Jump to content

Steward requests/Permissions: Difference between revisions

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Browse history interactively
← Older editNewer edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
m 3 requests archived
→Removal of access: resigning as steward soon
Line 210: Line 210:
Ditto.--[[user:Kegns|K]][[user_talk:Kegns|egns]] 13:53, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
Ditto.--[[user:Kegns|K]][[user_talk:Kegns|egns]] 13:53, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
:{{done}} - Please thank them for all their work as admin. - [[User:Taketa|Taketa]] ([[User talk:Taketa|talk]]) 18:49, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
:{{done}} - Please thank them for all their work as admin. - [[User:Taketa|Taketa]] ([[User talk:Taketa|talk]]) 18:49, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

==== Jusjih as steward ====
{{sr-request
|status = <!--don't change this line-->
|domain = meta.wikimedia<!-- such as en.wikibook -->
|user name =Jusjih
|discussion= resigning as steward
}}
I am resigning as a steward, effective 2015-12-12T12:12:12Z. I will better concentrate on being an administrator here on Meta and 11 other wikis.[[User:Jusjih|Jusjih]] ([[User talk:Jusjih|talk]]) 01:47, 10 December 2015 (UTC)


=== Miscellaneous requests ===
=== Miscellaneous requests ===

Revision as of 01:47, 10 December 2015

Shortcut:
SRP

This page is for requests to have stewards grant or revoke administrator, bureaucrat, checkuser, and oversight rights on Wikimedia projects which do not have a local permissions procedure. Minimum voting requirement are listed here.

Old sections are archived. The list of archives is below.

  • Requests for bot flags are handled at SRB, and requests for global permissions are handled at SRGP.
  • If you are requesting adminship or bureaucratship, and your wiki has a local bureaucrat, submit your request to that user or to the relevant local request page (index).
  • For urgent requests, such as to combat large-scale vandalism on a small wiki, contact a steward in the #wikimedia-stewardsconnect IRC channel. In emergencies, type !steward in the channel to get the attention of stewards. Otherwise, you can type @steward for non-urgent help.

Other than requests to remove your own access or emergencies, please only make requests here after gaining the on-wiki approval of your local community.

Quick navigation: Administrator | Interface administrator | Bureaucrat | CheckUser | Oversight | Removal of access | Miscellaneous | Global permissions

(translate | edit)

Cross-wiki requests
Meta-Wiki requests

Using this page

1. Place the following code at the bottom of the appropriate section below: 

==== Username@xxproject ====
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!-- Don't change this line -->
 |domain    = <!-- Such as en.wikibooks -->
 |user name = 
 |discussion= 
}}
(your remarks) ~~~~

2. Fill in the values:

  • domain: the wiki's URL domain (like "ex.wikipedia" or "meta.wikimedia").
  • user name: the name of the user whose rights are to be changed (like "Exampleuser"). In case this is for multiple users, leave this field blank and give a list of these users in your remarks.
  • discussion: a link to the local vote or discussion about the rights change (for example, "[[ex:Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship#ExampleUser]]"). This should normally be for at least one week, but no more than three weeks (if so, you'll need to restart the process).

3. If anything is missing from your request, a steward will request more information.

Confirmation of signing confidentiality agreement

Certain permissions (notably CheckUser and Oversight) additionally require users to sign a confidentiality agreement. Users requesting these permissions must make a request below, and must also sign the confidentiality agreement with the Wikimedia Foundation. The request is placed on hold temporarily, until the receipt has been formally confirmed by the Office.

Requests

COPY THE FOLLOWING CODE to the bottom of the appropriate section below: 

==== User name@xxproject ====
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!--don't change this line-->
 |domain    =
 |user name =
 |discussion= 
}}

Administrator access

See Administrator for information about this user group.

  • MediaWiki interface translations are done at translatewiki.net. Please do not request administrator access solely for that purpose; your request will be declined.
  • Stewards: Please use {{Systmp}} for approved temporary requests.

Requests for removal of access should be posted at the section below.

Please start a new discussion about requesting the permission on the local village pump, administrators' noticeboard or a designated page for requesting permissions each time you request or renew adminship.

  • Discussions should be open for seven days. Please request adminship here seven days after discussions started. This page is not the place for any discussions or votes. (For wikis with few active users, it is OK to have no comments.)
  • If you only want adminship for specific tasks, please state for how long and for which tasks you need it. Otherwise stewards will decide whether to assign permanent adminship and the duration of adminship. See Steward requests/Permissions/Minimum voting requirements.

AzChanna@Sd.Wikipedia

Status:    In progress

I am already admin on sd wiki and i want to adminship for life:-- AzChanna (talk) 14:03, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Is actually a consensus in this discussion? Only three !votes? Ruslik (talk) 20:41, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Where is the request? The link given above was last edited 2 months ago. --Stryn (talk) 15:10, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, AzChanna, the discussion you posted was for the first election (Steward_requests/Permissions/Approved_temporary#AzChanna.40sdwiki) which expired on 14 Nov 2015. Usually, after the temporary adminship expires, you start another discussion for a permanent adminship [there is no "adminship for life" ;)].
Vote wise, considering this is a small wiki with 4,000-ish content, and 30-something active users, 3 votes are not that unusual for wiki of that size. ✒ Bennylin 13:39, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
If the community hasn't grown, it is more likely we will extend your temporary adminship. Savhñ 14:06, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@AzChanna, please file a new request to extend your temporary adminship. Savhñ 14:53, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@AzChanna, please file a new local request to have your temporary adminship extended. Apologies for the confusion caused by the previous message. Savhñ 01:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Joxemai@eu.wikibooks

Status:    On hold
 On hold until 15 Dec - Taketa (talk) 17:32, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Joxemai@eu.wiktionary

Status:    On hold
 On hold until 15 Dec - Taketa (talk) 17:32, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

gitartha.bordoloi@as.wikisource

Status:    On hold

I request you to grant me sysop right for 3 more months. Thanks. Gitartha.bordoloi (talk) 18:20, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 On hold until 15 Dec - Taketa (talk) 21:26, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Renessaince@be.wikisource

Status:    On hold

Prolongation after temporary rights were given. --Renessaince (talk) 21:51, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Renessaince, you posted under the old topic on be.wikisource. Please open a new request instead, so it is more visible. The same as last time. All the best, Taketa (talk) 06:22, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
OK. --Renessaince (talk) 21:14, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 On hold until 16 Dec - Taketa (talk) 21:23, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

555@ptwikisource

Status:    On hold

I would like to renew my sysop term on pt.Wikisource. Lugusto • ※ 01:36, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 On hold until 16 Dec - Taketa (talk) 06:25, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

David1010@ka.wikibooks

Status:    In progress

I would like to renew my sysop rights on Georgian Wikibooks. David1010 (talk) 08:18, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi David1010, please post a local request. And provide us with a link. After a week we can check if there is enough support, or at least no real objections. Sincerely, Taketa (talk) 11:58, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

唐吉訶德的侍從@cdo.wikipedia

Status:    On hold

I request you to grant me sysop right. Thx. el caballero de los Leones (talk) 10:34, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your bureaucrat GnuDoyng was active 2 weeks ago. Please ask him to appoint you admin. We only act if he does not respond. Sincerely, Taketa (talk) 12:09, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Taketa: Okay, i have sent him an e-mail to notice him. But, his life seems very busy because he had no contributions from 11 August 2013 to 16 November 2015 [2]. If he didn't reply me, when can i request here next time?--el caballero de los Leones (talk) 14:22, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I have also posted a note on his talk page. Let's give it a week, that should be enough time to respond. All the best, Taketa (talk) 18:43, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bureaucrat access

See Bureaucrat for information about this user group.
  • In principle, requests for temporary bureaucrat access are not granted.
  • A small project does not need bureaucrats. Currently whether a promotion is valid or not is decided by stewards. See here for a guideline.

Requests for removal of access should be posted at the section below.

CheckUser access

See CheckUser policy for information about this user group and the policy governing the use of this tool.
  • To request CheckUser information, see Steward requests/Checkuser. This is the place to request CheckUser access.
  • One-time CheckUser access is not permitted and temporary access is only used by Stewards or when the mandate of the CUs has an expiry date specified in local policies.

Oversight access

See Oversight policy for information about this user group and the policy governing the use of this tool.
  • To request to have content oversighted, ask for a steward in #wikimedia-stewardsconnect and contact a steward privately. This section is for requesting access to the Oversight tool.
  • For contact details about oversighters across the wikis, refer to this page.
  • Note that temporary Oversight access is not permitted and temporary status is only used by Stewards .
  • When a new user is assigned to this group, please add them to this list.

Removal of access

  • If you're requesting the removal of your own permissions, make sure you're logged in to your account. If you have multiple flags, specify which you want removed. Stewards may delay your request a short time to ensure you have time to rethink your request (see previous discussion on 24 hour delays); the rights will not be restored by stewards once they are removed.
  • To request the removal of another user's permissions, you must gain consensus on the local wiki first. When there is community consensus that the user's access should be removed, provide a link to the discussion, with a brief explanation of the reason for the request, and summarize the results of discussion. However, as bureaucrats of some wikis may remove users from the administrator or bureaucrat group, please see also a separate list of these specific wikis.
  • To request the removal of another user's permissions for inactivity, link to your local inactivity policy. If your site does not have inactivity policy, the global policy Admin activity review applies.
  • See the instructions above for adding new requests. Please post new requests at the bottom of the section.

User names@ne.wikipedia

Status:    In progress
S.N. Sysops Usernames Contributions
1. Indiver Contribs
2. Eukesh Contribs
3. Laxmi Rose Contribs
4. RajeshPandey Contribs
5. सृजना Contribs
6. Nepaboy Contribs

According to newikipedia local policy, I had made a local discussion for request of removal of sysops flags at newikipedia, & got no argues while it being open for more than a month. There are 3 bureaucrats but no response at all while i've already left messages on their talk page. So, We would like to request here on meta for removal of sysops rights. -- Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 06:11, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What are conditions for the removal in this new policy? Ruslik (talk) 11:19, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Ruslik0: Hi, According to the policy, main condition is that sysops should give atleast 100 contrib. as well with administrative task for example: delete, restore, import, granting user right etc. within time period of 6 months. IMO, They haven't such activities and they are inactive too. They also haven't given atleast 150 contributions within 6 months. For more info about sysops removal policies, you can visit here. -- Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 07:32, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

RajeshPandey@ne.wikipedia

Status:    In progress

As per above, and also inactivity of Rajeshpandey. I had made a local discussion for request of removal of bureaucrat flag at newikipedia, & got no argues while it being open for more than a month. So that requested here on meta. -- Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 06:23, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AS@ukwikipedia

Status:    Done

Please remove my sysop rights. AS (talk) 11:26, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

on hold for 24 h per standard practice. Taketa (talk) 14:10, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Done, einsbor talk 14:34, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Charlotte1125@zh.wikipedia

Status:    Done

He has been inactive for 6 months, and did not return in 1 month after notification. Per our local policy, his sysop flag should be removed.--Kegns 13:53, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done - Please thank them for all their work as admin. - Taketa (talk) 18:49, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

RalfX@zh.wikipedia

Status:    Done

Ditto.--Kegns 13:53, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done - Please thank them for all their work as admin. - Taketa (talk) 18:49, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jusjih as steward

Status:    In progress

I am resigning as a steward, effective 2015-12-12T12:12:12Z. I will better concentrate on being an administrator here on Meta and 11 other wikis.Jusjih (talk) 01:47, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Miscellaneous requests

YmKavishwar@hi.wikipedia.org

Status:    Not done

Now local sysop temporary not active on hiwiki. this nomination for reviewer right.--Yogesh Kavishwar (talk) 14:20, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done There are multiple active sysops on hiwiki. Please, ask them. Ruslik (talk) 11:11, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Ruslik0: sir, currently any sysop not available. All nomination are a waiting.-Yogesh Kavishwar (talk) 11:46, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


wikinews Thai

Status:    Not done
Please, create a request at Requests_for_new_languages. Ruslik (talk) 14:51, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See also

Cooperation requests for: comments (local) (global) · translation

Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steward_requests/Permissions&oldid=15054463"