Wikimedia Foundation elections/FDC Ombudsperson elections/2015/Candidates/tr

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page is a translated version of the page Wikimedia Foundation elections/FDC Ombudsperson elections/2015/Candidates and the translation is 27% complete.

Info The election ended 31 Mayıs 2015. No more votes will be accepted.
The results were announced on 5 Haziran 2015. Please consider submitting any feedback regarding the 2015 election on the election's post mortem page.
Other languages:
Bahasa Indonesia • ‎Deutsch • ‎English • ‎Kiswahili • ‎Nederlands • ‎Tiếng Việt • ‎Türkçe • ‎español • ‎français • ‎italiano • ‎polski • ‎português do Brasil • ‎русский • ‎українська • ‎العربية • ‎فارسی • ‎हिन्दी • ‎বাংলা • ‎中文 • ‎日本語

This page contains candidates for the 2015 Wikimedia Foundation FDC Ombudsperson elections. Members of the 2015 Wikimedia Foundation Elections Committee, or the Wikimedia Foundation staff, will verify wiki based candidate requirements. Wikimedia Foundation staff will verify identification and later verify offline candidate requirements. Verification of wiki-based requirements and identification will be identified on this page. Offline candidate requirements will be verified at a later stage.

Kirill Lokshin (Kirill Lokshin)

Kirill Lokshin (talk meta edits global user summary CA  AE)

Aday ayrıntıları
Kirill Lokshin (2013).jpg
  • Kişisel:
    • İsim: Kirill Lokshin
    • Yaş: 31
    • Konum: Washington, DC, United States
    • Diller: English-N, Russian-N, French-1
  • Başyazı:
Açıklama Yaklaşık on yıldır Wikimedia görevlisiyim, ilk Haziran 2005'te editörlüğe başladım. Yaklaşık on yıldır Wikimedia görevlisiyim, ilk Haziran 2005'te editörlüğe başladım. Bu süre içinde, Wikimedia DC kurul üyeliği ve Üyelik Komitesi, Ýngilizce Wikipedia Hakem Kurulu üyelikleri ve diğer çeşitli danışma grupları dahil, hareket içinde birçok görev üstlendim.

FDC süreci son birkaç yıl içinde önemli ölçüde olgunlaşmış ve geliştirilmiş olmakla birlikte, daha da geliştirmenin her zaman mümkün olduğuna ve bu temel süreçleri sürekli değerlendirme ve iyileştirme felsefesinin Fonları Yaygınlaştırma Komitesi ve Wikimedia hareketinin geri kalanı için sağlıklı olduğuna inanıyorum. Ombudsman bu sürekli iyileştirmeyi savunma ve katılımcıların ve paydaşların sürece ilişkin kaygılarının yapıcı bir şekilde ele alınmasını sağlamada önemli bir rol oynamaktadır.

Zorunlu sorular 1. What experiences of yours do you think will enhance the work and recommendation process of the FDC?
1.1. Around directing and/or evaluating annual plans and programs?
As a board member of Wikimedia DC, I've been a part of the chapter's annual planning and evaluation processes since they began in 2012; this has included developing annual plans, soliciting corresponding funding through the WMF's grants programs, executing the planned programs, and conducting end-of-year evaluations of program success and impact. I've also had the opportunity to review other affiliate organizations' annual plans during as part of my participation on the Grant Advisory Committee.
1.2. Around grantmaking?
I've been involved with the Wikimedia movement's grantmaking processes at various levels for a number of years. I served on the Grant Advisory Committee (GAC) in 2012–2013, and have been a member of the Individual Engagement Grants (IEG) Committee since 2014. In addition, I oversee the Wikimedia DC small grants program.

2. Ombudsmanın rolü sizin için ne ifade ediyor?

The role of the Ombudsperson is twofold. First, the Ombudsperson collects, investigates, synthesizes, and documents complaints and other feedback about the FDC process from participants and observers, and provides recommendations based on this feedback to the various stakeholders in the process. Second, the Ombudsperson is available to assist the Board and the FDC in investigating formal complaints when an independent evaluation is requested.

3. What are some potential complaints about the FDC process that you believe could be documented with the Ombudsperson, and how might you deal with them?

Historically, the majority of complaints about the FDC process appear to relate to poor documentation and communication, as well as differences in expectations between the FDC applicant organizations and the WMF staff and FDC members who review their applications. By identifying insufficiently documented or misunderstood process elements and acting as an advocate for process evaluation and improvement from cycle to cycle, the Ombudsperson can help to resolve the sources of these miscommunications and misunderstandings.
Doğrulama Verification performed by elections committee or Wikimedia Foundation staff.
Eligibility: Artículo bueno.svg Onaylı
Verified by: Ruslik (talk) 22:05, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
Identification: Artículo bueno.svg Onaylı
Verified by: Jalexander--WMF 21:20, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Mykola Kozlenko (NickK)

NickK (talk meta edits global user summary CA  AE)

Aday ayrıntıları
Visiting Wikimedia UK office, August 2013
  • Kişisel:
    • İsim: Mykola Kozlenko
    • Yaş: 25
    • Konum: Kyiv, Ukraine / Paris, France
    • Diller: Ukrainian-N, Russian-N, English-3, French-3, German-2
Açıklama FDC Ombudsmanlığı görevi en çok göze çarpan görev değildir, Ama Fonları Yaygınlaştırma Komitesi'nin çalışmaları geliştirilmesinde önemli bir rol oynar. Yıllık Plan Hibeler programı sürekli evrilmektedir ve ilgili tarafların önerilerini dikkate almak Wikimedia hareketi için faydalı olacaktır: öneriler sunan kuruluşlar, önerilerin gözden geçirilmesinde görev alan FDC ve kurul üyeleri, süreci kolaylaştıran Wikimedia Vakfı kadroları ve genel olarak topluluk üyeleri. FDC Ombudsmanı’nın önemli bir görevi sürecin saydamlığının korunmasını ve tüm kaygıların ele alınmasını sağlamak olacaktır.

7 yıldır Wikimedia hareketinde aktifim ve hem Küresel Güney (Ukrayna) hem de Küresel Kuzey (Fransa ) Wikimedia topluluklarında oldukça bilgi sahibiyim. Çevrimiçi olarak, Ukraynaca Wikipedia’nın bir yöneticisi, denetmen kullanıcısı ve eski hakemiyim ve aynı zamanda diğer dillerde çeşitli Wikimedia projelerine katkıda bulundum. Çevrimdışı olarak, 2009’dan beri Wikimedia Ukrayna’nın bir üyesi, 2012’den beri kurul üyesi ve 2013’ten beri saymanıyım, ayrıca Wiki Loves Monuments & Wiki Loves Earth, makale yarışmaları, QRpedia ve diğerleri gibi çeşitli projelerde görev aldım.

Zorunlu sorular 1. What experiences of yours do you think will enhance the work and recommendation process of the FDC?
1.1. Around directing and/or evaluating annual plans and programs?
As a board member of Wikimedia Ukraine since 2012, I have been involved in both planning and evaluating our annual programmes. In particular, for the last two years I was a contributor to the chapter's annual plan and an author of our annual reports. As a treasurer, I have written and supported the grant proposals, worked on the execution of the respective programmes and prepared reports measuring results and impact of these activities. While preparing Wikimedia CEE Meeting 2014, I was also involved in evaluating activities of other chapters and communities of Central and Eastern Europe.
1.2. Around grantmaking?
I have an extensive experience in grantmaking, most notably, I am involved in submitting grant proposals for annual PEG grants for Wikimedia Ukraine for the last three years. I also contributed to the review of a number of grants to other Wikimedia affiliates, and I was a member of the team managing travel scholarships for Wikimedia CEE Meeting 2014.

2. Ombudsmanın rolü sizin için ne ifade ediyor?

The role of FDC Ombudsperson involves documenting complaints and suggestions of the participants of the process in order to improve it. On one hand, the Ombudsperson should deal with formal complaints from the participants of the process, which involves collecting evidence from all parties of the process, publicly documenting complaints and assisting investigations if needed. On the other hand, the Ombudsperson summarise general feedback about the FDC process by taking into account suggestions by the participants of the process.

3. What are some potential complaints about the FDC process that you believe could be documented with the Ombudsperson, and how might you deal with them?

I believe that complaints regarding the FDC process can be split into two groups:
  • Complaints affecting one particular participants of the process. The most likely conflicts here will be those regarding eligibility or fund allocations, and these conflicts mean that the outcome of the FDC process did not meet the expectations of these organisations. In these cases I will collect points of view and evidence from all involved parties and will analyse and investigate them in impartial and transparent way.
  • Complaints affecting many participants of the process. The most likely concerns here will be around usability of the FDC portal for both applicants and reviewers and clarity of the requirements regarding information and documents to provide. In order to deal with these problems, I will collect suggestions by different participants of the process and will summarise them and raise these issues.
Doğrulama Verification performed by elections committee or Wikimedia Foundation staff.
Eligibility: Artículo bueno.svg Onaylı
Verified by: Varnent (talk)(COI) 00:06, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
Identification: Artículo bueno.svg Onaylı
Verified by: Jalexander--WMF 00:16, 1 May 2015 (UTC)