Stewards/Elections 2016/Votes/Hindustanilanguage

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Warning

These steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.

Hindustanilanguage (Muzammil)[edit]

ContentsYes • No • Neutral
  • Languages: ur-N, hi-N, en-3, fr-1, te-2, eo-1, ar-1, fa-1
  • Personal info: (English)
    Dear all,

    My name is Muzammil and I come from India. I speak both Hindi and Urdu at the native level. I am comfortable with English - both written and oral. I’ve been a registered active Wikimedian for over five years now (starting 2011) . As I look back, some of my initial contributions were on Hindi Wikipedia, mainly on AIDS Control Agencies in India. I later contributed to a wide range of topics, mostly on Hindi and Urdu Wikipedias, followed by English. I did a lot of maintenance work on Commons and soon became a filemover and rollbacker there. I rose to Sysop position on Urdu Wikipedia and Reviewer position on Hindi Wikipedia.I have a total of more than 56,000 edits on all Wikimedia projects put together.

    As a result of my efforts since 2012, I am glad that the first Hindi Wiki Sammelan Meet became a reality last year and I am optimistic for a large-scale Hindi Wiki Sammelan soon. I also hope to hold a similar events for Urdu Wikipedia which currently holds the top position among Indian language Wikipedias

    Over the last 2-3 years, I have also transformed myself into a “Wikimedia Researcher” - in the sense that I survey, study and write blogposts on leading Wikipedians, communities and events. I have so far written blogposts on English, Sanskrit, Esperanto, Urdu, Hindi, Maithili, Doteli, Ido, Punjabi, Western Punjabi and Ido Wikipedia(s)/ Wikipedian(s). I proactively worked with Maithili Wikipedians in getting their project out of incubator and became the admin of the mailing list in the process.

    My main objective in asking for steward rights is to address Steward requests, fight cross-Wiki spams and to counter vandalism. Examples of some incidents which I came across as an editor and resolved with the help of stewards are this cross-Wiki spam case and this counter-vandalism request. On a broader perspective, I would like to work in connection with SRP, SRG, SRM and SRCU and any other maintenance activity. Since I am comfortable with Latin, Perso-Arabic & Devanagri Scripts, I am ready to work with diverse communities across the world (as indicated in my research interests). I am interested in extending a helping hand to emerging as well as established communities and I feel that I will be able to justifiably discharge my duties as a Steward.
    Umpteen thanks for your consideration!!
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2016/Questions#Hindustanilanguage


Yes[edit]

  1. Gereon K. (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 • --Gereon K. (talk) 14:35, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. 6AND5 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 • --6AND5 (talk) 14:42, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Sfic (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 • --Sfic (talk) 14:46, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Holder (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 • --Holder (talk) 15:05, 8 February 2016 (UTC) We need more native speakers of non-European languages.[reply]
  5. Vituzzu (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  --Vituzzu (talk) 15:17, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Natuur12 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Never noticed this candidate but sure. Let's give him a change. Natuur12 (talk) 15:23, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Ali32liver (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Ali32liver (talk) 15:52, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  8. امین اکبر (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Ameen Akbar (talk) 15:56, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  9. محمد شعیب (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Muhammad Shuaib (talk) 15:57, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Żyrafał (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Żyrafał (talk) 15:58, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  11. राजु सुथार (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  --राजु सुथार (वार्ता) 10:05, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  12. UsmanKhan (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  UsmanKhan (talk) 16:45, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Sevimleribo (Not eligible, checked by Steinsplitter) •  Sevimleribo (talk) 17:04, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Per Natuur12. Miniapolis 17:11, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Deryck Chan (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Sure, go ahead. Deryck C. 17:13, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Obaid Raza (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Obaid Raza (talk) 17:29, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  16. عثمان منصور انصاري (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 • --عثمان منصور انصاري (talk) 18:22, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  17. LavaBaron (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  LavaBaron (talk) 18:32, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Ejensyd (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Ejensyd (talk) 18:47, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  19. مھتاب احمد (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  I support because you are willing to facilitate perso-arabic languages too. مھتاب احمد (talk) 18:51, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Zunter (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Zunter (talk) 18:56, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Andrewredk (Not eligible, checked by Stryn) •  Andrewredk (talk) 19:18, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Mscuthbert (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Need more speakers of South Asian languages across the project. Mscuthbert (talk) 19:19, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Work2win (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Work2win (talk) 20:52, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Wolmar (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Wolmar (talk) 20:57, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       REPanetta (Not eligible, checked by Riley Huntley) •  REPanetta (talk) 22:21, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  24. White Master (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  White Master (es) 22:52, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Zeljko (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Zeljko (talk) 00:09, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  26. SQL (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  SQLQuery me! 00:15, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Fanchb29 (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2016 •  Fanchb29 (talk) 00:32, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  28. HalanTul (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  HalanTul (talk) 02:33, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Mashford (Not eligible, checked by Riley Huntley) •  Mashford (talk) 02:45, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:26, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Jogi don (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  He is supportive Wikipedian, and I hope he will also help us in development of Sindhi Wikipedia. Jogi don (talk) 03:40, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Ibrahim khashrowdi (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Ibrahim khashrowdi (talk) 03:54, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Rachitrali (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  I am casting my vote for Hindustanilanguage Rehmat Aziz Chitrali 04:16, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Tahir mq (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Tahir mq (talk) 05:16, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Hamsterlopithecus (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Hamsterlopithecus (talk) 05:51, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Syced (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Your language skills would be put at great use, even more if you get more experience, good luck for this election or the next! Syced (talk) 05:54, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Ahmed Nisar (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  He is an asset to Wikipedia movement in India and I wish him serve and lead as a steward. Ahmed Nisar (talk) 06:35, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  37. JVRKPRASAD (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 • He is a supportive Wikipedian, and I hope that he will also help us in development of Telugu Wikipedia. JVRKPRASAD (talk) 07:07, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Zbrnajsem (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Zbrnajsem (talk) 11:06, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Ruthven (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Ruthven (talk) 11:24, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Babymissfortune (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Babymissfortune (talk) 11:26, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Deb (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  Deb (talk) 12:07, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  42. David1010 (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  David1010 (talk) 12:16, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Ellery (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Ellery (talk) 13:04, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Abbas dhothar (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Muzzamil Sahib have great contributions on different languages wikipedias & wiki projects.And also there is need of more native speakers of non-European languages Abbas dhothar (talk) 13:16, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  45. YmKavishwar (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 • Yogesh Kavishwar (talk) 14:40, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Buggia (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  --Buggia 14:48, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Fafnir (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Fafnir (talk) 14:56, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  48. தமிழ்க்குரிசில் (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  -தமிழ்க்குரிசில் (talk) 15:32, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Bff (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Bff (talk) 15:41, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  50. बिप्लब आनन्द (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Trusted and experienced user. Biplab Anand (Talk) 16:00, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Satdeep Gill (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Satdeep Gill (talk) 17:40, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Abualsarmad (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 • --Abualsarmad (talk) 18:22, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Sodeif (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  you have large experience and you can speaks to many languages. Sodeif (talk) 18:38, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       قیصرانی (Not eligible, checked by Riley Huntley) •  قیصرانی (talk) 19:14, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  54. شہاب (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  <we South Asians are badly in need of a great helping hand>. شہاب (talk) 20:43, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Risk Engineer (Not eligible, checked by Vogone) •  Risk Engineer (talk) 00:23, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Baljeet Bilaspur (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Baljeet Bilaspur (talk) 02:42, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  56. محمد مجیب (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  محمد مجیب (talk) 03:30, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Arif80s (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  rehman (talk) 04:12, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  58. فیروز اردووالا (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  فیروز اردووالا (talk) 04:37, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Mirajbibi (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  Support Mirajbibi (talk) 04:39, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  60. VanEman (Eligible, checked by shanmugamp7)2016 •  VanEman (talk) 05:07, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       زہیر عبّاس (Not eligible, checked by shanmugamp7) •  زہیر عبّاس (talk) 05:09, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Gauravsood0289 (Eligible, checked by shanmugamp7)2016 •  Gauravsood0289 (talk) 05:12, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Sj (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Sure, per Mscuthbert. –SJ talk  06:42, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Syedalinaqinaqvi (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Syedalinaqinaqvi (talk) 07:32, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Gaurav Pruthi (Not eligible, checked by Riley Huntley) •  Gaurav Pruthi (talk) 08:21, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Nooruddin2020 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Yes, Nooruddin2020 (talk) 08:54, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Naidugari Jayanna (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Naidugari Jayanna (talk) 09:33, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Kenrick95 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Kenrick95 (talk) 09:39, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  67. t.sujatha (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Yes T.sujatha (talk) 10:00, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Gurbakhshish chand (Not eligible, checked by shanmugamp7) •  --Gurbakhshish chand (talk) 10:56, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Kolega2357 (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  Kolega2357 (talk) 11:29, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Veleius (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Veleius
  70. Nabin K. Sapkota (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Support. Nabin K. Sapkota (talk) 12:35, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Drcenjary (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  The candidate has already proved himself on different occasions, at different levels without interruption in the context and scenario of multi lingual Wikipedia. Moreover the candidate is at ease at multi wikis. At last Urdu Wikipedia desperately needs his services, since, it is a need of time Drcenjary (talk) 14:45, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Jugni (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 • Yes. --Jugni (talk) 15:18, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Zotezangu (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Zotezangu (talk) 15:45, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Kasyap (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  he has nice ability in translations Kasyap (talk) 16:00, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  75. AbhiSuryawanshi (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 • AbhiSuryawanshi (talk) 16:05, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Harvinder Chandigarh (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  --Harvinder Chandigarh (talk) 16:54, 10 February 2016 (UTC) Doing good research oriented Wikipedia projects related to multiple Native languages including Punjabi ( covering both east and west Punjab).[reply]
  77. Capella87 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Capella87 (talk) 16:59, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Kapidis (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5) •  Kapidis (talk) 19:01, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Drzewianin (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Drzewianin (talk) 19:19, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Jose Barreto Cegarra (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Jose Barreto Cegarra (talk) 20:24, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  80. Yodin (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  From the statement and Q&A, seems to me that as a steward Muzammil will gain a lot of experience and learn through the process. Stands out as a very strong candidate. --YodinT 00:35, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Vfrickey (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  loupgarous (talk) 03:49, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       RacIndian (Not eligible, checked by Riley Huntley) •  A very experienced person on Hindi Wikipedia and also on Wikimedia commons. RacIndian (talk) 04:27, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Janak Bhatta (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Support. Janak Bhatta (talk) 05:04, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Sakthi swaroop (Not eligible, checked by Riley Huntley) •  has very good knowledge and writing skills Sakthi swaroop (talk) 06:15, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Zaheeruddin25 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Zaheeruddin25 (talk) 07:12, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  84. ABDUL RAZZAQ QADRI (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  ABDUL RAZZAQ QADRI (talk) 08:36, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Taivo (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Taivo (talk) 09:57, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  86. విశ్వనాధ్.బి.కె. (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  విశ్వనాధ్.బి.కె. (talk) 11:28, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  87. రహ్మానుద్దీన్ (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Rahmanuddin (talk) 15:23, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Maferlona (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Maferlona (talk) 20:47, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Tony Esopi (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  tony esopiλέγε 21:20, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Rberchie (Eligible, checked by Savh)2016 •  Rberchie (talk) 11:08, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Raj Singh (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5) •  experienced, excellent and exceptionally great member of the wiki community, definitely deserves it no doubt. Raj Singh (talk) 12:15, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  91. The Average Wikipedian (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Enthusiastic, broad range of subjects, open-minded, helpful. The Average Wikipedian (talk) 16:13, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Bigs7 (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5) •  Bigs7 (talk) 21:44, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  92. Xoegki (Eligible, checked by 范)2016 •  Xoegki (talk) 04:50, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  93. Alfasst (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Alfasst (talk) 08:06, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  94. B25es (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  B25es (talk) 09:47, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Wikibenchris (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Wikibenchris (talk) 11:11, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Munci (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2016 •  Munci (talk) 13:56, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  97. හරිත (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  හරිත (talk) 14:16, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  98. زكريا (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Zack (talk) 21:32, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Hampcky (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  --Hampcky (talk) 22:57, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  100. Sparkyb10123 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Seems highly qualified Sparkyb10123 (talk) 23:07, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  101. NehalDaveND (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  I hope he will help Sanskrit Wikipedia. NehalDaveND (talk) 04:42, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  102. Nannadeem (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  He has good memory and constructive way of action with the policy "Try Again" Nannadeem (talk) 06:34, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  103. Irfan Arshad (Eligible, checked by Alan)2016 •  Irfan Arshad (talk) 13:04, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  104. Gag0409 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2016 •  Gag0409 (talk) 14:00, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  105. Seedorfjohnny (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Seedorfjohnny (talk) 16:27, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  106. לערי ריינהארט (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016 •  ‫·‏לערי ריינהארט‏·‏Th‏·‏T‏·‏email me‏·‏‬ 00:04, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  107. Zezen (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Answered well to the leading questions Zezen (talk) 00:56, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  108. Knowledgebattle (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Knowledgebattle (talk) 01:25, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  109. Spasage (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Spasage (talk) 06:53, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  110. Antoine.01 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Antoine.01 (talk) 14:59, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  111. Krish Dulal (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Krish Dulal 20:12, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  112. Liridon (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Liridon (talk) 21:26, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  113. Fadesga (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Very interesting profile! Fadesga (talk) 23:42, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  114. Wpollard (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Wpollard (talk) 02:40, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  115. Gonzo.Lubitsch (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Gonzo.Lubitsch (talk) 07:09, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  116. Saehrimnir (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Saehrimnir (talk) 13:21, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  117. Shubha (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Shubha (talk) 14:22, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  118. Ciberprofe (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Ciberprofe (talk) 01:51, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  119. Hamedvahid (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Hamedvahid (talk) 18:58, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  120. Giorgos ab1234 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  por plibonigo de vikipedio Giorgos ab1234 (talk) 20:33, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Kapohogrrl (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Kapohogrrl (talk) 05:31, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  121. The ed17 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Ed [talk] [en] 06:23, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Hawajez (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  -- Hawajez (talk) 07:54, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Mjadil (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  یہ مصنف اپنے زبان کے ویکیپیڈیا میں بہت متحرک ہے۔ نیز مثبت طریقے سے تنقید و راہنمائی کے فرائض بھی انجام دے رہا ہے۔ اللہ جزائے خیر عطا فرمائے۔ Mjadil (talk) 11:17, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  122. Marshallsumter (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  A relatively new contributor with some 6 edits on Wikiversities even in 2016! Feel free to contribute more often! --Marshallsumter (talk) 15:29, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  123. Xatian11968 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Xatian11968 (talk) 17:18, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  124. Mirer (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016 •  Mirer (talk) 20:08, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Kiranravikumar (Not eligible, checked by Syum90) •  Kiranravikumar (talk) 06:26, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  125. राम प्रसाद जोशी (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  R.P.Joshi talk 12:11, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  126. Sayant Mahato (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Sayant Mahato (talk) 12:50, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  127. Parveer Grewal (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Parveer Grewal (talk) 14:14, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  128. MariusM (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  MariusM (talk) 18:44, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  129. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Jusjih (talk) 00:11, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  130. Pratyeka (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016 •  Seems a friendly cross-community figure. Pratyeka (talk) 06:30, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  131. Melilac (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016 •  Active in many wikis, which makes argument that he is sysop in only one wiki null and void. Melilac (talk) 07:37, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  132. Lingüista (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Lingüista (talk) 08:36, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  133. Petronas (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Petronas (talk) 09:00, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  134. Mer du Japon (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  We need more native speakers of non-European languages. Mer du Japon (talk) 09:41, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  135. Csisc (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Csisc (talk) 10:46, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  136. Odisha1 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  --Srikant Kedia 14:05, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  137. Rich Farmbrough (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Rich Farmbrough 18:02 20 February 2016 (GMT). 18:02, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Christianrueger (Not eligible, checked by RadiX) •  Christianrueger (talk) 19:07, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  138. Goombiis (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016 •  Goombiis (talk) 00:26, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  139. Yotamsvoray (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016 •  good luck! Yotamsvoray (talk) 06:09, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  140. Eminn (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Emin • message 07:29, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  141. Tonton Bernardo (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Yes, we need more Hindustanis ! Tonton Bernardo (talk) 08:47, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  142. Pratyya Ghosh (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Yes.. Pratyya (Hello!) 09:27, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  143. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016 •  MZaplotnik (contribs) 14:41, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  144. BluesyPete (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  BluesyPete (talk) 17:50, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  145. Arbnos (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Arbnos (talk) 18:46, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  146. Höyhens (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Höyhens (talk) 23:11, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Hasan Okarvi (Not eligible, checked by RadiX) •  Hasan Okarvi (talk) 01:13, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       BRPever (Not eligible, checked by Stryn) •  BRP ever 18:12, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Tom29739 (Not eligible, checked by RadiX) •  Tom29739 (talk) 21:52, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  147. Gioto (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Gioto (talk) 02:21, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  148. Leništudent (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  good candidate Leništudent (talk) 07:37, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Shkif (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Shkif (talk) 07:50, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  149. Bogger (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Bogger (talk) 08:27, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Stephen Allcroft (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Stephen Allcroft (talk) 18:19, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  150. Glane23 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Geoff Who, me? 22:17, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  151. Ganesh Paudel (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Ganesh Paudel (talk) 00:36, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Ananth subray (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5) •  Ananth subray (talk) 12:57, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  152. Fimako (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Kun la espero ke vi subtenu la esperantan version de vikipedio Fimako (talk) 17:48, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  153. Zyephyrus (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Zyephyrus (talk) 01:38, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  154. Bennylin (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  I believe he would be a valuable addition to the stewards list ✒ Bennylin 04:07, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  155. PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ (talk) 09:26, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  156. Wikiuser13 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Wikiuser13 (talk) 17:13, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  157. Aydinsalis (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Aydinsalis (talk) 22:32, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  158. Kayser Ahmad (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Kayser Ahmad (talk) 09:06, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  159. Lutzv (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Lutzv (talk) 11:19, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  160. NoychoH (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  NoychoH (talk) 11:57, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  161. Nachhattardhammu (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  improve it — Nachhattardhammu // Nachhattardhammu // ) 15:40, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Kellyprice (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Kellyprice (talk) 18:44, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  162. Severino (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  --Severino (talk) 21:16, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  163. Dimitra megest (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  Dimitra megest (talk) 01:52, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Lawrencedepe (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Lawrencedepe (talk) 08:22, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  164. Dbastro (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Dbastro (talk) 15:55, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  165. محمد الفلسطيني (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  --محمد الفلسطيني (talk) 16:09, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Proektir (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Proektir (talk) 16:46, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  166. Tracouti (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  --Tracouti (talk) 16:58, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  167. BORGATO Pierandrea (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  BORGATO Pierandrea (talk) 18:01, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  168. Rsrikanth05 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 19:25, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  169. Defrenrokorit (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Defrenrokorit (talk) 06:03, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Mallikarjunasj (Not eligible, checked by Steinsplitter) •  Mallik (talk) 08:38, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  170. Nnemo (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Nnemo (talk) 13:26, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No[edit]

  1. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  I am not very convinced. I have so far not noticed this candidate to be involved in "fight[ing] cross-Wiki spams and [...] counter[ing] vandalism" which he says he wants to focus on as a steward. He listed a mere two "examples" of such activity in the statement, of which one, as it turns out, was only a request to block some local IPs. Also he doesn't have much administrative experience (only a sysop on one wiki). Also, I do not feel comfortable with the idea that he explicitly declares a desire to handle SRCU requests, when his only dealing with CU was filing one request at all so far (cf. question 3 by Tanvir). --MF-W 14:05, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Golden Bosnian Lily (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  --Golden Bosnian Lily (talk) 14:18, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Steinsplitter (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:36, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Ulflarsen (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Ulflarsen (talk) 15:18, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  While I appreciate the user's dedication to Wikimedia, I do not feel that the steward tools would be used much outside of a few select crosswiki spam incidents, and serving as a global sysop might accomplish much of what the user proposes to do in their candidacy. Rschen7754 15:39, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6. O.Koslowski (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  O.Koslowski (talk) 16:03, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  7. SPQRobin (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  SPQRobin (talk) 16:20, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Not this year, due to lack of potential use for the steward bit as mentioned above. But I would be very open to supporting this next year after seeing more global involvement. Ajraddatz (talk) 17:26, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    For what it's worth, the candidate has now gone and opposed the confirmations of the stewards that voted no here. Part of being a steward is taking constructive criticism well; these actions very clearly show that the candidate is not ready to be a steward, and would not be able to contribute to the collaborative environment that we volunteer our time in. Ajraddatz (talk) 19:26, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Widr (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Widr (talk) 17:44, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Vogone (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Same as Ajraddatz. Vogone (talk) 17:57, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Alan (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Alan (talk) 18:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Nrautava (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Feel his lack of administrative experience weigh too much for me to vote yes. Nrautava (talk) 18:16, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Asav (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Asav (talk) 18:18, 8 February 2016 (UTC) Lacks experience.[reply]
  14. Laberinto16 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Laberinto16 (talk) 18:24, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Armbrust (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Armbrust (talk) 18:47, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Pmlineditor (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Global activity is a problem. Weak oppose for now. I'm very disappointed by the canvassing I've been seeing offwiki for this election. Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 18:56, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  17. OlEnglish (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Not comfortable. OlEnglish (Talk) 19:17, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Hypergio (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  НУРшЯGIO(beware of the moose) 20:36, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Patrug (Eligible, checked by Savh)2016 •  I'd like to see more of a global perspective, including the username. —Patrug (talk) 20:44, 8 February 2016 (UTC) @en.wikipedia.org[reply]
  20. Pharaoh of the Wizards (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 21:37, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  21. ChristophThomas (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  ChristophThomas (talk) 21:45, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Atcovi (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  No cross-wiki experience Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 22:38, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Teles (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Per Ajraddatz. —Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 23:14, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Checkingfax (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Checkingfax (talk) 02:03, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Alexmar983 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 • --Alexmar983 (talk) 02:05, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Eurodyne (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  eurodyne (talk) 02:29, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Legoktm (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Legoktm (talk) 03:31, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Yash! (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Yash! 04:31, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  29. FreeatlastChitchat (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  He seems to lack experience and some of the things he said he "wants to do" are going to be a first off for him. My recommendation is that he gains experience before applying. He says he is skilled in editing different wikis, so he should demonstrate that instead of just claiming it. FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 05:47, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Gimmy dd (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  Gimmy dd (talk) 13:04, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Billinghurst (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  From my interactions, while competent in the tasks done, I am not convinced that stewardry is that next role at this time.  — billinghurst sDrewth 13:10, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Bodhisattwa (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  Cross-wiki activity is not good. Bodhisattwa (talk) 13:56, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Vincenzo1492 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Vincenzo1492 (talk) 16:30, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Uğurkent (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  No cross-wiki experience. --Uğurkenttalk 16:59, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  35. DCB (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  DCB (talk) 17:49, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Ernstol (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Ernstol (talk) 19:59, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Gorlingor (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Gorlingor (talk) 01:12, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Timothycrice (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Timothycrice (talk) 05:59, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Gulnar Rehimli (Not eligible, checked by shanmugamp7) •  Gulnar Rehimli (talk) 10:57, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Mathmensch (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  This user was capable of creating an article basically only containing a link to an erotic website. Mathmensch (talk) 13:12, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Wikitanvir (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Not convinced by the answers of my questions. Also those he claims as his cross-wiki experience are more local to me and not diverse. I would expect to see broader knowledge for a steward candidate. — T. 13:21, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Richardkiwi (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Richardkiwi (talk) 20:52, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Waka Waka (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Waka Waka (talk) 00:47, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Morza (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Morza (sono qui) 08:47, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Barras (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  I've never noticed you in any relevant area (cw work etc.). Furthermore, he pointed me to a page here on meta where he posted a log from #wikimedia-stewards, including the IP address of a Wikimedian. That page has been suppressed by now, however, it is for me a serious reason to oppose. -Barras talk 13:08, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Bikarhêner (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Bikarhêner (talk) 14:27, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Liliana-60 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Massive issues with incivility and inability to follow rules on Commons, see their failed request for rollback. -- Liliana • 22:36, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    to be fair: that's old stuff from three and a half years ago ... --Rax (talk) 21:02, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Fastily (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  FASTILY 08:59, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Snaevar (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  No global rights, lacking experience.--Snaevar (talk) 19:17, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  49. 小躍 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  No enough experiences. Eager Lin (Message) 05:18, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Carlotm (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Carlotm (talk) 04:39, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Tulsi Bhagat (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 12:32, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  52. -revi (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Barras' comment is really giving a red light for me. — regards, Revi 17:25, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Fuxx (Eligible, checked by Vogone)2016 •  Fuxx (talk) 18:19, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Az1568 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Az1568 (talk) 02:05, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Coffee (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  — Coffee // have a cup // 16:43, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  56. The Interior (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  The Interior (talk) 16:50, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Rax (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Rax (talk) 21:02, 15 February 2016 (UTC) what you promise to do as a steward and what you did in the past (in interwiki context) doesn't really match - so far ...[reply]
  58. Thogo (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  თოგო (D) 23:47, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Hemeier (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Hemeier (talk) 10:26, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Ringbang (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Ringbang (talk) 21:35, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Courcelles (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Courcelles 22:20, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Berlin-George (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Berlin-George (talk) 00:29, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Dvellakat (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  pakalon (talk) (talk) 09:12, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  64. CaZeRillo (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016 •  CaZeRillo (talk) 09:12, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Kharkiv07 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Kharkiv07 (T) 02:06, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  66. SideshowBob7 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  SideshowBob7 (talk) 12:50, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Qewr4231 (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Qewr4231 (talk) 21:26, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  67. MBurch (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2016 •  MBurch (talk) 03:25, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Octahedron80 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Octahedron80 (talk) 13:24, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Shanmugamp7 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Sorry but I never expected this from you (adding remove comment in the confirmations for the stewards who voted NO here ). IMO this is not a good quality for a steward candidate. Shanmugamp7 (talk) 13:32, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Gross misinterpretation: As a democratic netizen, I exercised my vote. I faced some problems with some of the stewards (mainly language projects) and I've mentioned the reasons in most cases with links/ cases. Therefore, while you can still vote "no" for me, I will appreciate if you erase your statement along with this request. Umpteen thanks in advance and God bless you. --Muzammil (talk) 14:36, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Please note that steward confirmations are not a vote, its a community feedback and commentary, and you have only commented on 6 people who are voted above, out of which 3 are blanket {{remove}} templates. though those comments may not be considered as valid, as i said above, i don't consider this as a good quality for a steward candidate.--Shanmugamp7 (talk) 15:07, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    While I value your opinion, I disagree with the interpretation as 2 cases predate this event and in 1 case I was unnecessarily subjected to CU, where my stand was vindicated.--Muzammil (talk) 15:21, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Ejs-80 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Great language skills and seems to be an enthusiastic guy. However, I’d like to see more admin experience. He has logged 332 admin actions on ur.wikipedia.org with only 11 blocks (per AdminStats tool), and that is not very much for a steward candidate. –Ejs-80 16:16, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Ankry (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  per Shanmugamp7: at least 3 "opinions" there point out that this candidate does not understand the procedure Ankry (talk) 19:38, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Kusurija (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  --Kusurija (talk) 20:10, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Jasper Deng (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  If your platform is cross-wiki anti-abuse activities like CheckUser requests, then you are not yet experienced enough for this role, sorry. Jasper Deng (talk) 22:40, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Cosine02 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Sorry. Stang 05:13, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  75. KTo288 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  KTo288 (talk) 08:26, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  76. PierreSelim (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  PierreSelim (talk) 08:38, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Pradeepabk (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5) •  not neutral Pradeepabk (talk) 11:11, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Wikifreund (Eligible, checked by MarcoAurelio)2016 •  Wikifreund (talk) 16:50, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Magog the Ogre (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016 •  We don't need someone who committed vandalism and engaged in personal attacks[1][2] as a steward. Magog the Ogre (talk) 02:03, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Thank you very much!Thank you very much! for this echo message appreciation of my recent work and reminding about an edit which took place about four year back, when I was a novice to Wikimedia. --Muzammil (talk) 05:04, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    If you are trying to convince people that you are a mature, level-headed and competent choice for stewardship through sarcastic comments like these, then it isn't working. Again, I cannot stress the importance of communication and getting along with others that disagree with you in this role, and really recommend that you work on it if you are elected or plan to run for this again. Ajraddatz (talk) 07:52, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  79. DerekvG (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  --DerekvG (talk) 16:40, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  80. 분당선M (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  DangSunM (talk) 20:14, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Ah3kal (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  —Ah3kal (talk) 08:57, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Timk70 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Timk70 question? 21:36, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Cybularny (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  ~Cybularny Speak? 23:41, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Tegel (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Tegel (Talk) 08:36, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  85. The Traditionalist (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  The Traditionalist (talk) 13:47, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Glaisher (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Glaisher (talk) 17:16, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Styko (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Styko (talk) 07:02, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Saramag (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Saramag (talk) 11:30, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Hobbamock (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Hobbamock (talk) 14:28, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  90. ContributorQ (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  --ContributorQ (talk) 18:28, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  91. Neolexx (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  NeoLexx (talk) 18:29, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  92. Base (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  It looks that the majority of x-wiki edits are from File moves on Commons rather than from CVN activity. I would like the user to become more active in the anti-vandal vanguard before he becomes a steward. I am of positive opinion about the user though so it's very likely that I'll be pro if he improves by the next SE. Base (talk) 12:07, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  93. Ireas (Eligible, checked by Mh7kJ)2016 •  Ireas (talk) 13:47, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral[edit]

  1. Laurent Jerry (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  I don't support neither reject. --Laurent Jerry (talk) 14:19, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Southparkfan (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Partially per MF-W. Southparkfan 14:23, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Tommy Kronkvist (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Tommy Kronkvist (talk) 14:55, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Flyingfischer (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Flyingfischer (talk) 18:21, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5. NickK (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  I could have supported because of good language skills and a reasonably good experience, but I could have opposed because of not very convincing answers, hence a neutral vote — NickK (talk) 01:49, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Hedwig in Washington (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  I think Muzammil should focus on projects using Urdu. There aren't many folks who actually want to do spam and vandal control. On the other hand I believe that Muzammil would be a good steward. I'd rather see the Urdu-projects evolve, tho. Hedwig in Washington (talk) 03:57, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  Jianhui67 talk★contribs 06:48, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Vinckie (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  Vinckie (talk) 12:38, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Trijnstel (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  Don't know this user well and also not that convinced. Neutral for now. Trijnsteltalk 13:19, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Lsanabria (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Lsanabria (talk) 14:00, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    You speaks many languages but your join year is at five year ago and this experience is very low. Sodeif (talk) 18:29, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Ghiutun (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016 •  per NickK. Ghiutun 22:41, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Bluerasberry (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Discussed with others. I worked with this user. I appreciate his outreach to Indian projects. Blue Rasberry (talk) 20:49, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Csyogi (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Csyogi (talk) 06:50, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Wagino 20100516 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Wagino 20100516 (talk) 23:48, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Ferran Mir (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Ferran Mir (talk) 07:38, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  16. GZWDer (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  GZWDer (talk) 19:32, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Magawla61 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Magawla61 (talk) 13:07, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Pgallert (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  (Second thoughts... that incident was years ago. Moving to neutral. --Pgallert (talk) 19:29, 15 February 2016 (UTC)) Nice guy, very committed, have met him. But I can only shake my head on the discussion that preceded this, sorry. Pgallert (talk) 19:10, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  19. AdiMind (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  AdiMind (talk) 18:09, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Indu (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  --Indu (talk) 22:30, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Fordmadoxfraud (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016 •  Ford MF (talk) 06:20, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Maleine258 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Maleine258 (talk) 13:07, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Wetterwolke (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  Wetterwolke (talk) 19:49, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Sanmosa (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  I have nothing to ask, and I am confused of everyone and everything, so neutral. Sanmosa (talk) 00:42, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Kadavr2000 (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Kadavr2000 (talk) 18:38, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Jo-Jo Eumerus (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Experience issues mentioned in the first oppose, basically. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 13:52, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  27. The Banner (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2016 •  The Banner (talk) 14:10, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  28. VictorBrice (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  VictorBrice (talk) 20:31, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Vimaparo147 (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5) •  Vimaparo147 (talk) 11:11, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Vachovec1 (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  Vachovec1 (talk) 01:29, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Mazuritz (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Mazuritz (talk) 11:00, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Bernd Bergmann (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Bernd Bergmann (talk) 19:58, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Ysjbserver (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  ysjbserver (talk) 07:41, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/Elections_2016/Votes/Hindustanilanguage&oldid=15564631"