Steward requests/Permissions: Difference between revisions

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Content deleted Content added
Sabri76 (talk | contribs)
→‎Removal of access: DYKadminBot@en.wikipedia
Line 226: Line 226:
}}
}}
: '''Done''', thank you for your work! [[User:Leinad|Leina<span style="font-weight: bold;">D</span>]] [[User talk:Leinad|<small>(<span style="color:#CC0000; font-weight: bold;">t</span>)</small>]] 17:23, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
: '''Done''', thank you for your work! [[User:Leinad|Leina<span style="font-weight: bold;">D</span>]] [[User talk:Leinad|<small>(<span style="color:#CC0000; font-weight: bold;">t</span>)</small>]] 17:23, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

==== DYKadminBot@en.wikipedia ====
{{sr-request
|status = <!--don't change this line-->
|domain = en.wikipedia
|user name = DYKadminBot
|discussion= [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Bureaucrats%27_noticeboard&oldid=348025271#DYKadminBot Agreement] by four (or five) local bureaucrats as of 02:24, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
}}


=== Miscellaneous requests ===
=== Miscellaneous requests ===

Revision as of 02:24, 6 March 2010

Shortcut:
SRP

This page is for requests to have stewards grant or revoke administrator, bureaucrat, checkuser, and oversight rights on Wikimedia projects which do not have a local permissions procedure.

Old sections are archived. The list of archives is below.

  • Requests for bot flags are handled at SRB, and requests for global permissions are handled at SRGP.
  • If you are requesting adminship or bureaucratship, and your wiki has a local bureaucrat, submit your request to that user or to the relevant local request page (index).
  • For urgent requests, such as to combat large-scale vandalism on a small wiki, contact a steward in the #wikimedia-stewardsconnect IRC channel. In emergencies, type !steward in the channel to get the attention of stewards. Otherwise, you can type @steward for non-urgent help.

Other than requests to remove your own access or emergencies, please only make requests here after gaining the on-wiki approval of your local community.

Quick navigation: Administrator | Interface administrator | Bureaucrat | CheckUser | Oversight | Removal of access | Miscellaneous | Global permissions

Cross-wiki requests
Meta-Wiki requests

Using this page

1. Place the following code at the bottom of the appropriate section below:

==== Username@xxproject ====
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!-- don't change this line -->
 |domain    = <!-- such as en.wikibooks -->
 |user name = 
 |discussion= 
}}
(your remarks) ~~~~

2. Fill in the values:

  • domain: the wiki's URL domain (like "ex.wikipedia" or "meta.wikimedia").
  • user name: the name of the user whose rights are to be changed (like "Exampleuser"). In case you're requesting access for multiple bots, leave this field blank and give a list of these bots in your remarks
  • discussion: a link to the local vote or discussion about the rights change (for example, "[[ex:Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship#ExampleUser]]"). This should normally be for at least one week, but no more than three weeks (if so, you'll need to restart the process).

3. If anything is missing from your request, a steward will request more information.

Confirmation of signing confidentiality agreement

Certain permissions (notably CheckUser and Oversight) additionally require users to sign a confidentiality agreement. Users requesting these permissions must make a request below, and must also sign the confidentiality agreement with the Wikimedia Foundation. The request is placed on hold temporarily, until the receipt has been formally confirmed by the Office.

Requests

COPY THE FOLLOWING CODE to the bottom of the appropriate section below:

==== user name@xxproject ====
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!--don't change this line-->
 |domain    =
 |user name =
 |discussion= 
}}

Administrator access

See administrator for information about the position. Requests for removal of access belong in another section. Admins doing cross-wiki work may wish to see IRC/wikimedia-admin for information about joining #wikimedia-admin.

If you are requesting administrator status to translate the wiki interface, this should be done at the BetaWiki project instead (see mw:localisation). You can ask questions in the IRC channel or on the mailing list.

If you are requesting adminship to handle one-time vandalism incidents or clearing a deletion backlog, please see Vandalism reports and Steward requests/Speedy deletions.

Stewards
Currently-active temporary permissions are listed at /Approved temporary; copy granted requests to the appropriate section there, stating the date of removal in the section header and at the bottom of the request. Please invite new sysops to the admin IRC channel.
Archiving
Requests only need remain listed below for a few days, and may afterward be removed as long as they have been copied to the subpage. Users who archive requests on that page, please check if the request was correctly added to the temporary subpage before removing it from this page.

For permanent sysopship please provide a link to the local community approval. For temporary sysopship please state for how long and for which tasks you need it, and link to a local announcement.

Demmy@yo.wikipedia

I am requesting a three-month extension to my sysop. I am the only active administrator on the wiki. Thanks. Demmy 01:08, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

before the extension, it would be better to reach local consensus! Inform your community please--Nick1915 - all you want 08:44, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
That would be great, but the community is not active. This is not the first time that I am renewing. Thanks Demmy 14:36, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Done Granted Expression error: Unrecognized punctuation character "{".Expression error: Unrecognized punctuation character "{".Expression error: Unrecognized punctuation character "{".Expression error: Unrecognized punctuation character "{". to expire on {{{2}}}-{{{3}}}-{{{4}}}. --Nick1915 - all you want 10:44, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

hanberke@tk.wikipedia

Please grant me 6-month temporary sysop status which expired on 3 March 2010. I had three temporary terms up to now. I was the only sysop there. Thanks in advance. --Hanberke 09:43, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, why not. Expires 3 September 2010. Kylu 00:25, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

hanberke@tk.wiktionary

Please extend my 6-month temporary sysop status for another 6 months. --Hanberke 09:47, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, why not. Expires 3 September 2010. Kylu 00:26, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jagwar@mg.wikipedia

I am requesting for a 6-month temporary sysop status. I am actually the only active sysop on this wiki . The three other sysops are inactive for at least five months or didn't have made a signifivative edit since Jan. 2010 ; and I need to unprotect the logo of the local wiki, and reprotect it when updating is done. Thanks, --Jagwar 交談 homewiki 13:14, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Is it possible to link to the discussion? Pmlineditor  13:54, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Also, notify the community before extension please. Pmlineditor  13:54, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
For local notification, look at here. --Jagwar 交談 homewiki 10:19, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

putnik@ruwikinews

putnik 14:30, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Request refused - not enough voters. Candidate should be supported by local community (at least 3 users), but not only by one person two persons. LeinaD (t) 15:00, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Request for permanent access has been changed into temporary access on 6 months. Expires 1 March 2010. LeinaD (t) 22:03, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
removed--Nick1915 - all you want 10:35, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I request prolong putnik's rights in ruwikinews (as one user of this wiki): project need more admins. Thanks and regards, —Innv {ru-ws} 11:25, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
Done Expires September 5th Laaknor 10:46, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sabri76@trwikiquote

Thanks...--Sabri76 00:48, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bureaucrat access

See bureaucrat for information about the position. In principle, requests for temporary bureaucrat access are not granted.

General note

There is an ongoing discussion regarding the minimum number of votes and overall participation to promote users to bureaucrat at Talk:Bureaucrat#Minimum_number_of_votes. Users are encouraged to assist in the development of a policy that allows stewards to not decide on whether a promotion is valid or not. Thank you.

Sabri76@trwiktionary

The voting has finished. Thanks...--Sabri76 23:21, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment only: There's a currently-ongoing (and momentarily stalled) discussion at Talk:Bureaucrat#Minimum_number_of_votes here regarding minimum participation and support in an election in order to grant bureaucrat flags here. Consensus is not yet reached, but traditionally has been that one needs 15 or so supports for the election to be meaningful. You may want to consider (advice only) leaving the election open to garner more votes. Kylu 01:10, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I've understood, but this wiktionary hasn't got a bureaucrat and we haven't got enough active users. If it is necessary, I'll wait for 15 votes. I'm opening the election to garner more votes.--Sabri76 08:35, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
We have got 15 votes. Is it enough?--Sabri76 21:22, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Done I sure hope so! I've added the bureaucrat right, so now we just need to see if someone yells or not. Thanks for your patience! :) Kylu 21:20, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome :) Most of them trust me. I'll use this right carefully.--Sabri76 00:18, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Aturantekin@ugwikipedia

Thank you! Aturantekin 18:45, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please give a link to communities decision. --WizardOfOz talk 19:31, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CheckUser access

To request CheckUser information, see Meta:Requests for CheckUser information. This is the place to request CheckUser access. Note that temporary CheckUser access is not permitted and the temporary status is only used by Stewards.

Stewards
When someone asks for CheckUser status, please check the current policy before giving the status. There is an email template to request identification from the new CU. Do not grant CU access unless the user is identified to the Foundation. Breaching these rules may be cause for removing your steward access. When you give someone CheckUser, please list them on CheckUser, ask them to subscribe to checkuser-l, email checkuser-l-owner@lists.wikimedia.org so the listadmins know the person is allowed on the mailing list, and make sure they contact an op for access to #wikimedia-checkuser.

Oversight access

To request to have content oversighted, ask in #wikimedia-stewards, or email oversight-l@lists.wikimedia.org for requests regarding English Wikipedia. This is the place to request Oversight access. Note that temporary Oversight access is not permitted and the temporary status is only used by Stewards.

Stewards
Do not grant Oversight access unless the user is identified to the foundation, which will be announced on the Identification noticeboard. When you give someone oversight access, list them on Oversight.

Hersfold@enwiki

I'm already identified to the foundation and hold the checkuser flag on en.wiki; I'm requesting this flag as a member of en.wiki's Arbitration Committee. Thanks, please let me know if you need any further information. Hersfold (talk) 21:12, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Confirming that Hersfold is a member in good standing of the Arbitration Committee and will be using the Oversight permissions in accord with his Arbcom responsibilities. Risker 00:10, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Done — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 00:11, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of access

If you're requesting the removal of your own status, make sure you're logged in to a global account. If you have multiple flags, specify which you want removed. Stewards may delay your request a short time to ensure you have time to rethink your request; the rights will not be restored by stewards once they are removed.

To request the removal of another user's status, you must gain consensus on the local wiki first. All discussion must take place on your local wiki. When there is community consensus that the user's access should be removed, a trusted person from that wiki should provide a link here to the discussion, a brief explanation of the reason for the request, and summarize the results of discussion. In either case, copy and paste the following text into the correct section (see instructions above).

==== username@xxproject ====
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!--don't change this line-->
 |domain    = meta.wikimedia
 |user name =  
 |discussion= <!-- local confirmation link / local policy link -->
}}

Anonymous Dissident@en.wikisource

Anonymous Dissident@commons.wikimedia

Anonymous Dissident@species.wikimedia

Anonymous Dissident@mediawiki.org

Thanks. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 11:55, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done, thank you for your work! LeinaD (t) 12:04, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Brynn@commons.wikimedia

Done, thank you for your work! LeinaD (t) 17:23, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYKadminBot@en.wikipedia

Miscellaneous requests

Requests that don't fit in other sections belong here. Import rights can be granted by stewards only, not bureaucrats, so the automatic list of local bureaucrats is irrelevant for this. Please gather community consensus before placing a link to the discussion here.

Note that the following types of requests belong on separate pages:

Christianrocker90@simplewikipedia

Done --FiliP ██ 14:33, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ottava Rima@simplewiki

Done Kylu 03:45, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Steward requests/Permissions/Footer