Steward requests/Miscellaneous

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
< Steward requests(Redirected from SRM)
Jump to: navigation, search


Requests and proposals Steward requests (Miscellaneous) Archives
This page is for requesting that a specific administrative action (such as page deletion) be performed by a steward or global sysop on a Wikimedia wiki having no active administrators. (If the wiki does have active administrators, file the request with one of them.) If the wiki has an active editor community, any potentially controversial action (deletion of actual content, edit to a protected page, renaming of a protected page, etc.) should receive consensus from the wiki community before being requested here, and a link should be provided to that consensus in the request.

To add a new request, create a new section header at the bottom of the page (just above the categories) of the form:

=== Very brief description of request here ===

{{Status|In progress}}
Your request --~~~~

Then describe your request more fully below that. It is helpful if you can provide a link to the wiki (or the specific page on the wiki) in question, either in the header or in the body of your request.

To report vandalism issues, please use Vandalism reports instead.

To request approval of OAuth consumers please use {{oauthapprequest}} (see the documentation before using).

Cross-wiki requests
Meta-Wiki requests


Bot-reported speedy deletion requests[edit]

This section is for reports filed via Kimberley-nia Bot on the SWMT's IRC channel #cvn-sw (bot's irc nick is Dellieplagiat). They are submitted on this subpage. Please watch this page separately if you are a steward, a global sysop, or a local administrator.

It is possible to manually edit this list if you follow the bot's formatting. If you feel a request is inappropriate, please remove the lines containing that request entirely. (Leaving comments, modifying the header line, and striking out reports will confuse the bot.)

Example for the correct formatting:

* {{msd-link|ie.wikipedia|Talk:Europa}}
*: spam - IRC user DerHexer ~~~~~

Properly-filed requests that point to pages that have already been deleted or do not exist will be automatically removed by the bot. Note: It is unnecessary to remove requests for wikis where local admins "can handle it by themselves". If that is really so, the pages will surely be deleted within a small period of time and then be automatically removed from the list by the bot.


Manual requests[edit]

Please see a list of pages nominated for speedy deletion via {{Delete}} and/or the local equivalent. You can also filter by wikis whose admins are less than X or have not delete since Y.

Cross-wiki spam on actors[edit]

Status:    In progress

Hello! For more than a year some anonymous spamers are spaming some of smaller wikipedias. Unfortunately, it seems sysops didn't notice that. These spamers take a line "American actor, comedian and dancer" in wiki's language and copy-paste it only changing title, birth date and picture. See example in Karakalpak Wikipedia, also, I marked some of these articles in Turkmen Wikipedia, other their targets are ace:, dsb:, frp:, co:, war:, etc. (some larger wikis have their sysops/active users who manage to delete/mark/improve these articles, but smaller ones just get bulked with pointless pages. Hugo.arg (talk) 14:21, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

@Hugo.arg: Thanks for bringing this up, it's been going on for a long time (while investigating I found a chain of similar behaviour going back five years). :( Lots of pages have been deleted but the user often recreates them and they're active on so many wikis and their IP address changes so often that it's hard to keep track of everything they're doing. I think this request is probably too broad and not well defined enough for stewards/global sysops to act on though. If we can make lists of pages which need deleting, that is easier for them to do something about. I've created a request for kaawiki below and I also did a request for hakwiki a few days ago. - Nikki (talk) 23:08, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for bringing this up; since months or probably already years I am blocking this guy's IP globally when I see him and try to clean up the pages he created which were not afterwards changed by local editors. I'll see to doing your request. --MF-W 10:56, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletions on as/ms[edit]

Status:    In progress

There are various copyvios which were reported 3+ months ago and not deleted yet at w:as:শ্ৰেণী:ক্ষিপ্ৰ বিলোপনৰ প্ৰাৰ্থী and w:ms:Kategori:Calon_untuk_penghapusan_segera#mw-category-media. --Nemo 09:18, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Some of these files are ineligible for copyright. Ruslik (talk) 17:43, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Any steward that could enforce wmf:Resolution:Licensing policy? 91.9.103.14 13:56, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Ruslik, it looks like almost all of the files are eligible for copyright, except for one or two text logos. MBisanz talk 13:33, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
In aswiki, there is no clear EDP so my opinion is that under the wmf:Resolution:Licensing policy, we can act on that project if local users with appropriate rights are unavailable to do so where necessary. In case of mswiki, they have clear EDP so it's up to them whether they host unused non-free files or not. Though most of the project where EDP exist, they're routinely cleaning non-free unused files. ~ Nahid Talk 14:30, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
  • I think you should discuss to local admin or bureaucrat some of there see statistics . Murbaut (talk) 03:37, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

ro.voy edit box[edit]

Status:    In progress

A few years ago I added some buttons to the edit box on ro.wikivoyage. Apparently, the code I wrote back then no longer works, so I've put up a replacement script. I would appreciate if someone would replace ro:voy:MediaWiki:Editor.js with voy:ro:User:Strainu/Editor.js. Alternatively (but less secure), you could just import my script in the main one. Thanks!--Strainu (talk) 14:21, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

@Strainu: Hi, have you already tested if this code works correctly? Syum90 (talk) 17:26, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
Yes, I tested with the dev tools. But I've looked closer now and it seems I was just importing the script in my common.js. I'll start a discussion on the local village pump about enabling it for everyone.--Strainu (talk) 19:52, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
Here it is: voy:ro:Wikivoyage:Hanul_călătorilor#Butoane_pentru_adrese--Strainu (talk) 19:59, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
@Strainu: Ok, please inform us when a decision is achieved by the community.--Syum90 (talk) 08:31, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

Making threatening[edit]

Status:    In progress

Hi, on 30 august 2016 above two IP addresses have done vandalism deeds on the pages in Sinhala wikipedia including putting serious threatening notes on my user pages.

  • 103.21.164.19 - Creating nonsense pages and edit other articles related to former and current Sri Lankan presidents [1], [2], [3], [4]

Blanking my User space main page by replacing filthy statements.[5], Put serious threatening statements on my talk page[6] and another related page[7]

  • 175.157.66.133 - (29 August) Making a fake user page by putting few targeted users' main page materials with their original signatures. (Users=Me, Shwetha and Ravindu_Navin)The name which has been put as the user name of this account is common and unsuitable rough word using in Sinhala language.[8]

I submitted this incident to Vandalism reports but no responses have been made yet. I already have complained about this vandalism deeds to our two local administrators but admin Lee is on a wiki-break as indicated in his talk page and other admin Singhalawap is usually inactive in these days. I ask you to do suitable measurements to this incident for prevent further problems. Thanks--L Manju (talk) 01:09, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

user Ravindu_Navin had used the IP address 175.157.119.85 indicate that he is retiring. The same IP address had been used by him for the following Sinhala Film related articles which shows his foot-print/identity: [9], [10], and [11]. Thus it is clear that user of IP address 175.157.119.85 is user Ravindu_Navin . This IP address had originated from a Dialog Axiata tower in Badulla district in Sri Lanka. The IP address 175.157.66.133 which had been used to vandalise and create the fake user page had alo originated from the same tower. The IP info of the following proves that:
I strong request the stewards to investigate whether these two IP adresses and user Ravindu_Navin belong to the same user. ----- Shwetha (talk) 09:20, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
the user "Ravindu_Navin" is a newcomer. He is a valuable resource to Sinhala Wikipedia. Even though we have a set of rules, it should not be used in such a way to thwart the efforts of newcomers .the matter shouldn’t look emotionally. --Rsekanayake (talk) 07:36, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
The user Ravindu Navin seems to be a new_user. However rules should not be bent. There should be a discipline at any entity at all levels. Success can be achieved only through such. Loosing the user will not destroy Sinhala Wikipedia. ----Shwetha (talk) 14:56, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

@Stewards:Can we bring this incident to Steward requests/Checkuser page for further action or are we late for it now?--L Manju (talk) 09:27, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

All local mediawiki messages on got.wikipedia.org should be deleted[edit]

Status:    In progress

We have a problem because translations done in translatewik aren't correctly viewed. The problem is countless incorrect local mediawiki messages, which can be viewed in green:

https://got.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:AllMessages&prefix=&filter=modified&lang=got&limit=500

Is it possible to remove all messages in green and keep the ones in yellow? Bokareis (talk) 19:05, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

I now at least deleted the ones that had content identical to the default (translatewiki) message. The remaining ones are those with a different version. Some of the local ones however have a translation where the default is still English, but I of course have no idea whether they are correct. SPQRobin (talk) 14:41, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
The problem is that our local messages overwrite the Translatewiki ones. The remaining ones with a different version should be deleted too, that means wht's in yellow should be removed and what's in green kept. Bokareis (talk) 13:16, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
Yes, I understand. However, what makes the local ones incorrect? I have no idea of knowing other than based on your request, so that's why I did only the identical ones; I'd like to be somewhat certain before going ahead and deleting all of them. SPQRobin (talk) 16:00, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Non-free content[edit]

Status:    In progress

Does anyone have an interest in Non-free content at wikis that have no exemption doctrine policy or that do not seem to be enforcing it properly? As an example of the latter, w:id:Wikipedia:Penggunaan media nonbebas#Kebijakan gambar tokoh yang masih hidup appears to prohibit non-free images for BLPs, but w:id:Istimewa:Daftar_berkas seems to have more photos of BLPs than one might expect under such a policy. (Please ping me.) WhatamIdoing (talk) 06:50, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Sure, you can/should tag such violations with {{delete}} and if the requests are not acted upon in a month or so you can ping global sysops/stewards here, as with #Speedy deletions on as/ms. Nemo 12:09, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

@WhatamIdoing: You mentioned id.wikipedia, which is a larger project and stewards can probably not edit there. There are 295 Wikipedias and of these there are ~85 Wikipedias [12] having more than 1000 local files. In 2012 Nemo claimed 76 [13]. These Wikipedias often 1) have upload open for any logged-in user 2) host dozens of unused files 3) have lots of unfree files among the unused files, i.e. they are not EDP-files, since they lack an applicable rationale. Some Wikipedias have more than 1000 unused files, some more than 5000 - the counter stops then. Some have 20% of all files unused.

Local files in Wikipedias
Date 1 Qty of projects 2 Qty of projects w/o local files
(100% Commons)
3 Qty of projects having local files 4 Qty of local files 4/3 Reference
2013-01-01 285 36 249 2 038 148 8185 [14]
2014-01-01 287 30 257 2 208 750 8594 [15]
2015-01-01 288 30 258 2 311 679 8959 [16]
2016-01-01 291 37 254 2 405 486 9470 [17]
2017-01-01 295 140 155 2 430 156 15678 [18]
2017-04-14 295 140 155 2 436 730 15720 [19]

In the last ~4 years (2013-01-01 to today) the number of local files in Wikipedias increased by 391 925 from 2 038 148 to 2 430 073 [20], i.e. ca. 100 000 per year. At the same time, the number of Wikipedias using local files decreased. The major part of the increase comes from the aforementioned 85 Wikipedias. Some are out of scope for stewards and SRM.

To stop the problem with non-free content in small, open-upload Wikipedias and the workload for stewards to become worse, one could restrict the upload to admins. That is not fixing current violations, but reducing chance for new violations and freeing steward resources.

Candidates for restriction are the following 40 Wikipedias, each has 9 or less admins and uploads still open: ksh, pfl, rm, wuu, nv, frr, als, vec, bar, zh-yue, an, mt, pa, km, ga, oc, bcl, as, ps, scn, eml, mn, ba, be-tarask, am, be, sw, wa, lb, ky, hi, kn, tt, my, si, jv, br, fy, ka, bs. 92.227.229.171 01:37, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

This is the problem we currently face on id.wp, most of those files were PD-Gov, can be seen from the source links, but we are currently muddling if we should just transfer them to commons or just tag and add pd-gov license to it, but then again, there are thousands file need to be handled, we don't have enough hand. As for Stewards and GS, can close this request as this cannot be actioned by stewards or GS, whatamdoing can just come to id.wp to make this announcement/comment (again).--AldNonymousBicara? 19:34, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Just a heads up, I'm one of the admin in id.wikipedia. I've worked up a Quarry script to detect those violating images and I've deleted all of them. There was around 2,000 of them but I suspect that it didn't cover all fairuse BLP images yet. Feel free to fork and/or improve the Quarry script. Kenrick95 (talk) 10:57, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

I'm amazed at how much you've already achieved there.
But idwiki is just one example (and perhaps one that is more capable of addressing it than average). Is there a desirable general approach to this issue, e.g., for a wiki with no (or many fewer) local admins? WhatamIdoing (talk) 06:26, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Pending DRs[edit]

Status:    In progress

d:Q24248446 cannot be deleted because of 3 pending DRs of 9 January:

See also c:Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Aboobackeramani and c:User:Achim55/Sockpuppet investigations. Best, --Achim (talk) 22:34, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Two of these projects have active administrators. Please, ask them. Ruslik (talk) 17:56, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
Ruslik, 2 are done, the third one is pending for more than 3 months. --Achim (talk) 17:04, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

OAuth consumer approval request for «yabbr [1.0]»[edit]

Status:    Done

Looking for someone to authorize this tool and change its callback URL from "http://tools.wmflabs.org/apersonbot/yabbr" to "http://tools.wmflabs.org/apersonbot/yabbr/index.py". Enterprisey (talk) 05:42, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

@Enterprisey: I don't think we can change the callback URL. Try updating the consumer or proposing a new version of it. Regards, —MarcoAurelio 08:42, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
@Hoo man: just approved it. Not sure how to change the callback URL though. —MarcoAurelio 19:49, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
@Enterprisey: You will definitely need to submit a new version. Cheers, Hoo man (talk) 20:31, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

OAuth approval request for ia-upload[edit]

Status:    Done

I've requested a new consumer for wikitech:Tool:IA Upload to change the callback to https. Thanks! If possible, the contact email address should be tools.ia-upload-at-tools.wmflabs.org rather than my own. Sam Wilson 01:30, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done by @BDavis (WMF). Will disable old versions. —MarcoAurelio 10:09, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

OAuth approval request for twlight-staging[edit]

Status:    Done

Hi! Could you please approve this proposal for a OAuth consumer for the Wikipedia Library Card Project staging server? (Consumers have already been approved for the production version; I'm just trying to get staging caught up so I can test things properly.) Thanks! --ThatAndromeda (talk) 15:04, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

@ThatAndromeda: Yes check.svg DoneMarcoAurelio 10:16, 16 February 2017 (UTC)


Blatant BLP violation contrary to the Wiki Terms of Use and other basic Wiki rules and request for deletion of page "Janevistan"[edit]

Status:    In progress

I would like to bring to your attention the case related to recently banned user Kolega2357 by Akeron and James Alexander form WMF[21] from Serbo-Croatian Wikipedia [22] who actively contributed in the creation of the admin. protected Nazi page "Janevistan" [23]. I was surprised to learn that one of the Wiki. projects, namely Serbo-Croatian Wikipedia, was involved in harmful and politically motivated actions with the apparent serious offences against the national symbols of the Republic of Macedonia and particularly insults relating to the Constitutional name of the Republic of Macedonia. May I kindly ask you to place a template for deletion on the page "Janevistan” [24], on the grounds of serious and blatant BLP violation of the Wiki rules and insults to the Macedonian state (Republic of Macedonia) and Macedonian people, as well as personal offences (Wikipedia Terms of Use offences, insults and mockery about Macedonia and Macedonians, misuse of Wiki. space etc.). If you place that template for deletion on harmful “Janevistan”, I am convinced that User:Orijentolog (the author of the text) from Serbo-Croatian Wikipedia will perhaps show a minimum good will and delete this (search visible) insulting page. I assume AGF principle. Sincerely yours,93.86.59.151 22:39, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

OAuth approval request for my-first-django-oauth-app-tool-labs[edit]

Status:    Done

Your comments --Tobias1984 (talk) 15:19, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done Ruslik (talk) 18:32, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

OAuth approval request for my-first-django-oauth-app-tool-labs 2.0[edit]

Status:    Done

Please also deactivate the 1.0 consumer, as it accidentally didn't use the tool name in the callback and therefore requests more rights than it needs (or should have).

Your comments --Tobias1984 (talk) 17:47, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done Ruslik (talk) 20:16, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
@Ruslik0: That was quick. Thanks! --Tobias1984 (talk) 20:53, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

OAuth approval request for QAdemo[edit]

Status:    Done

Hi, we want to build a Question Answering System base Knowledge Base, we use FreeBase last years, but unfortunately, when google retire this DB, we think wikidata is a new DB for our, we only need the permission for get entity using id or title&site. Could you please approve this request? Thanks.

Request for my account to be unlocked on nl-wikiquote and/or a desysop[edit]

Status:    In progress

Can a steward please undo my permanent block on Wikiquote:nl? Last month, this imho completely undeserved block was (again) imposed on me by user:Whaledad, who in my opinion is (still) misusing his administrative rights on this local project. About that, I earlier started this and this discussion, which I ended myself last January, thinking the issue had been solved. Unfortunately, a new sock puppet of Graaf Statler who has already been globally locked since May last year returned on wikiquote-nl and did again some destructive edits (such as nominating good pages for deletion) which I found absolutely necessary to revert. This was Graaf Statler's most recent sock puppet.

Whaledad, for his part, thought this was a reasonable argument to impose (again, as he already did this last year) an indefinite block on me. De Wikischim (talk) 10:52, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

The following is not a strict requirement, but can at least the option be taken into consideration to desysop Whaledad after all on nl-wikiquote, as I already requested elsewhere on this project site some time ago (here for example last year)? There are two main points: 1) For about one year now, Whaledad has more or less been pushing through his own self-willed policy on Wikiquote-nl with regards to the content of that project. 2) Since last summer, Whaledad has, most of the time obviously very consciously, admitted that several sock puppets of the by then already globally locked user:Graaf Statler could still go ahead, causing a lot of fuss every time again, by which Wh. thus violated at the same time the official rules here on Meta. De Wikischim (talk) 19:00, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

In addition, I am still convinced that my first indefinite block, which was imposed in August 2016, had no real justification at all either. About that, I earlier wrote among others here on Meta: [...] What I did here was putting this earlier version of Vituzzu back, after which it was YOU who undid Vituzzu's decision to remove Statler's harassing remark from Robotjes talk page (while Vituzzu is a steward here) by putting the same remark, which by then had already been removed twice, back one more time. You should be very ashamed to go against so many conventions at the same time, being a sysop on Wikiquote. (see one more time this discussion, in which I placed a remark with time stamp 19:09, 8 August 2016). In other words: it was in that earlier case Whaledad himself who actually here undid again (shortly after Graaf Statler's sock puppet Opruimer had done the same) a version of that discussion page which had been placed by user:Vituzzu who is a steward from here (this one), thus actually starting an edit war/(wheelwar?). A little earlier, it had been me from an IP address who had put here Vituzzu's version back (the whole edit history of that discussion page can be found back here). Anyway, Whaledad used THAT (by which I mean, the fact that I had put back Vituzzu's version) as a decisive argument to block me undefinitely for the first time in August 2016, in an edit war in which he himself was involved too, and not just "simply involved" but actually overruling a steward. Maybe the stewards could take that into consideration too, in particular with regards to my additional request to desysop Whaledad on nl-wikiquote? De Wikischim (talk) 21:43, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Stewards do not have any special authority to override local administrators. So, probably your request will be denied. Ruslik (talk) 12:25, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
Can you please take into account that this is not an ordinary case? It's been going on for about a year now and Whaledad's acting as a sysop (imposing almost completely self-invented rules as a stringent policy, giving arbitrary blocks, on the other hand tolerating silently many block-evading sock puppets of a user who by then already had a block on all Wikimedia projects) has become a point of discussion in several respects, see the examples given above. Several users (mainly from NL-WP) have already expressed their amazement on it. Last year on Wikiquote-nl, Whaledad was tackled about his conduct by several users from here on Meta (example: q:nl:Overleg gebruiker:Whaledad/Archief 2016#De-blokkades). De Wikischim (talk) 08:24, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

See also[edit]