Steward requests/Permissions: Difference between revisions

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Browse history interactively
← Older editNewer edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Line 326: Line 326:
:{{done}} -- [[User:Quentinv57|Quentinv57]] [[User talk:Quentinv57|<small><sup>(talk)</sup></small>]] 11:23, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
:{{done}} -- [[User:Quentinv57|Quentinv57]] [[User talk:Quentinv57|<small><sup>(talk)</sup></small>]] 11:23, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
:Noting for eventual future reference the local inactivity page listing the user, [https://pl.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administratorzy/Odbieranie_uprawnie%C5%84/Nieaktywno%C5%9B%C4%87&oldid=30081094]. <i><b>[[User:Snowolf|<font color = "darkmagenta">Snowolf</font>]] <sup><small>[[User talk:Snowolf|<font color = "darkmagenta">How can I help?</font>]]</small></sup></b></i> 11:24, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
:Noting for eventual future reference the local inactivity page listing the user, [https://pl.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administratorzy/Odbieranie_uprawnie%C5%84/Nieaktywno%C5%9B%C4%87&oldid=30081094]. <i><b>[[User:Snowolf|<font color = "darkmagenta">Snowolf</font>]] <sup><small>[[User talk:Snowolf|<font color = "darkmagenta">How can I help?</font>]]</small></sup></b></i> 11:24, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

==== MichaelDiederich@de.wikipedia ====
{{sr-request
|status = <!--don't change this line-->
|domain = de.wikipedia
|user name = MichaelDiederich
|discussion= <!-- local confirmation link / local policy link -->
}}
Due to our policy, I hereby request removal of sysop access due to inactivity for more than a year. User has been notified 92 days ago. --[[User:Unbekannter Benutzer|Unbekannter Benutzer]] ([[User talk:Unbekannter Benutzer|talk]]) 17:51, 3 March 2012 (UTC)


=== Miscellaneous requests ===
=== Miscellaneous requests ===

Revision as of 17:51, 3 March 2012

Shortcut:
SRP

This page is for requests to have stewards grant or revoke administrator, bureaucrat, checkuser, and oversight rights on Wikimedia projects which do not have a local permissions procedure.

Old sections are archived. The list of archives is below.

  • Requests for bot flags are handled at SRB, and requests for global permissions are handled at SRGP.
  • If you are requesting adminship or bureaucratship, and your wiki has a local bureaucrat, submit your request to that user or to the relevant local request page (index).
  • For urgent requests, such as to combat large-scale vandalism on a small wiki, contact a steward in the #wikimedia-stewardsconnect IRC channel. In emergencies, type !steward in the channel to get the attention of stewards. Otherwise, you can type @steward for non-urgent help.

Other than requests to remove your own access or emergencies, please only make requests here after gaining the on-wiki approval of your local community.

Quick navigation: Administrator | Interface administrator | Bureaucrat | CheckUser | Oversight | Removal of access | Miscellaneous | Global permissions

(translate | edit)

Cross-wiki requests
Meta-Wiki requests

Using this page

1. Place the following code at the bottom of the appropriate section below: 

==== Username@xxproject ====
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!-- don't change this line -->
 |domain    = <!-- such as en.wikibooks -->
 |user name = 
 |discussion= 
}}
(your remarks) ~~~~

2. Fill in the values:

  • domain: the wiki's URL domain (like "ex.wikipedia" or "meta.wikimedia").
  • user name: the name of the user whose rights are to be changed (like "Exampleuser"). In case you're requesting access for multiple bots, leave this field blank and give a list of these bots in your remarks
  • discussion: a link to the local vote or discussion about the rights change (for example, "[[ex:Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship#ExampleUser]]"). This should normally be for at least one week, but no more than three weeks (if so, you'll need to restart the process).

3. If anything is missing from your request, a steward will request more information.

Confirmation of signing confidentiality agreement

Certain permissions (notably CheckUser and Oversight) additionally require users to sign a confidentiality agreement. Users requesting these permissions must make a request below, and must also sign the confidentiality agreement with the Wikimedia Foundation. The request is placed on hold temporarily, until the receipt has been formally confirmed by the Office.

Requests

COPY THE FOLLOWING CODE to the bottom of the appropriate section below: 

==== Username@xxproject ====
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!--don't change this line-->
 |domain    =
 |user name =
 |discussion= 
}}

Administrator access

Steward requests/Permissions/Sysop-header

Хомелка@be.wiktionary

Status:    Done

Good day, I ask to give me a temporary administrator's status for the term is about 3 months. I am an administrator in the be.wikipedia is about 1.5 years, also endorsed my candidacy for the status of the administrator and bureaucrat to being created now be.wikisource. The status of the administrator in be.wictionary will become a logical continuation of my work for the development of Belarusian-language sector of Wikimedia projects. Since the activity of the project is very low, in fact it is almost absent, then spend the discussion is not possible. Хомелка (talk) 10:04, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Did you put a notification on bewiktionary that you want to be sysop for 3 months ? -- Quentinv57 (talk) 10:22, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, the fact that you placed your request at the wrong place doesn't make it trustfully ... a×pdeHello! 10:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I do not deny that it is not very well know English, so I figured out a little on the page requests. This does not prevent me well enough to know the Belarusian and Russian languages​​, to be quite good and active administrator. But, of course, the final decision to accept Stuarts :). I left post on the community-page.--Хомелка (talk) 16:39, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 On hold till 3 March 2012 -- Quentinv57 (talk) 11:37, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2012-06-03. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. -- Quentinv57 (talk) 11:49, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mohau@nsowikipedia

Status:    In progress

Please extend my adminship. Thanks, Mohau (talk) 11:18, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please make a local announcement on your local village pump or request for adminship page. Thanks. Bencmq (talk) 12:06, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reder@roa-tara.wikipedia

Status:    On hold

Hi, roa-tara is my home wiki, I count more than 10.000 edits and I'm an admin here by more than two years. I have already passed various elections and reconfirmations but the community isn't large enough to have a good number of votes, so I always had to have a temporary administrator access. I would ask if you can to grant me a permanent access. If you can't, I kindly ask you to renew my access for another year. Thank you in advance. --Reder (talk) 18:56, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please leave a note on the community page for this year. As long as there are no opposes, extension should not be an issue. --Jyothis (talk)

 On hold until 7 March, see the new vote for this year. Trijnstel (talk) 16:25, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

BarkingFish@tpi.wikipedia

Status:    On hold

Hi again Stewards. As you probably know, I used to be an admin on the Tok Pisin wikipedia, and was so until my resignation for medical and personal reasons last September. I'm now fit and well, getting better by the day, and ready to resume my duties there if you'd be willing to regrant my permissions. Tok Pisin Wikipedia is still a very small wiki, but growing slowly in Human Editors, and I have no doubt that soon, we will be able to wake up the local RFA process. Regards, BarkingFish (talk) 02:00, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please wait for a week to get inputs from community if any. --Jyothis (talk) 02:07, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bhawani Gautam@ne.wiktionary

Status:    On hold

Hi. As you know, I used to be an admin on the Nepali Wiktionary,now my term has expired please extend my admship for next one year if possible as there are enough no enough users to discuss to choose sysop.Bhawani (talk) 15:56, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please post a local announcement. You'll get another temporary term if there are no objections. Bencmq (talk) 16:00, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Please see hereBhawani (talk) 16:15, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
February 2011 ? That's quite old... I guess he's asking you for a new request, not the old one that expired. -- Quentinv57 (talk) 16:21, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 On hold until 8 March. (@Quentin, see this edit, he just posted it.) Trijnstel (talk) 16:23, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bureaucrat access

Steward requests/Permissions/Crat-header

CheckUser access

Steward requests/Permissions/CU-header

Salvio giuliano@enwiki

Status:    Done

Thank you, –xeno 18:14, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Jyothis (talk) 18:18, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ponyo@enwiki

Status:    Done

The Helpful One 19:24, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done Matanya (talk) 19:32, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

विकिजी@hi.wikipedia

Status:    Not done

To prevent from getting blocked by your edits when we edit we some time get blocked. Sock Puppets may be created if don't get confirmed so therefore this user want to be checkeduser.. (विकिजी | talk | Contribs) 16:16, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Did you mean that you want to be come a checkuser? --Jyothis (talk) 12:20, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes!! Sorry!! — The preceding unsigned comment was added by विकिजी (talk) 12:25, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I moved this request here from the CU request page. Snowolf How can I help? 12:30, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Switched the targed user from the inexisted ali user to विकि, per user reply to Jyothis above. Snowolf How can I help? 12:32, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Fixed the user, you appear to have only 88 edits across all wikimedia projects. The CheckUser tool is an advanced userrights generally only granted to experienced administrators. In any case, you would need to start a local discussion about it, there would need to be two users at least elected as CheckUsers, and you would need to identify to the Wikimedia foundation. You should start a local discussion about this, and file the request here only after its has been completed successfully. I have marked this request as not done as it to say the least highly unlikely that a user with 35 edits on a project would ever be granted such an advanced permission. Snowolf How can I help? 12:41, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Means i must have edited at lease 35 edits after that i will be able to be checked user?? — The preceding unsigned comment was added by विकिजी (talk) 14:25, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No, that means that you need to understand what this is all about before you gain a community's trust to get a bit of any kind. You have a long way to go. --Jyothis (talk) 12:59, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK that's OK — The preceding unsigned comment was added by विकिजी (talk) 13:46, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I have reverted your removal of this discussion and alteration of the status, please refrain from performing such actions. Snowolf How can I help? 14:58, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oversight access

To request to have content oversighted, ask in #wikimedia-stewards, or email oversight-l@lists.wikimedia.org for requests regarding English Wikipedia. This is the place to request Oversight access. Note that temporary Oversight access is not permitted and the temporary status is only used by Stewards.

Stewards
Do not grant Oversight access unless the user is identified to the foundation, which will be announced on the Identification noticeboard. When you give someone oversight access, list them on Oversight.

Salvio giuliano@enwiki

Status:    Done

Thank you, –xeno 18:14, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Jyothis (talk) 18:19, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ponyo@enwiki

Status:    Done

The Helpful One 19:24, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed, for the Arbitration Committee. Courcelles (talk) 19:30, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Done use it wisely. best Matanya (talk) 19:31, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of access

<translate>

  • If you're requesting the removal of your own permissions, make sure you're logged in to your account. If you have multiple flags, specify which you want removed. Stewards may delay your request a short time to ensure you have time to rethink your request (see [[<tvar name="self-discussion">Talk:Steward_requests/Permissions/2011#Self_requests</tvar>|previous discussion]] on 24 hour delays); the rights will not be restored by stewards once they are removed.
  • To request the removal of another user's permissions, you must gain consensus on the local wiki first. When there is community consensus that the user's access should be removed, provide a link to the discussion, with a brief explanation of the reason for the request, and summarize the results of discussion. However, as bureaucrats of some wikis may remove users from the administrator or bureaucrat group, please see also a [[<tvar name="crat-rem">Bureaucrat#Removing_access</tvar>|separate list of these specific wikis]].
  • To request the removal of another user's permissions for inactivity, link to your local inactivity policy. If your site does not have inactivity policy, the global policy [[<tvar name="aar">Admin activity review</tvar>|Admin activity review]] applies.
  • See the [[<tvar name="usage">#Using this page</tvar>|instructions above]] for adding new requests. Please post new requests at the bottom of the section.</translate>

Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt@ptwikinews

Status:    Done

I think this is the last time... Thank you guys. --- @lestaty discuţie 03:06, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

On hold for 24 hours. PeterSymonds (talk) 08:59, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Done removing your bureaucrat flag based on your statement and intent. Just to ascertain, do you also want to quit the administrator flag?--Jusjih (talk) 11:47, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I'm leaving from wmf. Please remove sysop flag too. Thanks - @lestaty discuţie 13:28, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Done thanks for your time and efforts. Matanya (talk) 13:29, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

EugeneZelenko@be-x-old.wikipedia

Status:    Done

Self-resignation. Please revoke my bureaucrat and administrator rights. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:47, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done. MBisanz talk 03:27, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for help! --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pedroca cerebral@ptwiki

Status:    Done

Please, remove my sysop status. --PcTalk 00:13, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 On hold for 24 hours as usual. Snowolf How can I help? 00:15, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Okay. PcTalk 00:47, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Done, thank you for your time and efforts and best of luck in your endeavors. Snowolf How can I help? 04:16, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

LarryGilbert@en.wikisource

Status:    Done

Failed annual reconfirmation. Hesperian 05:55, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Snowolf How can I help? 05:59, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Klemen Kocjancic@slwiki

Status:    Done

Based on the results of voting (see section Results of voting), I request removal of administrator status for user Klemen Kocjancic. Regards, --Deviator13 (talk) 15:55, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Bencmq (talk) 16:00, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

str4nd@commonswiki

Status:    Done

The inactivity run of Feb-Mar 2012 on Commons has ended, and this is one of 6 admins who haven't signed therefore will lose adminship --Morning Sunshine (talk) 04:27, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bastique@commonswiki

Status:    Done

The inactivity run of Feb-Mar 2012 on Commons has ended, and this is one of 6 admins who haven't signed therefore will lose adminship --Morning Sunshine (talk) 04:27, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done by Mentifisto some hours ago. --Vituzzu (talk) 09:58, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew c@commonswiki

Status:    Done

The inactivity run of Feb-Mar 2012 on Commons has ended, and this is one of 6 admins who haven't signed therefore will lose adminship --Morning Sunshine (talk) 04:27, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bureaucrat comment: Yes, procedure has been followed, and user has not used admin tools. --99of9 (talk) 10:09, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Snowolf How can I help? 10:21, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Admrboltz@commonswiki

Status:    Done

The inactivity run of Feb-Mar 2012 on Commons has ended, and this is one of 6 admins who haven't signed therefore will lose adminship --Morning Sunshine (talk) 04:27, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Something went wrong :|
--Vituzzu (talk) 09:54, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Bureaucrat comment: No, that's not a problem, it's his choice how often to archive his talk page. I confirm that he has been long inactive, and has not responded to the message, which was correctly placed according to the procedure. --99of9 (talk) 10:04, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Done -- Quentinv57 (talk) 11:28, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dodo@commonswiki

Status:    Done

The inactivity run of Feb-Mar 2012 on Commons has ended, and this is one of 6 admins who haven't signed therefore will lose adminship --Morning Sunshine (talk) 04:27, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bureaucrat comment: I confirm that he only used logged admin tools once in the period, and has not responded to request continuation. --99of9 (talk) 10:16, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Done -- Quentinv57 (talk) 10:20, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Szczepan1990@commonswiki

Status:    Done

The inactivity run of Feb-Mar 2012 on Commons has ended, and this is one of 6 admins who haven't signed therefore will lose adminship --Morning Sunshine (talk) 04:27, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bureaucrat comment: I confirm that the procedure has been followed, and the status can be removed. The user has used admin rights once since notification, so I assume they have overlooked the message (seemingly along with quite a few others on their talk page), and perhaps they will reapply for adminship. Babel indicates en-2, so the notification in English was ok. --99of9 (talk) 10:24, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Done -- Quentinv57 (talk) 10:28, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

יוסאריאן@hewiki

Status:    Done

Based on the results of voting, I request removal of administrator status for user יוסאריאן. Regards, יוסאריאן (talk) 09:05, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hewiki has 3 local bureaucrats, which should probably close the discussion and determine the consensus. If I understand it correctly, the policy specifies that it's a discussion and not a vote, and local crats are fairly active. These are just my two cents and if other stewards feel they can determine consensus themselves, they should feel free to ignore my comments here. Snowolf How can I help? 09:35, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, quite. Not done at this venue; please wait for a local bureaucrat. PeterSymonds (talk) 09:52, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion stoped because יוסאריאן decided to remove his sysop rights, so there was no need for the bureaucrats to close the discussion and determine the consensus. Neukoln (talk) 10:03, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Done as a self-request. --Vituzzu (talk) 10:09, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wames@pl.wikipedia

Status:    Done

Due to our policy, I hereby request removal of sysop acces due to inactivity in main namespace longer than one year. User has been notified two weeks earlier. --Abronikowski (talk) 11:16, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done -- Quentinv57 (talk) 11:23, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Noting for eventual future reference the local inactivity page listing the user, [11]. Snowolf How can I help? 11:24, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orlica@pl.wikipedia

Status:    Done

Due to our policy, I hereby request removal of sysop acces due to inactivity in main namespace longer than one year. User has been notified two weeks earlier. --Abronikowski (talk) 11:16, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done -- Quentinv57 (talk) 11:23, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Noting for eventual future reference the local inactivity page listing the user, [12]. Snowolf How can I help? 11:24, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

MichaelDiederich@de.wikipedia

Status:    In progress

Due to our policy, I hereby request removal of sysop access due to inactivity for more than a year. User has been notified 92 days ago. --Unbekannter Benutzer (talk) 17:51, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Miscellaneous requests

Steward requests/Permissions/Misc-header

See also

Steward requests/Permissions/Footer

Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steward_requests/Permissions&oldid=3533158"