Steward requests/Global permissions
This is not a vote and any active Wikimedia editor may participate in the discussion.
Global rollback and global interface editor requests require no fewer than 5 days of discussion while abuse filter helper and maintainer requests require no fewer than 7 days. Global renamer and global sysop requests require no fewer than 2 weeks of discussion. For requests that are unlikely to pass under any circumstances, they may be closed by a steward without further discussion (after a reasonable amount of input).
Quick navigation:Cross-wiki requests |
---|
Meta-Wiki requests |
Requests for global rollback permissions
| Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Global rollback for Em-mustapha
- Global user: Em-mustapha (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
- Not ending before 12 September 2021 07:08 UTC
Hi all, hope this finds you well. I would like to request global rollback access on my account, it will help ease my counter-vandalism activities on Wikimedia projects. Yes! I was previously opposed due to lack of crosswiki activity. Thanks Em-mustapha talk 07:08, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
Prior request is at Steward requests/Global permissions/2021-06#Global rollback for M-Mustapha --Ts12rAc (talk) 07:41, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
- Neutral, I still believe that the cross-wiki activity is too low. Nadzik (talk) 10:21, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose a: the request is far too soon. b: still too low x-wiki activity. c: for grollbacker, ideally you'd need about 100 edits on at least 15 for me to consider as "active x-wiki" user SHB2000 (talk | contibs) 13:06, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
- Neutral Trusted user but cross-wiki activity is too low. —Yahya (talk • contribs.) 10:35, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose not satisfied with the lack of crosswikiness. —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 21:02, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Regrettably the crosswiki isn't enough yet still, don't give up though, keep on reverting, and if there is sufficient heavy use of undos, surely we can be happy to support. Thank you for volunteering. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 07:30, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- Request withdrawn I would like to halt this request at this moment. Thank you everyone your insights. Em-mustapha talk 07:54, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
Not done per above --Alaa :)..! 11:14, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
Requests for global sysop permissions
| Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Requests for global rename permissions
Steward requests/Global permissions/Global renamers
Global rename for Ulubatli Hasan
- Wiki: meta.wikimedia.org (list 'crats • bot policy • summary • 'crats rights)
- User: Ulubatli Hasan (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
- Not ending before 20 September 2021 02:43 UTC
Hello everybody. I'd like to request global rename permission to assist rename request and my main focus would be urwiki where I'm serving as a eliminator since september 2020 (voting). I've been assisting admins since I became eliminator on ur wiki and saving pages from vandalism. I'm requesting this flag because there is no global renamer on ur wiki that's why we often face issues and had directed users to request on meta for renaming. Thank you... Hasan (talk) 02:43, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Comment What's an eliminator? Never heard of that... Then I'll choose on whether to support or not. SHB2000 (talk | contibs) 13:08, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
- (Edit: Per below clarification, I will Oppose this as the lack of sysop rights on a content project. The reason I'm opposing because of lack of sysop rights is because if they have all the rights of an admin, why aren't they an admin yet? SHB2000 (talk | contibs))
- I suppose this is a group which allows for actions related to page deletion, but not other admin permissions. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 14:09, 7 September 2021 (UTC) - SHB2000 I think Eliminator gives every admin task except giving rights to users and renaming. I have deleted/undeleted, protected/unprotected, blocked/unblocked. It also allows user (who has this flag) to edit protected pages on admin level or protect pages on admin level. Hasan (talk) 15:38, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
- Giving rights to users is for bureaucrats (but some rights can be given by admins) and renaming users is only for global renamers. SHB2000 (talk | contibs) 22:25, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
- I suppose this is a group which allows for actions related to page deletion, but not other admin permissions. ~~~~
- Weak support While this is not full adminship, I still think that the eliminator user group shows enough trust already – unlike a similar flag on ruwiki, this one allows for blocking as well, and it don't seem like there are too many important permissions missing from the admin toolset. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 23:25, 7 September 2021 (UTC) - Support --Muzammil (talk) 08:53, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
- Support: urwiki's eliminator user group basically is sysop except for the ability to change rights. With the three core tools of the set, blocking, protecting and deleting, a part of the group, I can treat the eliminator group as being equivalent to sysop, satisfying my main criterion for renamer. Additionally, the lack of renamers on urwiki would be further grounds to grant the requestor renamer rights. JavaHurricane 11:26, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
- Support per User:JavaHurricane. —Yahya (talk • contribs.) 12:36, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
- Support -J. Ansari Talk 15:06, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
- Support Faismeen (talk) 03:23, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- Neutral. Eliminator is so called granted by sysops after a vote, which makes the user trusted in their local community. However, I do not see there is a need for another renamer from ur (if I recall correctly there is one already), is the load from ur that great? I am not saying there is a lack of trust but is there a sustained need. Do correct me if I am wrong and will be happy to support. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 07:33, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- Hi Camouflaged Mirage, I didn't know that. Before making request I checked every admins global flag but I didn't find anyone who has global renamer user group. Could you please name him? Thanks Hasan (talk) 08:12, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Ulubatli Hasan Hello, what I mean is that there is already a renamer who claims they can understand ur per this list and is there any big backlogs coming from ur which the global queue system is unable to clear. I am all for someone who have unique language skills, but my thinking is that is there a need for one more user holding a flag if the load isn't that high in the first place? Just my thoughts. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 08:51, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Camouflaged Mirage I'm thinking the same too. If Ulubatli Hasan is trusted enough with the tools of a sysop kit, then why are they not a sysop? It's something that has got me concerned that we're missing something here. SHB2000 (talk | contibs) 09:39, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- SHB2000 I've not applied adminship because of previous two nominations (first and second) where users (mostly admins) have rejected both nominations saying that there is no need for more admins... Hasan (talk) 13:34, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- There shouldn't be such restrictions for admins. Only 'crats. SHB2000 (talk | contibs) 22:48, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- And on your second adminship nom, google translate gives me: The user does not currently meet admin standards. . That's a clear no. SHB2000 (talk | contibs) 22:52, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- @SHB2000: You are misunderstanding I think, the nomination they linked are of different users and I think they meant to say that as those two other user got no support from current admins, it implied to them that there's no need for more admins, so they never applied. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 05:30, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
- SHB2000 I've not applied adminship because of previous two nominations (first and second) where users (mostly admins) have rejected both nominations saying that there is no need for more admins... Hasan (talk) 13:34, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Camouflaged Mirage I'm thinking the same too. If Ulubatli Hasan is trusted enough with the tools of a sysop kit, then why are they not a sysop? It's something that has got me concerned that we're missing something here. SHB2000 (talk | contibs) 09:39, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Ulubatli Hasan Hello, what I mean is that there is already a renamer who claims they can understand ur per this list and is there any big backlogs coming from ur which the global queue system is unable to clear. I am all for someone who have unique language skills, but my thinking is that is there a need for one more user holding a flag if the load isn't that high in the first place? Just my thoughts. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 08:51, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- Question: You said in application
I'm requesting this flag because there is no global renamer on ur wiki that's why we often face issues and had directed users to request on meta for renaming.
- Could you please provide link(s) where you helped in such cases? ‐‐1997kB (talk) 10:22, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- this user request for renaming.
تبدیلی نام کی درخواستوں کے لیے اب اس صفحہ کا استعمال متروک ہوچکا ہے، چنانچہ اس قسم کی درخواستیں دینے کے لیے میٹا ویکی پر تشریف لے جائیں.
- this user request for renaming.
- Hasan (talk) 13:34, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- That page was last edited in 2015 and even has been protected. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 14:36, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- Hasan (talk) 13:34, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- Weak oppose When a user is not a sysop, I personally look if the user is helping in renaming related areas but it looks like they have no experience in such areas, so I am hesitant if they know how the renaming works. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 14:43, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- Support -Maffeth.opiana (talk) 14:56, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
- Support These eliminator rights contain the key admin tools: block, protect and delete. Quite a few global renamers rename users who may need a rename after a block. The other tools involved in the admin toolkit (abuse filter, user rights etc.) aren't as relevant to what a global renamer actually does. So whilst Ulubatli Hasan doesn't have "sysop" rights, and therefore may not fulfill some people's criteria, the experience in other sysop areas is not/not as relevant to the global renamer rights, so I am supporting. --Ferien (talk) 19:33, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
Requests for global IP block exemption
| Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Global IP block exempt for Formores
- Formores (talk · contribs)
- Status: In progress
- 需复审或解除之权限:申请获得IP封禁豁免权
- 理由:我是Mixed Elements的wiki运营人员,编辑、更新公司的相关wiki是我的工作内容,是正当需求,顾申请IP封禁豁免。 — The preceding unsigned comment was added by Formoresss (talk) 07:22, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Dude literally just admitted he is here to post ads-AINH (talk) 14:14, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Note: Requester seems to have misspelt their username. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 23:55, 7 September 2021 (UTC)- Looks quite suspicious to me SHB2000 (talk | contibs) 09:42, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- Note: Requester seems to have misspelt their username. ~~~~
Global IP block exempt for Itcfangye
- Global user: Itcfangye (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
I have moved to Mainland China since July 2021 and have been granted IPBE for Zhwiki and Meta. I require eith GIPBE or IPBE for Wikidata to add cross-wiki links on Wikidata, thanks, --Itcfangye (talk) 11:59, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
Global IP block exempt for Sojol Rana
- Global user: Sojol Rana (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
Hi, I'm from Bangladesh. I regularly contribute BN wiki, EN wiki, Wikidata, and Commons. Internet Archive is blocked by the government in our country, which I use to add references to an article. So that I use VPN to access the Internet Archive to contribute on Wikis. Sometimes I also use public wifi to contribute on Wikis and I found both of these two (VPN, public wifi) are blocked on Wikis. So I need this permission to contribute on Wikis, thanks
Sojol Rana (talk) 14:18, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
Requests for 2 Factor Auth tester permissions
Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
|
2FA Tester for isometry
- Global user: isometry (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
Thank you. — The preceding unsigned comment was added by Isometry (talk) 20:10, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Isometry: Hello, have you read H:2FA? stanglavine msg 03:12, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
Requests for other global permissions
Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
|
See also
- User groups — Information on user groups
- Global rights log — Log of global permissions changes
- Archives
General requests for: help from a Meta sysop or bureaucrat · deletion (speedy deletions: local · multilingual) · URL blacklisting · new languages · interwiki map
Personal requests for: username changes · permissions (global) · bot status · adminship on Meta · CheckUser information (local) · local administrator help
Cooperation requests for: comments (local) (global) · translation