Meta:Requests for checkuser/Trijnstel

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.

Trijnstel

Trijnstel (talk • contribs • count • logs • page moves • block log • CA • email)

Hello fellow Wikimedians, I'd like to propose Trijnstel as a possible new checkuser for metawiki. We lost Herby this year as a CU and he was one of the most active CUs we ever had (see stats). Metawiki is regularly flooded by spambots and there is more than enough work to do here with the CU tools. We currently have another RfCU going on, however, I think that even two more checkusers here wouldn't hurt. I think Trijnstel would make a great addition to our current team of checkusers. She is very active, helpful and already experienced with the tool and could surely help us a lot.

I hope that you agree with me and support Trijnstel for that. -Barras talk 20:35, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Thank you, Barras. I humbly accept. Trijnstel_talk 20:38, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

1.  Support - as nominator. -Barras talk 20:35, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
2.  Support if she accepts :P --Rschen7754 20:36, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
3.  Support Very clueful, active and experienced admin. Vogone talk 20:37, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
4.  Support Her commonswiki work alone shows experience with the tool. She is clueful and active which is pretty much all I would like to see in a CheckUser. John F. Lewis (talk) 20:42, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
5.  Support active + experienced + (per above) --Steinsplitter (talk) 20:44, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
6.  Support.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 23:11, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
7.  Support PiRSquared17 (talk) 23:13, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
8.  Strong support LlamaAl (talk) 00:20, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
9.  Support  Hazard SJ  01:47, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
10.  Support --Kolega2357 (talk) 09:38, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
11.  Support --Glaisher [talk] 10:53, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
12. Strong support. Highly trusted and active. Zonder twijfel. Savh^ñ 14:27, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
13.  Support Why not? -FASTILY 06:19, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
14.  Support an extra Dutch speaking checkuser might be very helpful in the near future. (^_^) Lotje (talk) 07:45, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
15.  Support — Defender (talk) 14:34, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
16.  Support 당연히 :) (en; Of course.) --Sotiale (talk) 16:02, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
17.  Support Courcelles 21:58, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
18.  Support Great candidate. INeverCry 22:04, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
19.  Support Why not? Southparkfan 12:31, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
20.  Support --Stryn (talk) 20:36, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
21.  Support Moral support if my vote doesn´t count. --WizardOfOz ^talk 21:32, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
22.  Support --cyrfaw (talk) 21:38, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
23.  Support No problem.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:48, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
24.  Support Sounds good Elfix 22:18, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
25. &   Excellent candidate, and with the departure of Herby, Meta could use some more CUs, per Barras' stats. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 00:08, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
26. ok --MF-W 22:21, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
27.  Support. Érico Wouters ^msg 02:41, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
28.  Support No concerns here. Ajraddatz (Talk) 21:29, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

     Support She is a great CU for Commons. No concerns. --96.29.242.140 13:27, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

    Sorry, only logged in users may vote in such requests. -Barras talk 16:39, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

---

Done Unanimous support, closing as successful. -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 16:55, 22 September 2013 (UTC)