Meta:Requests for adminship/1234qwer1234qwer4

1234qwer1234qwer4[edit]

1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk • contribs • deleted user contributions • logs • block log • abuse log • CentralAuth • stalktoy) Bureaucrats: user rights management.

Not ending before 4 May 2021 13:34 (UTC)

Hello, I do not hold any advanced rights on other wikis, yet I am requesting adminship here on Meta-Wiki. The reason is mainly that I have not been doing any maintenance tasks where I would benefit from these rights on other wikis. However, when I came to Meta a couple months ago, I realised the recent changes feed was only partly monitored and I could help with that. In the recent weeks, I usually visited Meta just once or twice a day and still found a lot of unreverted vandalism. Administrator rights would help me deal with some abusers more quickly and also fulfill deletion requests by other users. Furthermore, it would allow me to edit MediaWiki:XTools-AutoEdits.json, to which I have contributed using Phabricator tasks in the past, when the configuration was not publicly editable yet. As a result, there is still quite a backlog of open requests by me and some other users there and a couple more on the page's talk page. As discussed at User talk:MusikAnimal#XTools, I could complete these requests and act upon new ones at MediaWiki talk:XTools-AutoEdits.json if I had the necessary rights. It has been suggested to me off-wiki as well that my language knowledge could be of use if I apply for adminship. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 13:34, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Cross-wiki experience, language knowledge, technical knowledge, and a definitive series of admin work to do. Meets my criteria. Thank you for volunteering, Vermont (talk) 13:37, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Helpful and knowledgeable user. –xeno 14:18, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support - A clueful user with a clear need for the tools. ƒirefly ( t · c ) 15:05, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Helpful in combating to vandalism, speedy deletion and other things. The justification is also acceptable. --Uncitoyen^talk 15:43, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support LGTM --Zabe (talk) 15:45, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support I've worked with 1234qwer1234qwer4 for some time now and it has always been a pleasure. With their vast cross-wiki experience, I think they would be great Meta admin regardless, but as mentioned in their statement I'm especially excited to have their help with maintaining the AutoEdits config :) — MusikAnimal ^talk 15:58, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good experience and has a good reason for getting the mop. Ferien (talk) 20:47, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support impressive and lots of crosswiki and multilingual contributions. Good reason for the mop. JackFromWisconsin (talk) 21:25, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support looks like a trusted user and valid use-case. – Ajraddatz (talk) 21:55, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support No concerns. GeneralNotability (talk) 22:10, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks good, cross-wiki experience. EpicPupper (talk) 03:52, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support LGTM --DannyS712 (talk) 07:52, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sure — csc^-1 13:58, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Novak Watchmen (talk) 05:59, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Minorax^talk 08:02, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support RadiX ∞ 14:25, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker ^(CA) 14:32, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Why???--𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 16:09, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support – experienced editor, good communication and cooperation. – Aca ^💬 19:07, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support, I can confirm the user's assertion on Meta-Wiki patrolling. Also am confused at @Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker:'s oppose. Leaderboard (talk) 19:35, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Has valid reasons for requesting the right, no concerns. --Ameisenigel (talk) 21:26, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support valid use case, multilingual, no reason to believe that they would abuse the tools. --Blablubbs|talk 16:07, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 16:09, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support No reason to oppose. Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 07:03, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support valid use case & trusted user. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 11:36, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Matiia (talk) 18:02, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]