Jump to content

Steward requests/Permissions: Difference between revisions

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Browse history interactively
← Older editNewer edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Line 226: Line 226:
:{{done}}
:{{done}}
:--[[User:M7|M/]] 20:44, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
:--[[User:M7|M/]] 20:44, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
==== Ataraxie@fr.wikipedia ====
{{sr-request
|status = <!-- don't change this line -->
|domain = fr.wikipedia
|user name = Ataraxie
|discussion= Please remove my administrator rights. Thank you. --[[User:Ataraxie|Ataraxie]] 16:47, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
}}


=== Miscellaneous requests ===
=== Miscellaneous requests ===

Revision as of 16:47, 12 October 2009

Shortcut:
SRP

This page is for requests to have stewards grant or revoke administrator, bureaucrat, checkuser, and oversight rights on Wikimedia projects which do not have a local permissions procedure. Minimum voting requirement are listed here.

Old sections are archived. The list of archives is below.

  • Requests for bot flags are handled at SRB, and requests for global permissions are handled at SRGP.
  • If you are requesting adminship or bureaucratship, and your wiki has a local bureaucrat, submit your request to that user or to the relevant local request page (index).
  • For urgent requests, such as to combat large-scale vandalism on a small wiki, contact a steward in the #wikimedia-stewardsconnect IRC channel. In emergencies, type !steward in the channel to get the attention of stewards. Otherwise, you can type @steward for non-urgent help.

Other than requests to remove your own access or emergencies, please only make requests here after gaining the on-wiki approval of your local community.

Quick navigation: Administrator | Interface administrator | Bureaucrat | CheckUser | Oversight | Removal of access | Miscellaneous | Global permissions

(translate | edit)

Cross-wiki requests
Meta-Wiki requests

Using this page

1. Place the following code at the bottom of the appropriate section below: 

==== Username@xxproject ====
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!-- Don't change this line -->
 |domain    = <!-- Such as en.wikibooks -->
 |user name = 
 |discussion= 
}}
(your remarks) ~~~~

2. Fill in the values:

  • domain: the wiki's URL domain (like "ex.wikipedia" or "meta.wikimedia").
  • user name: the name of the user whose rights are to be changed (like "Exampleuser"). In case this is for multiple users, leave this field blank and give a list of these users in your remarks.
  • discussion: a link to the local vote or discussion about the rights change (for example, "[[ex:Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship#ExampleUser]]"). This should normally be for at least one week, but no more than three weeks (if so, you'll need to restart the process).

3. If anything is missing from your request, a steward will request more information.

Confirmation of signing confidentiality agreement

Certain permissions (notably CheckUser and Oversight) additionally require users to sign a confidentiality agreement. Users requesting these permissions must make a request below, and must also sign the confidentiality agreement with the Wikimedia Foundation. The request is placed on hold temporarily, until the receipt has been formally confirmed by the Office.

Requests

COPY THE FOLLOWING CODE to the bottom of the appropriate section below: 

==== user name@xxproject ====
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!--don't change this line-->
 |domain    =
 |user name =
 |discussion= 
}}

Administrator access

See administrator for information about the position. Requests for removal of access belong in another section. Admins doing cross-wiki work may wish to see IRC/wikimedia-admin for information about joining #wikimedia-admin.

If you are requesting administrator status to translate the wiki interface, this should be done at the BetaWiki project instead (see mw:localisation). You can ask questions in the IRC channel or on the mailing list.

If you are requesting adminship to handle one-time vandalism incidents or clearing a deletion backlog, please see Vandalism reports and Steward requests/Speedy deletions.

Stewards
Currently-active temporary permissions are listed at /Approved temporary; copy granted requests to the appropriate section there, stating the date of removal in the section header and at the bottom of the request. Please invite new sysops to the admin IRC channel.
Archiving
Requests only need remain listed below for a few days, and may afterward be removed as long as they have been copied to the subpage. Users who archive requests on that page, please check if the request was correctly added to the temporary subpage before removing it from this page.

For permanent sysopship please provide a link to the local community approval. For temporary sysopship please state for how long and for which tasks you need it, and link to a local announcement.


Barras@simplewq

Status:    Done

Done for one week. Effeietsanders 10:27, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Barras 10:27, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Masterches@htwiki

Status:    Done

MasterChes

link to the page : http://ht.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedya:Paj_Kominote#Sesyon_2009

I tend to decline this. You have not been active on the wiki in the past 3 months. And please inform the community before you request temp sysopship. The page you linked only contains your request from June 2009. --თოგო (D) 10:44, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
i follow the contributions made on the wiki and bring enhancements each time it is possible-you can look at my homepage to see the work that has been done; i should log in before each contributions of mine in order to have higher statistics ...
many things have been done to maintain contributions on the wiki but the community is still poor; there are a small increasing on anonymous contributions but the take-off is not spectacular yet.
Please remember to sign your posts with "~~~~", it sets a good example as you grow your community. I agree with Thogo that you should be a visible contributor to the wiki you want a temporary adminship on... Perhaps it's as simple as remembering to log in so we can see your work. Perhaps come back in a few weeks? ++Lar: t/c 01:07, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
i don't know why coming back in a few weeks, my contributions are on my homepage (homepage), on my discussion panel (ht:Diskisyon_Itilizatè:Masterches), on the log there ([1]); i'm not an inexperienced user ...it's my fourth application for this post and the reasons invoqued each time for not having a longer adminship are "community is too small to give you more than 6 or 3 months"; do explain me what the problem is now... Masterches 10:35, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Because when we go to your contribs on htwiki we see only 5 edits since June. That's not very many. If you aren't working there much or at all, do you need a temp sysopship there? I'd be inclined to say no. But you also said you were contributing but forgot to log in.... so, try to remember to log in and come back in a few weeks so we can see what you do there, that's my thinking. Other stewards may have a different view. ++Lar: t/c
Done to expire on 2010-01-12. Please use edit summaries more often as well.--Jusjih 02:57, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hanberke@tk.wiktionary

Status:    In progress

Please extend my 3-month temporary sysop status for, if possible, 6 months. --Hanberke 04:36, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You just started asking on 2009-10-10. I would like to wait until 2009-10-17.--Jusjih 03:04, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bureaucrat access

See bureaucrat for information about the position. In principle, requests for temporary bureaucrat access are not granted.


Si Gam Acèh@acewikipedia

Status:    Not done

I request as bureaucrat please. Si Gam Acèh 08:32, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Another request... ace.wiki has only one sysop, relatively small community, in my opinion it's not enough for granting bureaucrat access. Other opinions? LeinaD (t) 15:17, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. Seems too soon. We can easily take care of things from Meta in the meantime. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 22:05, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Not done for having only one administrator and limited active users. Please do not feel discouraged.--Jusjih 03:08, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CheckUser access

To request CheckUser information, see Meta:Requests for CheckUser information. This is the place to request CheckUser access. Note that temporary CheckUser access is not permitted and the temporary status is only used by Stewards.

Stewards
When someone asks for CheckUser status, please check the current policy before giving the status. There is an email template to request identification from the new CU. Do not grant CU access unless the user is identified to the Foundation. Breaching these rules may be cause for removing your steward access. When you give someone CheckUser, please list them on CheckUser, ask them to subscribe to checkuser-l, email checkuser-l-owner@lists.wikimedia.org so the listadmins know the person is allowed on the mailing list, and make sure they contact an op for access to #wikimedia-checkuser.

Oversight access

To request to have content oversighted
Ask in #wikimedia-stewards, or email oversight-l@lists.wikimedia.org for requests regarding English Wikipedia.
Note that this section is the place to request Oversight access. Note that temporary Oversight access is not permitted and the temporary status is only used by stewards.
Stewards
Do not grant Oversight access unless the user is identified to the foundation, which will be announced on the Identification noticeboard. When you give someone oversight access, list them on Oversight.

Removal of access

If you're requesting the removal of your own status, make sure you're logged in to a global account.

To request the removal of another user's status, you must gain consensus on the local wiki first. All discussion must take place on your local wiki. When there is community consensus that the user's access should be removed, a trusted person from that wiki should provide a link here to the discussion, a brief explanation of the reason for the request, and summarize the results of discussion. In either case, copy and paste the following text into the correct section (see instructions above). 

==== username@xxproject ====
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!-- don't change this line -->
 |domain    = 
 |user name =  
 |discussion= <!-- local confirmation link / local policy link -->
}}

Tubaist@sv.wikipedia

Status:    In progress

Abigor@Simple.wikibooks

Status:    Done

I guess they don't need me as admin anymore sinds they already removed my ip block exept what means I cant edit any longer there, I'm pretty much done with that project is starting to look like a big sandbox. Huib talk 20:28, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Status removed. LeinaD (t) 20:35, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sirmelle@bs.wiki

Status:    Done
Please remove sysop rights. User vote himselve for desysoping (Amer Zeherovic=Sirmelle), explanation on village pump, he has no time for Wikipedia at the moment. THX --Seha 13:12, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Just to confirm that Sirmelle did indeed write that he wants his rights removed. --FiliP ██ 13:15, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Cspurrier 20:18, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sysops@huwikipedia

Status:    In progress

The community opted for a new rule in hu.wikipedia – voted and approved here –, that any sysop with less than 10 actions in the last 12 months or no action at all in the last 6 months must be desysopped. There will be a grace period of 3 months starting from September 28, 2009 for inactive admins to reactivate themselves.

But from all the sysops in this condition, 2 had specifically indicated that they have no time for WP at the moment & for the near future, namely:

So please remove their sysop rights. Thx. Bennó 20:30, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

To confirm that Dhanak didn't want to retain his sysop rights: [2].
That one done, waiting for confirmation of NCurses's resignation. Kind regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 17:02, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Tietew@ja.wikibooks

Status:    Done

It is sad for me to request for removing Tietew's sysop/bureaucrat status. Per our latest reconfirmation votes for admins, b:ja:User:Tietew got more removes than keeps, i.e. 4 removes and only 2 keeps. Our policy provides for removing admins who get more 解任 (remove) votes than 留任 (keep) votes (「解任」票数が「留任」票数を上回った場合は解任). In other words, an admin needs at least 50% supports to be reconfirmed. At ja.wikibooks, Tietew has been quite inactive for more than two years. Thank you. --Kanjy 12:38, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done--Cspurrier 20:21, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
sobbing Thanks... --Kanjy 07:57, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Danutz@rowiki

Status:    Done

I donnot have enough time to keep up with Wikipedia anymore. So I ask you to remove my bureaucrat and sysop rights from the Romanian Wikipedia. Thank you. --Danutz 16:02, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done. LeinaD (t) 16:07, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GlassCobra@en.wikipedia

Status:    Done

Removal of sysop rights, as per Arbitration Committee motion. (Please refer to Motion 3 of case "Disclosure of known alternate accounts".)

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Manning 14:49, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done
--M/ 14:52, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

PauloHelene@strategy.wikimedia

Status:    Done
Done
--M/ 20:44, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ataraxie@fr.wikipedia

Status:    In progress

Miscellaneous requests

Requests that don't fit in other sections belong here. Import rights can be granted by stewards only, not bureaucrats, so the automatic list of local bureaucrats is irrelevant for this. Please gather community consensus before placing a link to the discussion here.

Note that the following types of requests belong on separate pages:


Steward requests/Permissions/Footer

Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steward_requests/Permissions&oldid=1671512"