Meta:Requests for adminship/TheSandDoctor

TheSandDoctor[edit]

TheSandDoctor (talk • contribs • deleted user contributions • logs • block log • abuse log • CentralAuth • stalktoy) Bureaucrats: user rights management.

Ending 8 May 2020 05:31 (UTC)

Hello, I have been a limited temporary administrator working on resolving a plethora of lint errors. I have primarily been focusing on the template namespace as it has the largest impact in reducing lint errors. It is important to note that one edit could resolve however many lint errors are on a page (basically unbound), it isn't just one error per edit. Conservatively estimating, I have resolved at least a few thousand overall; it is difficult to get an accurate estimate given that Special:LintErrors can fluctuate, at times, in the tens of thousands. I am requesting full meta administrator permissions as I would like to continue this work and also help out elsewhere on meta. I have carefully reviewed the meta admin policy. I am frequently active on IRC and could help in responding to urgent requests combating LTAs, vandals, and bots. I am an administrator on the English Wikipedia and am familiar with the admin toolset, and as a bot operator/programmer and Computer Science major, I am comfortable fixing these errors, including those in complex templates. Thank you for your consideration, TheSandDoctor ^Talk 05:31, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Experienced, trustworthy, responsible, did well with the limited userrights, and could definitely help in a larger capacity as a full admin. Thank you for volunteering, Vermont (talk) 05:34, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support My bar is on the high side but I'm happy enough here. --Herby ^{talk thyme} 07:35, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -FASTILY 07:57, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sure. No issues. Very competent sysop and well qualified. Per Vermont and Herbythyme too.Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 08:07, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Minorax (talk) 08:42, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. —Sgd. Hasley 11:29, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Of course! ~riley (talk) 11:57, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support why not?-BRP^ever 12:07, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support as Vermont already said. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 14:14, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kostas20142 (talk) 14:18, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Clear need for tools, fully trustworthy and experienced Wikipedia admin, absolutely no reason to oppose. — Coffee // have a cup // 15:40, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 15:47, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support No concerns, welcome to the club. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 16:01, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support - with no hesitation Operator873^talkconnect 16:02, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --May♡♡→♡℃※Talk 03:38, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 14:47, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Sure. Hiàn (talk) 15:00, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Ahmad^talk 22:10, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Thanks for the fish! ^{talk•contribs} 22:25, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support ok Leaderboard (talk) 16:48, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support LGTM --DannyS712 (talk) 17:29, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good luck.--Turkmen ^talk 20:17, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tmv (talk) 04:12, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Ajraddatz (talk) 14:32, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Matiia (talk) 04:46, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]