Jump to content

Steward requests/Permissions: Difference between revisions

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Browse history interactively
← Older editNewer edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
→‎Administrator access: + Mathieudu68 on hawwiki
Line 67: Line 67:
=== CheckUser access ===
=== CheckUser access ===
{{/CU-header}}
{{/CU-header}}

==== DeltaQuad@enwiki ====
{{sr-request
|status = <!--don't change this line-->
|domain = en.wikipedia.org
|user name = DeltaQuad
|discussion= arbcom-l
}}
DeltaQuad {{diff|8255055|-|prev|voluntarily relinquished}} access in April due to lack of time. He has requested that his rights be returned, and as he was not "under a cloud" at the time of his departure, we have no objection to allowing him to regain them. Thank you! [[User:LFaraone|LFaraone]] ([[User talk:LFaraone|talk]]) 16:31, 19 June 2014 (UTC)


=== Oversight access ===
=== Oversight access ===

Revision as of 16:32, 19 June 2014

Shortcut:
SRP

This page is for requests to have stewards grant or revoke administrator, bureaucrat, checkuser, and oversight rights on Wikimedia projects which do not have a local permissions procedure.

Old sections are archived. The list of archives is below.

  • Requests for bot flags are handled at SRB, and requests for global permissions are handled at SRGP.
  • If you are requesting adminship or bureaucratship, and your wiki has a local bureaucrat, submit your request to that user or to the relevant local request page (index).
  • For urgent requests, such as to combat large-scale vandalism on a small wiki, contact a steward in the #wikimedia-stewardsconnect IRC channel. In emergencies, type !steward in the channel to get the attention of stewards. Otherwise, you can type @steward for non-urgent help.

Other than requests to remove your own access or emergencies, please only make requests here after gaining the on-wiki approval of your local community.

Quick navigation: Administrator | Interface administrator | Bureaucrat | CheckUser | Oversight | Removal of access | Miscellaneous | Global permissions

(translate | edit)

Cross-wiki requests
Meta-Wiki requests

Using this page

1. Place the following code at the bottom of the appropriate section below: 

==== Username@xxproject ====
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!-- don't change this line -->
 |domain    = <!-- such as en.wikibooks -->
 |user name = 
 |discussion= 
}}
(your remarks) ~~~~

2. Fill in the values:

  • domain: the wiki's URL domain (like "ex.wikipedia" or "meta.wikimedia").
  • user name: the name of the user whose rights are to be changed (like "Exampleuser"). In case you're requesting access for multiple bots, leave this field blank and give a list of these bots in your remarks
  • discussion: a link to the local vote or discussion about the rights change (for example, "[[ex:Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship#ExampleUser]]"). This should normally be for at least one week, but no more than three weeks (if so, you'll need to restart the process).

3. If anything is missing from your request, a steward will request more information.

Confirmation of signing confidentiality agreement

Certain permissions (notably CheckUser and Oversight) additionally require users to sign a confidentiality agreement. Users requesting these permissions must make a request below, and must also sign the confidentiality agreement with the Wikimedia Foundation. The request is placed on hold temporarily, until the receipt has been formally confirmed by the Office.

Requests

COPY THE FOLLOWING CODE to the bottom of the appropriate section below: 

==== Username@xxproject ====
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!--don't change this line-->
 |domain    =
 |user name =
 |discussion= 
}}

Administrator access

Steward requests/Permissions/Sysop-header

Vigyani@pawiki

Status:    Done

My temporary adminship expires on 19th June. I have been active both as an admin and as an editor. I will request an extension in my admin status. Vigyani (talk) 03:48, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please start a local discussion or announcement and link to it here. After a week, if there is consensus or no opposition to extend your access then I or another steward will do so. Thanks for your work, Ajraddatz (talk) 04:14, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2014-12-18. Ajraddatz (talk) 01:57, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I came here today to add a link to local discussion, because 7 days had passed, but noticed that you had already added the link. :). --Vigyani (talk) 08:41, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

सत्यम् मिश्र@bhwiki

Status:    Done

I request adminship because on local level nobody is there to grant me this status. An Admin is needed as the only local admin is defunct for many years. Kindly grant me the Adminship.-- सत्यम् मिश्र (talk) 09:22, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please, make a local announcement about this request and post the link here. After a week, if there is consensus or no opposition to your request, you will be given sysop rights. Thank you, M/ (talk) 09:29, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I have made the request public on the local chaupaal page in English as well as Bhojpuri languages and the link is here. Kindly do the needful. Thank you very much ! -- सत्यम् मिश्र (talk) 12:22, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you,  On hold until June 18. --M/ (talk) 13:38, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2014-09-18. Ajraddatz (talk) 01:59, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much ! -- सत्यम् मिश्र (talk) 13:52, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mathieudu68@hawwiki

Status:    In progress

Hello,
I request again for adminship on Hawaiian Wikipedia, in order to continue the maintenance task as same as I used to do before (delete useless pages, block vandals...). I requested adminship first time here, and was given a temporary access which expired on 2014-06-09. I didn't met any problem with adminship on this Wikipedia since. Sincerely, Mathieudu68 (talk) 15:19, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bureaucrat access

Steward requests/Permissions/Crat-header

CheckUser access

Steward requests/Permissions/CU-header

DeltaQuad@enwiki

Status:    In progress

DeltaQuad voluntarily relinquished access in April due to lack of time. He has requested that his rights be returned, and as he was not "under a cloud" at the time of his departure, we have no objection to allowing him to regain them. Thank you! LFaraone (talk) 16:31, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oversight access

Steward requests/Permissions/OS-header


Removal of access

<translate>

  • If you're requesting the removal of your own permissions, make sure you're logged in to your account. If you have multiple flags, specify which you want removed. Stewards may delay your request a short time to ensure you have time to rethink your request (see [[<tvar name="self-discussion">Talk:Steward_requests/Permissions/2011#Self_requests</tvar>|previous discussion]] on 24 hour delays); the rights will not be restored by stewards once they are removed.
  • To request the removal of another user's permissions, you must gain consensus on the local wiki first. When there is community consensus that the user's access should be removed, provide a link to the discussion, with a brief explanation of the reason for the request, and summarize the results of discussion. However, as bureaucrats of some wikis may remove users from the administrator or bureaucrat group, please see also a [[<tvar name="crat-rem">Bureaucrat#Removing_access</tvar>|separate list of these specific wikis]].
  • To request the removal of another user's permissions for inactivity, link to your local inactivity policy. If your site does not have inactivity policy, the global policy [[<tvar name="aar">Admin activity review</tvar>|Admin activity review]] applies.
  • See the [[<tvar name="usage">#Using this page</tvar>|instructions above]] for adding new requests. Please post new requests at the bottom of the section.</translate>

Олександр Коваль@uk.wiktionary

Status:    On hold

The user is inactive (no logged actions nor edits) for 4.5 years. Local vote was held, user was notified but didn't respond. The local policy actually requires 5+ users with 50+ edits and 1 month of experience to vote to consider vote successful but when you look at the list of active users you can ensure that it's impossible to fulfil that requirement at current state of the wiki. The most active user supported the denomination. --Base (talk) 19:29, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am crat of ukwiktionary. Our policy says that we need have at least 5 voters for successful nomination. Now we have only 2 votes there and it is not enough. So I suggest to change this to 'On hold' and wait one week more.--Anatoliy (talk) 19:31, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I've explained about this piece of requirements. There are less active users in a month — another week of holding won't make things better. The case also falls under Admin activity review I have no idea why stews have not dealt with that yet. --Base (talk) 19:40, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Because there are hundreds of notifications, communications and actions to take - the Admin Activity Review is taking time. QuiteUnusual (talk) 07:18, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 On hold till 1 July 2014. If nothing changes the user will be desysoped based on Admin activity review policy. Ruslik (talk) 18:40, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ilya@uk.wiktionary

Status:    In progress

The user is inactive (the last logged action in January 2013, the last but 1 in 2011, and the last edit in 2009). Local vote was held, user was notified but didn't respond. The local policy actually requires 5+ users with 50+ edits and 1 month of experience to vote to consider vote successful but when you look at the list of active users you can ensure that it's impossible to fulfil that requirement at current state of the wiki. 2 activemost users supported the denomination. --Base (talk) 19:29, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am crat of ukwiktionary. Our policy says that we need have at least 5 voters for successful nomination. Now we have only 3 votes there and it is not enough. So I suggest to change this to 'On hold' and wait one week more.--Anatoliy (talk) 19:32, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I've explained about this piece of requirements. There are less active users in a month — another week of holding won't make things better. --Base (talk) 19:40, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The user is active on Commons. You can ask him about removal there. Ruslik (talk) 18:38, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The flag in question is on Ukrainian Wiktionary not in Commons so I see no reasons to ask him elsewhere. Anyway he must have got an emain notification about my talk page notification so if he wanted he would answer. --Base (talk) 19:04, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
We want to see that there has been communication with the user, and that they have basically abandoned the community, so please do try Commons as a contact place, even if it points to their talk page at your wiki where the conversation can take place. With ten active users, I would think that a vote of 3-0 after an extension, and all attempts to communicate, would be sufficient and has an alignment with the global approach to inactive users.  — billinghurst sDrewth 13:57, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I told with user via Skype. He said that he not need that status.--Anatoliy (talk) 23:55, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Danny B.@cs.wikiversity

Status:    In progress

This is a repeated request. In the previous request, steward billinghurst asked the cs.wv community not to debate within Meta and move the debate back to cs.wv. Now the discussion doesnt continue ([1], [2], [3]) so we move the request back to stewards.

The previous request stated that 100% of active community members (counting users with 1 edit/day during the last 30 days as active, except Danny B. himself) expressed their mistrust in Danny B. and therefore the request is reasonable though three users mainly involved in other communites opposed this request. --Juandev (talk) 20:59, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The powder toy@zh.wikinews

Status:    Done

--Ou0430 (talk) 01:11, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Removed, thanks for their service. Ajraddatz (talk) 01:54, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GaiJin@kkwiki & GaiJinBot@kkwiki

Status:    In progress

Hereby it is requested to remove the admin as well as bureaucrat access of GaiJin & GaiJinBot on Kazakh Wikipedia due to a long-time inactivity. --Qarakesek (talk) 07:14, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Miscellaneous requests

Steward requests/Permissions/Misc-header

See also

Steward requests/Permissions/Footer

Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steward_requests/Permissions&oldid=8942508"