html version of the feed (for the curious: the feed is generated by mw:Extension:News). I would like to be listed as Daniel Kinzler. -- Duesentrieb 16:04, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Just starting a new Wikipedia blog, and it would be great to be included! The blog is at http://blog.mets501.com and the RSS feed is http://blog.mets501.com/feed/. Thanks. ("Mets501" is good for the list of included blogs) --Mets501 03:36, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Hi, my blog will have occasional wiki-related posts. Feed for these is here. Can I be listed under my username please. the wub "?!" 15:43, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  59. My blog URL changed after moving hosts - "wiki" category feed is now: here. Thanks Gary KIRK parler! 13:56, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Updated. 81.156.175.231 18:26, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  60. This blog often deals with Wikimedia projects and Open Source projects in general - of course also connections among them - it would be nice to see it included. Sabine
  61. My blog, Spontaneous Monotony, is at http://www.davidarussell.co.uk/ . The feed http://www.davidarussell.co.uk/category/wikimedia/atom is a dedicated feed for my Wikimedia category - the same URL except with /rss/ at the end also works if the aggregator doesn't support Atom, but Textpattern's RSS feed isn't as good as the Atom feed so use Atom if possible :). I would prefer to appear as David A. Russell (Cynical) in the participants list if possible. Thanks. Cynical 17:26, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Hi, can you edit my name to leave out (cohesion), the standard formatting (like the rest of the list) would be better I think. :) - Cohesion 04:57, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Actually not my feed but I think it deserves inclusion http://daveydweeb.com/ Kpjas 06:58, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Please add my blog: http://jimbojw.com/wiki/index.php?title=Blog&action=feed&tags=mediawiki
    This filtered feed of my blog contains only articles about MediaWiki from a technical development standpoint, including announcements of new or updated extensions that I've written. Bonus points: The feed itself is a live demo of a MediaWiki Extension called WikiArticleFeeds.
    Thanks in advance. If possible, I'd like my name to appear as "Jim R. Wilson" in the credits. Thanks! --Jimbojw 23:04, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  65. This is me (Urpo Lankinen, a random coffee-addled en.wikipedia admin): [25] - it's a filtered feed. I have no idea how well this works - it involves some Yahoo! Pipes hackery and Feedburnination. Basically, it's supposed to take posts from my blogs that are tagged Wikipedia/Wiki/Wikimedia, and I've been so busy with other stuff lately that only one post from last month shows up (I posted one today, let's hope it shows up then)... well, I hope it works =) --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 12:04, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Oh, and if it's at all possible, link the user/blog name to [26] where this blog really resides. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 14:14, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  66. My blog is a http://gpollard.wordpress.com. http://gpollard.wordpress.com/feed/ Please put it under the name Gabriel Pollard. I am Nzgabriel on wikinews. 08:53, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Feed: i-iter blog Hi! let me know if you need tech details. It's a feed made by the Views module under Drupal 5.1. I had no direct filtered feed in the platform, so I made one myself. --Bèrto 'd Sèra 00:42, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  68. My filtered feed The feed is empty right now, as I've had to move some stuff around, but I intend to post to it soonish. I'd like to be identified as 'Sean Whitton (Xyrael)' on the participants list, if that's possible. Thanks. —Xyrael / 14:49, 13 March 2007 (UTC) This feed now does have a carefully filtered post. I've also realised that usernames are displayed under posts, so I am quite happy with just Sean Whitton in the bar on the left. Thanks. —Xyrael / 10:08, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  69. feed this is a feed of the "wikipedia" tag. cool idea! I would like my username after my name like "Judson Dunn (cohesion)" or something similar :) - Cohesion 23:59, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  70. feed - Wikzine - If you can do that only label that as "Wikizine" and not as "Walter Vermeir". --Walter Do you have news? Report it to Wikizine 13:04, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Joseph Reagle [27]
    • I just noticed my recent blog entry "Reuse vs. self plagiarism" is appearing on Wikipedia Planet, though it is not specific to the Wikipedia category feed that I provided. The entry is peripherally about Wikipedia, since it is about my methodology, but not specific to it. I don't mind if it ends up on Planet, but I think others might. If they do, I certainly don't object Planet focusing specifically on my Wikipedia category -Reagle 19:41, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Bookcrafting Guru - This blog is exclusively about internal politics and philosophies of English Wikibooks, or about other free textbook projects. I do not anticipate any posting on this blog that would not have substantial interest to people interested in Wikibooks in general, and may even be of general interest to other Wikimedia users. --Roberth 01:01, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Wikipedia Signpost - The English Wikipedia's internal newspaper, Wikipedia Signpost. Published weekly late on Mondays. Ral315 (talk) 02:56, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Wikipedia Blog Tlogmer 01:23, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  75. XD @ WP - I'll try to tag everything relevant with "Wiki" tags, but I doubt I'll post anything else in there. Titoxd(?!?) 07:55, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Thoughts For Deletion --bainer (talk) 13:43, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Wikinews Reports -- Zanimum 17:26, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    This blog will be solely for promoting significant original coverage by the English Wikinews. It will not include insignifcant coverage, and posts will discuss the manner in which the story was covered, instead of focusing on the story itself. It will be open to contributions by any administrator on the English Wikinews, but all on this one topic. Sample backdated posts were created. The only time I can ever see this blog straying is the very occasional times that the mainstream press cites Wikinews as a source, as was the case with a political interview of Joe Mihevc, quoted in The Toronto Star, Canada's largest paper by circulation.
  78. jumpy jumpy vitamins - jredmond 21:56, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Gary Kirk - wiki feed Gary KIRK parler! 13:35, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  80. Feed of Wikitech tag at [28]. Domas Mituzas
  81. Arnomane - feed. However I post in English and German. Arnomane 16:29, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Now I managed it to create an appropriate sub category feed for Wikimedia project related postings in English: http://arnomane.wordpress.com/tag/wiki-en/feed/ -- Arnomane 17:59, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Ragesoss 2.02 - Wikipedia feed --Ragesoss 19:08, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  83. [29] feed [30] why not :) Brian Wikinews / Talk 05:04, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Original research the Wikipedia category feed is http://original-research.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default/-/wikipedia -- Llywrch 06:45, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  85. scienceroll.com; feed of Wikipedia tag. Thank you, NCurse 07:28, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  86. http://blog.valuewiki.com   wiki category feed is http://blog.valuewiki.com/tag/wiki/feed Thank you! Jonathan Stokes
  87. http://www.perspektive89.com/ from http://de.planet.wikimedia.org/ - because it's the german feed, but not the blog. Marcus Cyron 18:28, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Somebody at home? Marcus Cyron 12:42, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Been two days, give them a chance... Majorly talk 14:10, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Hi guys - my blog is going to become less reliably Wikipedia-focused, and the feed issue isn't working, most likely because GoDaddy is the worst blog/web platform out there and for all that is decent and holy, use WordPress if you start one yourself. Thanks for the opportunity to provide some content for awhile - could you take Shankblog off the feed? Happy New Year! --David Shankbone 16:29, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    http://blog.shankbone.org per request. NonvocalScream 05:33, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Just a reminder that the removal has not been completed. NonvocalScream 02:07, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Done in rev:46575. ^demon 03:35, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Please adjust blog.shankbone.org to filter "Wikipedia" tag per the talk page of this page. Thanks, NonvocalScream 20:00, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Not quite sure how to do this, but the User:Svaksha wiki feed is entirely off-topic. Many of the posts are about Indian politics, none of them are about Wikimedia. Kenb215 22:16, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Done in rev:49785 ^demon 21:24, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Can Dendodge be removed please. It is nearly always off-topic. And personally I find it horribly painful to read even when it is not. Hesperian 23:40, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Another day, another off-topic post.... Hesperian 23:34, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    I do now post more off-topic posts than on-topic ones. However, all my Wikipedia-related posts are tagged with the "Wikipedia" label. If there's any way to aggregate only posts with that label, that is fine by me. If not, I am happy for my blog to be removed. Dendodge 17:04, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  91. Hi all. Please remove the link to Remigiu's blog from the Romanian planet blog list, because the blog was deleted. Thanks in advance. --Gikü 15:05, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Done rev:61463. ^demon 14:21, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]