Steward requests/Global permissions: Difference between revisions
→Abusefilter for Addshore: user has withdrawn. |
→Requests for global IP block exemption: request removal |
||
Line 92: | Line 92: | ||
::Or a ISP caching server that's being picked up as a proxy. [[User:Techman224|<font color="0000FF">'''Techman224'''</font>]][[User talk:Techman224|<font color="FF0000">'''<sup>Talk</sup>'''</font>]] 20:38, 2 March 2013 (UTC) |
::Or a ISP caching server that's being picked up as a proxy. [[User:Techman224|<font color="0000FF">'''Techman224'''</font>]][[User talk:Techman224|<font color="FF0000">'''<sup>Talk</sup>'''</font>]] 20:38, 2 March 2013 (UTC) |
||
:::I don't know what the technical reason is, but the issue seems to happen transiently. I made this edit from the office. I think the error message popped up when I was at home and connecting to the Internet through my personal ISP. — [[User:Smuconlaw|Smuconlaw]] ([[User talk:Smuconlaw|talk]]) 07:31, 6 March 2013 (UTC) |
:::I don't know what the technical reason is, but the issue seems to happen transiently. I made this edit from the office. I think the error message popped up when I was at home and connecting to the Internet through my personal ISP. — [[User:Smuconlaw|Smuconlaw]] ([[User talk:Smuconlaw|talk]]) 07:31, 6 March 2013 (UTC) |
||
=== Global IP block exempt for [[User:Makecat-bot|Makecat-bot]] === |
|||
{{sr-request |
|||
|status = <!--don't change this line--> |
|||
|domain = global<!--don't change this line--> |
|||
|user name = Makecat-bot |
|||
|discussion= |
|||
}} |
|||
My bot doesn't need global IP block exempt because it's currently running on Wikimedia Labs. Please remove it. --<span style="font:14px Arial;text-shadow:0 1px 5px #808080">[[User:Makecat|<span style="color:#2299FF">Make</span>]][[User Talk:Makecat|<span style="color:#7777FF">cat</span>]]</span> 09:37, 8 March 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== Additional global rights == |
== Additional global rights == |
Revision as of 09:37, 8 March 2013
This is not a vote and any active Wikimedia editor may participate in the discussion.
Successful global rollback requests require no fewer than 5 days of discussion, while successful global sysop discussions require no fewer than 2 weeks.
Cross-wiki requests |
---|
Meta-Wiki requests |
Requests for global rollback permissions
| Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Global rollback for Makecat
- Global user: Makecat (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
Hello, I am here to apply for global rollback rights again after failed three months ago. First, I must apologize for some childish behaviours at the end of last year, and after that I resigned on both wikis where I am an administrator. If you can forgive me for that, please see my activity in SWMT. According to luxo's tool, I have made 350+ reverts in recent months, plus nominating many pages for speedy deletion. If this time I fails again, I will keep active in SWMT and try it later. Thank you. --Makecat 07:04, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose globally you've put in a lot of work and are knowledgeable, but I can't support someone who was blocked on their home wiki for almost all of January 2013. [1] --Rschen7754 07:22, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose it isn't specifically about the childishness, it is the breach of trust, that takes a long time to re-earn — billinghurst sDrewth 02:35, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose per Rschen7754, and the fact that that mishap with global IP block exemption and vandalism is far too recent for comfort.--Jasper Deng (talk) 02:37, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
Comment, It's ridiculous that a vandal want to be a global rollbacker, hahaha! --Oihfoisd (talk) 02:54, 4 March 2013 (UTC)LTA comment struck.--Jasper Deng (talk) 02:58, 4 March 2013 (UTC)- After reading your comments (except the one above), I decided to withdraw this request. --Makecat 03:25, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
Withdrawn. Mathonius (talk) 06:04, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
Requests for global sysop permissions
Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
| <translate>
Requests for global editinterface permissions
Steward requests/Global permissions/GEI-Header
Requests for new wiki importer permissions
Steward requests/Global permissions/NWI-Header
Requests for global IP block exemption
Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
| <translate>
Global IP block exempt for Jk9357
- Global user: jk9357 (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
<Hey wanted to request an unblock. I'm using the german gigabit server of Perfect-Privacy.com and my IP is blocked from editing.>, thanks, --Jk9357 (talk) 15:35, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
- Could you please post the exact block message you get? Trijnsteltalk 21:42, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
Global IP block exempt for Huangjinghai
- Global user: Huangjinghai (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
Sometimes I need to edit via anonymous proxies. I live in China, because of the Great Firewall, it's hard to access some pages directly. Already get IPBE right on zh.wp. --Huangjinghai (talk) 13:29, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
- What about HTTPS access? --Makecat 14:08, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
- HTTPS -- not stable;--Huangjinghai (talk) 01:36, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- I do not think that we should be granting this exemption. I have some specific concerns and these are noted on the steward's wiki. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:14, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- HTTPS -- not stable;--Huangjinghai (talk) 01:36, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Global IP block exempt for josheee12
- Global user: josheee12 (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
I use a VPN when on public networks and would like to be exempted from the ban. VPS6 uses this block and consequently, a lot of VPNs are most likely in this block.— The preceding unsigned comment was added by Joshdevel12 (talk)
- We will not be granting an IP exemption for a request for another account. The request should come from the account for which the exemption is being sought. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:13, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- I cannot login; I went to IRC and had the ban temporarily lifted and was unable to reset my password, as I was still getting errors about being blocked. — joshdevel12
- You said nothing about it in IRC at the time. I have tripped enWP to send the password. Please use that to login to this wiki (not enWP). — billinghurst sDrewth 15:24, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
- I cannot login; I went to IRC and had the ban temporarily lifted and was unable to reset my password, as I was still getting errors about being blocked. — joshdevel12
Global IP block exempt for Smuconlaw
- Global user: Smuconlaw (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
I tried to edit Wikidata, but received the following error message:
- Your IP address has been blocked on all Wikimedia wikis. The block was made by [//meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Shizhao Shizhao] (meta.wikimedia.org). The reason given is [[m:NOP|Open proxy]]. * Start of block: 01:22, 18 June 2012 * Expiry of block: 01:22, 18 June 2013 You can contact [//meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Shizhao Shizhao] to discuss the block. You cannot use the "Email this user" feature unless a valid e-mail address is specified in your account preferences and you have not been blocked from using it. Your current IP address is 220.255.2.124. Please include all above details in any queries you make. You may appeal this block at m:Steward requests/Global.
It appears I'm being affected by a block. I've been editing Wikipedia since January 2010. Smuconlaw (talk) 19:15, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
- Your internet connection must have switched to go through an ISP server that's not configured properly. I see you made edits on March 2nd. Techman224Talk 20:21, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
- Or a ISP caching server that's being picked up as a proxy. Techman224Talk 20:38, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
- I don't know what the technical reason is, but the issue seems to happen transiently. I made this edit from the office. I think the error message popped up when I was at home and connecting to the Internet through my personal ISP. — Smuconlaw (talk) 07:31, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
- Or a ISP caching server that's being picked up as a proxy. Techman224Talk 20:38, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
Global IP block exempt for Makecat-bot
- Global user: Makecat-bot (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
My bot doesn't need global IP block exempt because it's currently running on Wikimedia Labs. Please remove it. --Makecat 09:37, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
Additional global rights
Abusefilter for Addshore
- Global user: Addshore (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
- Discussion: Requesting access to edit the abuse filter on all wikis, specifically to create filters to stop pywikipedia bots from adding interwiki links to pages now that WikiData has rolled out. I will use the default pywikipedia interwiki edit summaries in these filters to stop the edits from going through and also use the logs created from the filters to notify the operators of the bots that they need to upgrade their bot.
I know this group is currently active on 0 wikis but I am guessing this can be changed. A bit of an odd request but it seems like the most logical way to deal with the issue. ·Add§hore· Talk To Me! 00:04, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
- Support temporary access. It seems to me the best solution to fix the interwiki bot problem. Regards, Vogone talk 00:11, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
- Not sure this is a good idea. You should absolutely not set up abuse filters on the major wikis, and I'm not sure how local admins would react to you setting up abuse filters on their wikis. Many do not enjoy interference even in gs-enabled wikis, let alone outside of them. Snowolf How can I help? 00:22, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
- For the record, there are two Abusefilter global groups (Abusefilter editor, Abusefilter helper). Which one would you prefer? Also, should we just wait for global AbuseFilters? πr2 (t • c) 00:25, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
- Abusefilter-helper, recently created for a special request, has no rights to edit abusefilters, only to view them. --MF-W 00:26, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
- Ah, true. I still don't see the point in creating 200 filters for this. Do we need to disable them when all the iw-bots stop operating? πr2 (t • c) 00:28, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
- Probably yes. I also think it's a bit overdone and too much effort. Bot owners should quickly adapt to the new situation or get their bots stopped, imho. --MF-W 00:30, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
- Abusefilter-helper, recently created for a special request, has no rights to edit abusefilters, only to view them. --MF-W 00:26, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose I concur with Snowolf. Different wikis have varying policies on their abuse filters.--Jasper Deng (talk) 00:27, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
- The alternative is to request a lot of blocks on bots, which I am totally for if it is the way it must be done! ·Add§hore· Talk To Me! 00:31, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
- That seems like a better option IMO. Using the abuse filter would simply add an unnecessary additional step in the edit-saving process -FASTILY (TALK) 00:36, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
- The alternative is to request a lot of blocks on bots, which I am totally for if it is the way it must be done! ·Add§hore· Talk To Me! 00:31, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose Agree with Snowolf. Notify the operators, and lock if they don't stop the bots. πr2 (t • c) 00:43, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
- I withdraw. I have just smashed together a much better solution scanning the irc rc feed --·Add§hore· Talk To Me! 01:34, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
- Not done per user request (withdrawn).—Teles «Talk to me ˱@ L C S˲» 01:58, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
See also
- User groups — Information on user groups
- Global rights log — Log of global permissions changes
- Archive
General requests for: help from a Meta sysop or bureaucrat · deletion (speedy deletions: local · multilingual) · URL blacklisting · new languages · interwiki map
Personal requests for: username changes · permissions (global) · bot status · adminship on Meta · CheckUser information (local) · local administrator help
Cooperation requests for: comments (local) (global) · translation