User talk:Jaluj

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Afrikaans | العربية | অসমীয়া | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Boarisch | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | བོད་ཡིག | bosanski | català | کوردی | corsu | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | ދިވެހިބަސް | Ελληνικά | emiliàn e rumagnòl | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | Nordfriisk | Frysk | galego | Alemannisch | ગુજરાતી | עברית | हिन्दी | Fiji Hindi | hrvatski | magyar | հայերեն | interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Ido | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | ភាសាខ្មែរ | 한국어 | kar | kurdî | Limburgs | lietuvių | Baso Minangkabau | македонски | മലയാളം | молдовеняскэ | Bahasa Melayu | မြန်မာဘာသာ | مازِرونی | Napulitano | नेपाली | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | Kapampangan | polski | português | پښتو | Runa Simi | română | русский | sicilianu | سنڌي | සිංහල | slovenčina | slovenščina | Soomaaliga | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ślůnski | தமிழ் | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkmençe | Tagalog | Türkçe | татарча/tatarça | ⵜⴰⵎⴰⵣⵉⵖⵜ  | українська | اردو | oʻzbekcha/ўзбекча | Tiếng Việt | 吴语 | 粵語 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/-

Welcome to Meta![edit]

Hello Jaluj, and welcome to the Wikimedia Meta-Wiki! This website is for coordinating and discussing all Wikimedia projects. You may find it useful to read our policy page. If you are interested in doing translations, visit Meta:Babylon. You can also leave a note on Meta:Babel or Wikimedia Forum (please read the instructions at the top of the page before posting there). Happy editing!

-- 12:27, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

WikiWomenCamp Registration Form[edit]

Hello,

You listed your name as someone interested in be part of WikiWomenCamp, which will be held in Buenos Aires from 23 to 25 May, 2012.

We are asking everyone to fill this form will all your info. Everyone is invited to fill this form, even if you don't have a grant to cover your expenses yet.

Thanks for you interrest, and I hope to see you in Buenos Aires in May :)

Béria Lima msg 18:21, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Individual Engagement Grants[edit]

Hi User: Jaluj, Nice to meet you after a very long time! It feels great to know that you are interested in the research! I have some understanding of clinical psychiatry, but I am not into psychology. It would be just great if you'd like to take up the project. As you might know, you could apply for a grant to cover the expenses involved in pursuing the research. Please see that you can modify the research question in whichever way you want. It is also fine to conduct the research in Spanish, we are looking for diversity in terms of language and geography. The last date for proposing complete submissions is 15th of February, so you've got to be quick! Please let me know if you have any questions.Thanks! --Netha Hussain (talk) 09:59, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Come celebrate IdeaLab’s (re)Launch![edit]

Idea Lab
Idea Lab

We’ve redesigned the Grants:IdeaLab to make awesome collaborators and shiny new ideas easier to find.
You’re invited to the (re)Launch party!

Come visit and create a profile, share or join an idea, and tell us what you think about the updates!

Hope to see you there! Siko (WMF) (talk) 19:08, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Wikimujeres[edit]

Hola, saludos, quería confirmar que deseas colaborar con wikimujeres. mándame un email con tu teléfono y te añadimos al telegram del grupo para coordinarnos. Un abrazo! Gracias por tu paciencia ;-) Mboix (talk) 17:53, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Attawapiskat First Nation[edit]

Re: Wikipedia Outreach: Please see this topic on Jimbo's talk page. I am contacting our chapters in Canada, Argentina and Finland for us all to work together to reach out to the vulnerable youth at Attawapiskat First Nation to promote Wikipedia editing and other wiki projects. I am very good on the phone so that is where I can be of most use. Right now I have a vision, subject to change should you having different ideas, of 1 or more of us using email and/or telephone and or Skype to communicated directly with individuals, groups, and local teachers promoting and illustrating how much fun and education they can have through Wiki editing. Please communicate back to me via my talk page as time is of the essence I think. Nocturnalnow (talk) 15:31, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Sobre la "Guía con criterios para evaluar artículos en un concurso"[edit]

Buenas Jaluj,

Como pediste comentarios, ¡aquí me tienes! A ver, tras una lectura rápida a la Guía con criterios para evaluar artículos en un concurso se me ocurre principalmente una cuestión y es en relación a las referencias, que es uno de los aspectos que más me preocupa.

Si tenemos en cuenta que las referencias son la base de todo artículo y que son las que fundamentan lo que leemos, ¿no se podría añadir que las referencias deben ser revisadas y comprobar si estas fundamentan el contenido por el que han sido puestas? Te pongo un caso personal en el que intervine porque me lo solicitaron: el artículo de Amaro Pargo, que sinceramente fue un quebradero de cabeza.

Si le echas un vistazo al apartado "Problemas que resolver en el artículo" de su página de discusión sabrás todos los problemas que tenía. Pero uno, y el que considero más importante, era el de las referencias. Amaro Pargo es un personaje histórico y por lo tanto, su artículo debería estar fundamentado con fuentes que fundamenten ese contenido; sin embargo, no creo que valga cualquier fuente para cualquier dato: por ejemplo, en la versión que revisé se señalaba que fue pirata e incluso un romance con sor María de Jesús ―una monja de Tenerife―, pero estos datos no estaban fundamentados por ningún documento científico ―tesis, articulo en revista científica, obra...―, sino por una serie de artículos publicados en periódicos y partes de novelas. La mayoría de las referencias del artículo eran artículos periodísticos y páginas webs turísticas y de autoría desconocida, que a su vez no tenían referencias, y un último recurso: obras literarias. Siento este tostón sobre Amaro Pargo, pero me ayuda a ilustrar lo que pretendo expresar a continuación.

Entonces, teniendo en cuenta que las referencias son esenciales, creo que hay que distinguir entre los diferentes tipos de contenido que existen y qué uso se le puede, o se le debería, dar a cada uno. Los artículos periodísticos son una fuente que todos sabemos que hay que tratar con delicadeza y por supuesto, creo que son excelentes para referencias acontecimientos actuales o de hace poco tiempo, además de para fundamentar menciones, premios u otros datos por el estilo; pero un artículo en el ABC o eldiario.es ―por poner dos periódicos― no debería ser utilizado para fundamentar artículos científicos, salvo que tenga referencias científicas o esté escrito por un personalidad versada en el tema ―sea un historiador, un biólogo, un etnoarqueólogo...―. Con las páginas webs o blogs ocurre lo mismo, ¿quién las escribe? ¿qué ha utilizado para elaborar lo que ha escrito? ¿es una fuente primaria?; seamos claros, no podemos confiar en lo que diga cualquier sitio web ni en lo que diga cualquier persona, y menos sin referencias claras o difícilmente consultables ―un ejemplo son las páginas webs turísticas, sobre las que además debemos tener en cuenta que su objetivo es hacer atractivo un destino―. Que conste que me apasiona leer, sobre todo novelas históricas, sin olvidar que no son obras científicas y que sus autores, aunque investigan para fundamentarlas, se toman sus licencias para modificar los acontecimientos históricos; por ejemplo, en el caso de Amaro Pargo, no podemos utilizar novelas para fundamentar leyendas, hechos dudosos o que directamente no ocurrieron, sin embargo, si son muy útiles para los apartados "En la cultura popular" o "Desde el punto vista literaria" ―o cualquier otro de índole semejante―.

Como ya me he liado demasiado y tal y como tengo la cabeza, no cuadro muy bien las ideas, creo que por hoy te voy a dejar este comentario, concluyendo que creo que se debería realizar un análisis exhaustivo de las referencias que se utilizan para la elaboración de artículos, sobre todo en los concursos, que puede que por cuestiones de tiempo se pille lo que más a mano esté. Volveré a pensar en este asunto y por supuesto, ¡estaré encantado de seguir echándole un ojo a futuras modificaciones!

Saludos, Ivanhercaz | User talk Plume pen w.png 23:23, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Whose Knowledge?: [April 2017][edit]

Whose KnowledgeWhose Knowledge? logo 01.png News
April 2017 • Volume 1 • Issue 2
Activities and Events:
Dalit History Month Events; Wikimania 2017 submissions
Resources:
Resources lists
Wikimedia Movement:
Wikimedia Strategy: Knowledge is Global
Home font awesome.svg About Whose Knowledge?
If this message is not on your home wiki's talk page, update your subscription.

We hope you enjoy this issue of the Whose Knowledge? News. Please reach out to us if you have any ideas or suggestions! -- Saileshpat using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:47, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Hardware donation program/Jaluj

Whose Knowledge?: [July 2017][edit]

Whose KnowledgeWhose Knowledge? logo 01.png News
July 2017 • Volume 1 • Issue 3
Activities and Events:
Okvir pilot in Bosnia and Herzegovina; Wikimania 2017
Resources:
Emancipatory Design Research
Wikimedia Movement:
Letter from Buenos Aires
Home font awesome.svg About Whose Knowledge?
If this message is not on your home wiki's talk page, update your subscription.

We hope you enjoy this issue of the '''Whose Knowledge?''' News. Please reach out to us if you have any ideas or suggestions! -- Saileshpat using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:18, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

Presenting Community Engagement Insights survey report: Tuesday, October 10, 1600 UTC[edit]

Hi Jaluj,
I am reaching out to you because you signed up to receive updates about the Global Wikimedia survey.[1]

We will be hosting a public event online to present the data, a few examples on how teams will be using it for annual planning, and what are next steps for this project. The event will take place on Tuesday, October 10, at 9:00 am PST (1600 UTC), and the presentation will be in English. You can watch the livestream here, and ask question via IRC on #wikimedia-office.

If you are unable attend, you can also find the report on meta, and watch the recording of the event at a later time.

We hope to have you join us online! -- María Cruz 23:29, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

  1. Update your subscription to these messages by clicking here.

Wikimedia diversity - What happened at the conference and how to follow up[edit]

Hello Jaluj,
We are messaging you now because you signed up as an ambassador for Wikimedia Diversity Conference 2017. We are sharing this message far and wide, so apologies in advance if you are receiving this message twice.

During the conference, we dedicated a full afternoon to discussing the strategic direction and what it means for the work on diversity in the Wikimedia movement. Compiling the outcomes of those conversations, we summarized the key problems and solutions identified, and we created a summary statement. But the conversation is far from over! We still need to hear from diversity ambassadors: (1) what does working for diversity mean at your local context?; (2) what are the needs that should be addressed; (3) what resources are relevant for these identified needs?

We know that diversity gains meaning in context, and this is why we need to hear every voice. Please take a few minutes to go over to the diversity conversation page and add your comments.

If you’d like to stay in touch, and share your experience working for diversity with others, add your profile on our group here.

Thank you and see you on the wiki,
Sara (talk)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:40, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Saludos Desde Marruecos[edit]

Hola, Soy Anass. Espero que todo esta bien con Vos. Te mando muchos saludos :) Anass Sedrati (talk) 09:50, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Thank you![edit]

Hello Jaluj,

Thank you for your endorsement of our Project Grant proposal "Community Toolkit for Greater Diversity". We are happy to convey to you that the proposal has been funded.

Regards, Rohini (talk) 13:22, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Therapy[edit]

Thank you!

One of the wiki periodicals featured a write-up of your program of therapy in hospitals using the editing of Wikiquote. Great stuff! Having worked with challenged children, I know that building self-esteem can be a key to mental health and overall development. I find that it works for me, personally, as well. I just wanted to give a bit of feedback. Breaking tasks into tiny, bite-sized increments works so well with the physically and mentally challenged. That's how I learned to edit Wikipedia as well. A natural fit, but one which took a special person to think of and implement. Ya done good, is all I'm trying to say. Rags (talk) 11:27, 12 February 2018 (UTC) Rags (talk) 11:27, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Sign-up for Whose Knowledge? on-line newsletter[edit]

Hi everybody,

We are leaving the wiki newsletter format behind and venturing into the email newsletter format. We'd love to keep sharing our projects and adventures with you all! You can sign up here to make that happen.

See you all there!

With love & solidarity,

Claudia - and the WK? Comms Team using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:45, 17 September 2018 (UTC)