User talk:Savh/Archive 5

Please do not post any new comments on this page. This is a discussion archive for 2017. To post a new message, refer to User talk:Savh.

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

One of the Mike[edit]

Bot. [[Special:MyLanguage/ --12.252.158.74 16:50, 9 January 2017 (UTC)w ]][reply]

I am unable to understand what you're referring to. Sa vh ^ñ 17:54, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Parámetro link en blanco en imágenes[edit]

Hola, gracias por el aviso, lo tendré en cuenta la próxima vez. Saludos. File:Alvaro Molina.png Alvaro Molina (Let's Talk) 23:09, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

De haber sabido no hubiese hecho esos cambios. Trataré de arreglar eso en algún momento, ya que no tengo claro en cuantas plantillas de ese tipo hice eso. File:Alvaro Molina.png Alvaro Molina (Let's Talk) 23:13, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cross-wiki action[edit]

Hi Savh! Gracias por la acción, en Wikipedia Nahuatl lo iba a bloquear directamente pero he visto que es muy evasivo. Ya MoiraMoira había borrado sus contribuciones pero él nuevamente las crea desde otras IP's. Un tiempo estuvo usando también las direcciones 24.251.24.185 // 24.251.87.63, no se si todavía las use o sigan vigentes. Te envío un cordial saludo. --Akapochtli (talk) 22:01, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Me parece que la actividad desde esas IP's es bastante vieja. Eso sí, hay bastantes contribuciones globales que quizás habría que verificar - no sé muy bien a qué se dedica. Sa vh ^ñ 23:31, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Savh: gracias por despejar la duda. Lo que yo veo (y nos da un respiro) es que no las está usando. Su enfoque es difundir las biografías (sic) de artistas norteamericanos; en las wikis grandes donde los usuarios pueden darle contenido no creo que represente ningún problema, el problema es en las pequeñas wikis donde más que vandalismo se vuelve spam. Estaré vigilando por si aparece con nuevas IP's y te lo haré saber. Acerca del otro tema ya solicité verificación. Estoy a tus ordenes, saludos y nuevamente gracias. --Akapochtli (talk) 02:21, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

please help to request.[edit]

Hello. Please help me! Steward requests/Permissions. Please help. Thank you 😊 -- Jaloliddin Madaminov (talk) 15:44, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Attended by Ajraddatz. Sa vh ^ñ 15:46, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please reopen that discussion[edit]

There is no other venue in which to discuss this issue. I request you lease reopen that discussion. Reguyla (talk) 21:45, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is definitely not an issue for meta admins or 'crats, and as such, not a discussion to be held there. Sa vh ^ñ 21:49, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry but I disagree. Meta is the wiki that has all of the IRC related pages, the group contacts and the inforation about the Wikimedia IRC channels. This is absolutely the right place to have a discussion both about the conduct of an IRC group contact and the unblocking of a Wikimedia user. AlexZ has been bullying me and pursuing an ongoing multi site vendetta against me and you are protecting his harassment. Reguyla (talk) 21:53, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am not. WM:RFH is a page for requests to meta sysops and bureaucrats. Your request isn't related to us. Sa vh ^ñ 21:55, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bloqueos[edit]

Hola. Creo que deberías revisar este bloqueo. Tranquilo, el sospechoso ya fue arrestado :-) —Marco Aurelio 12:52, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Curioso, eso de 5 décadas, solo tenían que ser 6 años (acabando de salir de un bloqueo de 3 que al parecer no desanimó el spam). Lo he adaptado. Sa vh ^ñ 12:56, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unfair and illegitimate decision[edit]

Were you aware of Commons:Administrators/Requests/INeverCry (readmin)? 27/2 is one of the top 5 most successful RFAs in Commons history. And then I removed a 3-month old block of a user who's 6 month block came after a 1-week block before it. Then the Commons crats organize an arbitrary Arbcom via private email and you remove my bit after the results of that and a straw poll. I didn't even merit a de-sysop request. And you decided to lend steward approval to this disgusting cheat. And you were happy to do it to someone who thought of you as a nice guy and a friend. You showed me you're an enemy to me.

AFBorchert, a respected crat, resigned rather than carry out something he knew was wrong, but you did it like it was no big deal. You served Odder and Nick and Savin, people who hate me and talk about and to me like I was a piece of shit or a little boy. I'm almost 50. I would've resigned as a steward before doing that to you. I would've told Commons that someone put in place by a strong RFA deserved the chance to defend himself in a de-sysop. The leadership of these projects gets worse by the year. I've watched it. But you and the cadre of Commons jackals won't get rid of me. I'm here to stay. Now you have a fine day ~~mi amigo~~. lNeverCry 09:26, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I merely proceeded to undoing the action done by one bureaucrat, per the request of all the remaining bureaucrats that agreed not the proper proceedure had been followed and the action had to be undone - the decision was not mine but an implementation of a decision to undo an action by one of their fellow bureaucrats. As much as I understand it to be upsetting, it really isn't up to me to involve myself further into this, it certainly isn't my intention to be a friend or enemy to anyone in this discussion and I would urge you to refrain from personal attacks. Sa vh ^ñ 14:51, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, let me apologise to Savh for using his talk page.

INeverCry I don't know you and certainly don't hate you, I said when you resigned that I valued the service you've given to Commons and that still holds true, your work on Commons then as now is appreciated. I said I do, of course, wish INeverCry well. The community has shown (largely) kindness and patience in the past and I hope (and ask) that we continue to do so going forward, supporting INC in whatever he wishes to do on Commons in the future.

I'm sorry about the events that occurred when you were de-sysopped at the request of the Commons Bureaucrats, but this was, we should remember, a result of promises you made, this in turn resulted in members of the community (myself included) wanting to hold you to those comments (and out of the 27 people who supported your re-RfA, 3 opposed you having your sysop permission reinstated during the discussion on Commons bureaucrat noticeboard, and the discussion there was 11/5/1 against you having your permission reinstated).

You and the community should remember it was you who said Let me make it very clear that I don't intend to be a sysop here again [1] and just want to make it clear that I do not under any circumstances want my sysop right returned once stewards remove it tomorrow. Not in a month and not in a year. I won't bother the community with another RFA. The community has my word on that. I don't expect that an RFA from me would garner much support after this. [2].

You now need to move on INeverCry, the events leading up to removal of permission were fair and took into account your own statements and stated wishes. I think it's very unfair to come here and complain to Savh, and a little unfair to Odder and myself, I don't hate you, I doubt Odder hates you, I only intend to hold you accountable to the comments you made when resigning in December 2016. Nick (talk) 22:28, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Bloqueo Ip[edit]

Buenas Savh, te escribo por aquí porque nuevamente me aparece lo siguiente por mas que haya iniciado sesion: "Ver el código de «Usuario discusión:Savh» ← Usuario discusión:Savh No tienes permiso para modificar esta página, por la siguiente razón: Tu dirección IP está en un rango que ha sido bloqueada en todos los wikis. Vituzzu (meta.wikimedia.org) realizó el bloqueo. La razón dada es leaky colo + open proxy at 104.236.30.249. Inicio del bloqueo: 08:40 5 oct 2016 Expiración del bloqueo: 08:40 5 oct 2021 Puedes ponerte en contacto con Vituzzu para discutir el bloqueo. No puedes usar la función de "Enviar un mensaje de correo a este usuario" a menos que especifiques una dirección de correo electrónico válida en las preferencias de tu cuenta y no hayas sido bloqueado para su uso. Tu dirección IP actual es 104.236.232.230, y el rango bloqueado es 104.236.0.0/16. Incluye todos los detalles anteriores en cualquier consulta que realices sobre el tema." Yo la verdad ya no se que hacer ya que cuando tengo tiempo libre quiero editar y me sale eso y ya no lo puedo hacer. ¿No hay forma de evitar esos bloqueos aunque sea de una forma local, en este caso la Wikipedia en español que es donde mas edito?. Bruno Rene Vargas (talk) 02:09, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks ...[edit]

... for deleting those pages at ro.wikinews. Just in case the reason/s for the deletion request is/are not clear, here is a quick (and pretty efficient) online translator from Romanian to English. Winter^eu 15:19, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

My mother tongue being Spanish, I can understand some flares of Romanian. I thought deleting it with the default summary would provide an even clearer reason for deletion. For the spam page, I could indeed have chosen "Autopromovare sau reclamă", but I guessed "spam" would also be understood - I perform quite some deletions of spam cross-wiki. Sa vh ^ñ 15:47, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

vote?[edit]

... and what do you think about this? Unsure if it should be considered a vote. Ankry (talk) 20:38, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No reason not to consider it a vote, imo. Corrected it. Sa vh ^ñ 20:44, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Special:Block/213.111.233.25[edit]

Just whacked it again locally, so flagging in case there is global whacking required. — billinghurst sDrewth 23:16, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, gave it another whack. I have little pity for IPs that have been spamming for nearly 2 years, so I'm glad they won't be in the next few years. Sa vh ^ñ 23:36, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

date translations[edit]

As I see here you may be more familiar with translation issues than others. I noticed that the date format used here (and likely in other places) should be language-dependent, eg.: for Slavic languages genitive form should be used for month, German people suggest that just a dot should be added after day, unsure about other languages. I tried to deal with it directly in translated texts like here, but it is ugly. Have you any idea how to introduce a language-dependent date format in a cleaner way? A dedicated template? Ankry (talk) 14:22, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am aware the translations are not great, and if I'd know where, I'd propose adapting the {{#time expression to these different forms in the various languages. Adapting the template to create an algorithm that works for every language differently & correctly seems impossible. In Spanish, when using a date in that sense, a "de" should be placed between the day, month and year. Even though not very aesthetic, I believed placing the raw date would be clear for everyone and a hassle less. Sa vh ^ñ 21:10, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I meant a template like this. It should support most ltr languages used for this template (it is based on wikidata), except Finnish & Kurdish which seem to be unsuported by #date. Of course, this is rather a suggestion for future; I do not intend to start a translation revolution during the vote. Ankry (talk) 22:09, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I understand the idea of your template, but I believe it should possibly be included in the #date function, instead of creating a custom template for it. It seems to me to be something the interface should be able to support. Sa vh ^ñ 23:06, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It would be obviously better. Ankry (talk) 23:14, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

TOR[edit]

https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:NotificationsMarkRead

Start of block: 2017-01-01T11:29:56
Expiration of block: 2018-01-01T11:29:56
Intended blockee: 2607:5300:0:0:0:0:0:0/32

Such a lovely range-block, that just happens to hit a lot of TOR exit nodes.

Many of us are using TOR for privacy reasons - we are in danger from our own governments. Please consider who you are blocking as well as the people you are targeting. A local block is a very blunt tool; prefer global blocks for which there are global exemptions. - Amgine/^{meta wikt wnews blog wmf-blog goog news} 05:35, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to say, but that rangeblock has been in place (on and off) since October 2012 with similar restrictions. I am not sure why you point me to the alleged bluntness of the local blocking tool either, since the range is also globally blocked but global blocks do not apply on meta. I have given you local IP block exemption. Sa vh ^ñ 11:06, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, there are local blocks on that same range as well on en.wiki, es.wiki, ja.wiki, nl.wiki, ru.wiki & zh.wiki. Sa vh ^ñ 11:09, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I had not realized meta is not covered by the global IP blocks; for me, that changes the everything and obviates my complaint. I apologize. I was wrong. - Amgine/^{meta wikt wnews blog wmf-blog goog news} 16:52, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Spambots[edit]

Hi Savh, as often happens alas all present stewards in the channel seem to be inactive. I see you not there but I see there that you are mass locking spambots. WVould you please also include this one stopped by filter on nl-wiki and blocked locally. Dank je wel. MoiraMoira (talk) 10:00, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Sa vh ^ñ 10:11, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted User Page[edit]

    Could you please explain to me why my user page was deleted and show what part of the deletion policy you had used to justify my user page being deleted 12 seconds after it was made?

I used the meta scope. Meta is not a free hosting provider. Sa vh ^ñ 02:12, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    It was under the acceptable section: Documentation intended to help users contribute and collaborate in other wiki projects. I am trying to set up a group that allows people to share ideas about technology, philosophy, etc. How is that not allowed, or did you just not read my page? Yes, I know it's pretty long, but atleast read it instead of deleting it 12 seconds after it was made...

I didn't delete it 12 seconds after it was created, but fast enough for me to realise it does not belong here. Feel free to ask another sysop, but what you say here does not correspond with the userpage I deleted. Sa vh ^ñ 02:24, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

So Wikimedia doesn't allow a community that answers questions and discusses ideas?

how can i use proxy?[edit]

hi, in my country some wikis were blocked and i must use proxy software (like freegate) to help wiki. for example see this page. today when i wanted to use freegate software (for accessing upper link), wiki didnt let me leave my comment! and wiki asked me to share my problem with you. whats ur opinion for free vpn?

Please ask for global IP block exemption on SRGP, if you are affected by proxy blocks. Sa vh ^ñ 09:51, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

89.218.186.82[edit]

Hi. I just reblocked for two years as recently came off a one year block. You global'd it finishing in May 2017, wonder whether you can update that global block now to get ahead of the game, and to sync with the local. Thanks for your consideration. — billinghurst sDrewth 23:15, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done! Sa vh ^ñ 23:28, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FYI: Blocked 134.249.48.0/21 here and commons[edit]

From my spambot monitoring of here and commons (predominantly), I have lightly blocked 134.249.48.0/21. While it is Kyvistar I am unable to see any IP edits in the range [3] [4]. There is spambots across the whole /16, the concentration is this /21 (at this time). — billinghurst sDrewth 22:53, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I come across Kyvistar ranges all the time, though they usually contain too much real users to justify a global block. The /21 is however globally blockable, most recent activity is spammy or otherwise suspicious, which I have done for 3 months. Sa vh ^ñ 00:16, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pretty much what I was seeing from normal view, glad that it is confirmed. Thanks. — billinghurst sDrewth 14:11, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Charo birth year[edit]

I am 67 years old and no way is Charo younger than me. I remember as a young girl watching her on the Ed Sullivan show nod she was definitely older than me by more than a couple of years. I honestly believe she is closer to 74 than 66 I remember her birth year as originally being given as 1944 then 1946 then early fifties. I honestly think her birth year is probably around 1944 but no way is she only 66 years old

Not sure why you bring that up on my talk page, but unfortunately your own experiences are not a reliable source. There is however a mention of this debate on her Wikipedia articles, both in Spanish and in English. Sa vh ^ñ 00:10, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Question about a lock[edit]

Hi,

I have a question regarding locks. I am looking at special:CentralAuth/PokestarFan and he is indefinitely blocked on 3 wikis for incompetence. Also, his edits on wikidata has been rocky since it is very easy to have an automated tool gone wrong, hence his 79k edits. I was wondering if a lock on srg is appropriate.

Regards,

MechQuester (talk) 03:28, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry I haven't responded before - I have been quite busy with other tasks lately. The procedure for global locks of established users is explained on the Global bans page. I am not fond of locking users with proper contributions to a project, even if they are semi-automated. Sa vh ^ñ 22:26, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Hammadsaeed[edit]

Hi,

I have an enquiry regarding the above user. The user, though indeffed on English & Simple Wikipedias, was granted autopatrolled rights on UrWiki.

As I checked the CentralAoth, I found this pic http://img.ctrlv.in/img/17/04/01/58dfe9cad4b7a.png i.e. the user a/c is tagged as a bot.

How is it possible? Besides all his edits are manual as far as I see nobody tagged him as bot on UrWiki.

Can you please look into the matter and explain? Thanks in advance. --Muzammil (talk) 18:03, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Looking into that. Sa vh ^ñ 18:04, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You granted the bot flag:

15:46, 25 March 2017 Hindustanilanguage (talk | contribs | block) changed group membership for Hammadsaeed from (none) to bot (تفویض اختیارات) 
15:46, 25 مارچ 2017 Hindustanilanguage (تبادلۂ خیال | شراکتیں | پابندی لگائیں) نے گروہی رکنیت برائے Hammadsaeed از (کچھ نہیں) تا خودکار صارف تبدیل کیا (تفویض اختیارات)

If the right is not correctly translated, file a request on phabricator. Sa vh ^ñ 18:08, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'll check it. Thanks for the quick input. --Muzammil (talk) 18:14, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There was some problem with Ur:میڈیاویکی:Group-bot-member, but thankfully the terminology is now corrected. Thank you again. --Muzammil (talk) 18:55, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

SOS[edit]

Bonjour et permettez-moi de me présenter : je suis Claude Piard, jadis contributeur sous le pseudo de Claude PIARD aujourd’hui quasi-banni dans des conditions pour le moins contestables. Et vous êtes mon ultime recours pour dénoncer des dérives nuisibles in fine à la réputation de Wikepdia. J'ai en effet déjà tenté d'alerter le CAR qui s'est déclaré incompétent puis fais appel récemment aux bureaucrates où mes messages sur leur PdD, revertés dans les délais les plus brefs par Habertrix, n'entrent même plus suite à une prise de contrôle que n'approuverait probablement pas la CNIL. Mais ce genre de manœuvre risquée est bien révélateur en soi de l'urgence qu'il y a pour certain(e)s de "cacher les poussières sous le tapis".

Excusez-moi donc de vous ramener loin en arrière. En novembre 2013 Litlok est intervenu sur la PaS pour TI d’un article consacré à l’ « Attitude des juifs sous le régime nazi » pour suggérer son transfert dans la catégorie Recherche en histoire de Wikiversité, ce que j’ai fait le 6 janvier 2014 non sans provoquer de réactions de Lgd/Alginatus, longtemps sous simple IP.

Deux ans plus tard, en octobre 2016 la fausse manoeuvre d’un collègue et ami qui a rapatrié par erreur les travaux résultant de l'évolution de cet article sur Wikiversité a été prétexte au procès le plus rapide de l’histoire wikipédienne. Un RA pour « désorganisation de l’encyclopédie » initié par Heddryin à mon encontre déposé le 22 octobre à 12 heures 46 a abouti à mon blocage indéfini le 24 octobre à 18 heures 41, sanction prononcée par Lomita – après une large consultation certes – aux motifs allégués de « WP-POINT, meatpuppetry et contournement de décision communautaire », la décision étant appliquée par Starus. Le RA initial a été clos dès le 23 par la même Lomita à 9 heures 33 – soit 15 heures après son ouverture – pour « conflit d’édition » trois minutes exactement après le dépôt de mon argumentaire, la discussion se poursuivant ensuite uniquement sur le BA entre administrateurs où celui-ci est ignoré.

Mes tentatives d’appel au RA puis au CaR sont rapidement éludés avec pour seul effet le blocage de mon IP (2A01:E35:2E8F:19D0:E574:9CCA:1C5C:7825) et l’effacement de ma page présentation ainsi que sa PdD probablement trop compromettantes pour mes détracteurs. Depuis d’épisodiques tentatives de modestes interventions lors d’éphémères déblocages de mon IP se traduisent par son reblocage immédiat par Lomita au seul prétexte du test du canard, empêchant ainsi toute remise en cause de sa décision. Et actuellement ma détermination à faire rétablir l’exactitude des faits me vaut en RA une proposition de bannissement de la part d’Heggesipe. L’IP flottante de mon téléphone me permet néanmoins de porter à votre connaissance cette situation sur laquelle je reste prêt à fournir tous les renseignements complémentaires utiles. A cette fin, et faute d'autres moyens, mon adresse e-mail était accessible via mon ancienne page Claude PIARD. Celle-ci est certes effacée et je suppose que vous avez les outils nécessaires pour la ré-ouvrir. Néanmoins je me permets de vous la confirmer : crjpiard@free.fr

Merci d’avoir pris le temps de me lire et bonne semaine. Envoyé depuis une adresse flottante, faute de pouvoir le faire plus régulièrement.--37.166.90.99 16:23, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Je découvre que ma connexion n'est pas bloquée sur Meta-Wiki et vous confirme donc totalement ce qui précède.--Claude PIARD (talk) 16:41, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cette version archivée avant effacement de ma page de discussion confirme et explicite ce qui précède. Elle démontre également que j’ai épuisé tous les recours avant de vous solliciter. Sans résultats autre que provoquer une demande de bannissement. Indifférence générale ? Complot ? Quoiqu’il en soit le remplacement du respect des principes fondateurs et des recommandations écrites par le concept de « décision communautaire » ( i.e. « au soviet ») a de quoi inquiéter pour l’avenir de Wikipédia francophone--Claude PIARD (talk) 09:40, 20 April 2017 (UTC).[reply]

Je suis désolé, mais meta n'est pas une instance supérieure pour resoudre les problèmes internes de fr.wikipedia. Sa vh ^ñ 10:20, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merci d'avoir pris le temps de me répondre. Ma démarche aura permis au moins de mettre en lumière le curieux fonctionnement de ce Wiki où les "décisions communautaires" de "tribunaux populaires" peuvent être prises et appliquées en contravention totale avec les principes fondateurs et les recommandations officielles qui en découlent. Puis leurs "victimes" bannies impunément - quelles que soient par ailleurs la qualité de leurs contributions - afin d'"étouffer l'affaire". Merci encore et bonne semaine.--Claude PIARD (talk) 12:43, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you block me?[edit]

Hi, I was wondering why you blocked me and would it be possible for you to remove the block?Thank you!

Hi, 54.165.38.53, you are not blocked.

Lotje (talk) 10:24, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am indeed unaware of which block could be affecting you, or which block you are referring to. Please e-mail us the details of your block, if the issue still persists. Sa vh ^ñ 10:50, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

please unblock me if possible??[edit]

hi ,please I explain why I block ???? thank you

Hi Hosseinblue, where are you blocked? Lotje (talk) 10:33, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am indeed unaware of which block could be affecting you, or which block you are referring to. Please e-mail us the details of your block, if the issue still persists. My apologies for the delay in answering, I was rather busy with other personal obligations. @Lotje: Hartelijk dank voor het inspringen! Sa vh ^ñ 10:51, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Saludito[edit]

Salut Savh. Te acabo de mencionar en este hilo y como creo que la notificación automática no llegó, te dejo este aviso, así como un saludo, Jmvkrecords ⚜ (Intra talk) 04:40, 7 May 2017 (UTC).[reply]

Gracias por la notificación. Andaba estos días algo distanciado por otras obligaciones, pero es cierto que el abuso de solicitudes de cambios de nombre requiere algo de atención. Sa vh ^ñ 10:48, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Vandal in ruewiki[edit]

[5] Менделеевец99 (talk) 10:27, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done. -- Tegel _(Talk) 10:29, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Synchbot request[edit]

Hi Savh. Your Synchbot request needs your attention to proceed. :) —Pathoschild 15:58, 01 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Zomaar[edit]

Hoi Savh. Hoe is ie? Realiseerde me dat ik al een tijd niets meer van je heb gehoord... Gaat alles goed? Of gewoon erg druk? Trijnstel_talk 23:06, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gewoon erg druk, en hier geen tijd voor over, helaas. Ik zal kijken of ik de komende week hier kan heropstarten, maar anders zal ik aftreden als steward. Hoe gaat alles met jou? Sa vh ^ñ 17:03, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jammer, ik hoop dat je aanblijft en hoop anders dat je sowieso nog af en toe langskomt (and I'm sure MarcoAurelio agrees with me, because tonight he asked me how you're doing). Met mij gaat het goed, ook druk, maar daarin ben ik niet de enige. :-) We'll stay in touch. Groet, Trijnstel_talk 21:44, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hola. Venía de nuevo a saber qué tal estás, si todo te va bien y esas cosas. Se te echa de menos. Lamento leer lo de más arriba, pero respeto tu decisión. Como persona cabal que te considero entiendo que tomarás la decisión que mejor sea para ti. En todo caso, sabes que mi bandeja de entrada siempre está a tu disposición :-) Un abrazo, —MarcoAurelio (talk) 22:35, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to see you go Savh. It's been a pleasure working with you over the last few years, and meeting you that one time! Have a good time in the real world :-) – Ajraddatz (talk) 23:22, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's always sad to see another one of us go... --Rs chen 7754 04:18, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm also sorry to see you go, Savh. Take care. —DoRD talk 15:11, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Droevig om je te zien zijn niet meer een steward. Ik hoop dat alles goed met je is. Jmvkrecords ⚜ (Intra talk) 14:17, 4 October 2017 (UTC).[reply]

Help design a new feature to stop harassing emails[edit]

Hi there,

The Anti-Harassment Tools team plans to start develop of a new feature to allow users to restrict emails from new accounts. This feature will allow an individual user to stop harassing emails from coming through the Special:EmailUser system from abusive sockpuppeting accounts.

We’re inviting you to join the discussion because you have experience dealing with abusive sockpuppeting accounts and you work across many wikis. We think that your insights will help us build a better feature.

You can leave comments on this discussion page or send an email to the Anti-Harassment Tools team.

It is important to hear from a broad range of people who are interested in the design of the tool, so we hope you join the discussion and let us know how it would work best for you.

For the Anti-Harassment Tools team SPoore (WMF), Community Advocate, Community health initiative (talk) 21:50, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please let us know if you wish to opt-out of all massmessage mailings from the Anti-harassment tools team.