Jump to content

Steward requests/Global: Difference between revisions

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Latest comment: 6 years ago by WhitePhosphorus in topic Requests for global (un)block
Content deleted Content added
+req
Line 27: Line 27:
* {{Luxotool|124.106.128.178}}
* {{Luxotool|124.106.128.178}}
Cross wiki harassment/abuse from a Philippines IP. [[User:Theinstantmatrix|theinstantmatrix]] ([[User talk:Theinstantmatrix|talk]]) 15:43, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Cross wiki harassment/abuse from a Philippines IP. [[User:Theinstantmatrix|theinstantmatrix]] ([[User talk:Theinstantmatrix|talk]]) 15:43, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

=== Global block for [[special:contribs/24.190.40.112|24.190.40.112]] ===
{{status}}
* {{luxotool|24.190.40.112}}
Cross-wiki vandalism on supercentenarians articles. --[[User:WhitePhosphorus|WhitePhosphorus]] ([[User talk:WhitePhosphorus|talk]]) 03:22, 26 November 2017 (UTC)


== Requests for global (un)lock and (un)hiding ==
== Requests for global (un)lock and (un)hiding ==

Revision as of 03:22, 26 November 2017

Shortcut:
SRG
This page hosts requests for global (un)blocks, (un)locks and hidings.

If you are here because you have been affected by a global block, please see Global blocks/FAQ for more information about global block and routes to appeal.

Note: (un)blocks apply to IP addresses; and (un)locks apply to global accounts.

Cross-wiki requests
Meta-Wiki requests


Requests for global (un)block

Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Your request might be rejected if you don't follow the instructions.
Please also review Global blocking . Only IP addresses can be globally blocked at this moment. Please see #Requests for global (un)lock and (un)hiding if your request involves an account.
Global blocks don't affect Meta-Wiki, so if your IP address is blocked, you can still appeal here. IP addresses that cause disruption on Meta should be reported at Meta:Requests for help from a sysop or bureaucrat instead of here so that they can be blocked locally.
Please describe the kind of cross wiki abusive activity you see from the IP. Saying an IP is a long term abuser is not helpful, but saying "IP vandalizes at ban.wikipedia, no.wikipedia and vi.wikipedia" is. This is especially important for range blocks. If you do not provide enough details, your request might be declined.
Instructions for making a request

Before requesting, make sure that:

  1. You know the IP address(es) you wish to have globally blocked or unblocked.
  2. For blocks, the global blocking criteria are met.
  3. For unblocks, your request addresses the original reason for blocking the IP, if any.

To make a request for the address(es) to be blocked or unblocked

Copy the template below to the bottom of this section and explain why the address(es) should be blocked/unblocked.
=== Global block/unblock for [[Special:Contributions/Some IP address|Some IP address]] ===
{{Status}} <!-- Do not remove this template -->
* {{Luxotool|IP address}}
Description, evidence, diffs, etc. --~~~~
When requesting that your IP be unblocked, note that stewards need to know your IP address to even consider a request.
To find your IP, please visit https://www.whatismyip.com/
You are not required to disclose your IP in public - you may make requests privately to any steward on IRC or by email at: stewards@wikimedia.org

Global unblock for 45.32.0.0/16

Status:    In progress

I'm trying to upload photos to the Commons and it says there's a global block? "Your current IP address is 45.32.48.109, and the blocked range is 45.32.0.0/16." I have no idea what drama this is but it doesn't encompass me or the people I live with. Please un-block our address.

IP block exemption granted on Commons. Please make sure you follow the licensing policy when uploading photos. Basically, only upload photos you took, or with explicit permission from the photographer. Guanaco (talk) 04:32, 10 November 2017 (UTC)Reply
@Lishuilynn: Suggest you make the request at SRIPBE. SA 13 Bro (talk) 05:01, 10 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Global block for 2.247.254.227

Status:    In progress

Cross wiki spam, "global warming" guy. Tuanminh01 (talk) 11:02, 16 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

eu:Wikibooks block for 158.227.171.28

Status:    In progress

Hello! The IP 158.227.171.28 is having two different behaviours in euwiki and euwikibooks. On wikipedia it's posting spam links, and we have decided to talk to him about this routine before we decide a blocking. But in euwikibooks it is deleting content randomly. There's no current active adminship on this project, so we would need as stated in this discussion to block this IP per content deletion. --Theklan (talk) 19:48, 23 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Global block for 124.106.128.178

Status:    In progress

Cross wiki harassment/abuse from a Philippines IP. theinstantmatrix (talk) 15:43, 24 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Global block for 24.190.40.112

Status:    In progress

Cross-wiki vandalism on supercentenarians articles. --WhitePhosphorus (talk) 03:22, 26 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Requests for global (un)lock and (un)hiding

Note that global blocking currently only applies to IPs, due to a technical limitation. If you wish to request a named account for global [un]locking, please request a global [un]lock here instead. Be sure to follow the instructions below:
  • Your request might be rejected if it doesn't include the necessary information.
  • Warning! This page is publicly viewable. If the account name is grossly insulting or contains personal information please contact a steward privately in #wikimedia-stewardsconnect or email your request to the stewards VRT queue at stewards-oversight@wikimedia.org (direct wiki interface) but do not post it here. Thanks.
  • Warning! This is not the place to ask for locks based on your opinion that someone is disruptive. Global locks are used exclusively against vandalism and spam, not because of content disputes, not because you think that someone deserves to be globally blocked. In such cases, you should ask for local blocks at appropriate places.
  • If you are globally locked, you should appeal your lock to stewards-appeals@wikimedia.org.

Please describe abusive activity of an account before reporting them here. Since stewards are often not active at projects the reported accounts are, things that seem obvious to you may not be equally obvious to the reviewing steward.

Instructions for making a request

Before requesting that a global account be (un)locked, please be sure that:

  1. You have evidence of cross-wiki disruption from the account(s).
  2. You can show that it is not feasible to use local-only blocks or other measures like page protection to combat the disruption.
  3. You have considered making the request in #wikimedia-stewardsconnect, especially for account names which will be hidden, or for urgent requests.
To make a request for an account to be locked or unlocked
Copy one of the codes below to the bottom of this section and explain why the account(s) should be locked/unlocked.
=== Global lock/unlock for Foo ===
{{status}} <!-- do not remove this template -->
* {{LockHide|username}}
* {{LockHide|username|hidename=1}} <!-- if you do not want the name to be visible on this page -->
*...
Reasons, etc. --~~~~

For many accounts:

=== Global lock for spambots/vandals ===
{{status}} <!-- do not remove this template -->
{{MultiLock|username|username2|username3}}
{{MultiLock|username|username2|username3|hidename=1}} <!-- if you do not want the names to be visible on this page -->
*...
Reasons, etc, --~~~~

Global unlock for Diegusjaimes

Status:    On hold

Hi, I'm not a normal IP. I am the same user. I can't edit with my original account, because this actually locked, and i can't access its. I request unlock and ask for forgiveness for the damages caused at this time. Thanks in advance --181.61.83.227 03:25, 27 July 2017 (UTC) PD: Sorry for my englishReply

To the Stewards, Bernard is a CU and can confirm a new block evasion [1] --Ks-M9 [disc.] 16:24, 28 July 2017 (UTC).Reply
I created it simply to continue editing. There is no vandalism or anything bad. I am worried that Wikipedia in Spanish will be so drastic with users who want to edit for the first time, or who want to resume editing, and I am also puzzled by the fact that they consider everyone as a "toxic element" to Anyone who gets blocked. 181.61.83.227 18:23, 28 July 2017 (UTC) PD: The last text is traduced by Google"Reply
See w:WP:BE and w:WP:SOCK - Using other account to continue editing while blocked is not permitted in most Wikimedia projects, even if the editor only makes good edits.
  • For Diegusjaimes: I suggest you do no edit in Spanish Wikipedia, using any account or anonymously, in no less than six months (i.e. until at least 2018-1-29) and request an unblock there. You're free to contribute other Wikimedia projects once you are unlocked.
  • For stewards: I think the account can be unlocked as long as there're no longer crosswiki issue. This allows user to make significant and useful contributions to other WMF projects (which is beneficial for unblocking in eswiki).

--GZWDer (talk) 19:18, 28 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Comment. I believe that the initial lock is wrong on a number of grounds. 1) Socking has no impact upon the use of the primary account. 2) Socks are not against WMF terms and use, and the use of global lock is not for this purpose of locking primary accounts. If the user is to be excluded we should be using a consensus of the community discussed in a global ban rather than summary exclusion by judge and jury stewardry.  — billinghurst sDrewth 22:07, 5 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Global unlock for Celestianpower

Status:    In progress

I am not sure why my account was blocked in the first place. It says my account was compromised and so globally blocked, but I see no evidence of this in my contributions. I used to be an administrator on en-wikipedia and en-wiktionary but I have been inactive for a while. Looking to make some sporadic edits, but unable to log in. The message on my en-wikipedia talk page says that I should contact a steward to have it reversed. Is this the correct channel for that? Thanks! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 109.181.34.182 (talk) 22:30, 29 October 2017‎ (UTC)Reply

Your account was locked by WMF staff due to account compromised in the past. @Tim Starling (WMF): There is a unlock requests issue at here. SA 13 Bro (talk) 23:25, 29 October 2017 (UTC)Reply
I was watching filtered authentication logs and saw the attacker successfully log in to your account in real time. So I locked it immediately, before they were able to do any damage. This attacker typically defaced the English Wikipedia main page within minutes of each account compromise, so it was important to act quickly. The attacker was using publicly available password databases from other websites, such as Yahoo and LinkedIn, correlating email addresses with user names, and trying the passwords against Wikipedia. So it's important that you change your password on any website where you've been using it. See https://haveibeenpwned.com/ -- Tim Starling (WMF) (talk) 23:47, 29 October 2017 (UTC)Reply
@Tim Starling (WMF): Thank you for alerting me. That's quite worrying. So if I change my password, am I able to continue using this account? Thanks 109.181.34.182 00:04, 30 October 2017 (UTC)Reply
Yes, you can continue to use that account. I assume you still have access to your email? A steward should contact you, confirm your identity, unlock your account, and give you advice on setting up 2FA. -- Tim Starling (WMF) (talk) 02:00, 30 October 2017 (UTC)Reply
@Tim Starling (WMF): That's great news. Happy to set up 2FA. When might a steward contact me and through what channel? Email? Thanks, 109.181.34.182 12:41, 30 October 2017 (UTC)Reply
You should e-mail stewards@wikimedia.org if you want your account unlocked. Ruslik (talk) 19:47, 30 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Global unlock for Trần Đình Phong

Status:    Done

I tried to log in over 5 times because I could not remember my password. I reset password and logged in again. Then I got the message "You cannot log in because your account is globally locked." I need this account for my work. Thanks! --117.6.113.253 13:06, 11 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

@Ruslik0: do you have any insight about this? – Ajraddatz (talk) 08:37, 12 November 2017 (UTC)Reply
This is related to Special:CentralAuth/Roterot and other accounts. Ruslik (talk) 13:40, 12 November 2017 (UTC)Reply
Can my account be restored back? What should I do now?
Well, if it turns out they are editing disruptively the account can always be re-locked. From what I can see, there are only edits on one wiki and none are reverted. I'm not seeing a compelling reason for this account to be locked, even with checkuser evidence. Multiple accounts aren't banned, disruptive editing is. – Ajraddatz (talk) 00:40, 23 November 2017 (UTC)Reply
Unlocked. Ruslik (talk) 18:25, 25 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Global lock for Swinslokw

Status:    In progress

Hi I Just Saw you blocked my IP so i can't do any modification on Modern Family anymore. I also don't understand why it's written that i began to be blocked from july 18 th 2015 as i could modify any pages on november 1st 2017. --Swinslokw

Your account is not blocked anywhere. So, it is probably an IP block. Ruslik (talk) 20:52, 24 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Global lock for a new Vhacker Vicky kadian socks

Status:    Done

Socks of a globally locked account Vhacker Vicky kadian. theinstantmatrix (talk) 19:19, 23 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Done Ruslik (talk) 18:31, 25 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Global lock for Fernando Benjamim News

Status:    Done

WP0 abusers. --Ilzhabimantara (talk) 01:11, 25 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

DoneDefender (talk) 02:20, 25 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Global lock for Natalicio Gomes

Status:    Done

WP0 abuser. --jdx Re: 05:56, 25 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Done Ruslik (talk) 18:23, 25 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Global lock for CIH0426 and Sockpuppets

Status:    In progress

These are all sockpuppets of the Cross-wiki abuser CIH0426. The sockmaster, CIH0426, originally vandalized the Chinese Wikipedia, before socking and migrating to other Wikimedia sites after the sockmaster was indef blocked on the Chinese Wikipedia. See the Sockpuppet Category for this user at the Chinese Wikipedia and the SPI casepage at the English Wikipedia for more information on this sockmaster. All of the edits of this user were either vandalism or just purely disruptive. The sockmaster, CIH0426, has already been indeffed at both the Chinese and English Wikipedia sites, and almost all of the sockpuppet accounts have some kind of vandalism activity at 2 or more Wikimedia Projects. The named accounts have already been CU Confirmed at the Chinese Wikipedia. The vandalism from this user shows that he has no intention of contributing positively to any of the sites; in addition, the referencing to recent Computer Malware/Cyberattacks in names of the newest socks (such as User:Mirai2016 and User:EternalBlue) is really concerning, as this indicates that this user may intend to carry out cyberattacks or has a more malicious bent that we have not witnessed yet. It should also be noted that yet another sockpuppet, My doom, has already been Globally Locked for cross-wiki vandalism on at least 4 different Wikimedia Project sites, while the sock account has yet to be blocked at a 5th Project, the English Wikipedia. Due to the Cross-wiki abuse and the recent socking spree from the sockmaster, I'm requesting a Steward to Globally Lock all of these accounts in order to prevent further damage to the Wikimedia Projects. LightandDark2000 (talk) 09:38, 25 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Global lock for Portal Diversos

Status:    Done

WP0 abuser. --jdx Re: 20:54, 25 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

DoneDefender (talk) 21:13, 25 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Global lock for Гузман Карой

Status:    In progress

Latest A3cb1 sock. --Guanaco (talk) 00:51, 26 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Global lock for User:Agnostic girl

Status:    In progress

Apparently the globally banned user INeverCry, doing automated vandalism on Commons. Guanaco (talk) 03:05, 26 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Global lock/unlock for Flickr (Bot)

Status:    In progress

LTA Shiwam Kumar Sriwastaw. --Guanaco (talk) 03:18, 26 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

See also