监管员方针

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page is a translated version of the page Stewards policy and the translation is 75% complete.

Outdated translations are marked like this.
Other languages:
Canadian English • ‎Deutsch • ‎English • ‎Esperanto • ‎Nederlands • ‎Scots • ‎Türkçe • ‎azərbaycanca • ‎dansk • ‎español • ‎français • ‎hrvatski • ‎lietuvių • ‎magyar • ‎occitan • ‎polski • ‎português • ‎português do Brasil • ‎română • ‎suomi • ‎čeština • ‎български • ‎русский • ‎українська • ‎العربية • ‎فارسی • ‎हिन्दी • ‎ไทย • ‎中文 • ‎日本語 • ‎한국어
方針與指引 監管員方針
這個頁面指示了監管員方針指引的概要。操作指示以及其他說明,參見監管員手冊
监管员
Wikimedia steward Icon.svg
申请
用于监管员
公告

方針

不要覆盖共识

Stewards should not override consensus, such as whether or not a user should be given a particular user right. Their task is to implement valid community consensus within the bounds of the Foundation's goals. If there are any doubts as to whether or not an action should be performed, stewards should not act unless it is an emergency situation requiring immediate action or there are no active local users to do it.

監管員應總是保持中立。他們可以在選舉中投票,但是必須根據社群投票的結果來執行操作,不論是否認同投票結果。

花冠

While stewards must follow the above rule, they are not required to like it and as they are still ordinary editors and any other position(s) they hold, are entitled to freely voice their opinions, state their view and be heard by the community, just as any other user may.

In a nutshell: they do not lose the ability to think and feel because they have access to more buttons.

不要在有现存行政员的项目上为用户提供权限

本地行政員負責賦予管理員、行政員、機器人權限。監管員應該只在該維基沒有活躍行政員的情況下賦予權限。

如果監管員在某一維基同時擁有行政員權限,他們應該使用本地行政員而非監管員的身分來授權其他使用者。這使得整個過程更加透明,因為這些操作會被記錄在本地維基上,並減少了因該用戶所扮演的角色而產生的困惑。

避免利益衝突

Stewards should use their judgment to avoid conflicts of interest, situations where they are not impartial to the decision. Such situations should be left to neutral stewards. These include:

  • using steward access on any wiki where they have been blocked;
  • changing rights on home wikis (wikis where they are active community members), except for clearcut cases (such as self-requested removal or emergencies).

透明度

Requests for steward action should be made on the relevant steward request page. When a community asks that rights be changed, a link should be provided to the page where the action was discussed and agreed upon by the community. Steward activity is visible in the Meta logs. When a request is fulfilled, stewards should note this on the Meta request page, and ideally on the local request page if there is one.

Discussion of steward actions should occur on Meta, rather than privately, so editors can understand the stewards' decisions. If a steward has doubts about a request, they should let the other stewards know so the request will not be granted by another steward.

檢查本地方針

Should a wiki have existing policies regarding the steward action, stewards must ensure requests conform to the relevant policy before acting, or that a consensus in favour exists.

链接至现有权限方针:

流程

選舉

請前往监管员/2019选举/指引以查看目前選舉的準則。

失去監管權

不活躍

不活躍的監管員將會失去他們的監管權。「不活躍」係指過去六個月沒有監管操作且過去一年操作低於10次。他們仍可以正常程序來重新申請監管員。

每年一次调查

監管員並不是終身的。使用者可以在需要時得到監管權,並在社群相信他時保留,但如果使用者不再需要監管權或是不再被社群信任時就會失去這個權限。Steward status is granted until the next yearly elections, where users will be invited to comment and in particular to ask for removal of status. However, since stewardship is typically a position likely to get into trouble and since the steward group can easily control itself, the confirmation itself will be done by other stewards. If the majority of other stewards request removal of steward access, the steward will lose their status. Stewards will be specifically careful to review situations when opposition from the community is registered.

參見