Steward requests/Permissions

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
< Steward requests
This is an archived version of this page, as edited by MarcoAurelio (talk | contribs) at 14:46, 9 November 2012 (→‎Diupwijk@svwiki: ok). It may differ significantly from the current version.
Shortcut:
SRP

This page is for requests to have stewards grant or revoke administrator, bureaucrat, checkuser, and oversight rights on Wikimedia projects which do not have a local permissions procedure.

Old sections are archived. The list of archives is below.

  • Requests for bot flags are handled at SRB, and requests for global permissions are handled at SRGP.
  • If you are requesting adminship or bureaucratship, and your wiki has a local bureaucrat, submit your request to that user or to the relevant local request page (index).
  • For urgent requests, such as to combat large-scale vandalism on a small wiki, contact a steward in the #wikimedia-stewardsconnect IRC channel. In emergencies, type !steward in the channel to get the attention of stewards. Otherwise, you can type @steward for non-urgent help.

Other than requests to remove your own access or emergencies, please only make requests here after gaining the on-wiki approval of your local community.

Quick navigation: Administrator | Interface administrator | Bureaucrat | CheckUser | Oversight | Removal of access | Miscellaneous | Global permissions

(translate | edit)

Cross-wiki requests
Meta-Wiki requests

Using this page

1. Place the following code at the bottom of the appropriate section below: 

==== Username@xxproject ====
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!-- don't change this line -->
 |domain    = <!-- such as en.wikibooks -->
 |user name = 
 |discussion= 
}}
(your remarks) ~~~~

2. Fill in the values:

  • domain: the wiki's URL domain (like "ex.wikipedia" or "meta.wikimedia").
  • user name: the name of the user whose rights are to be changed (like "Exampleuser"). In case you're requesting access for multiple bots, leave this field blank and give a list of these bots in your remarks
  • discussion: a link to the local vote or discussion about the rights change (for example, "[[ex:Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship#ExampleUser]]"). This should normally be for at least one week, but no more than three weeks (if so, you'll need to restart the process).

3. If anything is missing from your request, a steward will request more information.

Confirmation of signing confidentiality agreement

Certain permissions (notably CheckUser and Oversight) additionally require users to sign a confidentiality agreement. Users requesting these permissions must make a request below, and must also sign the confidentiality agreement with the Wikimedia Foundation. The request is placed on hold temporarily, until the receipt has been formally confirmed by the Office.

Requests

COPY THE FOLLOWING CODE to the bottom of the appropriate section below: 

==== Username@xxproject ====
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!--don't change this line-->
 |domain    =
 |user name =
 |discussion= 
}}

Administrator access

Steward requests/Permissions/Sysop-header

आशीष भटनागर@hi.wikipedia

Status:    Done

I have been working at Hindi wikipedia for so long with much of contribution, which can be seen by admin tools, I need not state them. Alongwith working as Admin & thereafter as Bureaucrat for long. Offcourse for last one year my contributions sufferred due to some personal reasons. Still I promise to abide by the policies & contribute towards editing as well as the Admin tasks in future. Request for Admin Rights, as for good editing it is required to have many rights, as deletion, protection, removal of protection & much more. Here it is to be noted that I have been elected by nomination (pls refer this nomination).

Therefore my Admin rights may please be revived. Ashish Bhatnagartalk 03:59, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

*Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2013-05-05. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. -- Avi (talk) 14:50, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Just want to enquire that why the dormant sysops पूर्णिमा वर्मन & Munita Prasad have been retained as sysops here (refer) who have been out of any activity so long?
Unfortunately, we cannot track every admin on every project. If you can show that there are people on your project who, according to your own wiki rules, are no longer eligible for being sysops, please file a request for removal below. Also, please make sure you link to the discussion on your project where the removal was reviewed. There are some projects, for example, who do not remove privs for inactivity. -- Avi (talk) 14:50, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the attention & grant. I actually requested for permanent sysops rights only, but missed to state the same. Actually we at hi.wikipedia generally used to grant permanent adminships, thats why I took missed to state the permanent word. Thats why I had also stated the link to the consensus at hi.wiki. Now if you see, I may be granted permanent admin rights. --Ashish Bhatnagartalk 15:57, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Just now observed the current status of the recent consensus at hi.wiki for permanent admin rights. This can be seen at the consensus/request for Permanent admin rights page at hi.wiki. Now I do request for permanent admin rights. --Ashish Bhatnagartalk 16:00, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • My sincere thanks for a prompt action. Here I would also like to remind that I was elected Bureaucrat on 16 June, 2010 & have been on the post with responsibility till then. This election was with consensus & can be seen on this Archive page. So I request you to please restore the Bureaucrat position rights for me, so that hi.wikipedia also has its one local Bureaucrat & everybody or anybody has no need to call up the stewards for the matters, that can be resolved there. --Ashish Bhatnagartalk 03:46, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Si Gam@ace.wikipedia

Status:    Done

Please grant me permanent administratorship since there is no administrator there. Thank you very much. -- Si Gam (talk) 15:42, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Permanently adminship is too long imho because you had the rights only for 3 months. I'd say 6 months or 1 year for now. Trijnsteltalk 17:27, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2013-05-05. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. -- Avi (talk) 22:19, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Why I can not get a permanent adminship? While before I have ever gotten it.. -- Si Gam (talk) 06:06, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
At this point, the community is a bit small, there are no other admins, and there were only four respondents. In six months, we'll see how the project has developed. Thanks. -- Avi (talk) 18:23, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Chorobek@ky.wikipedia

Status:    Done

He have sysop from May 2012--Shizhao (talk) 01:52, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Umut@ky.wikipedia

Status:    Done
Done--Shizhao (talk) 01:54, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Кадыров, Элдос@ky.wikipedia

Status:    In progress

Initial administrators@wikidatawiki

Note : This section won't be automatically archived by the bot

Guerillero@wikidatawiki
Status:    Done
Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2013-02-08. While the project decides whether 8 votes is enough for adminship, I've gone ahead and flagged this editor since it has ten or more than ten support votes and a 75% support or higher. Given the consensus to reconfirm all elected admins in this first bach, this is set as temporary here. While the reconfirmations can and should be done internally, Wikimedia Stewards wants to keep track of all requests and their status. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 16:21, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yair rand@wikidatawiki
Status:    In progress
Pigsonthewing@wikidatawiki
Status:    In progress
Wiki13@wikidatawiki
Status:    Done
Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2013-02-08. While the project decides whether 8 votes is enough for adminship, I've gone ahead and flagged this editor since its RfA has been opened for a week, has ten or more than ten support votes and a 75% support or higher so this promotion oughtn't be controversial. Given the consensus to reconfirm all elected admins in this first bach, this is set as temporary here. While the reconfirmations can and should be done internally, Wikimedia Stewards wants to keep track of all requests and their status. If the editor is confirmed later please do tell us and we will archive and close the temporary request as renewed. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 16:57, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
SarahStierch@wikidatawiki
Status:    Done
Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2013-02-08. While the project decides whether 8 votes is enough for adminship, I've gone ahead and flagged this editor since its RfA has been opened for a week, has ten or more than ten support votes and a 75% support or higher so this promotion oughtn't be controversial. Given the consensus to reconfirm all elected admins in this first bach, this is set as temporary here. While the reconfirmations can and should be done internally, Wikimedia Stewards wants to keep track of all requests and their status. If the editor is confirmed later please do tell us and we will archive and close the temporary request as renewed. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 16:57, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yiyi@wikidatawiki
Status:    In progress
Superzerocool@wikidatawiki
Status:    Done
Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2013-02-08. While the project decides whether 8 votes is enough for adminship, I've gone ahead and flagged this editor since its RfA has been opened for a week, has ten or more than ten support votes and a 75% support or higher so this promotion oughtn't be controversial. Given the consensus to reconfirm all elected admins in this first bach, this is set as temporary here. While the reconfirmations can and should be done internally, Wikimedia Stewards wants to keep track of all requests and their status. If the editor is confirmed later please do tell us and we will archive and close the temporary request as renewed. -- Quentinv57 (talk) 19:00, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Romaine@wikidatawiki
Status:    Done
Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2013-02-08. While the project decides whether 8 votes is enough for adminship, I've gone ahead and flagged this editor since its RfA has been opened for a week, has ten or more than ten support votes and a 75% support or higher so this promotion oughtn't be controversial. Given the consensus to reconfirm all elected admins in this first bach, this is set as temporary here. While the reconfirmations can and should be done internally, Wikimedia Stewards wants to keep track of all requests and their status. If the editor is confirmed later please do tell us and we will archive and close the temporary request as renewed. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 16:57, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hazard-SJ@wikidatawiki
Status:    In progress
Stryn@wikidatawiki
Status:    In progress
ShinePhantom@wikidatawiki
Status:    In progress
Sannita@wikidatawiki
Status:    Done
Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2013-02-08. While the project decides whether 8 votes is enough for adminship, I've gone ahead and flagged this editor since its RfA has been opened for a week, has ten or more than ten support votes and a 75% support or higher so this promotion oughtn't be controversial. Given the consensus to reconfirm all elected admins in this first bach, this is set as temporary here. While the reconfirmations can and should be done internally, Wikimedia Stewards wants to keep track of all requests and their status. If the editor is confirmed later please do tell us and we will archive and close the temporary request as renewed. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 16:57, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Restu20@wikidatawiki
Status:    Done
Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2013-02-08. While the project decides whether 8 votes is enough for adminship, I've gone ahead and flagged this editor since its RfA has been opened for a week, has ten or more than ten support votes and a 75% support or higher so this promotion oughtn't be controversial. Given the consensus to reconfirm all elected admins in this first bach, this is set as temporary here. While the reconfirmations can and should be done internally, Wikimedia Stewards wants to keep track of all requests and their status. If the editor is confirmed later please do tell us and we will archive and close the temporary request as renewed. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 16:57, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Magalhães@wikidatawiki
Status:    In progress
Tpt@wikidatawiki
Status:    Done
Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2013-02-08. While the project decides whether 8 votes is enough for adminship, I've gone ahead and flagged this editor since its RfA has been opened for a week, has ten or more than ten support votes and a 75% support or higher so this promotion oughtn't be controversial. Given the consensus to reconfirm all elected admins in this first bach, this is set as temporary here. While the reconfirmations can and should be done internally, Wikimedia Stewards wants to keep track of all requests and their status. If the editor is confirmed later please do tell us and we will archive and close the temporary request as renewed. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 16:57, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Merlissimo@wikidatawiki
Status:    Done
Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2013-02-08. While the project decides whether 8 votes is enough for adminship, I've gone ahead and flagged this editor since its RfA has been opened for a week, has ten or more than ten support votes and a 75% support or higher so this promotion oughtn't be controversial. Given the consensus to reconfirm all elected admins in this first bach, this is set as temporary here. While the reconfirmations can and should be done internally, Wikimedia Stewards wants to keep track of all requests and their status. If the editor is confirmed later please do tell us and we will archive and close the temporary request as renewed. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 16:57, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Sebleouf@wikidatawiki
Status:    Done
Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2013-02-08. While the project decides whether 8 votes is enough for adminship, I've gone ahead and flagged this editor since its RfA has been opened for a week, has ten or more than ten support votes and a 75% support or higher so this promotion oughtn't be controversial. Given the consensus to reconfirm all elected admins in this first bach, this is set as temporary here. While the reconfirmations can and should be done internally, Wikimedia Stewards wants to keep track of all requests and their status. If the editor is confirmed later please do tell us and we will archive and close the temporary request as renewed. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 16:57, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Raymond@wikidatawiki
Status:    Done
Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2013-02-08. While the project decides whether 8 votes is enough for adminship, I've gone ahead and flagged this editor since its RfA has been opened for a week, has ten or more than ten support votes and a 75% support or higher so this promotion oughtn't be controversial. Given the consensus to reconfirm all elected admins in this first bach, this is set as temporary here. While the reconfirmations can and should be done internally, Wikimedia Stewards wants to keep track of all requests and their status. If the editor is confirmed later please do tell us and we will archive and close the temporary request as renewed. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 16:57, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Emijrp@wikidatawiki
Status:    Done
Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2013-02-08. While the project decides whether 8 votes is enough for adminship, I've gone ahead and flagged this editor since its RfA has been opened for a week, has ten or more than ten support votes and a 75% support or higher so this promotion oughtn't be controversial. Given the consensus to reconfirm all elected admins in this first bach, this is set as temporary here. While the reconfirmations can and should be done internally, Wikimedia Stewards wants to keep track of all requests and their status. If the editor is confirmed later please do tell us and we will archive and close the temporary request as renewed. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 16:57, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Wagino 20100516@wikidatawiki
Status:    In progress
Arkanosis@wikidatawiki
Status:    Done
Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2013-02-08. While the project decides whether 8 votes is enough for adminship, I've gone ahead and flagged this editor since its RfA has been opened for a week, has ten or more than ten support votes and a 75% support or higher so this promotion oughtn't be controversial. Given the consensus to reconfirm all elected admins in this first bach, this is set as temporary here. While the reconfirmations can and should be done internally, Wikimedia Stewards wants to keep track of all requests and their status. If the editor is confirmed later please do tell us and we will archive and close the temporary request as renewed. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 16:57, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! — Arkanosis ✉ 17:01, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Jitrixis@wikidatawiki
Status:    In progress
Seewolf@wikidatawiki
Status:    Done
Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2013-02-08. While the project decides whether 8 votes is enough for adminship, I've gone ahead and flagged this editor since its RfA has been opened for a week, has ten or more than ten support votes and a 75% support or higher so this promotion oughtn't be controversial. Given the consensus to reconfirm all elected admins in this first bach, this is set as temporary here. While the reconfirmations can and should be done internally, Wikimedia Stewards wants to keep track of all requests and their status. If the editor is confirmed later please do tell us and we will archive and close the temporary request as renewed. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 16:57, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Kondicherry@wikidatawiki
Status:    In progress
Zanka@wikidatawiki
Status:    In progress
Benoit Rochon@wikidatawiki
Status:    Done
Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2013-02-08. While the project decides whether 8 votes is enough for adminship, I've gone ahead and flagged this editor since its RfA has been opened for a week, has ten or more than ten support votes and a 75% support or higher so this promotion oughtn't be controversial. Given the consensus to reconfirm all elected admins in this first bach, this is set as temporary here. While the reconfirmations can and should be done internally, Wikimedia Stewards wants to keep track of all requests and their status. If the editor is confirmed later please do tell us and we will archive and close the temporary request as renewed. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 16:57, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hoo man@wikidatawiki
Status:    Done
Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2013-02-08. While the project decides whether 8 votes is enough for adminship, I've gone ahead and flagged this editor since its RfA has been opened for a week, has ten or more than ten support votes and a 75% support or higher so this promotion oughtn't be controversial. Given the consensus to reconfirm all elected admins in this first bach, this is set as temporary here. While the reconfirmations can and should be done internally, Wikimedia Stewards wants to keep track of all requests and their status. If the editor is confirmed later please do tell us and we will archive and close the temporary request as renewed. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 16:57, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Sven Manguard@wikidatawiki
Status:    Done
Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2013-02-08. While the project decides whether 8 votes is enough for adminship, I've gone ahead and flagged this editor since its RfA has been opened for a week, has ten or more than ten support votes and a 75% support or higher so this promotion oughtn't be controversial. Given the consensus to reconfirm all elected admins in this first bach, this is set as temporary here. While the reconfirmations can and should be done internally, Wikimedia Stewards wants to keep track of all requests and their status. If the editor is confirmed later please do tell us and we will archive and close the temporary request as renewed. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 16:57, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Michiel1972@wikidatawiki
Status:    In progress
Leag@wikidatawiki
Status:    In progress
Lomita@wikidatawiki
Status:    Done
Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2013-02-08. While the project decides whether 8 votes is enough for adminship, I've gone ahead and flagged this editor since its RfA has been opened for a week, has ten or more than ten support votes and a 75% support or higher so this promotion oughtn't be controversial. Given the consensus to reconfirm all elected admins in this first bach, this is set as temporary here. While the reconfirmations can and should be done internally, Wikimedia Stewards wants to keep track of all requests and their status. If the editor is confirmed later please do tell us and we will archive and close the temporary request as renewed. -- Quentinv57 (talk) 11:47, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
TBloemink@wikidatawiki
Status:    In progress
Jdforrester@wikidatawiki
Status:    In progress
Grondin@wikidatawiki
Status:    Done
Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2013-02-08. While the project decides whether 8 votes is enough for adminship, I've gone ahead and flagged this editor since its RfA has been opened for a week, has ten or more than ten support votes and a 75% support or higher so this promotion oughtn't be controversial. Given the consensus to reconfirm all elected admins in this first bach, this is set as temporary here. While the reconfirmations can and should be done internally, Wikimedia Stewards wants to keep track of all requests and their status. If the editor is confirmed later please do tell us and we will archive and close the temporary request as renewed. -- Quentinv57 (talk) 11:47, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Skull33@wikidatawiki
Status:    In progress
Koavf@wikidatawiki
Status:    In progress
Overall discussion

At http://wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Requests_for_permissions there are many users who have had a request for admin rights open for at least 7 days. These are (as of 06:38, 8 November 2012 (UTC)):

  • User:Guerillero
  • User:Yair rand
  • User:Pigsonthewing
  • User:Wiki13
  • User:SarahStierch
  • User:Yiyi
  • User:Superzerocool
  • User:Romaine
  • User:Hazard-SJ (note: lacks strong support in the discussion: 3 support, 1 oppose)
  • User:Stryn
  • User:ShinePhantom
  • User:Hydriz
  • User:Sannita
  • User:Restu20
  • User:Magalhães (note: lacks sufficient participation in the discussion: only 2 users)
  • User:Tpt
  • User:Merlissimo
  • User:Sebleouf
  • User:Raymond
  • User:Emijrp
  • User:Wagino 20100516 (note: lacks sufficient participation in the discussion: only 3 users)
  • User:Arkanosis
  • User:Jitrixis (note: minor opposition: 9 support, 2 oppose)
  • User:Seewolf
  • User:Kondicherry (note: lacks sufficient participation in the discussion: only 2 users)
  • User:Zanka
  • User:Benoit Rochon
  • User:Hoo man
  • User:Sven Manguard

A strong consensus has formed at http://wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata_talk:Administrators#Reconfirmation_for_initial_wave_of_admins that these admin rights should be reconfirmed in 3 months' time. However, since there is a large community active at Wikidata, I would expect the project to handle this reconfirmation internally. I don't believe the formal "temporary sysop" procedure needs to be followed in this case.

I will leave it to stewards to select which users have enough support to be promoted. This, that and the other (talk) 06:38, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I have modified the format of this request, moving this text down. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 15:38, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Request for further requests. Please do use the required format for this page next time. The domain for the template is wikidata. Thanks. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 15:38, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I added some more using the required format:
  • User:Michiel1972
  • User:Leag
  • User:Lomita
  • User:TBloemink
  • User:Jdforrester
  • User:Grondin
  • User:Skull33
  • User:Koavf
But I did not use permanent links like you did, because more votes may be added before the requests are decided. This, that and the other (talk) 06:47, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bureaucrat access

Steward requests/Permissions/Crat-header

George Animal@kuwiktionary

Status:    On hold
I am a local administrator on ku.wikt.Local bureaucrats are almost inactive see here and here. Please promote. Thanks.If any questions then email me here--Thx in advance--George Animal —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 85.176.174.245 (talk) 20:13, 3 November 2012‎
Please, provide a link to the local discussion of this issue. Ruslik (talk) 18:27, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 On hold until at least 12 November. Trijnsteltalk 17:24, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
To me the best solution would be removing current bureaucrats, I don't see a sufficient community to hold local 'crats. --Vituzzu (talk) 11:43, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
In agreement with Vituzzi, v. low activity — billinghurst sDrewth 13:43, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

CheckUser access

Steward requests/Permissions/CU-header

Oversight access

To request to have content oversighted, ask in #wikimedia-stewards, or, for requests regarding English Wikipedia email oversight-en-wp@wikipedia.org. This is the place to request Oversight access. Note that temporary Oversight access is not permitted and the temporary status is only used by Stewards.

Stewards
Do not grant Oversight access unless the user is identified to the foundation, which will be announced on the Identification noticeboard. When you give someone oversight access, list them on Oversight.

Removal of access

<translate>

  • If you're requesting the removal of your own permissions, make sure you're logged in to your account. If you have multiple flags, specify which you want removed. Stewards may delay your request a short time to ensure you have time to rethink your request (see [[<tvar name="self-discussion">Talk:Steward_requests/Permissions/2011#Self_requests</tvar>|previous discussion]] on 24 hour delays); the rights will not be restored by stewards once they are removed.
  • To request the removal of another user's permissions, you must gain consensus on the local wiki first. When there is community consensus that the user's access should be removed, provide a link to the discussion, with a brief explanation of the reason for the request, and summarize the results of discussion. However, as bureaucrats of some wikis may remove users from the administrator or bureaucrat group, please see also a [[<tvar name="crat-rem">Bureaucrat#Removing_access</tvar>|separate list of these specific wikis]].
  • To request the removal of another user's permissions for inactivity, link to your local inactivity policy. If your site does not have inactivity policy, the global policy [[<tvar name="aar">Admin activity review</tvar>|Admin activity review]] applies.
  • See the [[<tvar name="usage">#Using this page</tvar>|instructions above]] for adding new requests. Please post new requests at the bottom of the section.</translate>

NickKBot@uk.wikipedia

Status:    Done

Please remove sysop rights of my bot. I asked for temporary adminship for mass deletion of over 33,000 local pages of Commons images that were used for WLM purposes. As I have completed this task, my bot does not need sysop rights anymore. Thanks — NickK (talk) 13:36, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done, thanks for the help! Trijnsteltalk 13:38, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Vigorous action@jawiki

Status:    Done

Please remove my sysop , bureaucrat , checkuser, and oversight access. Thanks --Vigorous action (talk) 13:13, 9 November 2012 (UTC) --Vigorous action (talk) 13:13, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done thank you for your service. --Vituzzu (talk) 13:17, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Diupwijk@svwiki

Status:    Done

Please remove my bureaucrat flag on Wikipedia. Thanks in advance. --Diupwijk (talk) 13:32, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done - Bureaucrat permissions removed. Left administrator and rollbacker. Best regards. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 14:46, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Miscellaneous requests

Steward requests/Permissions/Misc-header

User:Strainu@ro.wikibooks

Status:    Done

I would like to apply for importer rights for ro.wikibooks in order to import some articles about the English language grammar from ro.wp (ro:Categorie:Timpurile_limbii_engleze)--Strainu (talk) 13:37, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that it would be more useful to submit a bugzilla to have rowiki be added as an import source for rowikibooks, and then we can assign transwiki import rights. Look at http://noc.wikimedia.org/conf/highlight.php?file=InitialiseSettings.php and search for wgImport. Then I would recommend a bugzilla requesting ... 'rowikibooks' => array( 'w', 's', 'commons' ), — billinghurst sDrewth 04:01, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Submitted bug 41774. Thanks for the detailed explanation.--Strainu (talk) 08:00, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The change is now live, you can now assign transwiki import rights.--Strainu (talk) 09:29, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Done glad that it was helpful. — billinghurst sDrewth 09:45, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User:arjunaraoc@te.wikipedia

Status:    In progress

I would like to apply for importer rights for in order to import templates from the English wikipedia and sister projects.--Arjunaraoc (talk) 17:25, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

See also

Steward requests/Permissions/Footer

Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steward_requests/Permissions&oldid=4494585"