Talk:Stewards/Confirm/2022

This page allows for general discussion and questions regarding the 2022 steward confirmations.

Final decisions (by stewards)[edit]

Confirmation discussions will remain open from 28 February 2022, 17:30 (UTC) till 07 March 2022, 17:29 (UTC). This may be extended to two weeks for one or more confirmations at the discretion of the Election Committee if the committee believes further input is required before concluding. The Election Committee will close these discussions and implement the outcome (which also means making a decision in non-obvious cases).

This page is for steward discussion only. Please do not comment in this box unless you are a steward.

The summaries below provide a very strict overview of the most relevant confirmation comments.

Stewards: Please leave your comments right below the boxes after reviewing the actual confirmation comments and your understanding of relevant policies. You may summarize the confirmation discussions in individual comments, but no overall summary is given.

Status	Candidate	Notes
Confirmed	-revi	clear consensus to confirm
Confirmed	AmandaNP	clear consensus to confirm
Confirmed	Base	clear consensus to confirm
Confirmed	Bsadowski1	clear consensus to confirm
Confirmed	Cromium	clear consensus to confirm
Confirmed	Defender	clear consensus to confirm
Confirmed	DerHexer	clear consensus to confirm
Confirmed	HakanIST	clear consensus to confirm
Confirmed	Hoo man	clear consensus to confirm
Confirmed	Jon Kolbert	clear consensus to confirm
Confirmed	Linedwell	clear consensus to confirm
Confirmed	MarcGarver	clear consensus to confirm
Confirmed	MarcoAurelio	clear consensus to confirm
Confirmed	Martin Urbanec	clear consensus to confirm
Confirmed	Masti	clear consensus to confirm
Confirmed	Matanya	clear consensus to confirm
Resigned	Melos	Did not run for reconfirmation
Confirmed	MusikAnimal	clear consensus to confirm
Confirmed	Operator873	clear consensus to confirm
Confirmed	RadiX	clear consensus to confirm
Confirmed	Ruslik0	clear consensus to confirm
Confirmed	Sakretsu	clear consensus to confirm
Confirmed	Schniggendiller	clear consensus to confirm
Confirmed	Sotiale	clear consensus to confirm
Confirmed	Stanglavine	clear consensus to confirm
Confirmed	Stryn	clear consensus to confirm
Confirmed	Tegel	clear consensus to confirm
Confirmed	Teles	clear consensus to confirm
Confirmed	Tks4Fish	clear consensus to confirm
Confirmed	Trijnstel	clear consensus to confirm
Confirmed	Vituzzu	clear consensus to confirm
Confirmed	Wiki13	clear consensus to confirm
Confirmed	Wim b	clear consensus to confirm
Confirmed	علاء	clear consensus to confirm

Results: The confirmation discussions are now closed. Please check the results just above.; For the Election Committee, RadiX ∞ 17:31, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

-revi[edit]

Keep: 107 (no issues / activity on the lower side but has a history of being active / trusted / good work / skilled / competent / helpful / knowledgeable / strong judgement / collaborative / rational / no reason given)
Remove: 4 (no willingness to help the community / no reason given)
Neutral: 0

Note: You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX ∞ 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AmandaNP[edit]

Keep: 99 (good work / very active / competent / helpful / hardworking / available on IRC / one of the most active stewards / no reason given)
Remove: 1 (issues regarding blocking open proxies / unsustainable activity level throughout the year)
Neutral: 1 (issues on lock evasion discussion / mostly good work)

Note: You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX ∞ 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Base[edit]

Keep: 81 (active enough / helpful / reachable / chill dude according to TonyBallioni / no issues / no reason given)
Remove: 4 (activity level below reasonable / inactive)
Neutral: 0

Note: You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX ∞ 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bsadowski1[edit]

Keep: 78 (very helpful / active / friendly / trusted / competent / available on IRC / reachable / one of the best stewards / knowledge of Star Wars is a true blessing and something of utmost importance for stewardship according to TonyBallioni / no issues / no reason given)
Remove: 1 (no reason given)
Neutral: 1 (acceptable cross-wiki work / unsatisfying overall work)

Note: You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX ∞ 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cromium[edit]

Keep: 59 (active enough given the circumstances / active enough / behind the scene tasks should be considered / no reason given)
Remove: 1 (unsatisfying overall work / stewardship isn't about trustworthy)
Neutral: 4 (no reason given)

Note: You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX ∞ 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Defender[edit]

Keep: 63 (moderately active / active enough / reasonable activity level throughout the year / good work at SRG / no issues / no reason given)
Remove: 0
Neutral: 1 (not doing 'real' steward work)

Note: You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX ∞ 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DerHexer[edit]

Keep: 109 (responsive oversighter / active everywhere / good long-term work besides low activity this year / active enough / trustworthy / no concerns / good job / experienced / no issues / no reason given)
Remove: 1 (no reason given)
Neutral: 1 (unrelated comment - user has been blocked)

Note: You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX ∞ 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

HakanIST[edit]

Keep: 70 (active enough / active throughout the year / helpful / no concerns / no issues / no reason given)
Remove: 2 (low activity level / silent)
Neutral: 0

Note: You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX ∞ 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hoo man[edit]

Keep: 74 (activity level has improved since last confirmation / helpful / no issues / no reason given)
Remove: 0
Neutral: 0

Note: You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX ∞ 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jon Kolbert[edit]

Keep: 73 (active / wonderful work / great steward / helpful in blocking proxies / proxies work / highly active in proxyblocking / the most active steward of 2021 / vegetarian - something of utmost importance for stewardship according to TonyBallioni / no issues / no reason given)
Remove: 1 (alleged bias in the 'Rodhullandemu' case)
Neutral: 1 (lacks involvement in SRG)

Note: You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX ∞ 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Linedwell[edit]

Keep: 56 (active enough / no issues / no reason given)
Remove: 1 (activity level has not improved in 2 years)
Neutral: 1 (activity should be increased)

Note: You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX ∞ 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

MarcGarver[edit]

Keep: 58 (active / uncontroversial user / no issues / no reason given)
Remove: 0
Neutral: 1 (active enough at cross-wiki spamblocks but lacks involvement other areas)

Note: You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX ∞ 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

MarcoAurelio[edit]

Keep: 109 (a grandee among the stewards / one of the most active stewards / quick responses / loves cats according to BRPever and Zabe / consistently good work / active throughout the year / active all around / active in every task / helpful in AAR tasks / no concerns / no issues / no reason given)
Remove: 0
Neutral: 0

Note: You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX ∞ 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Martin Urbanec[edit]

Keep: 133 (active in every task / one of the most active stewards / very active / extremely capable / very helpful / sound / valuable steward / reachable / reachable on IRC / does 'real' steward work / no issues / no reason given)
Remove: 8 (untrustworthy / discussion at English Wikipedia Village Pump / offensive comment / cases of misuse or even abuse of steward rights - no examples provided)
Neutral: 1 (question about whether - or not - an action should be performed by WMF staff or stewards)

Note: You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX ∞ 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Masti[edit]

Keep: 82 (very helpful / very active in account locking and IP blocking / helpful with LTA / good work / no issues / no reason given)
Remove: 0
Neutral: 0

Note: You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX ∞ 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Matanya[edit]

Keep: 70 (active enough / solid and good work / no issues / no reason given)
Remove: 0
Neutral: 1 (question about whether - or not - an action should be performed by WMF staff or stewards)

Note: You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX ∞ 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

MusikAnimal[edit]

Keep: 85 (active in almost every task / great vandal fighter / active enough / technically skilled / very good admin and interface admin on enwiki / always assumes good faith / no issues / no reason given)
Remove: 0
Neutral: 0

Note: You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX ∞ 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Operator873[edit]

Keep: 75 (good work at SRG / valuable work / impressive work / very active / trusted / helpful / competent / reachable on IRC / friendly / humble / diplomatic / unfortunately unable to get a hold of him according to TonyBallioni / no issues / no reason given)
Remove: 0
Neutral: 0

Note: You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX ∞ 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

RadiX[edit]

Keep: 77 (has the finest sense of humour of any steward, exquisite taste in coffee/wine and vast knowlegde of riots, things of utmost importance for stewardship according to TonyBallioni / no issues / no reason given)
Remove: 0
Neutral: 0

Note: You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX ∞ 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ruslik0[edit]

Keep: 90 (very active / active throughout the year / one of the most qualified stewards / no issues / no reason given)
Remove: 0
Neutral: 0

Note: You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX ∞ 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sakretsu[edit]

Keep: 74 (active enough / no issues / good at locking LTAs / very active / good experience / relevant CU work / polite / friendly / no issues / no reason given)
Remove: 0
Neutral: 0

Note: You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX ∞ 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Schniggendiller[edit]

Keep: 81 (good activity level / moderate activity level / active / good work / no reason given)
Remove: 0 (no reason given)
Neutral: 1 (unrelated comment - user has been blocked)

Note: You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX ∞ 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sotiale[edit]

Keep: 111 (one of the best stewards ever / active everywhere / great work overall / outstanding work at SRCU / excellent CU work / the most active steward at SRCU / combat of sockpupptry, LTA and cross-wiki abuse / very helpful / calm / kind / wise / reachable / does not have an "InstantPot" according to TonyBallioni / no issues / no reason given)
Remove: 1 (no reason given)
Neutral: 0

Note: You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX ∞ 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stanglavine[edit]

Keep: 73 (active / helpful / always available on IRC / no issues / helpful in AAR tasks / no reason given)
Remove: 0
Neutral: 0

Note: You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX ∞ 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stryn[edit]

Keep: 75 (active enough / reasonably active / reachable / no issues / no reason given)
Remove: 0
Neutral: 0

Note: You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX ∞ 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tegel[edit]

Keep: 77 (good at fighting LTA / active / no issues / no reason given)
Remove: 1 (no reason given)
Neutral: 0

Note: You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX ∞ 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Teles[edit]

Keep: 66 (great work with spambots / very active / no issues / no reason given)
Remove: 0
Neutral: 0

Note: You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX ∞ 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tks4Fish[edit]

Keep: 97 (very helpful / friendly / trusted / reliable / sound / active / very active / competent / responsible / helpful with proxy global blocking / no issues / no reason given)
Remove: 1 (no reason given)
Neutral: 0

Note: You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX ∞ 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Trijnstel[edit]

Keep: 89 (active enough / no doubt / good work / helpful / helpful with requests at SRG and dealing with backlogs / good person / no issues / no reason given)
Remove: 1 (communication issue)
Neutral: 1 (no reason given)

Note: You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX ∞ 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vituzzu[edit]

Keep: 81 (trusted / excellent steward / hardworking / helpful / no issues / no reason given)
Remove: 1 (no reason given)
Neutral: 0

Note: You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX ∞ 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki13[edit]

Keep: 67 (very active / helpful / good at dealing with open proxies / available on IRC / no issues / is a user after my own heart according to TonyBallioni / no reason given)
Remove: 0
Neutral: 0

Note: You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX ∞ 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wim b[edit]

Keep: 67 (active enough / always available / reachable / no concerns / no issues / no reason given)
Remove: 0
Neutral: 0

Note: You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX ∞ 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

علاء[edit]

Keep: 102 (successful at dealing with sockpuppetry / helpful / helpful at SRG / active / kind and generous person / helpful in AAR tasks / helpful in cross-wiki issues / no issues / no reason given)
Remove: 1 (no reason given)
Neutral: 0

Note: You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX ∞ 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All stewards running for confirmation[edit]

Note: Should you be decided to drop your comment here, please don't forget to add Confirm all or Remove all to your text. Thanks, RadiX ∞ 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: The discussion below applies to all stewards listed in the sections above, except the one commenting. RadiX ∞ 22:01, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirm all 😁 -- TNT (talk • she/her) 18:30, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirm all, especially those who love cats. Vermont (talk) 19:20, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirm all — MusikAnimal ^talk 01:17, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirm all, consensus to keep.-BRP^ever 01:28, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirm all. Sgd. —Hasley 01:30, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirm all. No issues.—Teles «Talk ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 02:08, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirm all including Melos, overwhelming consensus. [₂₄Cr][talk] 06:48, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirm all Clear consensus to retain all delegates. Operator873 ^connect 07:33, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirm all --Alaa :)..! 08:31, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirm all --Base (talk) 10:49, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirm all MarcGarver (talk) 11:27, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirm all —Thanks for the fish! ^{talk•contrib} (he/him) 15:57, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirm all, pretty clear feedback. Neutral about myself, of course. —DerHexer (Talk) 22:03, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirm all, no issues or immediate concerns, happy with the feedback also.--HakanIST (talk) 06:57, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirm all, Neutral about myself. Matanya (talk) 15:51, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirm all, Neutral about myself. --Wim b 18:44, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirm all, neutral about myself. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 18:51, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirm all. Ruslik (talk) 20:56, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirm all. Trijnstel_talk 19:57, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirm all. -- Tegel _(Talk) 22:15, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirm all Stryn (talk) 13:37, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirm all masti <talk> 21:51, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirm all --Martin Urbanec (talk) 10:38, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirm all except about myself. --Sotiale (talk) 11:11, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirm all Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:11, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirm all --Defender (talk) 22:34, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirm all, especially those who are chill dudes and vegetarians, don't have an "InstantPot" and also have a vast knowledge of Star Wars. RadiX ∞ 04:18, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Outcome: All confirmed. RadiX ∞ 17:31, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]