Steward requests/Permissions: Difference between revisions
→IgorT@ukwiki: comment |
Silver Spoon (talk | contribs) Request for removal of sysop rights |
||
Line 259: | Line 259: | ||
Thanks --[[User:Hercule|Hercule]] 08:53, 15 October 2009 (UTC) |
Thanks --[[User:Hercule|Hercule]] 08:53, 15 October 2009 (UTC) |
||
:{{done}}--[[User:Nick1915|Nick1915]] -<sup><small> [[User_talk:Nick1915|all you want]]</small></sup> 10:04, 15 October 2009 (UTC) |
:{{done}}--[[User:Nick1915|Nick1915]] -<sup><small> [[User_talk:Nick1915|all you want]]</small></sup> 10:04, 15 October 2009 (UTC) |
||
==== Silver Spoon @ nl.wikipedia.org ==== |
|||
{{sr-request |
|||
|status = <!-- don't change this line --> |
|||
|domain = nl.wikipedia |
|||
|user name = Silver Spoon |
|||
|discussion= [[:nl:Overleg gebruiker:Silver Spoon#Request for removal of sysop rights]] |
|||
}} |
|||
Thanks in advance :) - [[User:Silver Spoon|Silver Spoon]] 15:49, 15 October 2009 (UTC) |
|||
=== Miscellaneous requests === |
=== Miscellaneous requests === |
Revision as of 15:49, 15 October 2009
This page is for requests to have stewards grant or revoke administrator, bureaucrat, checkuser, and oversight rights on Wikimedia projects which do not have a local permissions procedure.
Old sections are archived. The list of archives is below.
- Requests for bot flags are handled at SRB, and requests for global permissions are handled at SRGP.
- If you are requesting adminship or bureaucratship, and your wiki has a local bureaucrat, submit your request to that user or to the relevant local request page (index).
- For urgent requests, such as to combat large-scale vandalism on a small wiki, contact a steward in the #wikimedia-stewardsconnect IRC channel. In emergencies, type
!steward
in the channel to get the attention of stewards. Otherwise, you can type@steward
for non-urgent help.
Other than requests to remove your own access or emergencies, please only make requests here after gaining the on-wiki approval of your local community.
Quick navigation: Administrator | Interface administrator | Bureaucrat | CheckUser | Oversight | Removal of access | Miscellaneous | Global permissions
Cross-wiki requests |
---|
Meta-Wiki requests |
Using this page
1. Place the following code at the bottom of the appropriate section below:
==== Username@xxproject ==== {{sr-request |status = <!-- don't change this line --> |domain = <!-- such as en.wikibooks --> |user name = |discussion= }} (your remarks) ~~~~
2. Fill in the values:
- domain: the wiki's URL domain (like "ex.wikipedia" or "meta.wikimedia").
- user name: the name of the user whose rights are to be changed (like "Exampleuser"). In case you're requesting access for multiple bots, leave this field blank and give a list of these bots in your remarks
- discussion: a link to the local vote or discussion about the rights change (for example, "[[ex:Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship#ExampleUser]]"). This should normally be for at least one week, but no more than three weeks (if so, you'll need to restart the process).
3. If anything is missing from your request, a steward will request more information.
Confirmation of signing confidentiality agreement
Certain permissions (notably CheckUser and Oversight) additionally require users to sign a confidentiality agreement. Users requesting these permissions must make a request below, and must also sign the confidentiality agreement with the Wikimedia Foundation. The request is placed on hold temporarily, until the receipt has been formally confirmed by the Office.
Requests
Administrator access
If you are requesting administrator status to translate the wiki interface, this should be done at the BetaWiki project instead (see mw:localisation). You can ask questions in the IRC channel or on the mailing list.
If you are requesting adminship to handle one-time vandalism incidents or clearing a deletion backlog, please see Vandalism reports and Steward requests/Speedy deletions.
- Stewards
- Currently-active temporary permissions are listed at /Approved temporary; copy granted requests to the appropriate section there, stating the date of removal in the section header and at the bottom of the request. Please invite new sysops to the admin IRC channel.
- Archiving
- Requests only need remain listed below for a few days, and may afterward be removed as long as they have been copied to the subpage. Users who archive requests on that page, please check if the request was correctly added to the temporary subpage before removing it from this page.
For permanent sysopship please provide a link to the local community approval. For temporary sysopship please state for how long and for which tasks you need it, and link to a local announcement.
Fadli Idris@acewiki
- Wiki: ace.wikipedia.org.org (list 'crats •
no standard bot policy• summary • 'crats rights) - User: Fadli Idris (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
- Discussion: Fadli_Idris_sebagai_Administrator
Fadli Idris 04:27, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
IgorT@ukwiki
- Wiki: uk.wikipedia.org (list 'crats •
no standard bot policy• summary • 'crats rights) - User: IgorT (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
- Discussion: Corrections can be performed later, uk:Administrators page
- adminship for uk:user:Turzh was removed because he can't log-in with this nickname (uk:user:Turzh) (some bug) Prima klasy4na 11:40, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
- uk:user:IgorT has nominated himself for adminship, but, I think, it's not needed, because uk:user:IgorT and uk:user:Turzh - the same person, which ask for removing of adminship after bug of system.--Prima klasy4na 14:58, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
- That's not the stewards' work. Ukrainian Wikipedia has enough active bureaucrats who can do this. Also, our policy does not have rule of giving rights back to users whose status was removed per their own request, according to the rules, a new discussion should be organized. In any case, that's the responsibility of local bureaucrats — NickK 15:40, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
-
- Not done. As said above, uk.wiki has own bureaucrats. LeinaD (t) 15:52, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
- Comment:Threaten by sysop on Uk Wikipedia with blocking--Prima klasy4na 17:19, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
- uk.wikipedia has 3 bureaucrats. Some of bureaucrats (user:Yakudza) last time doing actions against rules. Others are not enough active. After uk:nomination nobody of them said, that nomination is not needed.--Prima klasy4na 17:19, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
- We do not have a policy of returning rights to former administrators whose rights were removed per their own request. This is the similar case, and previously other administrators who refused of their rights (uk:Користувач:Alex K and uk:Користувач:Oleksii0) had to renominate themselves in order to become sysops again. As rules tell nothing about possibility of gaining rights without community consensus, a vote has to be organized, and acoording to the results a bureaucrat will make a desicion, in any case it is not a stewards' duty to grant this flag — NickK 19:14, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
- Not done. As said above, uk.wiki has own bureaucrats. LeinaD (t) 15:52, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
- There are 3 reasons to decline this request:
- there is not-closed voting about IgorT now;
- uk-wiki has 3 bureaucrats;
- Prima klasy4na (aka Ink) is famous Ukrainian troll.--Ahonc 21:49, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
- I think, that asking for explain the rules, asking why Ukrainian sysops and bureaucrats doing actions against rules and why Ukrainian Wikipedia has no some writhing ruler is not trolling. Ahonc is famous Ukrainian
пибалабол.--Prima klasy4na 01:59, 15 October 2009 (UTC)- Stewards do not decide, that is not their job. Also IgorT's request for adminship currently has less community support then necessary (68.6% instead of 70% needed). I do not see how stewards can do this, if it is against our local rules and we have 3 active bureaucrats — NickK 10:17, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
- I think, that asking for explain the rules, asking why Ukrainian sysops and bureaucrats doing actions against rules and why Ukrainian Wikipedia has no some writhing ruler is not trolling. Ahonc is famous Ukrainian
Barras@simplewq
- Wiki: simple.wikiquote.org (list 'crats •
no standard bot policy• summary • 'crats rights) - User: Barras (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
- Discussion: temp access. No local admin around and hugh amount of vandalism. Thanks Barras 10:26, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
Done for one week. Effeietsanders 10:27, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
Masterches@htwiki
- Wiki: ht.wikipedia.org (list 'crats • bot policy • summary • 'crats rights)
- User: Masterches (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
- Discussion: I'm applying for a new longer mandate to admin the HT wiki; the community is growing slowly; many things have been done (sand articles, templates, attractiveness, help); on basis of sand articles, enhancements and contributions are being made; it's a good sign for future developpment.
link to the page : http://ht.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedya:Paj_Kominote#Sesyon_2009
- I tend to decline this. You have not been active on the wiki in the past 3 months. And please inform the community before you request temp sysopship. The page you linked only contains your request from June 2009. --თოგო (D) 10:44, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
- i follow the contributions made on the wiki and bring enhancements each time it is possible-you can look at my homepage to see the work that has been done; i should log in before each contributions of mine in order to have higher statistics ...
- many things have been done to maintain contributions on the wiki but the community is still poor; there are a small increasing on anonymous contributions but the take-off is not spectacular yet.
- Please remember to sign your posts with "~~~~", it sets a good example as you grow your community. I agree with Thogo that you should be a visible contributor to the wiki you want a temporary adminship on... Perhaps it's as simple as remembering to log in so we can see your work. Perhaps come back in a few weeks? ++Lar: t/c 01:07, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
- i don't know why coming back in a few weeks, my contributions are on my homepage (homepage), on my discussion panel (ht:Diskisyon_Itilizatè:Masterches), on the log there ([1]); i'm not an inexperienced user ...it's my fourth application for this post and the reasons invoqued each time for not having a longer adminship are "community is too small to give you more than 6 or 3 months"; do explain me what the problem is now... Masterches 10:35, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
- Because when we go to your contribs on htwiki we see only 5 edits since June. That's not very many. If you aren't working there much or at all, do you need a temp sysopship there? I'd be inclined to say no. But you also said you were contributing but forgot to log in.... so, try to remember to log in and come back in a few weeks so we can see what you do there, that's my thinking. Other stewards may have a different view. ++Lar: t/c
- Done to expire on 2010-01-12. Please use edit summaries more often as well.--Jusjih 02:57, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
- Because when we go to your contribs on htwiki we see only 5 edits since June. That's not very many. If you aren't working there much or at all, do you need a temp sysopship there? I'd be inclined to say no. But you also said you were contributing but forgot to log in.... so, try to remember to log in and come back in a few weeks so we can see what you do there, that's my thinking. Other stewards may have a different view. ++Lar: t/c
Hanberke@tk.wiktionary
- Wiki: tk.wiktionary.org (list 'crats • bot policy • summary • 'crats rights)
- User: Hanberke (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
- Discussion: wikt:tk:Wikisözlük:Ýolbaşçylyk_saýlawy/Hanberke
Please extend my 3-month temporary sysop status for, if possible, 6 months. --Hanberke 04:36, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
- You just started asking on 2009-10-10. I would like to wait until 2009-10-17.--Jusjih 03:04, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
Tiptoety@simple.wikibooks
- Wiki: simple.wikibooks.org (list 'crats •
no standard bot policy• summary • 'crats rights) - User: Tiptoety (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
- Discussion: http://simple.wikibooks.org/wiki/WB:A#Tiptoety
After discussion, consensus is to promote. We need another admin, anyways. :) GrooveDog 00:01, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
- Sysop flag granted --Mardetanha talk 07:47, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
- I wouldn't normally comment, but I saw the log on RecentChanges. In my experience, it's usually good form to remove the Rollbacker right when granting admin status, because it's redundant. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 08:30, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
- It doesn't matter. The user can do it later on himself or also every admin. Barras 08:35, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
- I already did it as soon as Mard gave the flag ;) Pmlineditor ∞ 08:38, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, that's true. I forgot about that. Nevermind. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 08:37, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
- It doesn't matter. The user can do it later on himself or also every admin. Barras 08:35, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
- I wouldn't normally comment, but I saw the log on RecentChanges. In my experience, it's usually good form to remove the Rollbacker right when granting admin status, because it's redundant. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 08:30, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
- Comment At the moment stewards can't remove rollback flag which was granted locally . it should be removed by local admins --Mardetanha talk 18:28, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
Reality006@trwikinews
- Wiki: tr.wikinews.org (list 'crats • bot policy • summary • 'crats rights)
- User: Reality006 (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
- Discussion: n:tr:Vikihaber:Hizmetli başvurusu/Reality006 2
We have resulted the poll for Reality006's adminship. Can someone grant him adminship status? Joseph48 18:12, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
- Done, sysop status granted. LeinaD (t) 18:18, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
Bureaucrat access
Si Gam Acèh@acewikipedia
- Wiki: ace.wikipedia.org (list 'crats • bot policy • summary • 'crats rights)
- User: Si Gam Acèh (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
- Discussion: Si Gam Acèh sebagai Birokrat
I request as bureaucrat please. Si Gam Acèh 08:32, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
- Another request... ace.wiki has only one sysop, relatively small community, in my opinion it's not enough for granting bureaucrat access. Other opinions? LeinaD (t) 15:17, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- Agreed. Seems too soon. We can easily take care of things from Meta in the meantime. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 22:05, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
- Not done for having only one administrator and limited active users. Please do not feel discouraged.--Jusjih 03:08, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
- Agreed. Seems too soon. We can easily take care of things from Meta in the meantime. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 22:05, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
CheckUser access
To request CheckUser information, see Meta:Requests for CheckUser information. This is the place to request CheckUser access. Note that temporary CheckUser access is not permitted and the temporary status is only used by Stewards.
- Stewards
- When someone asks for CheckUser status, please check the current policy before giving the status. There is an email template to request identification from the new CU. Do not grant CU access unless the user is identified to the Foundation. Breaching these rules may be cause for removing your steward access. When you give someone CheckUser, please list them on CheckUser, ask them to subscribe to checkuser-l, email checkuser-l-ownerlistswikimediaorg so the listadmins know the person is allowed on the mailing list, and make sure they contact an op for access to #wikimedia-checkuser.
Smooth O@bs.wikipedia
- Wiki: bs.wikipedia.org (list 'crats •
no standard bot policy• summary • 'crats rights) - User: Smooth O (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
- Discussion: http://bs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Prijedlozi_za_upravnika#Prijedlozi_za_korisnika_sa_CheckUser_pravima
User Smooth O has been elected for a new CheckUser of bs.Wikipedia. Please send a mail to him where to provide his identity to WMF. THX --Seha 19:18, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
Karol007@pl.wikipedia
- Wiki: pl.wikipedia.org (list 'crats •
no standard bot policy• summary • 'crats rights) - User: Karol007 (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
- Discussion: http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Przyznawanie_uprawnie%C5%84/Karol007/CU
Oversight access
- To request to have content oversighted
- Ask in #wikimedia-stewards, or email oversight-llistswikimediaorg for requests regarding English Wikipedia.
- Note that this section is the place to request Oversight access. Note that temporary Oversight access is not permitted and the temporary status is only used by stewards.
- Stewards
- Do not grant Oversight access unless the user is identified to the foundation, which will be announced on the Identification noticeboard. When you give someone oversight access, list them on Oversight.
Removal of access
If you're requesting the removal of your own status, make sure you're logged in to a global account.
To request the removal of another user's status, you must gain consensus on the local wiki first. All discussion must take place on your local wiki. When there is community consensus that the user's access should be removed, a trusted person from that wiki should provide a link here to the discussion, a brief explanation of the reason for the request, and summarize the results of discussion. In either case, copy and paste the following text into the correct section (see instructions above).
==== username@xxproject ==== {{sr-request |status = <!-- don't change this line --> |domain = |user name = |discussion= <!-- local confirmation link / local policy link --> }}
Capaccio@nlwiki-project
- Wiki: nl.wikipedia.org (list 'crats • bot policy[no automatic approval] • summary • 'crats rights)
- User: Capaccio (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
- Discussion: Last night he wrote on his user-page and in the dutch village pump (kroeg): "Ik leg nu mijn functie als moderator neer ..." [2] which means: "I resign as a sysop ... " - Robotje 08:34, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
- Done please thank him for his past work!--Nick1915 - all you want 09:44, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
Sysops@huwikipedia
- Wiki: hu.wikipedia.org (list 'crats • bot policy[no automatic approval] • summary • 'crats rights)
- Discussion: http://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikip%C3%A9dia:Szavaz%C3%A1s/Egy_%C3%A9v_admini_inaktivit%C3%A1s_ut%C3%A1n_deadmin%C3%A1l%C3%A1s,_2009
The community opted for a new rule in hu.wikipedia – voted and approved here –, that any sysop with less than 10 actions in the last 12 months or no action at all in the last 6 months must be desysopped. There will be a grace period of 3 months starting from September 28, 2009 for inactive admins to reactivate themselves.
But from all the sysops in this condition, 2 had specifically indicated that they have no time for WP at the moment & for the near future, namely:
So please remove their sysop rights. Thx. Bennó 20:30, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
- To confirm that Dhanak didn't want to retain his sysop rights: [3].
- That one done, waiting for confirmation of NCurses's resignation. Kind regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 17:02, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
PatruBOT & CVBOT@eswiki
- Wiki: es.wikipedia.org (list 'crats •
no standard bot policy• summary • 'crats rights) - User: PatruBOT (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
- Discussion: Past emergency RfP
- Wiki: es.wikipedia.org (list 'crats •
no standard bot policy• summary • 'crats rights) - User: CVBOT (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
- Discussion: Past emergency RfP
Please remove from those accounts the 'confirmed' flag. As you can see on the discussion section, the prior request to add that group to those accounts for 4 days due to technical issues. Now both users have the autoconfirmed flag so there is no need for them to have it. Thank you, --Dferg 18:43, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
- Done, confirmed status removed. LeinaD (t) 18:59, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
O@wuuwiki
- Wiki: wuu.wikipedia.org (list 'crats • bot policy[no global bots] • summary • 'crats rights)
- User: O (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
- Discussion: local automatic revocation policy. O didn't used his sysop tools since 14 month. Please remove his sysop flag.
Thanks --Hercule 08:53, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
Silver Spoon @ nl.wikipedia.org
- Wiki: nl.wikipedia.org (list 'crats • bot policy[no automatic approval] • summary • 'crats rights)
- User: Silver Spoon (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
- Discussion: nl:Overleg gebruiker:Silver Spoon#Request for removal of sysop rights
Thanks in advance :) - Silver Spoon 15:49, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
Miscellaneous requests
Requests that don't fit in other sections belong here. Import rights can be granted by stewards only, not bureaucrats, so the automatic list of local bureaucrats is irrelevant for this. Please gather community consensus before placing a link to the discussion here.
Note that the following types of requests belong on separate pages:
- Local or global bot status
- Other global rights, requests regarding global blocking, and requests regarding locking accounts
- URL blacklisting
- Requests for CheckUser information
- Changing your username on Meta
- Changing your username or usurping an account on a Wikimedia wiki without bureaucrats
GrooveDog@simplewb
- Wiki: simple.wikibooks.org (list 'crats •
no standard bot policy• summary • 'crats rights) - User: GrooveDog (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
- Discussion: http://simple.wikibooks.org/wiki/Wikibooks:Simple_talk#.2Bimport_for_me
simple.wb is a small community, and all active users have supported GrooveDog's request for Import, i think consensus has been reached and the flag can be granted to him. Thanks Tempodivalse [talk] 00:47, 14 October 2009 (UTC)