Steward requests/Global permissions

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
< Steward requests
This is an archived version of this page, as edited by Ruslik0 (talk | contribs) at 13:57, 17 April 2021 (→‎Global IP block exempt for XZTDean: done). It may differ significantly from the current version.
Shortcut:
SRGP
This page hosts requests for global permissions. To make a request, read the relevant policy (global rollback , global sysop , global rename , …) and make a request below. Explain why membership is needed for that group, and detail prior experience or qualifications.

This is not a vote and any active Wikimedia editor may participate in the discussion.

Global rollback and global interface editor requests require no fewer than 5 days of discussion while abuse filter helper and maintainer requests require no fewer than 7 days. Global renamer and global sysop requests require no fewer than 2 weeks of discussion. For requests that are unlikely to pass under any circumstances, they may be closed by a steward without further discussion (after a reasonable amount of input).

Quick navigation:
Dynamic pages:

Cross-wiki requests
Meta-Wiki requests

Requests for global rollback permissions

Shortcut:
SRGR
Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Your request might be rejected if you don't follow the instructions, and not doing so would reflect poorly on your suitability.
Please also review the Global rollback policy.
Instructions for making a request

Before requesting, make sure that: You have sufficient activity to meet the requirements to be allocated the global rollback flag

To make a request
Copy the template below to the bottom of this section and explain of why you need the access and why you're suitable.
=== Global rollback for {{subst:u|{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}}} ===
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!-- don't change this line -->
 |domain    = global <!-- don't change this line -->
 |user name = {{subst:REVISIONUSER}} <!-- don't change this line unless you're nominating another user -->
}}
::''Not ending before {{subst:#time:j F Y H:i|+5 days}} UTC''

The request will be approved if consensus to do so exists after a period of consideration of no less than 5 days (with rare exceptions , no matter how obvious the result may seem). This is not a vote, and all input is welcome. Stewards will determine whether consensus exists; when doing so it is likely that the weight given to the input of those involved in cross-wiki work will be most influential.

Global rollback for कन्हाई प्रसाद चौरसिया

Status:    In progress
Not ending before 18 April 2021 15:43 UTC

I have been associated with Hindi Wikisource since January 2019 and am gradually getting involved with many language projects of Wikipedia. Although my editing has been more Hindi. I joined late as a member of SWT but my work has continued to function all wiki. While I am a Rollbacker on Hindi Wikipedia, I am using Twinkle prefence on all Wikipedia projects to prevent vandalism and to increase my contribution by making positive contributions on the lalanguages. So Global rollback permissions would help me a lot doing crosswiki vandalism fighting.

Neutral Neutral Your contribution in Hindi-based projects isn't bad (and I don't see a problem having Hindi-based rollbackers), but I would like to see some more experience handling vandalism on more projects, because GR applies everywhere. Leaderboard (talk) 16:51, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Sir, as I mentioned above, I am doing the work of removing vandalism with positive edits in various Hindi projects like Hindi Wikisource, Wikipedia, wikibooks, Wiktionary, wikiquote, wikivoyage etc. It will be in Hindi language, so there is no problem in removing vandalism. Will be. And speaking of languages, the person who knows Hindi is able to work in other languages ​​like Bhojpuri, Maithili, Nepali, Punjabi languages, and I am from Bengal so I write a little - read Bengali and English. . And as a matter of experience, I have edited some improvements on every wiki, From which it can be known whether I am able to remove the vandalisam or not. - कन्हाई प्रसाद चौरसिया (talk) 18:23, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Neutral Neutral As you have said yourself, you have contributed mostly to the projects of Hindi and its surrounding languages as geographically in general. On your wikis with more than hundred edit, I see that you created a new page and edit categories with hotcat. I also specifically looked at your edits on wikis where less than your 20 edits. There are usually create new pages and some minor edits. I see on the GUC tool that you sometimes undo for non-constructive edits on some wikis. You have been more active since last month, but these are mostly on Hindi projects. These all contributions are good. But if you become a little more active in such edits on cross-wiki, why not? --Uncitoyentalk 15:28, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Oppose Oppose I gave a chance with my neutral comment but as my personal reaction I change my opinion into oppose because of the serial non-justification support comments from non-very active Meta users. --Uncitoyentalk 18:03, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Martin Urbanec: I welcome your thoughts Sir as well as I want to ask you as a prayer whether the block of a day goes away leaving a question mark forever. There is no way for him to move forward. Taking a look at the back of this blocked, sir, was this reason justified, due to which the blocked for one day was always the decision made by the manager, it is not right, it is not necessarily a mistake. it is such that you can see talk page due to some categories of discord / HERE] You do not get me wrong, Sir, I have no right, Sir, to prove myself right, I only wanted to tell the truth. For three years, my work seemed positive to him, why would he take a negative review of it today, Sir, perhaps the truth would be revealed to you.-- कन्हाई प्रसाद चौरसिया (talk) 10:05, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@1997kB: I liked it Sir, you have given your opinion, yet I would like to say something Sir, as you said that I kept talking about my bad revert, but there has been some reason for this, I want to tell that I still edit from mobile whose You will never see a reason that a slight remorse leads to a wrong revert. This mistake was caused by my smart rollbacker which I also mentioned on my talk page. [1] And you mentioned that I myself mentioned about the rollbacker removal as well as the always blocked because when a person is proven to be wrong while blocking them for one day and can erase those whom he can make in such a way. Due to this, people are probably a victim of blockage. When I was blocked for a day for good work, I wrote down due to morale. When I saw that my actions seemed positive for three years and had faith but not today, I proposed to remove the rollbacker as well as block it forever. Otherwise who will be the person who will give up the question of renouncing their revert facilities and being blocked forever. I thought that now I will do global work, hence proposed here.-- कन्हाई प्रसाद चौरसिया (talk) 11:05, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requests for global sysop permissions

Shortcut:
SRGS
Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Your request might be rejected if you don't follow the instructions, and not doing so would reflect poorly on your suitability.
Please also review the Global sysops policy.
Stewards
When you give someone global sysop rights, please list them on Users with global sysop access and ask them to subscribe to the global sysops mailing list.
Instructions for making a request

Before requesting, make sure that:

  1. You have a global account ;
  2. You are logged in on this wiki, and the account is part of your global account;
To make a request
Copy the template below to the bottom of this section and explain of why you need the access and why you're suitable. If you previously requested that right, please add a link to the previous discussion(s).
=== Global sysop for {{subst:u|{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}}} ===
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!-- don't change this line -->
 |domain    = global <!-- don't change this line -->
 |user name = {{subst:REVISIONUSER}} <!-- don't change this line unless you're nominating another user -->
}}
:''Not ending before {{subst:#time:j F Y H:i|+2 week}} UTC''

The request will be approved if consensus to do so exists after a period of consideration of no less than two weeks (no exceptions are allowed no matter how obvious the result may seem). This is not a vote, and all input is welcome. Stewards will determine whether consensus exists; when doing so it is likely that the weight given to the input of those involved in cross-wiki work will be most influential. Please note: Since 2019 all global sysops are required to have two-factor authentication (2FA) enabled.

Requests for global rename permissions

Steward requests/Global permissions/Global renamers

Requests for global IP block exemption

Shortcut:
SRIPBE
Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Your request might be rejected if you don't follow the instructions. Please review Global IP block exemption. You may request Global IP block exemption via stewards(_AT_)wikimedia.org if you can not edit this page.
Please note: Global IP block exemption does NOT make one immune to locally-created blocks of any sort, only global blocks.
Instructions for making a request

Before requesting global IP block exemption, make sure that:

  1. You have a global account ;
  2. You are logged in on this wiki, and the account is part of your global account;
To request global IP block exemption
Copy the template below to the bottom of this section and explain why you need the access and why you're suitable. If needed, link to relevant discussions.
=== Global IP block exempt for {{subst:u|{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}}} ===
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!--don't change this line-->
 |domain    = global<!--don't change this line-->
 |user name = {{subst:REVISIONUSER}}
}}
<Add an explanation here>, thanks, --~~~~

The request will be approved if there is demonstrated need for the permission, such as bypassing a global block from someone who is not the intended target.

Global IP block exempt for Lvxing6321

Status:    In progress

I have obtained ip exemption from China Wikipedia, but I want to use Wikisource, thanks, --Lvxing6321 (talk) 14:37, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Global IP block exempt for 四条河原町

Status:    Done

Currently editing in China right now and VPN is needed to bypass censorship.

Done Ruslik (talk) 15:34, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Global IP block exempt for 沙盒梦想

Status:    In progress

I live in China and I have to use proxy to connect wikipedia,thanks --沙盒梦想 (talk) 08:19, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You do not seem to contribute to other projects except Chinese Wikipedia. Ruslik (talk) 13:55, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Global IP block exempt for 大禾花

Status:    In progress

<Hi, My user's name is 大禾花. I'm from Chinese Mainland so I have to use the open proxy. I have uploaded some images on Commons. But now the exception on the Commons expired this month. I want to ask for the global exception because I want to upload the images on Commons, and I also want to make some tiny contribution on Wikisource. >，Thanks a lot!--大禾花 (talk) 13:36, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Global IP block exempt for XZTDean

Status:    Done

I currently live in China, so I can only access the Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects by the proxy. I already got IP exemption in Chinese Wikipedia, but I want to edit something on other projects like Wikidata. Thanks! --XZTDean (talk) 00:46, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done Ruslik (talk) 13:57, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requests for 2 Factor Auth tester permissions

Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Your request might be rejected if you don't follow the instructions.
Testing this service may result in the loss of your access and is not recommended for inexperienced users.
Instructions for making a request

Before requesting 2FA tester global permissions, make sure that:

  1. You are logged in on this wiki;
  2. You have read the help page about two-factor authentication and understand how it could lead to irrecoverable loss of access to your account ;
To request 2FA tester global permissions
Copy the template below to the bottom of this section and INDICATE you have read the Help page.
If the request page is currently protected, please file as an edit request on the talk page.
=== 2FA Tester for {{subst:u|{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}}} ===
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!--don't change this line-->
 |domain    = global <!--don't change this line-->
 |user name = {{subst:REVISIONUSER}}
}}
<Add an explanation here>, thanks, --~~~~

The request will be approved if there is no reason not to grant one. A steward will review the request.

2FA Tester for Bebiezaza

Status:    Done

I am being nominated to be an interface administrator at Thai Wikisource(th:s:Special:Diff/150553) and I have read and understood the document. --Bebiezaza (talk) 18:28, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done. stanglavine msg 02:09, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2FA Tester for WhoAteMyButter

Status:    Done

Extra account security is nice to have, I think. I have indeed read the help page in full. Thanks, --WhoAteMyButter (talk) 21:52, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done. stanglavine msg 02:09, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requests for other global permissions

Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Your request might be rejected if you don't follow the instructions.
Instructions for making a request

Before requesting additional global permissions, make sure that:

  1. You are logged in on this wiki;
  2. No specific section on this page exists for the permission you want to request;
To request additional global permissions
Copy the template below to the bottom of this section and explain what kind of access you need and why. If needed, link to relevant discussions. If you hold, or have previously held, the right and are asking for either a renewal or revival of that right, please add a link to the previous discussion.
=== <Add requested permission here> for [[User:Foo|Foo]] ===
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!--don't change this line-->
 |domain    = global<!--don't change this line-->
 |user name = Username
 |discussion=
}}
<Add an explanation here>, thanks, --~~~~

The request will be approved if consensus to do so exists after a short period of consideration. A steward will review the request.

remove global OTRS member for Versageek

Status:    In progress

Thanks, --Krd 08:43, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

See also

Cooperation requests for: comments (local) (global) · translation

Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steward_requests/Global_permissions&oldid=21354135"