Meta:Requests for adminship/1234qwer1234qwer4

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

1234qwer1234qwer4[edit]

Not ending before 4 May 2021 13:34 (UTC)

Hello, I do not hold any advanced rights on other wikis, yet I am requesting adminship here on Meta-Wiki. The reason is mainly that I have not been doing any maintenance tasks where I would benefit from these rights on other wikis. However, when I came to Meta a couple months ago, I realised the recent changes feed was only partly monitored and I could help with that. In the recent weeks, I usually visited Meta just once or twice a day and still found a lot of unreverted vandalism. Administrator rights would help me deal with some abusers more quickly and also fulfill deletion requests by other users. Furthermore, it would allow me to edit MediaWiki:XTools-AutoEdits.json, to which I have contributed using Phabricator tasks in the past, when the configuration was not publicly editable yet. As a result, there is still quite a backlog of open requests by me and some other users there and a couple more on the page's talk page. As discussed at User talk:MusikAnimal#XTools, I could complete these requests and act upon new ones at MediaWiki talk:XTools-AutoEdits.json if I had the necessary rights. It has been suggested to me off-wiki as well that my language knowledge could be of use if I apply for adminship. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk)
13:34, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

  • Support Support - Cross-wiki experience, language knowledge, technical knowledge, and a definitive series of admin work to do. Meets my criteria. Thank you for volunteering, Vermont (talk) 13:37, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Support Support - Helpful and knowledgeable user. –xeno 14:18, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Support Support - A clueful user with a clear need for the tools. ƒirefly ( t · c ) 15:05, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Support Support Helpful in combating to vandalism, speedy deletion and other things. The justification is also acceptable. --Uncitoyentalk 15:43, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Support Support LGTM --Zabe (talk) 15:45, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Support Support I've worked with 1234qwer1234qwer4 for some time now and it has always been a pleasure. With their vast cross-wiki experience, I think they would be great Meta admin regardless, but as mentioned in their statement I'm especially excited to have their help with maintaining the AutoEdits config :) MusikAnimal talk 15:58, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Support Support Good experience and has a good reason for getting the mop. Ferien (talk) 20:47, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Support Support impressive and lots of crosswiki and multilingual contributions. Good reason for the mop. JackFromWisconsin (talk) 21:25, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Support Support looks like a trusted user and valid use-case. – Ajraddatz (talk) 21:55, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Support Support No concerns. GeneralNotability (talk) 22:10, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Support Support Looks good, cross-wiki experience. EpicPupper (talk) 03:52, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Support Support LGTM --DannyS712 (talk) 07:52, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Support Support Sure — csc-1 13:58, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Support Support --Novak Watchmen (talk) 05:59, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Support Support --Minoraxtalk 08:02, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Support Support RadiX 14:25, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote oversat.svg Strong oppose Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker (CA) 14:32, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
    Why???--𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 16:09, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Support Support – experienced editor, good communication and cooperation. – Aca💬 19:07, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Support Support, I can confirm the user's assertion on Meta-Wiki patrolling. Also am confused at @Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker:'s oppose. Leaderboard (talk) 19:35, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Support Support Has valid reasons for requesting the right, no concerns. --Ameisenigel (talk) 21:26, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Support Support valid use case, multilingual, no reason to believe that they would abuse the tools. --Blablubbs|talk 16:07, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Support Support--𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 16:09, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Support Support No reason to oppose. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:03, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Support Support valid use case & trusted user. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 11:36, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Done. Matiia (talk) 18:02, 4 May 2021 (UTC)