Stewards/Confirm/2012/Dungodung

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
< Stewards‎ | Confirm‎ | 2012
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The following discussion is closed: This election is closed and these pages are an archive of that event.

Dungodung[edit]

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, & activity, steward actions counter | translate: translation help, statement

Deutsch:
  • Sprachen: sr, en-3, hr-3, bs-3, de-1
  • Informationen zur Person: Hallo ihr. Ich bin seit Dezember 2007 Steward, somit habe ich eine Menge Erfahrung gesammelt. Nun, ich weiß, dass ich die Stewardknöpfe in letzter Zeit nicht so viel genutzt habe, aber das kommt hauptsächlich daher, dass es einen Wechsel in meinem Leben gegeben hat: Ich bin in die Hauptstadt umgezogen, bekam eine Arbeit und änderte mein Leben völlig, sodass ich wenig Zeit für andere Dinge übrig hatte. Wenn ich mich daran völlig angepasst haben werde, hoffe ich darauf, meine Aktivität als Steward erhöhen zu können. Ich habe lange darüber nachgedacht, ob ich ausscheiden soll oder nicht, aber einige Wikifreunde brachten mich davon ab. Ich bin dankbar, wenn mir eine weitere Amtszeit beschieden wird, um Wikimedia und seinen Projekten bescheiden zu dienen. Danke.
English:
  • Languages: sr, en-3, hr-3, bs-3, de-1
  • Personal info: Hi there. I've been a steward since December 2007, so I've got a lot of experience. Now, I know I haven't been using the tools that much lately, but that is mostly because I've had a shift in my life: I'm moved to the capital, got a job and changed my life completely, so I had little time left for much else. Once I fully adapt, I hope I'll be able to enhance my activity as a steward. I had long thoughts about whether I should quit or not, but several wiki-friends dissuaded me. I'll be thankful if I'm given another term to humbly serve Wikimedia and its projects. Thanks.
suomi:
  • Kielet: sr, en-3, hr-3, bs-3, de-1
  • Henkilökohtaiset tiedot: Moi. Olen ollut ylivalvoja joulukuusta 2007 asti, joten minulla on paljon kokemusta. Tiedän, etten ole käyttänyt työkaluja kovin paljoa viime aikoina, mutta se johtuu suurimmaksi osaksi muutoksista elämässäni: Olen muuttanut pääkaupunkiin, saanut työtä ja muuttanut elämäni täysin, joten minulla ei ole ollut paljoa aikaa mihinkään muuhun. Kun sopeudun täysin, toivon pystyväni kasvattamaan aktiivisuuttani ylivalvojana. Mietin pitkään, pitäisikö minun lopettaa vai ei, mutta useat wikiystävät saivat minut suostuteltua. Olen kiitollinen jos saan nöyrästi palvella Wikimediaa ja sen projekteja uudella kaudella. Kiitos.
Tiếng Việt:
  • Ngôn ngữ: sr, en-3, hr-3, bs-3, de-1
  • Thông tin cá nhân: Chào mọi người. Tôi trở thành tiếp viên từ tháng 12 năm 2007, vì vậy tôi đã có rất nhiều kinh nghiệm. Lúc này, tôi biết là mình đã không sử dụng thường xuyên các công cụ gần đây, nhưng lý do chủ yếu là vì một số thay đổi trong cuộc sống của tôi: tôi đang chuyển đến sống ở thủ đô, có việc làm mới và thay đổi hoàn toàn cuộc sống, vì vậy tôi chỉ có chút thời gian để làm những việc khác. Khi đã hoàn toàn thích ứng được, tôi hy vọng có thể tăng cường các hoạt động tiếp viên của mình. Tôi đã suy nghĩ liệu mình có nên từ bỏ quyền này hay không, nhưng nhiều bạn bè wiki đã ngăn cản tôi. Tôi rất biết ơn nếu được nhận một nhiệm kỳ mới để phục vụ khiêm tốn cho Wikimedia và các dự án. Xin cảm ơn.

Comments about Dungodung[edit]

(UTC)

  • Keep Keep -- Alanscottwalker (talk) 02:14, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 23:44, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. Courcelles (talk) 00:51, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Dungo is a very kind and helpful person, even with those who were not so kind with him in the past. Always careful and with lot of selfcontrol. In situations of great tension, he always stayed calm and objective. He is young, but many older people can learn a lot from him. Strong support. --Maduixa (talk) 09:36, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
  • Oppose Oppose Regardless of such an opening above, I also have experienced a totally opposite approach of Dungodung. We did not have had much conversation for some time and one could say he might have changed in the meantime, of which I would not be as certain as someone who occasionally sees his comments on sr.wiki. I do not expect this vote to have much impact on the confirmation outcome, but I also would make remark that if the voting outcome was all that matters, we would never advance and become better wikipedians. I intended my vote to be warning that certain improvements can be made in the approach, which can be initiated either by the environment, or by the candidate himself. When I notice such improvements, my vote will change. 本 Mihajlo [ talk ] 07:50, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
    I honestly don't know what you're talking about. Can you outline briefly what problems you have noticed in my behaviour/wikiing? You say "improvements", but how can I improve if I don't know what it is that needs improvement. Thanks --FiliP ██ 07:16, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
    For quite some time yet there is a trend that addresses not only the necessity of a fine work that can be measured through the protocolar and other logs on Wikimedia servers, but also makes more demands on existence of strong ethical norms built within a person that has taken the role and acts as a steward not only on the projects but also on other occasions that are of importance for presenting the community under a steward's hood. I would remind the whole auditorium that I only supported Dungodung before 2007 2011, so it would be safe to assume he did a few very wrong moves in the meantime to earn such a vote. I must make remark that, in my very belief, his personality has changed in the way I would take the liberty of finding ethically dislikable. Reading this, I do not really feel encouraged to post here about the things that would be helpful in making my point. Although it does not really surprise me Dungodung *does not remember* what he did wrong when presenting himself as a Steward -- of course, here he can deny every mistake that is not really linkable, and I am not about to give him that joy -- I would assume good faith and offer him simple live talk. There is a whole year till the next vote.本 Mihajlo [ talk ] 22:49, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
    OK, I understand that you have unresolved personal issues with Dungodung, and you voted the way you voted. But why you called a blocked sockpuppeter and his friends to come here to support you?Isn't that pathetic?--Wikit 19:39, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
    I am really displeased there are assumptions tending to reduce my partake in this vote to some low personal level, totally diminishing the need to assume I am acting in best faith -- for which I gave enough space to the best of my belief. As such, those assumptions speak rather of the ones who made them. But this comment above has gone even further to the level I shall classify as irrational shooting in the dark. Oh, I am getting it! The sockpuppeter guy below insults the whole lot of people and then I am the one to be addressed back by the ones who do not only fantasize I called him here, but also are trying to insult me back. I am just not getting how could *I* be called *pathetic* then. :D To elaborate: Thank you for the comment; it tells me how you are thinking and what you are probably doing on the sr.wiki project. 本 Mihajlo [ talk ] 08:11, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
    Како то тврдиш да су дошли по позиву само они који нису изразили сагласност, а ти си дошао спонтано? Зар није доказан супротан пример да су позивани гласачи и са друге википедије? Та „технологија” ти је много блиска. Ово смо гласање пресликали на излед гласања на ср вики и то захваљујући оваквој необјективности.--Sahara (talk) 20:45, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
  • Oppose Oppose --Bas-Celik (talk) 05:47, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
  • Oppose Oppose --Sahara (talk) 07:29, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
  • Oppose Oppose --SmirnofLeary (talk) 22:54, 24 February 2012 (UTC) Insufficiently involved in disputes between users on project of Wikipedia in Serbian language. My voice against because once he sided with one group of users, and another group called „hyper-nationalists“. I think this is inappropriate behavior of one administrator.
  • Keep Keep Strong support.--Павлица talk 14:01, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
  • Oppose Oppose Zašto mislim da Dungodung ne zaslužuje mesto stjuarda: - Nezaineresovan je za poboljšanje, dalji razvoj i unapređenje sr.Wikipedije, - krši Wiki pravila u cilju održavanja statusa kvo, - nekorektan je: priča jedno, radi drugo a misli treće, - zloupotrebljava ovlašćenja. Sve u svemu vreme mu je za abdikaciju.--Dusanbasic (talk) 19:22, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
    • Heh, lies said by a user currently blocked on srwiki. --FiliP ██ 19:26, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
      • I could agree with the word 'untrue', but 'lie' sounds too hard. Not only too hard, but it also might be incorrect, in case that the user believes all those allegations are true. Further diplomacy would lead us to the state of weak shock: 'I really do believe those allegations are untrue, and caused by the block you have on sr.wiki. I did not block you, so I would feel so free to assume you might be wanting to further damage sr.wiki by this vote and nothing more. Thanks.' 本 Mihajlo [ talk ] 18:26, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
    • To što je Dusanbasic blokiran je tvoja sramota, istorijat je malo duži. Tvoja prethodna rečenica je jeftin način za diskreditovanje neistomišljenika. Ti i tvoja kamarila dovodite do ratnog stanja na sr. wikipediji. Na sve pozitivne predloge idete đonom a ovde se vajkaš da nema predloga. Ovde vidim ima reizbora, zašto se kod kuće ne založiš za to, nego pravite nedodirljive, a pokušaje uvođenja reizbora blokirate. Pravite od Sr. Wikipedije cirkus. Zar ti glavnu reč i politiku na sr. wikipediji vodi "žena u crnom". Odgovori mi samo na jedno pitanje ako sve ovo ne znaš zašto ne znaš, a ako znaš zašto to činite.--Dusanbasic (talk) 07:34, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
      • It would be nice if you can explain what this has to do with his use of the steward tools, because this is not the place to discuss sr.wp problems as Dungodung doesn't act as a steward on that project. mickit 16:38, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
    • Kad je čovek čestit on svaki posao može čestito da uradi, ako nije onda nastaju problemi. Ovo o čemu pišem, je moralna kategorija što verovatni ni ti, ni on, ni Bokica ne možete da shvatite jer vam to nije blisko. Svoju blokadu strpljivo podnosim pa kad se to završi sve vaše marifetluke ću izneti u javnost ako vas u međuvremenu čestiti korisnici ne počiste ili se sami međusobno ne "pojedete".--Dusanbasic (talk) 17:08, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep -- Hoo man (talk) 22:52, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Béria Lima msg 23:02, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Ceradon (talk) 00:00, 28 February 2012 (UTC)