Steward requests/Global permissions: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 02:27, 7 June 2016

This page hosts requests for global permissions. To make a request, read the relevant policy (global rollback, global sysop, global rename, …) and make a request below. Explain why membership is needed for that group, and detail prior experience or qualifications.

This is not a vote and any active Wikimedia editor may participate in the discussion.

Global rollback and global interface editor requests require no fewer than 5 days of discussion while abuse filter helper and maintainer requests require no fewer than 7 days. Global renamer and global sysop requests require no fewer than 2 weeks of discussion. For requests that are unlikely to pass under any circumstances, they may be closed by a steward without further discussion (after a reasonable amount of input).

Quick navigation:

Global rollback
Global sysop
Global rename
Global IP block exemption
Other global rights
Removal of access
Local permissions

Dynamic pages:

Cross-wiki requests
CheckUser information Global blocks/locks Permissions (global) Permissions (bot) Permissions (other) Username changes/ usurpation requests Miscellaneous requests URL blacklisting Title/username blacklisting Email blacklisting
Meta-Wiki requests
CheckUser information Deletion Permissions Requests for help

Requests for global rollback permissions

Shortcut:
SRGR

Please be sure to follow the instructions below:

Your request might be rejected if you don't follow the instructions, and not doing so would reflect poorly on your suitability.

Please also review the Global rollback policy.

Please note that Global rollbackers discussions are not votes. Comments must present specific points in favor of or against a user's approval.

Instructions for making a request

Before requesting, make sure that: You have sufficient activity to meet the requirements to be allocated the global rollback flag

To make a request: Copy the template below to the bottom of this section and explain of why you need the access and why you're suitable.

=== Global rollback for {{subst:u|{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}}} ===
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!-- don't change this line -->
 |domain    = global <!-- don't change this line -->
 |user name = {{subst:REVISIONUSER}} <!-- don't change this line unless you're nominating another user -->
}}
::''Not ending before {{subst:#time:j F Y H:i|+5 days}} UTC''

The request will be approved if consensus to do so exists after a period of consideration of no less than 5 days (with rare exceptions , no matter how obvious the result may seem). This is not a vote, and all input is welcome. Stewards will determine whether consensus exists; when doing so it is likely that the weight given to the input of those involved in cross-wiki work will be most influential.

Global rollback for Максим Підліснюк

Status: Not done

Global user: Максим Підліснюк (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)

Not ending before 29 May 2016 16:52 UTC

I am the sysop of two projects (one of which is small), a member of SWMT, and I think that the global rollback permissons would help me in my work --Максим Підліснюк (talk) 16:52, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Ilya Drakonov (talk) 16:54, 24 May 2016 (UTC).[reply]
Support. AHercog (talk) 16:59, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Adam-Yourist (talk) 17:04, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This is the 4th time that you are asking for GR flag and i still have concerns regarding crosswiki activity. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:07, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe you just do not see? For example, my last cross-wiki editing? --Максим Підліснюк (talk) 17:11, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See here, automated edits are included. If you remove them only a few recent edits are remaining. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:33, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not seeing much experience either. I can also find some mistakes, like this, though that is older and I can't find anything recent. That said, there is more since last time, so I would be comfortable supporting. Ajraddatz (talk) 17:28, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support. --Visem (talk) 20:00, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, by far does not meet the criteria outlined in the policy, as per Steinsplitter. --Vogone (talk) 20:07, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Some concerns here. Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 08:51, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - honestly, this is starting to smell like hat collecting. Natuur12 (talk) 09:09, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 11:13, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above concerns, and the fact that this is request #4 should have been disclosed. --Rs chen 7754 00:43, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above. ~riley (talk) 18:19, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above. Biplab Anand (Talk) 01:10, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral because I don't want to stack opposes. Thanks for volunteering for the global rollback privilege, however, it seems that you are not yet qualified for this kind of privilege. First, due to lack of crosswiki activity. Global rollbackers should have sufficient crosswiki activity. Second, lack of trust due to lack of transparency. For a user to be a global rollbacker, they should have the trust of the community. Otherwise, they won't be confident of you performing global rollback. Once you solved the two concerns I said above, you may reapply for global rollback. Thank you! Pokéfan95 (talk) 09:43, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nothing seems to have changed since the previous request -FASTILY 03:07, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Steinsplitter. —Ah3kal (talk) 06:32, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. Unfortunately there's too much opposition to grant you the global rollback rights. --Stryn (talk) 19:03, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Global rollback for BRPever

Status: Withdrawn

Global user: BRPever (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)

Not ending before 30 May 2016 10:39 UTC

Hello everyone, I am a member of SWMT and I usually patrol various GS projects and revert many vandalism and nonsense. This permission will be helpful for me to continue my work of patrolling and reverting vandalism. Thanks-BRP^ever 10:39, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support good work end good antivandal activity . Devraj poudel (talk) 13:05, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support clearly has made heavy use of revert across multiple wikis. I've checked over 15 recent reverts, and all 15 were good. Looks like a good candidate; thanks for volunteering! Ajraddatz (talk) 20:57, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Why not? Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 22:38, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm a little surprised by User:Ajraddatz's comment because crossactivity indicates a complete lack of recent activity. Is the tool broken? Unless it is, the candidate clearly does not meet the criteria outlined in the policy. --Vogone (talk) 23:18, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Looking through his global contribs, I see a whole bunch of reverts in late 2015 and 2016. Those 55 results go back only to the start of 2016. Ajraddatz (talk) 23:26, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, indeed it seems there has been some activity, but it's limited to only a few days, only a few wikis were edited, and there is no real recent activity either (not even the days immediately before this request). This does neither look like "heavy use" nor like "demonstrated activity" to me and thus makes me unable to support. I suggest resubmitting a request after this has been fixed. --Vogone (talk) 23:33, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

regarding this I was quite busy in the datathon and women edit athon conducted in newiki for a month but now it is over I am now back for the vandal fight.-BRP^ever 23:51, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per Vogone. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:38, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Vogone, I'd expect recent activity before requesting. ~riley (talk) 18:21, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw but will be back with more crosswiki.-BRP^ever 00:30, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Global rollback for 和平奮鬥救地球

Status: In progress

Global user: 和平奮鬥救地球 (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)

Not ending before 11 June 2016 06:10 UTC

I am a sysop of Chinese Wikipedia and a member of SWMT, and I usually check vandalisms and nonsenses on the #cvn-sw channel of IRC (my nickname on IRC: Peace). This permissons would help me in my work. Thanks!--- Earth Saver _(talk) at 06:10, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support.┌─⚡⠠⠵［learningis1st］-［~］- _{time =} 06:15, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support。--霧島聖 (talk) 06:50, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support seems to have good experience using revert across multiple wikis. I can't find any errors myself in their work, and there is enough of it (and in recent times) to justify being granted GR. Ajraddatz (talk) 07:06, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Imho not enough crossactivity. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:30, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support,she has a lot of experience on global anti-vandalism, and she is also a sysop in zhwp, so I think she is competent for this duty.--James970028 (talk) 09:51, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support, good experience on global anti-vandalism. I think this user can competent the works, too.--Bowleerin (talk) 12:39, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Steinsplitter, I'd like to see a bit more activity. eurodyne (talk) 15:39, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Reverted vandalism on 62 wikis. — Music1201 ^talk 23:09, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Strange, I see reverts on less than 40 wikis. Matiia (talk) 00:30, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support A bit low on the number of reverts but being a sysop on a big wiki makes up for it IMO. --Rs chen 7754 00:16, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, crossactivity seems to support Steinsplitter's point, unfortunately. Though I am optimistic 和平奮鬥救地球 could be a good candidate if activity is being kept up constantly for a few months. Thanks for volunteering, --Vogone (talk) 00:25, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Quite a few of the projects are in green there, and the rest are within the last couple of months. I know you oppose anyone who doesn't have months and months of non-stop experience in this area, but really, are there any mistakes in their work? Is there any actual reason why this person shouldn't be granted this flag to help them contribute a little more effectively, other than your own subjective interpretation of what you expect to see in terms of experience? Ajraddatz (talk) 00:33, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support though a bit more crosswiki activity would be favourable. Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 02:01, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requests for global sysop permissions

Shortcut:
SRGS

Please be sure to follow the instructions below:

Your request might be rejected if you don't follow the instructions, and not doing so would reflect poorly on your suitability.

Please also review the Global sysops policy.

Stewards: When you give someone global sysop rights, please list them on Users with global sysop access and ask them to subscribe to the global sysops mailing list.

Please note that Global sysops discussions are not votes. Comments must present specific points in favor of or against a user's approval.

Instructions for making a request

Before requesting, make sure that:

You have a global account ;
You are logged in on this wiki, and the account is part of your global account;

To make a request: Copy the template below to the bottom of this section and explain of why you need the access and why you're suitable. If you previously requested that right, please add a link to the previous discussion(s).

=== Global sysop for {{subst:u|{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}}} ===
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!-- don't change this line -->
 |domain    = global <!-- don't change this line -->
 |user name = {{subst:REVISIONUSER}} <!-- don't change this line unless you're nominating another user -->
}}
:''Not ending before {{subst:#time:j F Y H:i|+2 week}} UTC''

The request will be approved if consensus to do so exists after a period of consideration of no less than two weeks (no exceptions are allowed no matter how obvious the result may seem). This is not a vote, and all input is welcome. Stewards will determine whether consensus exists; when doing so it is likely that the weight given to the input of those involved in cross-wiki work will be most influential. Please note: Since 2019 all global sysops are required to have two-factor authentication (2FA) enabled.

Requests for global IP block exemption

Shortcut:
SRIPBE

Please be sure to follow the instructions below:

Your request might be rejected if you don't follow the instructions. Please review Global IP block exemption. You may request Global IP block exemption via stewards

wikimedia.org if you can not edit this page.

Please note: Global IP block exemption does NOT make one immune to locally-created blocks of any sort, only global blocks.

If you want to edit the Chinese Wikipedia, usually global IP block exemptions will not help you. Please see this instruction to request a local IP block exemption.

Instructions for making a request

Before requesting global IP block exemption, make sure that:

You have a global account ;
You are logged in on this wiki, and the account is part of your global account;

To request global IP block exemption: Copy the template below to the bottom of this section and explain why you need the access and why you're suitable. If needed, link to relevant discussions.

=== Global IP block exempt for {{subst:u|{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}}} ===
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!--don't change this line-->
 |domain    = global<!--don't change this line-->
 |user name = {{subst:REVISIONUSER}}
}}
<Add an explanation here>, thanks, --~~~~

The request will be approved if there is demonstrated need for the permission, such as bypassing a global block from someone who is not the intended target.

Global IP block exempt for CoBot

Status: In progress

Global user: CoBot (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)

CoBot is a bot I operate on eswiki and it has been affected by a block on 2001:19F0:0:0:0:0:0:0/32 since I changed hosting providers in February. --Polsaker (talk) 01:41, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That range has been blocked for a year globally, if you are only having a problem at eswiki, have you applied for a local (es:Wikipedia:Exento de bloqueo a IP) exemption? eswiki administrators should be able to handle that. — xaosflux ^Talk 15:06, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've been told by the eswiki administrators that the local excemption doesn't work with global blocks. Polsaker (talk) 18:23, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Local exemption will handle global blocks as well. I can still give you the global flag if needed, if the bot has the potential to be used on Wikidata and other projects as well. Please advise. Ajraddatz (talk) 07:03, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'd suggest that he tries first the local option. —Marco Aurelio 09:36, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'll ask for the local flag too, but this bot also sporadically edits in Wikidata (when moving categories). Polsaker (talk) 16:58, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requests for global rename permissions

Steward requests/Global permissions/Global renamers

Requests for other global permissions

Please be sure to follow the instructions below:

Your request might be rejected if you don't follow the instructions.

Instructions for making a request

Before requesting additional global permissions, make sure that:

You are logged in on this wiki;
No specific section on this page exists for the permission you want to request;

To request additional global permissions: Copy the template below to the bottom of this section and explain what kind of access you need and why. If needed, link to relevant discussions. If you hold, or have previously held, the right and are asking for either a renewal or revival of that right, please add a link to the previous discussion.

=== <Add requested permission here> for [[User:Foo|Foo]] ===
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!--don't change this line-->
 |domain    = global<!--don't change this line-->
 |user name = Username
 |discussion=
}}
<Add an explanation here>, thanks, --~~~~

The request will be approved if consensus to do so exists after a short period of consideration. A steward will review the request.

remove global OTRS member for Grashoofd

Status: In progress

Global user: Grashoofd (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)

thanks, --Krd 02:27, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 105: / Line 105: @@
 {{dynamite|title=:Steward requests/Global permissions/SGP-Header}}
 <!-- Your requests go UNDER this comment. Copy the request template above and fill in your information. {{none}}-->
+=== remove global OTRS member for [[User:Grashoofd|Grashoofd]] ===
+{{sr-request
+ |status    =
+ |domain    = global
+ |user name = Grashoofd
+ |discussion=
+}}
+thanks, --[[User:Krd|Krd]] 02:27, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
 == See also ==<!-- DO NOT EDIT UNDER THIS LINE -->