Steward requests/Global permissions: Difference between revisions

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Content deleted Content added
Line 97: Line 97:
*{{s}} --'''[[User:Kolega2357|Kolega2357]] ([[User talk:Kolega2357|talk]])''' 02:54, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
*{{s}} --'''[[User:Kolega2357|Kolega2357]] ([[User talk:Kolega2357|talk]])''' 02:54, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
*{{s}} Thanks for helping :) [[User:Legoktm|Legoktm]] ([[User talk:Legoktm|talk]]) 02:56, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
*{{s}} Thanks for helping :) [[User:Legoktm|Legoktm]] ([[User talk:Legoktm|talk]]) 02:56, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

=== OTRS-member for Ochilov ===
{{sr-request
|status = <!--don't change this line-->
|domain = global<!--don't change this line-->
|user name = Ochilov
|discussion=
}}
Thank you. [[User:Rjd0060|Rjd0060]] ([[User talk:Rjd0060|talk]]) 20:27, 3 August 2015 (UTC)


== See also ==
== See also ==

Revision as of 20:27, 3 August 2015

Shortcut:
SRGP
This page hosts requests for global permissions. To make a request, read the relevant policy (global rollback, global sysop, global rename, …) and make a request below. Explain why membership is needed for that group, and detail prior experience or qualifications.
This is not a vote and any active Wikimedia editor may participate in the discussion.
Successful global rollback requests require no fewer than 5 days of discussion, while successful global renamer and global sysop discussions require no fewer than 2 weeks.
Cross-wiki requests
Meta-Wiki requests


Requests for global rollback permissions

Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Your request might be rejected if you don't follow the instructions, and not doing so would reflect poorly on your suitability.
Please also review the Global rollback policy.
Instructions for making a request

Before requesting, make sure that: You have sufficient activity to meet the requirements to be allocated the global rollback flag

To make a request
Copy the template below to the bottom of this section and explain of why you need the access and why you're suitable.
=== Global rollback for {{subst:u|{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}}} ===
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!-- don't change this line -->
 |domain    = global <!-- don't change this line -->
 |user name = {{subst:REVISIONUSER}} <!-- don't change this line unless you're nominating another user -->
}}
::''Not ending before {{subst:#time:j F Y H:i|+5 days}} UTC''

The request will be approved if consensus to do so exists after a period of consideration of no less than 5 days (with rare exceptions , no matter how obvious the result may seem). This is not a vote, and all input is welcome. Stewards will determine whether consensus exists; when doing so it is likely that the weight given to the input of those involved in cross-wiki work will be most influential.

Global rollback for Максим Підліснюк

This is my second attempt. Since the first nomination I became more experienced as in the fight against cross-wiki vandalism and global work in general. --Максим Підліснюк (talk) 21:05, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Global rollback for Tropicalkitty

I've decided to go ahead and submit this early... I think I am ready for global rollback. I understand what is obviously unconstructive edits. Although, I have been under fire when first using this username back close to the end of May (sockpuppet abuse of a user I never was related to at all on a major wiki, which I shouldn't have been there in the first place... I know [and some or most stewards know who I was prior [revealed on IRC]) and a block made on me in error at ru.wiktionary.

I'm not interested in the hat collecting at all. I never requested any local rights, but am satisfied with whatever happens and make sure I use it properly. Thank you in advance. Tropicalkitty (talk) 10:10, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I know... it was something I shouldn't have said (along with this on IRC) Tropicalkitty (talk) 11:41, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Oppose tagged a user talk page for deletion yesterday as well as their actual user page. I'm pretty sure most places don't delete such things for "no meaningful content" so there may be a bit to learn yet. --Herby talk thyme 11:50, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I should have clarified that the user had links/content completely unrelated to the Wikimedia projects in one of their earlier edits. Tropicalkitty (talk) 11:55, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
One more...perhaps Tropicalkitty (talk) 12:05, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Requests for global sysop permissions

<translate>

Please be sure to follow the instructions below:

Your request might be rejected if you don't follow the instructions, and not doing so would reflect poorly on your suitability.
Please also review the Global sysops policy.
Stewards
When you give someone global sysop rights, please list them on [[<tvar name="T:GS">Template:List of global sysops</tvar>|Users with global sysop access]] and ask them to subscribe to the [[<tvar name="2">mail:global-sysops</tvar>|global sysops mailing list]].</translate>
<translate> Instructions for making a request</translate>

<translate> Before requesting, make sure that:

  1. You have a global account ;
  2. You are logged in on this wiki, and the account is part of your global account;
To make a request
Copy the template below to the bottom of this section and explain of why you need the access and why you're suitable. If you previously requested that right, please add a link to the previous discussion(s).</translate>
=== Global sysop for {{subst:u|{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}}} ===
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!-- don't change this line -->
 |domain    = global <!-- don't change this line -->
 |user name = {{subst:REVISIONUSER}} <!-- don't change this line unless you're nominating another user -->
}}
:''Not ending before {{subst:#time:j F Y H:i|+2 week}} UTC''

<translate> The request will be approved if consensus to do so exists after a period of consideration of no less than two weeks (no exceptions are allowed no matter how obvious the result may seem). This is not a vote, and all input is welcome. Stewards will determine whether consensus exists; when doing so it is likely that the weight given to the input of those involved in cross-wiki work will be most influential. Please note: Since 2019 all global sysops are required to have two-factor authentication (2FA) enabled.</translate>

Noting proposal

Status:    In progress

For those with an interest in global sysops and their actions, please see the following Requests for comment/Adding global abuse filter rights to global sysops.  — billinghurst sDrewth 06:28, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Requests for global IP block exemption

<translate>

Please be sure to follow the instructions below:

Your request might be rejected if you don't follow the instructions. Please review [[<tvar name="GIBE">Global IP block exemption</tvar>|Global IP block exemption]]. You may request Global IP block exemption via stewards(_AT_)wikimedia.org if you can not edit this page.
Please note: Global IP block exemption does NOT make one immune to locally-created blocks of any sort, only global blocks.</translate>
<translate> Instructions for making a request</translate>

<translate> Before requesting global IP block exemption, make sure that:

  1. You have a global account ;
  2. You are logged in on this wiki, and the account is part of your global account;
To request global IP block exemption
Copy the template below to the bottom of this section and explain why you need the access and why you're suitable. If needed, link to relevant discussions.</translate>
=== Global IP block exempt for {{subst:u|{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}}} ===
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!--don't change this line-->
 |domain    = global<!--don't change this line-->
 |user name = {{subst:REVISIONUSER}}
}}
<translate><!--T:6-->
<Add an explanation here>, thanks</translate>, --~~~~

<translate> The request will be approved if there is demonstrated need for the permission, such as bypassing a global block from someone who is not the intended target.</translate>

Global IP block exempt for Genium

I am using Tor Browser again and was blocked in my attempt to edit Wikidata. I am allowed to use it on wfr and want to stop using another browser for all others wmf wikis. French government is currently spying its own citizens for security reasons, so it's time for me to use Tor all the time, including on all wmf wikis. Thanks, --genium ⟨✉⟩ 15:28, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 On hold till 3 August 2015. Ruslik (talk) 20:13, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Requests for global rename permissions

Steward requests/Global permissions/Global renamers

Requests for other global permissions

<translate>

Please be sure to follow the instructions below:

Your request might be rejected if you don't follow the instructions.</translate>
<translate> Instructions for making a request</translate>

<translate> Before requesting additional global permissions, make sure that:

  1. You are logged in on this wiki;
  2. No specific section on this page exists for the permission you want to request;
To request additional global permissions
Copy the template below to the bottom of this section and explain what kind of access you need and why. If needed, link to relevant discussions. If you hold, or have previously held, the right and are asking for either a renewal or revival of that right, please add a link to the previous discussion.</translate>
=== <Add requested permission here> for [[User:Foo|Foo]] ===
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!--don't change this line-->
 |domain    = global<!--don't change this line-->
 |user name = <translate><!--T:4-->
Username</translate>
 |discussion=
}}
<translate><!--T:5-->
<Add an explanation here>, thanks</translate>, --~~~~

<translate> The request will be approved if consensus to do so exists after a short period of consideration. A steward will review the request.</translate>

Ability to edit protected redirects for タチコマ robot

I operate my bot on practically every wiki where I deal with double redirects through pywikibot redirect.py. I infrequently encounter protected double redirects per individual wiki but they accumulate over time. Manually dealing with this on so many wikis is a thankless tiring task which I would prefer humans aren't involved. The bot would only edit protected pages where the page itself is a double redirect. I request whatever minimum permission that would achieve this. -- とある白い猫 chi? 16:30, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The only way to do this is to add 'editprotected' userright to the "global bot' global group. This will allow editing protected double redirects on all global bot wikis but will require a consensus. For the wikis where global bots are not allowed there is no simple solution. Ruslik (talk) 20:23, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oh indeed. I am only looking at wikis with global bot opt in with my request. My bot already has a global flag. I was told a special usergroup could be formed for allowing only protected redirect pages to be edited. This would be ideal for the purpose I am posting. It could also be beneficial to extend such a restricted extension to the global bot flag. Such a redirect bot flag would be helpful on wikis that opt-out of a global bot flag where the alternative is having an admin bot which isn't something many communities are comfortable in having. -- とある白い猫 chi? 11:51, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Global editinterface for Helder

Per User talk:He7d3r#Global interface editor rights expired, thanks, --Helder 20:05, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS-member for Ochilov

Thank you. Rjd0060 (talk) 20:27, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See also