User talk:Matěj Suchánek

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Boarisch | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | བོད་ཡིག | bosanski | català | کوردی | corsu | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | ދިވެހިބަސް | Ελληνικά | emiliàn e rumagnòl | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | Nordfriisk | Frysk | galego | Alemannisch | ગુજરાતી | עברית | हिन्दी | Fiji Hindi | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Ido | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | ភាសាខ្មែរ | 한국어 | kar | Kurdî | Limburgs | lietuvių | Baso Minangkabau | македонски | മലയാളം | молдовеняскэ | Bahasa Melayu | မြန်မာဘာသာ | مازِرونی | नेपाली | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | Kapampangan | polski | português | Runa Simi | română | русский | sicilianu | سنڌي | සිංහල | slovenčina | slovenščina | Soomaaliga | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ślůnski | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkmençe | Tagalog | Türkçe | татарча/tatarça | ⵜⴰⵎⴰⵣⵉⵖⵜ  | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 吴语 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/-

Welcome to Meta![edit]

Hello Matěj Suchánek, and welcome to the Wikimedia Meta-Wiki! This website is for coordinating and discussing all Wikimedia projects. You may find it useful to read our policy page. If you are interested in doing translations, visit Meta:Babylon. You can also leave a note on Meta:Babel or Wikimedia Forum (please read the instructions at the top of the page before posting there). Happy editing!

-- 12:33, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

Translation notification: Grants:APG/Funds Dissemination Committee/Advisory Group/Recommendations/2014[edit]

Hello Matěj Suchánek,

You are receiving this notification because you signed up as a translator to čeština on Meta. The page Grants:APG/Funds Dissemination Committee/Advisory Group/Recommendations/2014 is available for translation. You can translate it here:

Your help is greatly appreciated. Translators like you help Meta to function as a truly multilingual community.

Thank you!

Meta translation coordinators‎, 08:58, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Tech News[edit]

As the year, at least according to the calendar used by Tech News, is drawing to end, I wanted to say thanks for the Tech News translations – both as a person writing Tech News and a Wikimedia editor who cares about the movement. It’s difficult enough to keep track of what’s happening if one speaks English. I’m happy there’s one place to get a weekly update of what’s happening if one doesn’t. The one true international language is translation. Thank you.

And, of course, for all your contributions to the newsletter, always making it a bit better and easier to translate. /Johan (WMF) (talk) 13:49, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

You are welcome. I must also thank you for taking care of preparing it, the newsletter is indeed very important. Matěj Suchánek (talk) 14:14, 16 December 2015 (UTC)


Thank you very much for notifying me about the unsigned comment on Vituzzu voting page! I signed it again and it's all OK now. Indeed very kind of you, thanks again. --Ttzavaras (talk) 17:37, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Should FuzzyBot remove all potentially outdated translations?[edit]

Hello, thanks for adding multiple new translations in your language here at Meta-Wiki in recent years. Please join the discussion with your opinion: Should FuzzyBot automatically remove all potentially outdated translations?. Nemo (talk) 12:01, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Plagiarism detection[edit]

Hi! You voted for improving plagiarism detection as an important suggestions in the community wishlist survey last year. I'm pinging people who showed interest in that task to tell them we have some suggestions for how things could look, if you'd like to glance at them and give us some feedback. They're available here: phab:T120435#2266283. It's easiest if comments are left in Phabricator, since that's where much of the development is happening, but they can be left on Meta too, of course. /Johan (WMF) (talk) 17:25, 13 May 2016 (UTC)


Thanks for reminding me that May has, in fact, 31 days. /Johan (WMF) (talk) 00:40, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

How to load gadgets with dependencies through global.js?[edit]

Hi. Can you help out a non-hacker. I can see how we add dependencies for a gadget, though if one uses the gadget directly from one's javacript files, I cannot work out how to apply the dependencies and the help pages don't help. To quote your cited request for change, one would load it directly by


mw:ResourceLoader/Migration_guide_(users) says to use mw.loader.using then talks about wrapping functions, etc. which loses me. Can you describe the simple way that one would combine "mw.loader.using" with utilisation of "mw.loader.load" style syntax.

Thanks for any help.  — billinghurst sDrewth 14:45, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Of course I will help you. This is basically mw:ResourceLoader/Migration guide (users)#In practice:
mw.loader.using( [ 'mediawiki.util' ], function () {

    mw.loader.load( '//' );

} );
The function (or closure) is executed as soon as the dependecy is ready. I believe this is possible as well:
mw.loader.using( [ 'mediawiki.util' ] )
.done( function () {
    mw.loader.load( '//' );
} );
Matěj Suchánek (talk) 15:02, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
Kewl thanks, and presumably I can cluster each gadget that has the dependency inside the function.  — billinghurst sDrewth 15:19, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Wikidata notifications[edit]

Hey, I see you put the Wikidata notifications for created articles back into the issue to be distributed on Monday. Just to explain why I thought/think it fit better next week, here's my reasoning: We announced it in Tech/News/2017/19 a couple of weeks ago, including all dates through May. If we do it next week, we'll have a) announced it once when it started happening and b) the week when all the wikis got it. You think this week is better?

(Also: Very long issue this week. I think more people will pay attention to it, or anything else we'd add right now, next week. But that's not as important.) /Johan (WMF) (talk) 12:32, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Isn't couple of weeks ago too long? This was behind my decision. Matěj Suchánek (talk) 12:36, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
If we include it, has the date changed? Given that 13 June is so soon, it would make more sense to say when than "later", if it's still true. /Johan (WMF) (talk) 13:45, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
Actually, I have no strong opinion on this. If you think it's better to have a single message for both past and future event, I have no problem with that. (Well, because of being busy I forgot to include it in the previous issue and now I wanted to make the delay as small as possible...) Matěj Suchánek (talk) 13:54, 2 June 2017 (UTC)